Niland Sanitary District Rapid Assessment Process Project Strategic Plan Niland Sanitary District Wastewater Systems Improvements Niland, California Presented.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CAERNARVON TOWNSHIP LANCASTER COUNTY June 17, 2013.
Advertisements

Assessing Capacity Through Sanitary Surveys. SDWA §1420 Capacity Development ~To receive their full Drinking Water State Revolving Fund allotment, States.
Alaska Clean & Drinking Water Funds Financial Capacity Assessment Mike Lewis Program Manager Municipal Grants & Loans Municipal Grants & Loans Alaska Department.
Wakulla County Sewer Project Eutaw Utilities Presentation April 7, 2011.
Stanlick Sewer Treatment Plant Upgrade Implementation Date: September 1, 2008.
Sanitary Sewer System Rate Study September 2012 Keystone Municipal Services.
City of San Juan Water & Wastewater Systems Improvements Hidalgo County, Texas Presented to: Project Sponsor and Agency Stakeholders July 24, 2003 City.
Floyd County Board of Commissioners Special Town Hall Meeting Topic: Update on status of Georgetown WWTP.
City of Clinton Fiscal Year 2013 Sewer Rate Recommendations Committee of the Whole April 24, 2012.
PROPOSITION 218 IMPACTS ON UTILITY USER FEES Case Study City of Dixon Sewer Rate Repeal of 2007.
2 Water and Waste Loans and Grants United States Department of Agriculture??? Rural Development: Mandate to improve the quality of life in Rural America.
Hopkins – St. Louis Park – Minneapolis Regional Sanitary Sewer Improvements Draft Facility Plan January 20, 2010 Metropolitan Council Public Information.
0 Scoring Community Development Block (CDBG)Grants Water/Sewer Apps April 8, 2013 SEIRPC CDBG Scoring Committee.
Cuba’s Future Development Needs, Funding Models, and Alternatives. A Perspective of the Operation of a Cuban Water & Sewer Utility. Eduardo Vega-Llort,
Public Hearing FY 2011 Budget 1. City Council Goals FY 2011 Flood Recovery and Protection –Identify Funding and Sources for Flood –Restore Affordable.
California’s New Onsite Wastewater Treatment System Policy Richard Sanchez, REHS, MPH President California Conference of Directors of Environmental Health.
Presentation to CITY OF PALM COAST, FLORIDA WATER AND WASTEWATER RATE STUDY AND BOND FEASBILITY REPORT Prepared in Conjunction with the Issuance of Utility.
Norwalk, Connecticut: A Public-Private Partnership Case Study Mayor Alex Knopp U.S. Conference of Mayors Urban Water Council October 2004.
KENTUCKY INFRASTRUCTURE AUTHORITY Office of the Governor Governor’s Office for Local Development 1024 Capital Center Drive, Suite 340 Frankfort, Kentucky.
December 4, 2014 Macon, Georgia Georgia Mountains Regional Commission.
Rapid Assessment Process Project Strategic Plan City of Alamo Municipal Water and Wastewater Project Hidalgo County, Texas Presented to: Project Sponsor.
Connecticut Department of Energy and Environmental Protection.
The Status of Water Services in County Galway A presentation to the Joint Committee on Environment, Transport, Culture and Gaeltacht 27 th September 2011.
TRP Chapter Chapter 4.2 Waste minimisation.
Developing a Waste Water Discharge Fee Programme in Sri Lanka Kolitha Himal Muthukuda Arachchi Deputy Director General, Pollution Control Central Environmental.
This project is funded by the European Union ENVIRONMENTAL COLLABORATION FOR THE BLACK SEA GEORGIA, MOLDOVA, RUSSIA and UKRAINE Euroconsult This project.
City of Polson April 5, 2010 PUBLIC HEARING Water System Improvements PRESENTATION ON PRELIMINARY ENGINEERING REPORT.
Rapid Assessment Process Project Strategic Plan Doña Ana MDWCA Water and Wastewater System Improvements Doña Ana County, NM Presented to: Stakeholders.
RURAL DEVELOPMENT WATER & WASTE PROGRAMS WATER AND WASTE FACILITIES WATER SYSTEMS OR COMPONENTS OF WATER SYSTEMS SEWER SYSTEMS OR COMPONENTS OF SEWER.
City of Lordsburg Rapid Assessment Process Project Strategic Plan City of Lordsburg Water and Wastewater System Improvements Lordsburg, New Mexico Presented.
Limited Proceedings Water & Wastewater Reference Manual1.
Presented by: Pechanga Environmental Department Designing and Managing a Recycling Program Source Reduction Strategies for Tribal Solid Waste Programs.
Water & Waste Disposal Loans and Grants The funding purpose is to construct, enlarge, extend or improve water, wastewater and solid waste systems in rural.
