Abstract Forest structure is intricately linked to ecosystem process and forest structure. Lidar remote sensing has proven valuable to quantifying forest.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Do In and Post-Season Plant-Based Measurements Predict Corn Performance and/ or Residual Soil Nitrate? Patrick J. Forrestal, R. Kratochvil, J.J Meisinger.
Advertisements

Estimating Anthropogenic Influence in Tropical Forests Using Charcoal Introduction Jessica Del Greco Advisors: Crystal H. McMichael, Earth System Research.
Frontiers in Fuels Science: Frontiers in Fuels Science: Species-Specific Crown Profiles Models from Terrestrial Laser Scanning.
A data assimilation approach to quantify uncertainty for estimates of biomass stocks and changes in Amazon forests Paul Duffy Michael Keller Doug Morton.
Sensing Winter Soil Respiration Dynamics in Near-Real Time Alexandra Contosta 1, Elizabeth Burakowski 1,2, Ruth Varner 1, and Serita Frey 3 1 University.
FOR 474: Forest Inventory Plot Level Metrics from Lidar Heights Other Plot Measures Sources of Error Readings: See Website.
Structure and Demography of Tree Communities in Tropical Secondary Forest Recovering From Logging Keala Cummings and Dr. Diane Thomson 2007 Keala Cummings.
Questions How do different methods of calculating LAI compare? Does varying Leaf mass per area (LMA) with height affect LAI estimates? LAI can be calculated.
Abteilung Biometrie und Informatik SMC Spring Meeting 2007, Vancouver, WA. Mapping Forest Characteristics across the Landscape using Sample Plot and Airborne.
Overview of Biomass Mapping The Woods Hole Research Center Alessandro Baccini, Wayne Walker and Ned Horning November 8 – 12, Samarinda, Indonesia.
Lecture 17 – Forest remote sensing  Reading assignment:  Ch 4.7, 8.23,  Kane et al., Interpretation and topographic correction of conifer forest.
DR. JOHANNES HEINZEL (Dipl.-Geogr.) University of Freiburg, Department of Remote Sensing and Landscape Information Systems, Freiburg, Germany Use.
1 TEC-MTT/2012/3788/In/SL LMD1D v1 and v2 Comparison with Phoenix Flight Data Prepared by Stéphane Lapensée ESA-ESTEC, TEC-MTT Keplerlaan 1, 2201 AZ Noordwijk.
Landscape-scale forest carbon measurements for reference sites: The role of Remote Sensing Nicholas Skowronski USDA Forest Service Climate, Fire and Carbon.
An overview of Lidar remote sensing of forests C. Véga French Institute of Pondicherry.
U.S. Department of the Interior U.S. Geological Survey December 2007 Fort Benning Forest Status and Trends Shuqing Zhao 1, Shuguang Liu 2, Larry Tieszen.
Introduction OBJECTIVES  To develop proxies for canopy cover and canopy closure based on discrete-return LiDAR data.  To determine whether there is a.
Examination of Tropical Forest Canopy Profiles Using Field Data and Remotely Sensed Imagery Michael Palace 1, Michael Keller 1,2, Bobby Braswell 1, Stephen.
Soil Nutrient Availability Following Application of Biosolids to Forests in Virginia. Eduardo C. Arellano and Thomas R. Fox Department of Forestry, Blacksburg,
A Tool for Estimating Nutrient Fluxes in Harvest Biomass Products for 30 Canadian Tree Species CONTEXT: With a growing interest in using forest biomass.
FLEX-US 2013 Airborne Campaign
Science Enabled by New Measurements of Vegetation Structure (ICESat-II, DESDynI, etc.) Some Ecological Considerations Jon Ranson & Hank Shugart Co-Chairs.
Mapping Forest Canopy Height with MISR We previously demonstrated a capability to obtain physically meaningful canopy structural parameters using data.
M. Cardoso*, G. Hurtt*, B. Moore*, C. Nobre † and E. Prins ‡ * Complex Systems Research Center / Institute for the Study of Earth, Oceans and Space University.
Quantitative Estimates of Biomass and Forest Structure in Coastal Temperate Rainforests Derived from Multi-return Airborne Lidar Marc G. Kramer 1 and Michael.
Introduction To describe the dynamics of the global carbon cycle requires an accurate determination of the spatial and temporal distribution of photosynthetic.
Analysis as a Potential Source of Renewable Energy And Bedding Material For the Organic Dairy Research Farm John Aber and the NR 403 Forest Production.
