Apr 17-22, 20061 NAOJ Dopplergram from Filtergram (FG) Observation Y. Katsukawa (NAOJ) SOT Team.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
000509EISPDR_SciInvGIs.1 EIS Performance and Operations Louise Harra Mullard Space Science Laboratory University College London.
Advertisements

T. Berger Solar-B FPP Solar & Astrophysics Laboratory FPP Overview NRL Meeting 18-Nov FPP Science Goals 2. Level 0 Requirements 3. FPP Instrument.
Helioseismology by Hinode(Solar-B) Takashi Sekii (NAOJ)
2006/4/17-20 Extended 17 th SOT meeting Azimuth ambiguity resolution from dBz/dz M. Kubo (ISAS/JAXA), K. Shimada (University of Tokyo), K. Ichimoto, S.
SDO/HMI multi-height velocity measurements Kaori Nagashima (MPS) Collaborators: L. Gizon, A. Birch, B. Löptien, S. Danilovic, R. Cameron (MPS), S. Couvidat.
The Doppler Effect Astrophysics Lesson 15. Learning Objectives To know:-  What the Doppler Effect is.  What is meant by the term ‘redshift’.  How to.
Data processing of filament observations using a tunable H-a filter Hyungmin Park 1,3, Jongchul Chae 2, Yong-Jae Moon 3, Young-Deuk Park 3 1 Dept. of Astronomy.
2006/4/17Extended Solar-B mission onboard control and data handling (data recorder, downlinks, observation tables…) Toshifumi Shimizu ISAS/JAXA.
1 Lites FPP-SP Initial Reduct SOT #17 Meeting, NAOJ, April Solar-B FPP Initial Data Reduction for the FPP Spectro- Polarimeter October, 2004 Bruce.
1 Lites FPP-SP Performance SOT #17 Meeting, NAOJ, April Solar-B FPP As-Built Performance of the FPP Spectro- Polarimeter October, 2004 FPP Team Bruce.
SPD/AAS Poster May 2007 Mark Weber Smithsonian Astrophysical Observatory On-Orbit Measurement of the Hinode / XRT Point Response Function.
HMI – Synoptic Data Sets HMI Team Meeting Jan. 26, 2005 Stanford, CA.
Alfvén Waves in the Solar Corona S. Tomczyk, S. Mclntosh, S. Keil, P. Judge, T. Schad, D. Seeley, J. Edmondson Science, Vol. 317, Sep., 2007.
Slide 1 Light and telescopes Just by analyzing the light received from a star, astronomers can retrieve information about a star’s 1.Total energy output.
CDS Session NAM Dublin April Active Region Loop Studies in Oslo Olav Kjeldseth-Moe and Terje Fredvik Institute of Theoretical Astrophysics University.
1.B – Solar Dynamo 1.C – Global Circulation 1.D – Irradiance Sources 1.H – Far-side Imaging 1.F – Solar Subsurface Weather 1.E – Coronal Magnetic Field.
Advanced Technology Center 1 HMI Rasmus Larsen / Processing Modules Stanford University HMI Team Meeting – May 2003 Processing Module Development Rasmus.
Spaceborne Weather Radar
…….CT Physics - Continued V.G.WimalasenaPrincipal School of radiography.
Science Specification of SOLAR-C payload SOLAR-C Working Group 2012 July 23.
1 Status of Ring-diagram Analysis of MOTH Data Kiran Jain Collaborators: F. Hill, C. Toner.
Image Formation. Input - Digital Images Intensity Images – encoding of light intensity Range Images – encoding of shape and distance They are both a 2-D.
200 MG 500 MG TheoryObservation Authors Institutes RE J is a hydrogen rich strongly magnetic white dwarf discovered as an EUV source by the ROSAT.
Apr 17-22, NAOJ SOT Initial Operation in Commissioning Phase Y. Katsukawa (NAOJ) SOT team.
Acoustic Holographic Studies of Solar Active Region Structure A. Malanushenko 1,2, D. Braun 3, S. Kholikov 2, J. Leibacher 2, C. Lindsey 3 (1) Saint Petersburg.
Apr 17-22, Tunable filter wavelength scan and calibration of intensity ripple Y. Katsukawa (NAOJ) and SOT team.
1 Solar-B Data Co-Alignment Plan T.Shimizu (NAOJ) Solar-B MO&DA Working Group Solar-B 4 th Science
Blue: Histogram of normalised deviation from “true” value; Red: Gaussian fit to histogram Presented at ESA Hyperspectral Workshop 2010, March 16-19, Frascati,
2005/11/086th Solar-B Science Supersonic downflows in the photosphere discovered in sunspot moat regions T. Shimizu (ISAS/JAXA, Japan),
OMEGA GROUND CALIBRATION B. Gondet,Saint Louis, 21/05/2008.
1 On-orbit SOT performance Kiyoshi Ichimoto and SOT-team Hinode workshop, , Beijing.
Polarization Calibration of the Daniel K Inouye Solar Telescope (DKIST) formerly Advanced Technology Solar Telescope David Elmore Instrument Scientist.