BORDER ENVIRONMENT COOPERATION COMMISSION Mitigating Impacts on Water Resources: Environmental Infrastructure Investment.
Rapid Assessment Process Preliminary Project Plan City of Alpine, Texas Public Water and Wastewater System Improvements Presented to: Texas Agencies February.
Regional Grant Funding Coordination for Implementation of Watershed Management Plans Project Clean Water Summit July 15, 2004 David W. Gibson SDRWQCB
Rapid Assessment Process Project Strategic Plan City of Marfa Water and Wastewater System Improvements Marfa, Texas Presented to: Stakeholders and Project.
Orange County Utilities Department Water and Wastewater Budget Challenges March 9, 2010.
Pelican Group of Lakes Improvement District Public Hearing on Facilities Plan Agenda Introduction of PGOLID Board of DirectorsDale Haakenstad Introduction.
City of San Luis, Arizona Rapid Assessment Process Project Strategic Plan City of San Luis Water & Wastewater Improvements Yuma County, Arizona Presented.
Overview of Integrated Solid Waste Management (ISWM) Presentation made at the European Commission 7 th Framework Programme on Capacity Building Workshop.
Programme Performance Criteria. Regulatory Authority Objectives To identify criteria against which the status of each element of the regulatory programme.
City of Calipatria Rapid Assessment Process Project Strategic Plan City of Calipatria Wastewater Systems Improvements Calipatria, California Presented.
Reclaimed Wastewater Quality Criteria, Standards, and Guidelines
California Integrated Waste Management Board Tire Flow Study Along the California-Mexico Border Region Special Waste Committee Meeting California Integrated.
Rapid Assessment Process Project Strategic Plan Village of Columbus Water Supply and System Improvements Luna County, New Mexico Presented to: Stakeholders.
Council Workshop, June 24, Image Date: 1/15/2014 Future WWTF No. 2 Capacity 2.0 MGD., Expandable to 6.0 MGD. Future WWTF No. 2 Capacity 2.0 MGD.,
Wastewater Treatment Plant # 2 Engineering Services Council Workshop July 8, 2014.
USDA, RURAL DEVELOPMENT LOAN & GRANT FINANCING WATER & WASTE FACILITIES Tim Rickabaugh, B&CP Specialist Rural Development State Office October 20, 2008.
Village of Almont WATER, SEWER, AND SSO RATES 2012 – 2013 FISCAL YEAR.
Mejoras en los sistemas de Agua Potable y Saneamiento en San Benito, Texas Water and Wastewater Facility Improvements in San Benito, Texas.
Status update presentation #1 for the Cayucos Sustainable Water Project Status update presentation #1 for the Cayucos Sustainable Water Project November.
Proposition 1 Workshop: the Grant Application Process July 2015.
1 Public Hearing User Rate Adjustments April 8, 2008.
Road Map to the Future: The Consolidation of Sewer Infrastructure in Rutherford County, NC November 16 th, 2015.
City of San Diego’s Recycled Water Study Item W15a October 10, 2012 Presentation to the California Coastal Commission.
Water System Master Plan & Rate Study City of DeKalb, Illinois City Council Presentation May 16, 2015.
Potential Consolidation of WMWD’s Murrieta Division into EMWD April 15, 2015 Paul D. Jones II, P.E. General Manager, Eastern Municipal Water District
Sanitary Sewer Fee Study March 4, Summary Sausalito’s 75-year-old sewer system is old and deteriorated. While the current rates have allowed the.
1 New Territory Municipal Utility Districts Strategic Partnership Agreement Discussions With the City of Sugar Land.
PRESENTED AND PREPARED BY CITY OF MISSOULA PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT.
Showcase cost-saving practices, scale- appropriate technologies, and economic development opportunities and case studies from Idaho communities. Provide.
Presentation to CITY OF PALM COAST, FLORIDA FINANCIAL FORECAST AND CAPITAL FACILITIES FEES ANALYSIS Prepared in Conjunction With the Utility System Revenue.
General Operations Limitation on Use of Funds Termination of Assistance Other Program Requirements.
CSA 7 – Boulder Creek. YOUR SANITATION FACILITY Facility Includes the Following Five Pump Stations –Total of 10 pumps 16,553 feet of collection lines.
Utilities Department Wedgefield Water November 28, 2017.
CITY OF MARSHALL CHLORIDE ISSUES September 26, 2017
CITY OF MARSHALL CHLORIDE ISSUES NOVEMBER 22, 2016
Public Hearing Sanitary Sewer Fees
Capital Improvement Plans
Presentation transcript:

Niland Sanitary District Rapid Assessment Process Project Strategic Plan Niland Sanitary District Wastewater Systems Improvements Niland, California Presented to: Project Sponsor and Agency Stakeholders November 5, 2003

Niland Sanitary District Rapid Assessment Process Project Strategic Plan  General Aspects  Environmental and Human Health Indicators  Environmental, Human Health and Sustainable Development Strategies  Technical Approach, Objectives and Funding Plan  Public Participation  Project Development Schedule Agenda

Niland Sanitary District Rapid Assessment Process Project Strategic Plan General Aspects The community of Niland:  Located in eastern California, in Imperial County;  Approximately 150 miles east of San Diego;  Approximately 50 miles north of the U.S./Mexico Border. Project Location Niland

Niland Sanitary District Rapid Assessment Process Project Strategic Plan  Niland Sanitary District (NSD)  Niland Population: 1,143 (Census 2000)  Slab City – Transient community located 4 miles east of Niland; Impact upon Niland infrastructure is currently inconclusive.  Median Household Income (Census Data): $25,592  Unemployment Rate: 15.9%  Existing Facilities  Wastewater  400 Sewer service connections;  Water  Privately owned by Southern California Water Company;  Ineligible for grant funding. General Aspects Project Sponsor Profile

Niland Sanitary District Rapid Assessment Process Project Strategic Plan General Aspects  Existing  Water, approximately 60,000 gpd, is obtained from Imperial Irrigation District;  Distribution system is owned and operated by the Southern California Water Company;  Customers may pay a flat rate of $41.78 / month or a metered service charge of $24.10 plus $1.11 per CCF Existing Water Distribution System  Concerns  Currently only 60% of the customers are metered; Requirement for 100% meted by 2010;  Difficulty determining illegal connections due to non-metered service;  Inadequate system pressure;  Maintenance problems with 2-inch lines;  Turbidity through the filters at the Treatment Plant has been observed;  Public perception is unfavorable. General distrust for rate increases and inadequate servics and new requirements by PRC..  Current Improvements  Water Treatment Plant Expansion in Calipatria;  Construction of transmission main to Niland to service both communities.  1.5 MG storage facility.. Water system privately owned and is ineligible for grant funding to develop improvements.

Niland Sanitary District Rapid Assessment Process Project Strategic Plan General Aspects  Collection  Existing system consists of 32,000 linear feet of sewer lines;  Currently exists 400 service connections.  Lift Station  One wastewater lift station at WWTP;  Treatment  NSD has an aeration pond system constructed in 1993;  Maximum average design flow is 0.5 MGD;  Currently operating at 50%; Existing Wastewater Collection and Treatment System

Niland Sanitary District Rapid Assessment Process Project Strategic Plan General Aspects  Collection  Sewer mains constructed over fifty years ago;  Numerous line breaks;  Groundwater infiltration into collection system is suspected.  Lift Station  Internal corrosion due to operation and minimal maintenance;  Emergency provisions are inadequate;  Pump accessibility for maintenance and repairs is limited.  Treatment  Existing screening is inadequate and results in blockage throughout plant;  Elevated levels of copper, selenium and thallium with source unknown;  E. Coli detected in plant effluent;  Overflow at ponds observed;  Minimal maintenance has possibly decreased the pond capacity;  Numerous violations issued for BOD 5 and Total Suspended Solids;  Condition of liners is undetermined;  Access to WWTP is hazardous. Wastewater System Deficiencies