Wood and soil surface CO 2 flux from the Tapajós National Forest Evilene C. Lopes 1, Michael Keller 1,2, Patrick M. Crill 1,3, Ruth K. Varner 4, William.
Biomass Mapping The set of field biomass training data and the MODIS observations were used to develop a regression tree model (Random Forest). Biomass.
CSIRO Marine & Atmospheric Research (CMAR) & ENSIS 1 The CSIRO Canopy Lidar Initiative, its ECHIDNA® and an EVI David LB Jupp 1, Darius Culvenor 2, Jenny.
Modeling Crown Characteristics of Loblolly Pine Trees Modeling Crown Characteristics of Loblolly Pine Trees Harold E. Burkhart Virginia Tech.
__________. Introduction Importance – Wildlife Habitat – Nutrient Cycling – Long-Term Carbon Storage – Key Indicator for Biodiversity Minimum Stocking.
SINGLE-TREE FOREST INVENTORY USING LIDAR AND AERIAL IMAGES FOR 3D TREETOP POSITIONING, SPECIES RECOGNITION, HEIGHT AND CROWN WIDTH ESTIMATION Ilkka Korpela.
Analysis of secondary forest succession using LIDAR analysis in the southern Appalachians Brian D. Kloeppel 1, Robbie G. Kreza 1, Marcus C. Mentzer 1,
BIOPHYS: A Physically-based Algorithm for Inferring Continuous Fields of Vegetative Biophysical and Structural Parameters Forrest Hall 1, Fred Huemmrich.
DN Ordinate Length DN Difference Estimating forest structure in tropical forested sites.
1) Single-Tree Remote Sensing with LiDAR and Multiple Aerial Images 2A) Mapping forest plots: A new method combining photogrammetry and field triangulation.
LiDAR Remote Sensing of Forest Vegetation Ryan Anderson, Bruce Cook, and Paul Bolstad University of Minnesota.
Spectral Reflectance Features Related to Foliar Nitrogen in Forests and their Implications for Broad-Scale Nitrogen Mapping Lucie C. Lepine, Scott V. Ollinger,
Examination of Canopy Disturbance in Logged Forests in the Brazilian Amazon using IKONOS Imagery Michael Palace 1, Michael Keller 1,2, Bobby Braswell 1,
An Examination of the Relation between Burn Severity and Forest Height Change in the Taylor Complex Fire using LIDAR data from ICESat/GLAS Andrew Maher.
Remote Sensing of Forest Structure Van R. Kane College of Forest Resources.
The GLOBE-Carbon Cycle project joins NASA carbon cycle science with the International GLOBE Education program to bring the most cutting edge research and.
Citation: Zhang Z.Y.,Kazakova A.N. and Moskal L.M Integrating LIDAR with Hyperspectral Data for Tree Species Classification in Urban Ecosystems.
FOR 274: From Photos to Lidar Introduction to LiDAR What is it? How does it work? LiDAR Jargon and Terms Natural Resource Applications Data Acquisition.
Airborne LiDAR requires purchase, but offers a number of advantages; Airborne LiDAR requires purchase, but offers a number of advantages; Spatial resolution.
G-LiHT Webmap: Over 100 Billion Laser Pulses Served Bruce Cook 1, Anika Halota 2, Douglas Morton 1, and Larry Corp 3 Biospheric Sciences, 1 NASA GSFC,
Integrating LiDAR Intensity and Elevation Data for Terrain Characterization in a Forested Area Cheng Wang and Nancy F. Glenn IEEE GEOSCIENCE AND REMOTE.
Counting the trees in the forest
Factsheet # 26 Understanding multiscale dynamics of landscape change through the application of remote sensing & GIS CREATING LIDAR-DRIVEN MODELS TO IMPROVE.
Factsheet # 27 Canopy Structure From Aerial and Terrestrial LiDAR
Assessing the climate impacts of land cover and land management using an eddy flux tower cluster in New England Earth Systems Research Center Institute.
PADMA ALEKHYA V V L, SURAJ REDDY R, RAJASHEKAR G & JHA C S
Retrieval of Information from Different Optical 3D Remote Sensing Sources for Use in Forest Inventory (3D-FORINVENT) HRVATSKI ŠUMARSKI INSTITUT CROATIAN.
