Economics of Cellulosic Ethanol Production Marie Walsh, Burt English, Daniel de la Torre Ugarte, Kim Jensen, Richard Nelson SAEA Annual Meeting Mobile,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
A Potentially Valuable Component of Texas Bioenergy Projects
Advertisements

Tim Reinbott University of Missouri Bradford Research and Extension Center.
Agricultural Land Use Lori Lynch, Professor Agricultural and Resource Economics University of Maryland.
EFFECTS OF CO-FIRING BIOMASS WITH COAL ON THE RETAIL PRICE OF ELECTRICITY David Bransby Professor, Energy Crops Auburn University
The Development of a Forest Module for POLYSYS Burton English, Daniel De La Torre Ugarte, Kim Jensen, Jamey Menard and Don Hodges USFS Forest Products.
Silage and Haylage: facing new economic realities Stan Smith Fairfield County, OSU Extension.
Socio-Economic Impacts of U.S. Ethanol Bruce A. Babcock Center for Agricultural and Rural Development Iowa State University.
Risk Assessment and Economics of Forest Biorefinery Concepts USDA Forest Service Forest Products Laboratory Madison, Wisconsin.
C. Robert Taylor Ronald D. Lacewell Emily Seawright.
Tennessee’s Bioenergy Future: Opportunities and Challenges
South Central Sun Grant: GIS/Data Report Michael R. Dicks Department of Agricultural Economics Oklahoma State University San Antonio February 24, 2010.
Are Biofuels the Answer? By: Catherine Clark Econ 539 Presentation 2.
Alternatives to Gasoline Possibilities and Capacities.
Emerging Biofuels: Outlook of Effects on U.S. Grain, Oilseed, and Livestock Markets Simla Tokgoz Center for Agricultural.
Soybean Outlook Pat Westhoff Food and Agricultural Policy Research Institute (
Opportunities and Challenges of Expanding Agriculture’s Contribution to the Energy Supply Daniel G. De La Torre Ugarte University of Tennessee.
Alternatives to Gasoline Possibilities and Capacities.
Economic and Land Use Implications of Biofuels: Role of Policy Madhu Khanna With Xiaoguang Chen and Haixiao Huang Department of Agricultural and Consumer.
Alternatives to Gasoline Possibilities and Capacities.
Comparative Regional Economic Advantages for Cellulosic Feedstocks for Bioenergy Production. Burton C. English.
The Energy Bill, Biofuel Markets and the Implications for Agriculture Daniel G. De La Torre Ugarte Chesapeake College, Wye Mill, MD February 21, 2008 University.
Global Biofuels Developments & Limits to Expansion 8/21/07 By Dr. Robert Wisner, University Professor of Economics and Coles Professor of International.
1 Biodiesel: The implications for soybean and product markets International Oilseed Producer Dialogue IX June 16-17, 2006.
The New World of Biofuels: Implications for Agriculture and Energy Keith Collins, Chief Economist, USDA EIA Energy Outlook, Modeling, and Data Conference.
Biomass, Biofuels and Hydrogen Sectors in Context of SEDS
1 Agriculture as a Producer of Energy Vernon R. Eidman Department of Applied Economics University of Minnesota.
World Feed and Food Supply and Demand Governors’ Agriculture, Energy, and Sustainability Roundtable Governors’ Biofuels Coalition Washington, DC January.
The Long-Run Impact of Corn-Based Ethanol on the Grain, Oilseed, and Livestock Sectors: A Preliminary Assessment Bruce A. Babcock Center for Agricultural.
Presented to: CFR 521 Elliott Schmitt Photos from
Ethanol: Facts, Fiction, and Questions Robert Hauser University of Illinois May 2007.
Fertility Issues in Switchgrass Production Joint Meetings of SERA-ieg 6, NEC-17 and NCRA Nashville, Tennessee Donald Tyler University of Tennessee.
Liberalization of Trade in Biofuels: Implications for GHG Emissions and Social Welfare Xiaoguang Chen Madhu Khanna Hayri Önal University of Illinois at.
Southeastern Regional Center Tennessee Agricultural Experiment Station U.S. Energy Situation & Outlook April 3-4, 2007 Jackson, TN Cookeville, TN Dr. Kelly.
Putting the Hopes and Fears of Climate Change Legislation in Perspective _________________________________________ Sustainable Agriculture: The Key to.
1 Land in: Other Uses In Transition In Switchgrass Crop Lifetime Net SG Addition Of Acres Acres in Switchgrass Yield from Ag R&D Ave Yield in Established.
Energy and Products from Agricultural Biomass: Prospects and Issues F. Larry Leistritz Donald M. Senechal Nancy M. Hodur Presented at: IAIA 2007 Conference,
Beyond Corn and Soybeans: Cellulose Feedstocks Marie E. Walsh, Burt English, Daniel de la Torre Ugarte, Chad Hellwinckel, Jamey Menard, Kim Jensen, and.
