Outcomes of screening mammography among women aged 40 to 43 Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences Toronto, Canada (2006)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
†Source: U.S. Cancer Statistics Working Group. United States Cancer Statistics: 1999–2011 Incidence and Mortality Web-based Report. Atlanta (GA): Department.
Advertisements

Controversies in Breast Cancer Allan Arkush, DO, FACOS.
Liver Transplantation and Subsequent Risk of Cancer: Findings from a Canadian Cohort Study By Scott, Berkeley and Rob Music by Black Sabbath.
LIFTING ALL BOATS: Quality Improvement as a Means to Reducing Racial Health Disparities Anne Marie Murphy, PhD 1, Danielle Dupuy, MPH 2, Garth Rauscher,
A. Sultan, December 2001 Utilization of Physician Services at the End of Life: Differences between U.S. and Canada Issue: Increased health care expenditure?
Every Woman, Every Time: Disparities in Breast Cancer Tony L. Weaver, D.O. ALOMA 2015.
The Facts about Breast Cancer
Early Detection of breast cancer Anthony B. Miller, MD, FRCP Associate Director, Research, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Canada.
Health Promotion and Disease Prevention-focus on Cancer Edward Anselm, MD Assistant Professor of Medicine Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai Medical.
Impact of Cancer Diagnosis and Chemotherapy on Mammography Use Xinhua Yu, M.B., Ph.D. A. Marshall McBean, M.D., M.Sc. Beth A. Virnig, Ph.D., M.P.H Division.
Breast Cancer Detection, Treatment, and Survival in Medicare and Medicaid Insured Patients Cathy J. Bradley, Ph.D. Professor of Health Administration Co-leader,
Knowledge, Cancer Fatalism and Spirituality as Predictors of Breast Cancer Screening Practices for African American and Caucasian Women Staci T. Anderson,
Racial/Ethnic Disparities in Cancer Incidence, Survival and Treatment Linda C. Harlan, PhD, MPH National Cancer Institute Division of Cancer Control and.
Disparities in Cancer September 22, Introduction Despite notable advances in cancer prevention, screening, and treatment, a disproportionate number.
The influence of Breast Cancer Pay for Performance Initiatives on breast cancer survival and performance measures: a pilot study in Taiwan Raymond NC Kuo,
Description of fracture with endocrine therapy use in older breast cancer survivors in a population-based setting Taryn Becker 123, Geoff Anderson 123,
Breast Cancer. This Presentation provided by The American Cancer Society The University of Georgia Cooperative Extension Service The Department of Human.
Research and analysis by Avalere Health Are Medicare Patients Getting Sicker? December 2012.
1 Lecture 20: Non-experimental studies of interventions Describe the levels of evaluation (structure, process, outcome) and give examples of measures of.
Early Detection Is Your Best Protection. Breast Cancer Statistics for Women A woman has a one in eight chance of developing breast cancer in her lifetime.
Preventive Health Care Use in Elderly Uterine Cancer Survivors Division of Health Policy and Management School of Public Health University of Minnesota.
Ethnic Disparities in Early Breast Cancer Management among Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders Rebecca P. Gelber, MD, MPH Department of Medicine, University.
Cardiovascular Morbidity Following Modern Treatment for Hodgkin Lymphoma: Age- and Sex- Specific Estimates of Risk in the Doxorubicin Era. D. Hodgson 1,
Atoosa Adibi MD. Department of Radiology Isfahan University Of Medical Sciences.
The effect of surgeon volume on procedure selection in non-small cell lung cancer surgeries Dr. Christian Finley MD MPH FRCSC McMaster University.
1 Proprietary and Confidential 1 Geographic Variation in the Rates of Chiropractic Manipulation Treatment in Northern New England APHA Session :
Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care:
Breast cancer screening Diana Sarfati Director, Cancer Control and Screening Research Group.
March 10, 2014 NURS 330 Human Reproductive Health.
Measuring changes in physician performance: Is it necessary to adjust for patient characteristics? Hoangmai H. Pham, MD, MPH AcademyHealth Annual Meeting.
Breast Cancer in Ghana How are we going to ‘beat’ it? Prof J-N Clegg-Lamptey SAMF Launch.
THE URBAN INSTITUTE Examining Long-Term Care Episodes and Care History for Medicare Beneficiaries: A Longitudinal Analysis of Elderly Individuals with.
Enhancing the effectiveness of health care for Ontarians through research Effects of Primary Care Supply in a Single Payer Health System Astrid Guttmann.