Preparing for the Production of Essential Climate Variables (ECVs) for Biomass from Future Spaceborne Remote Sensing Missions: Is There A Role for CEOS-Carbon?
Contact: Tel.: Exploring the influence of canopy structure on the link between canopy nitrogen concentration.
Factsheet # 19 Understanding multiscale dynamics of landscape change through the application of remote sensing & GIS Hyperspectral Remote Sensing of Urban.
LiDAR and Habitat Identification
Temporal and spatial variability in stand structure and individual-tree growth for 10 years following commercial thinning in spruce-fir forests of northern.
Factsheet # 21 Understanding multiscale dynamics of landscape change through the application of remote sensing & GIS Quantifying Vertical and Horizontal.
Semi-arid Ecosystem Plant Functional Type and LAI from Small Footprint Waveform Lidar Nayani Ilangakoon, Nancy F. Glenn, Lucas.
By: Paul A. Pellissier, Scott V. Ollinger, Lucie C. Lepine
Integrating Airborne LiDAR and Terrestrial Laser Scanner for Accurate Estimation of Above-ground Biomass/Carbon of Tropical Forests Accuracy Matters Muluken.
Integrating Airborne LiDAR and Terrestrial Laser Scanner for Accurate Estimation of Above-ground Biomass/Carbon of Tropical Forests Accuracy Matters Muluken.
Integrating Airborne LiDAR and Terrestrial Laser Scanner for Accurate Estimation of Above-ground Biomass/Carbon of Tropical Forests Accuracy Matters Muluken.
Species distribution by height in the canopy
A Comparison of Forest Biodiversity Metrics Using Field Measurements and Aircraft Remote Sensing Kaitlyn Baillargeon Scott Ollinger,
Sources of Variability in Canopy Spectra and the Convergent Properties of Plants Funding From: S.V. Ollinger, L. Lepine, H. Wicklein, F. Sullivan, M. Day.
Using Airborne Hyperspectral and LiDAR Remote Sensing to Map
Evaluating the Ability to Derive Estimates of Biodiversity from Remote Sensing Kaitlyn Baillargeon Scott Ollinger, Andrew Ouimette,
Presentation transcript:

Abstract Forest structure is intricately linked to ecosystem process and forest structure. Lidar remote sensing has proven valuable to quantifying forest structure. Using discrete return lidar and data from field campaigns, we examined forest structure at Harvard Forest. Harvard Forest in Petersham, MA, USA is the location of one of the first temperate forest plots established by the Center for Tropical Forest Science (CTFS) as a joint effort with Harvard Forest and the Smithsonian Institute’s Forest Global Earth Observatory (ForestGEO) to characterize ecosystem processes and forest dynamics. 35 ha census of Prospect Hill completed during winter of 2014 by Harvard Forest researchers 39 variable radius plots (VRPs) were randomly sampled for tree biometric properties within and throughout the Prospect Hill CTFS/ForestGEO plot during September and October 2013 Stem map developed using the Harvard Forest ForestGEO Prospect Hill census by applying allometric equations of crown depth, radius and tree height Tree height and crown radius distributions from crown delineation (Palace et al. 2008) of both images were compared In future work, high quality field-based stem maps with species and crown geometry information will allow for better interpretation of individual tree spectra extracted from the G-LiHT (Cook et al. 2013) hyperspectral data using our automated crown delineation of the G-LiHT lidar canopy height model. Methods Prospect Hill Tract Census Between June 2010 and March 2014, >116,000 individual stems >1 cm diameter-at-breast-height (DBH, 1.3 m) were tagged and measured according to CTFS protocol for an initial census. In total, 60 unique species ranging in DBH from 1.0 cm to 93.5 cm were logged. Of these, there were 38,272 live stems with 44 unique species of >5 cm DBH. Tree Biometrics and Crown Geometry During Fall 2013, variable radius plot sampling was conducted at 39 randomly selected coordinate sets distributed throughout the Prospect Hill census plot for trees approx. >5 cm. Total height, crown base height, and crown radius toward and away from plot center were measured for sampled trees. Plots were distributed throughout the census area to account for all stand types (on right) and variations in stand conditions. In total, 374 trees were sampled with 14 unique species ranging in diameter from 4.5 cm to 71.1 cm and ranging in total height from 1.3 m to 35.5 m. Lidar Acquisition Airborne lidar Airborne lidar were acquired using the G-LiHT sensor package during the growing season of The lidar sensor used is the VQ-480 (Riegl USA, Orlando, FL, USA; Cook et al. 2013). At an altitude of 335 m, the sensor