Niland Sanitary District Rapid Assessment Process Project Strategic Plan General Aspects Evaluation and inspection of the existing system will assist in selecting and implementing the necessary improvement to include the following possible alternatives:  Collection  Rehabilitation/Replacement of existing system;  Install clean-outs at the dead ends;  Rehabilitation of existing manholes as required.  Lift Station  Rehabilitation of wet well interior;  Equipment upgrades to ensure sufficient redundancy.  Treatment  Upgrade testing laboratory as needed;  Install a commutator to improve the current screening operations;  Improve water transfer between ponds;  Provide additional aerators;  Provide stand-by power; Proposed Wastewater System Improvements Total Estimated Cost - $TBD

Niland Sanitary District Rapid Assessment Process Project Strategic Plan General Aspects Existing System

Niland Sanitary District Rapid Assessment Process Project Strategic Plan General Aspects Existing System

Niland Sanitary District Rapid Assessment Process Project Strategic Plan General Aspects Existing System

Niland Sanitary District Rapid Assessment Process Project Strategic Plan Environmental Indicators Environmental and Human Health Indicators  Levels of E. Coli, violating state regulations have been observed in effluent and may pose potential health risk downstream of discharge  Existing plant not designed to treat copper, selenium and thallium at the WWTP and discharge within the effluent may be occurring;  Elevated levels of BOD 5 in violation of state regulations have been observed at the WWTP effluent;  Lack of maintenance at plant may have reduced capacity thus reducing efficiency and worsening conditions above;  Numerous lines breaks and manhole leaks have created nuisance condition throughout Niland;  Potential groundwater contamination may affect environmentally sensitive areas including farmland, habitats for protected species and water bodies including the Salton Sea.

Niland Sanitary District Rapid Assessment Process Project Strategic Plan Environmental and Human Health Indicators Compliance with Environmental Norms & Regulations  Water System  Wastewater System  Administrative Civil Liability Complaint issued by California Regional Water Quality Control Board for numerous violations;  Majority of violations related to BOD 5 in effluent;  Levels of copper, selenium and thallium exhibited a reasonable potential to cause an excursion above water quality standards in violation of the priority pollutant monitoring under the California Toxic Rule (CTR).

Niland Sanitary District Rapid Assessment Process Project Strategic Plan Environmental and Human Health Strategies  Determine the CEQA/NEPA document requirements, an EIS or EA.  Analyze the chemical composition of the wastewater and groundwater to determine the nature and possible source of contaminants existing at the WWTP.  Conduct an analysis of the WWTP influent to detemine the sufficiency of oxygen as it is introduced in the treatment process.  Describe the environmental and human health risks associated with the deteriorated conditions of the existing collection system infrastructure as well as with the WWTP and effluent violations.

Niland Sanitary District Rapid Assessment Process Project Strategic Plan Sustainable Development Strategies  Two stakeholder workshops to be conducted. The baseline conditions report is complete.  Demonstrate appropriate institutional capacities:  Establish permanent operation staffing Regional Operations – Shared operators with City of Calipatria or other.  Improve rate structure and collections Restructured User Rate collected monthly – Agreement with water provider/Imperial County.  Seek Training NADB UMI; Operator and administrative development  An operation and maintenance program will be developed as part of the project.  Coordinate with water provider to develop a water usage assessment, including possibilities for conservation/reuse.  Determine if there is a need for industrial pretreatment.  30% design review by system operator

Niland Sanitary District Rapid Assessment Process Project Strategic Plan  Provide the NSD customers with adequate, affordable wastewater service in compliance with State regulations;  Rehabilitation of existing centralized wastewater collection system and improvement to existing treatment facilities; Technical Approach,Objectives and Funding Plan Project Objectives