Racial Disparities in Primary Care and Utilization of Health Services at the End-of-Life Andrea Kronman, MD Boston University School of Medicine.
Patient’s Guide to Accessing Women’s Health Care.
Breast Cancer. Breast cancer is a disease in which malignant cells form in the tissues of the breast – “National Breast Cancer Foundation” The American.
The Usual Source of Care and Delivery of Preventive Services to Medicare Beneficiaries Academy Health, June 2005 Hoangmai Pham, MD, MPH Deborah Schrag,
Unit 15: Screening. Unit 15 Learning Objectives: 1.Understand the role of screening in the secondary prevention of disease. 2.Recognize the characteristics.
Urban/Rural Differences in Survival Among Medicare Beneficiaries with Breast Cancer Melony E.S. Sorbero, Ph.D. RAND Corporation Funded by Health Resources.
v. # Breast Cancer Update Monita Soni, MD, FCAP-President, PrimePath, PC Decatur, AL CAP Spokesperson November 2010.
Medicaid and the 4 A’s: Use of 1115 Waivers and State Plan Amendments American Cancer Society Washington, Dc June 5, 2008 Erin Reidy
Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium (BCSC): A Research Infrastructure sponsored by the National Cancer Institute Breast Cancer Risk Models William Barlow,
Kathleen Decker Alain Demers Daniel Chateau Marion Harrison Cervical Cancer in Manitoba: evaluating risk, Pap test utilization, and access CancerCare Manitoba.
Health data in Ontario Susan Bondy, U. of Toronto Dalla Lana School of Public Health Presented at: Health Over the Life Course, Pre-conference Workshop.
The Cancer Registry of Norway Jan F Nygård Head of the IT-department.
Quality & Sustainability in Cancer Control: A System Performance Spotlight Report To use a hyperlink, right click on it and select ‘Open Hyperlink’, or.
Linking Electronic Health Records Across Institutions to Understand Why Women Seek Care at Multiple Sites for Breast Cancer Caroline A. Thompson, PhD,
Presented at the NAACCR Annual Conference Quebec City June 22, 2010.
A Perspective on Family Medicine and End-of-Life and Palliative Care Peter Selwyn, M.D., M.P.H. Professor and Chairman Department of Family & Social Medicine.
Collaboration with Community Partners to Provide Breast and Cervical Cancer Services to the Underserved University of Texas Health Sciences Center at Tyler.
Date of download: 6/29/2016 From: Overdiagnosis of Invasive Breast Cancer Due to Mammography Screening: Results From the Norwegian Screening Program Ann.
Arnold School of Public Health Health Services Policy and Management 1 Women’s Cancer Screening Services Utilization Versus Their Insurance Source Presenter:
Screening Tests: A Review. Learning Objectives: 1.Understand the role of screening in the secondary prevention of disease. 2.Recognize the characteristics.
TMIST A Breast Cancer Screening Trial
Cancer Screening Guidelines
Spartanburg Family Medicine Residency
Mammograms and Breast Exams: When to start /stop mammograms
Breast Cancer Screening/Imaging
Longitudinal Evaluation of Physician Payment Reform and Team-Based Care on Chronic Disease Management and Prevention NAPCRG Annual Meeting, October 27,
Trends in Use of Pulmonary Rehabilitation Among Older Adults with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Anita C. Mercado, Shawn P. Nishi, Wei Zhang, Yong-Fang.
Background & Objectives
Surgical Cancer Treatment
Definition of Cancer Screening
Tara Kiran1,2, Alex Kopp2, Rick Glazier1,2
Presenter: Wen-Ching Lan
Megan Eguchi, MPh Sana karam, md, phd
Selection of DFU patients and non-DFU controls
3.7.1 Definition The percentage of Ontario men and women of screen-eligible age (ages 50-74), who have completed at least one FOBT in the prior two years.
Cases of and deaths from cervical cancer, with associated incidence and mortality (rates per women), among Canadian women (2002–2006) by age group.
Using Large Databases for Research
Presentation transcript:

Outcomes of screening mammography among women aged 40 to 43 Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences Toronto, Canada (2006)

Selection criteria All women age 40 – 43 resident in Ontario on January 1, OHIP (medicare) beneficiaries: -all permanent residents + refugees - no premium / deductible for beneficiaries No history of breast cancer prior to this date Breast screening program recruits from age 50. Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care: Insufficient evidence to recommend for or against screening younger women.