has a beam width of 10 cm and approximately 8 returns per pulse. Using terrain removed elevations, a CHM was developed. Terrestrial lidar Terrestrial lidar were acquired during September 2013 prior to leaf-off. At each variable radius plot center, one ground-based lidar scan was collected using a FARO Focus 3D, which has a beam width of <5 mm at 50 m and approximately 40 million returns per scan. Statistical Analyses Allometric equations for crown geometry were developed using mixed effects modeling in R (version 3.0.1) with DBH as the fixed effect and sample plot and species as random effects. Final models were determined by ANOVA and Akaike Information Criterion to compare model strength. Although the random effect of plot would not be directly applied in the extrapolation, by including it in this analysis it ensures that our models were more efficiently fit. Allometric equations were applied to the census data set to develop a canopy height model and stem map. Results & Discussion Allometry: Canopy height model generated from allometric equations applied to census, assuming ellipsoidal crown shape, with crown delineation results displayed. Max height m. Lidar: Canopy height model from G-LiHT collected in June 2012 with crown delineation results displayed. Brighter colors indicated higher elevation. Scales differ (max height m). Height: Distribution of individual tree heights from crown delineation results of allometry (green, n=10882 trees) and G-LiHT (red, n=10240) images displayed against estimated tree height from census data (n=38272). The disparity in number of trees is likely due to understory trees not visible in CHMs. Crown Radius: Distribution of individual crown radii from crown delineation results of allometry (green) and G-LiHT (red) displayed against estimated crown radius from census data. Minimum tree crown radius cutoff of 1.0 m was applied for crown delineation and estimated crown sizes <1.0 m were excluded from census. Comparison of stem map developed from crown geometry allometry linked census data to airborne and terrestrial lidar at Harvard Forest, MA Franklin Sullivan 1 ϕ, Michael Palace 1, Mark Ducey 2, David Orwig 3, Bruce Cook 4, Lucie Lepine 1 1. Institute for the Study of Earth, Oceans and Space (EOS), University of New Hampshire (UNH), Durham, NH; ϕ contact information: 2. Department of Natural Resources & Environment, UNH, Durham, NH 3. Harvard Forest, Harvard University, Petersham, MA 4. NASA Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, MD Stand map as of 1993 within the extent of the Prospect Hill census plot showing the primary species within each stand except for within wetland areas. The most sampled species in the VRP campaign were hemlock, red oak, red maple, and white pine, which were also four of the most prevalent in the census data. Primary Species Wetland Black Oak Hemlock Hardwood Poplar Red Maple Red Oak Red Pine White Pine Study Site – Prospect Hill Tract, Harvard Forest, MA Crown Radius ± Pseudo R 2 : RMSE: 1.22 CV(RMSE): 38.8% Crown Depth ± Pseudo R 2 : 0.35 RMSE: 3.24 CV(RMSE): 32.8% Tree Height* Pseudo R 2 : RMSE: 2.96 CV(RMSE): 13.8% *plot effect insignificant ±plot effect significant, removed Crown Geometry Allometric Equations from VRPs – Mixed Effects Modeling Allometric Canopy Height Model G-LiHT Canopy Height Model Crown Delineation Comparison References Cook BD, Corp LW, Nelson RF, Middleton EM, Morton DC, McCorkel JT, Masek JG, Ranson KJ, Ly V, and Montesano PM NASA Goddard's Lidar, Hyperspectral and Thermal (G-LiHT) airborne imager. Remote Sens 5: , doi: /rs Palace M, Keller M, Asner GP, Hagen S, Braswell B Amazon forest structure from IKONOS satellite data and the automated characterization of forest canopy properties. Biotropica 40(20): Acknowledgements Airborne lidar were collected by NASA’s G-LiHT airborne imager ( Census data were collected by David Orwig and numerous field assistants, with financial assistance provided by the Smithsonian Institute ( NSF LTER program (DEB and DEB ) and Harvard University. Above: Coefficients for the random effect, species (represented by different colored lines in the above figures), were allowed to vary using mixed effects modelling in R. Significant positive relationships resulted from allometric modelling of crown geometry. Allometric models were developed using mixed effects modelling, using DBH as the fixed effect and species and sample plot as random effects. Significant relationships remain when the mean plot effect was applied. The plot effect was not significant for tree height, and could not be accounted for in the census data stem map.