Niland Sanitary District Rapid Assessment Process Project Strategic Plan Recommended Technical Approach Technical Approach,Objectives and Funding Plan PDAP Eligible Tasks:  Preliminary Engineering Report  Quality Assurance Program Plan (QAPP) - TBD  Environmental Report – Complete comprehensive Multi- Agency Environmental Checklist to ensure all requirements are satisfied.  Financial Analysis  Public Participation Program  Final Engineering Design Non-PDAP Eligible Tasks:  Rate study.  Training and institutional strengthening.  Contingency Plans  Project Management  Operation and Maintenance Plan

Niland Sanitary District Rapid Assessment Process Project Strategic Plan Institutional Capacity The Frank M. Tejeda Center has been contacted to prepare a Statement of Institutional Capacity of the City of Calipatria addressing the following : Technical Approach, Objectives and Funding Plan  Regulatory Compliance Issues  On-going Projects and Planning  Existing Planning  Project Development and Funds Management  Outsourcing  Operational Capacity  Management Capabilities  Governance Institutional Development RAP Recommendations:  Revised Rate Structure/Collections Procedures  Administration/Operations Staffing – Potentially Regional Effort  Training

Niland Sanitary District Rapid Assessment Process Project Strategic Plan Project Sponsor Financial Potential Technical Approach, Objectives and Funding Plan  Revenue generated by collections of a $279 annual property tax assessment;  Imperial County has a role in the financial operations;  Fiscal year from July 1 st to June 30 th for each year; Current Rate Structure  400 service connections;  Annual assessment $279 collected by Imperial County through taxes ($23.25/month);  Annual assessment also includes bond portions Operating Revenues146,254161,032205,816 Operating Expense260,576257,282199,658 Total114,32296,2506,158 Wastewater Fund

Niland Sanitary District Rapid Assessment Process Project Strategic Plan Identified Potential Funding Sources Technical Approach, Objectives and Funding Plan  USDA-RUS  Colonias Grant and Water and Waste Disposal Program.  USDA-RD – In 1993, the NSD received Sewer Revenue Bonds in the amount of $545,000. To date, the City owes approximately $503,000 on this loan.  California Housing and Community Development (HCD)  CDBG Fund - Grants for communities with population <50,000 maximum $500K  CDBG Program Planning and Technical Assistance Grants – Providing funds to small cities for planning and evaluation studies related to CDBG-eligible activity.  State Water Resources control board (SWRCB)  Small commiunity Grants – Provides grants up to 97 ½ % with population < 5,000;  State Revolving Fund – Loans for construction maximum $50M and 20 year payback.  NADBank  BEIF to support construction, service connections, project management and rate transition. A rate study and additional capacity building tasks may be funded through the IDP.  BECC  The community is eligible through the Project Development Assistance Program (PDAP).

Niland Sanitary District Rapid Assessment Process Project Strategic Plan  Largest obstacle is cost associated with repaying loans;  Requirements to establish monthly user rates;  Operation of system currently performed on a part-time basis as available. Sharing a full- time operator with City of Calipatria or other may not be feasible. Potential Obstacles Public Participation Strategy Local Politics  Niland Township is not incorporated and does not have a local government;  Regulated by Imperial County Board of Supervisors;  The NSD was created in 1970’s, by Imperial County to operate the wastewater facilities, and is managed by a five member Board of Directors. Typically less than 10% of residents participate in the election. Socio-Economic Indicators  Approximately 26.1% of the population, over the age of 25, has completed a high school education;  2002 Census denotes 6.2% unemployment rate.

Niland Sanitary District Rapid Assessment Process Project Strategic Plan Project Schedule

Niland Sanitary District Rapid Assessment Process Project Strategic Plan  Modify PSP with Final Comments – 11/21.  Develop Scope of Work (SOW),  Send Sample TA Agreement to NSD and assist with resolution. BECC Action Items Project Sponsor - NSD  Provide any additional comments – 11/12.  Consider Resolution – Accept PSP, request recommended TA Tasks, and designate lead contact – 11/27.  Participate in development of SOW – approve SOW by letter.  Invite participants for Steering Committee. Stakeholder Agencies  Provide any additional comments – 11/12.  Participate in SOW development – approve SOW.