Study design: case—cohort Entire underlying population at risk All deaths Random sample Study population Time to death analysis, corrected s.e.

Ascertainment of cases (deaths) Multiple hits: Ontario Cancer Registry (Registrar General of Ontario) Hospital database OHIP (medicare) eligibility roster

Ascertainment of breast cancer ICD-9 174xx registered by Ontario Cancer Registry diagnosis date between January 1, 1995 and December 31, ,043 / 370,130 Intended to be invasive only, however DCIS is misclassified as invasive Not an issue for primary analysis because ‘cases’ are ‘deaths’

Sampling subcohort from entire population Random sample 20,000 / 387,130 (there is no method of calculating sample size requirements for case-cohort design)

Case-cohort study population Random sample, alive 19,677 (Random sample, breast ca alive) (174) (Breast cancer cases, alive) (3,262) Deaths 5,913 (Deaths, breast cancer cases) (607) Case-cohort population 25,590 (Total breast cancer cases) (4,043) Underlying population 387,130

Bilateral mammography utilization among underlying population Bilateral mammography is an insured service available to any woman of any age on request of physician 47.1% one or more eligible bilateral mammograms (no breast procedure or breast visit during preceding 11 months) by December 31, 2002.

Exposure and primary outcome Exposure: Periodic bilateral mammography (no breast imaging or biopsy or procedure or physician visit with breast code within 11 months) January 1, 1995 to December 31, 2002 Primary outcome: Death (all causes) January 1, 1995 to December 31, 2004

Ascertainment of periodic screening (2 or more episodes = periodic) among study population OHIP (medicare) billing claims Original reports photocopied and coded No breast imaging / biopsy / surgery / medical visit with breast code within 11 months preceding Not more than 16 months following preceding screening mammogram

Ascertainment of periodic screening (2 or more episodes = periodic) among study population 2.1% of subcohort (random sample) 14.4% of cases (women who died) 25.2% of women who developed breast cancer 15.5% of women who developed breast cancer and died

Ascertainment of covariates OHIP (medicare) eligibility roster: Year of birth Residence code as at January 1, 1995: Neighbourhood income quintile (adjusted for region) Urban / rural distinction Hospital database: January 1, 1990 – December 31, 1994 ICD-9 diagnosis codes >> comorbidity score

Secondary exposures and outcomes (not for primary analysis of death) All breast biopsies and surgeries regardless of pathology (Hospital database > institution, dates, codes for abstraction / photocopy operative and pathology reports) Family history of breast cancer (women with breast cancer and / or breast surgery chart abstraction) Radiation therapy, chemotherapy, hormone therapy for women with breast cancer

Case—cohort mortality analysis (all cause) (multivariate, s.e. corrected for design) Periodic screening mammography 2.09 (1.92,2.27) Year of birth(per year 1951 >> 1954)0.94 (0.92, 0.96) Urban residence (vs rural) 0.88 (0.82, 0.96) Neighbourhood income quintile 0.91 (0.90, 0.93) (per 1 quintile increase, low to high) Comorbidity score (per 1 unit increase) 1.70 (1.66, 1.74)

Case—cohort mortality analysis (all cause) (multivariate, s.e. corrected for design) among women diagnosed with breast cancer Periodic screening mammography 0.64 (0.49, 0.82) Year of birth(per year 1951 >> 1954)1.03 (0.92, 1.11) Urban residence (vs rural) 0.97 (0.74, 1.26) Neighbourhood income quintile 0.94 (0.88, 0.99) (per 1 quintile increase, low to high) Comorbidity score (per 1 unit increase) 0.93 (0.66, 1.31)