Multi-level observations of magneto- acoustic cut-off frequency Ding Yuan Department of Physics University of Warwick Coventry CV4 7AL, UK
Figure 8.Color map of the geometric correction along the dispersion axis for segment A. Figure 4. Measured distortions for all PSA positions for segment.
Tuning. Overview Basic Tuning Difference between commutation methods Use of digital filters Vertical axis – no brake Overview 2.
XRT’s Observational Parameters R. Kano (NAOJ). Contents FOV & Full Disk Imaging Time Cadence & Observation Table New Items as Solar X-ray Telescopes –Pre-flare.
Solar-B Mission Status, Operations and Planning Len Culhane – UK EIS Principal Investigator Louise Harra – UK Project Scientist David Williams – UK EIS.
1 Magnetogram from the Filtergraph (FG) observation K.Ichimoto, M.Kubo, Y.Katsukawa and SOT Team SOT#
Feb 4, 20034th Solar-B Science Meeting1 SOT Scientific Observations & Operations T. Shimizu (National Astronomical Observatory of Japan)
Zasshikai S.UeNo MDI Measurement Errors: The Magnetic Perspective Y. Liu & A.A. Norton SOI-Technical Note Zasshikai S.UeNo.
Apr 17-22, NAOJ SOT optical performance Focus stability in orbit Y. Katsukawa (NAOJ) and SOT team.
Calibration of the Polarization Property of SOT K.Ichimoto, Y.Suematsu, T.Shimizu, Y.Katsukawa, M.Noguchi, M.Nakagiri, M.Miyashita, S.Tsuneta (National.
1. Twist propagation in Hα surges Patricia Jibben and Richard C. Canfield 2004, ApJ, 610, Observation of the Molecular Zeeman Effect in the G Band.
CS TC 22 CT Basics CT Principle Preprocessing. 2 CT Basics CT principle preprocessing CS TC 22 Blockdiagram image processor.
Examples of SOT Observation in Performance Verification Phase M. Kubo (JAXA/ISAS) and SOT team.
Kitt Peak Vacuum Telescope -- Raw to Synoptic Map J. Harvey.
On the Evaluation of Optical Performace of Observing Instruments Y. Suematsu (National Astronomical Observatory of Japan) ABSTRACT: It is useful to represent.
GIST th -29 th Apr B.Stewart RAL In-orbit Mirror Performance.
1 Scientific Data from Solar-B Solar Optical Telescope (SOT) T.Shimizu (NAOJ) Solar-B MO&DA Working Group
Thomas Hackman: Stellar differential rotation1 Detecting stellar differential rotation NORDITA – Solar and stellar dynamo cycles Thomas Hackman,
Diagnostic capability of FG/SP Kiyoshi Ichimoto NAOJ Hinode workshop, , Beijing.
Takashi Sekii NAOJ SOT observing modes for local helioseismology and data analysis.
8:30-9:10 AM: Philip Scherrer, What Can We Hope to Learn from SDO Overview of SDO HMI Investigation HMI Instrument.
XRT SOT Alignment DeLuca With comments from Tarbell & Metcalf 21-Jan-2006.
EPIC Calibration Meeting, Madrid Experience with combined Fe 55 /Vela SNR calibration K. Dennerl, 2010 March 23 Experience with combined Fe 55 / Vela SNR.
2006/4/17-20 Extended 17 th SOT meeting M. Kubo (JAXA/ISAS), K. Ichimito, Y. Katsukawa (NAOJ), and SOT-team Comparison of FG and SP data from Sun test.
IAS Hinode Data WorkshopThursday 15-November-2007 The Hinode Solar Optical Telescope Data & Calibration Dr. Thomas Berger Lockheed Martin Advanced Technology.
Coronal Hole recognition by He 1083 nm imaging spectroscopy O. Malanushenko (NSO) and H.P.Jones (NASA's GSFC) Tucson, Arizona, USA Solar Image Recognition.
Date of download: 6/29/2016 Copyright © 2016 SPIE. All rights reserved. Experimental SEM images of an ArF-photoresist pattern. The images are 2000 nm long.
A. Ealet Berkeley, december Spectrograph calibration Determination of specifications Calibration strategy Note in
Examinations of the relative alignment of the instruments on SOT
OMEGA GROUND CALIBRATION
On-Orbit Performance and Calibration of the HMI Instrument J
Lunar data preparation for FY-2
Meteorological Service of Canada
HDAC status and analysis: Photometric observations by HDAC onboard Cassini Yuri Skorov, Horst Uwe Keller, Ralf Reulke, Karl-Heinz Glassmeier, Vlad.
T. J. Okamoto (NAOJ/Kyoto Univ.)
Soothing Massage of HMI Magnetic Field Data
Subaru HDS Ground-based Transmission Spectroscopy
106.13: A Makeover for HMI Magnetic Field Data
Presentation transcript:

Apr 17-22, NAOJ Dopplergram from Filtergram (FG) Observation Y. Katsukawa (NAOJ) SOT Team

Apr 17-22, NAOJ2 SOT Dopplergrams (DGs) Narrowband Filter Imager (NFI) on SOT provides Dopplergrams (DGs) which are images of Doppler (line-of-sight) velocities. Observations with DGs are critically important in studies of photospheric dynamics and helioseismology. The primary photospheric line used for DGs is Fe I 5576 Å which is a line insensitive to the Zeeman effect (Lande g=0). FOV: 80”x160” (1Kx2K) for no summing 320”x160” (2Kx1K) for 2x2 summing 4 uniform wavelength samplings are a standard observable. It takes about 12 secs to make one Dopplergram. 1   30m/s for 2x2 summ. Two wavelength sampling is also available when higher temporal resolution is required.

Apr 17-22, NAOJ3 5576A 4-wavelengths Dopplergrams The nominal wavelength sampling for 5576A F1: -90mA, F2: -30mA, F3: +30mA, F4: +90mA Up to   3km/s velocities are detectable by this sampling. The velocity index R is calculated using the 4 images In order to reduce the telemetry amount, the denominator and the numerator are calculated on-board, and sent to the ground. Denominator: F1-F2-F3+F4Numerator: F1+F2-F3-F4 DG obtained at Palo Alto in April, 2005

Apr 17-22, NAOJ4 5576A 4-wavelengths Dopplergrams Fe I 5576A spectrum and the transmission profiles of TF at 4 wavelength positions. The relation between the actual Doppler velocities V and the velocity indexes R are calculated using the ideal TF profiles and the atlas spectrum. The Doppler velocities are derived from the velocity indexes R using LUT. QS Umbra

Apr 17-22, NAOJ5 Quantitative evaluation of DGs The data used here were obtained by FPP in April 19-20, 2005 at Palo Alto. 2x2 summing mode, 1Kx1K partial images Magnification is different from the actual telescope, and the solar diameter is around 600 pixels (1/3 of full FOV). The Doppler velocity is evaluated along the latitudinal lines at 0,  30 , and  60 . Raw data of FG Dopplergram Velocity index (R)

Apr 17-22, NAOJ6 Solar rotation speed obtained by SOT DGs

Apr 17-22, NAOJ7 Solar rotation speed obtained by SOT DGs

Apr 17-22, NAOJ8 The velocity profiles exhibit linear dependence on positions along the longitudinal lines as expected. The velocities of the solar rotation obtained by FPP are roughly consistent with the expected one. Systematic difference is  200m/s But there is time variation in the obtained velocity, and the deviation from the theoretical prediction is about 400m/s in the worst case.

Apr 17-22, NAOJ9 Intensity ripple through wavelength scan Solar spectrum Lamp source

Apr 17-22, NAOJ10 Effect of the intensity ripple on DGs The intensity ripple can be reproduced by including errors in the wide field elements of the calcite blocks in TF. The relation between the velocity indexes and the Doppler velocities is reexamined using the TF profiles including the ripple. The deviation from the ideal case is  1 km/s in the worst case. Ideal with ripple difference Ideal with ripple difference

Apr 17-22, NAOJ11 Errors caused by I-ripple and satellite revolution Fine tuning of the wavelength against solar originated absorption lines is important for deriving physical parameters from the obtained data by NFI. Adjustment of TF wavelength is performed in FPP by using Doppler velocities value calculated in MDP. The largest velocity is caused by the revolution of the satellite around the earth. The maximum velocity is 3.9 km/s in a period of about 95mins. In the worst case, about 1 km/s velocity offset is produced by the intensity ripple. Simulated error of the Doppler velocities caused by the intensity ripple and the Doppler motion of the satellite.

Apr 17-22, NAOJ12 FOV non-uniformity Full-FOV DG with 2x2 summing The solar diameter is 1.5 times larger than FOV Velocity profiles along the latitudinal lines show relatively large FOV non-uniformity than expected.

Apr 17-22, NAOJ13 Calibration of the intensity ripple When the intensity ripple is caused by the halfwave plates in the calcite blocks, the intensity modulation can be represented as a function of the motor positions (provided by encoders) of the tuning elements. Calcite blockMotor pos Calcite-02*(Motor-0)+(Motor-1) Calcite-1(Motor-1) Calcite-22*(Motor-2)+(Motor-3) Calcite-3(Motor-3) Calcite-42*(Motor-4)+(Motor-5) Calcite-5(Motor-5) Calcite-62*(Motor-6)+(Motor-7) Calcite-7(Motor-7) : Intensity amplitude for ith calcite block (Position dependent) : Phase of the motor position for ith calcite block (Position dependent) : Motor positions corresponding to ith calcite block a i (x,y) and b i (x,y) will be stored in the data base.

Apr 17-22, NAOJ A: Amplitude and phase map Calcite-6 Calcite-2 Amplitude Phase Amplitude Phase Amplitude Phase Calcite-3

Apr 17-22, NAOJ15 Spectra after calibration of I-ripple: 5576A Fe I 5576A Black: After corrected Red: Atlas +TF ideal profiles Black: Measured Red: Atlas +TF ideal profiles

Apr 17-22, NAOJ16 Position-dependent LUT Dopplergram FITS data will have the motor positions of the tuning elements for the 4 exposures. From the motor positions in a FITS data and the stored I-ripple function (amplitude and phase), generate a position-dependent look-up-table. Doppler velocity: V(R, X, Y) Y X V index Velocity R: Velocity index (X, Y): Position in FOV

Apr 17-22, NAOJ17 DG after I-ripple calibration Velocity offsets and linearity are improved. More improvement might be possible. Before calibrationAfter calibration

Apr 17-22, NAOJ18 Current status The data sets necessary to build the calibration function were obtained in the ground-based test. The preliminary calibration data base and the S/W to generate the position-dependent LUT have been produced, but are still necessary to be tested.