The Economics of Alternative Energy Sources and Globalization: The Road Ahead Embassy Suites Airport, Orlando, FL 1.
The Role of Biofuels in the Transformation of Agriculture Daniel G. De La Torre Ugarte and Chad M. Hellwinckel The Economics of Alternative Energy Sources.
THE SUPPLY OF CORN STOVER IN THE MIDWESTERN UNITED STATES Richard G. Nelson 1, Marie E. Walsh 2, and John Sheehan 3 1 Kansas State University 2 University.
Estimated Impacts of Attaining 60 Billion Gallons of Ethanol by 2030 on Agriculture and the Nation’s Economy Governor’s Ethanol Coalition Kansas City,
Structure of the US farm economy EconS350 Fall Semester, 2010.
Madhu Khanna Department of Agricultural and Consumer Economics
Future Of Agricultural Machinery in the United States UNACOMA General Assembly 21 June 2007 Charlie O’Brien Vice President – Agricultural Services.
1 Bioenergy Development at West Virginia University West Virginia is the third most forested state in the US West Virginia is the third most forested state.
U.S. Ethanol Industry Outlook: Socio/Economic Impact of Booming Ethanol Industry Bruce A. Babcock Center for Agricultural and Rural Development Iowa State.
APCA Agricultural Policy Options for Improving Energy Crop Economics Daniel G. De La Torre Ugarte Agricultural Policy Analysis Center University of Tennessee.
An Evaluation of the Economic and Environmental Impacts of the Corn Grain Ethanol Industry on the Agricultural Sector Western Agricultural Economics Association.
American Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007 (EIS) and the global agriculture Yong Liu Department of Agriculture.
Biofuel Policy Effects on Soil Erosion C. Robert Taylor, Auburn University Ronald D. Lacewell Texas A&M.
Bioenergy: Where We Are and Where We Should Be Daniel G. De La Torre Ugarte Chad M. Hellwinckel.
Bottlenecks and Oil Price Spikes: Impact on U.S. Ethanol and Agriculture Chad Hart Center for Agricultural and Rural Development Iowa State University.
Feed Grain and Wheat Market Situation And Outlook 2001 Southern Region Agricultural Outlook Conference September 25,2001 Kurt M. Guidry Associate Specialist.
April 8, 2009Forestry and Agriculture GHG Modeling Forum Land Use Change in Agriculture: Yield Growth as a Potential Driver Scott Malcolm USDA/ERS.
APCA Economic Synergism Between Agricultural and Energy Policies Daniel G. De La Torre Ugarte Agricultural Policy Analysis Center University of Tennessee.
Extension and Outreach/Department of Economics Corn Stover: Economic Considerations Iowa Corn Stover Harvest Meeting Dubuque, Iowa March 6, 2013 Chad Hart.
Bottlenecks, Drought, and Oil Price Spikes: Impact on U.S. Ethanol and Agriculture Chad Hart Center for Agricultural and Rural Development Iowa State University.
Corn and Wheat Market Overview and Outlook by Cory G. Walters Southern Regional Outlook Conference Agricultural Economics.
Slide 1 Economics of Biodiesel and the Impact on Commodities Allan Gray, Purdue University Center for Food and Agricultural Business.
Department of Economics Biofuel Economics Intensive Program in Biorenewables Ames, Iowa June 9, 2009 Chad Hart Assistant Professor/Grain Markets Specialist.
Biofuels CENV 110. Topics The Technology Current status around the world – Supply and trends in production Impact Benefits Costs – Carbon balance – Net.
Policies to Accelerate the Bioeconomy: Unintended Effects and Effectiveness Madhu Khanna University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.
Bioenergy Supply, Land Use, and Environmental Implications
Biofuel Demand Projections In the Annual Energy Outlook
Chad Hart & Bruce Babcock
Iowa State University Extension Dr. Robert Wisner: Grain Outlook
Crop Outlook Farm Management In-Service Ames, Iowa Oct. 11, 2010
Assistant Professor/Grain Markets Specialist
Impacts of Biofuels on the South
Presentation transcript:

Economics of Cellulosic Ethanol Production Marie Walsh, Burt English, Daniel de la Torre Ugarte, Kim Jensen, Richard Nelson SAEA Annual Meeting Mobile, AL February 6, 2007

Interest in Biomass Numerous visions/initiatives have been recently proposed to displace percent of our transportation fuels with biomass-derived fuels within the next years. Large scale production of biofuels raises numerous issues regarding feasiblility, development approach, and impacts, particularly –Food vs. fuel issues –Limits to corn and soybean use –Need for alternative technologies (i.e., cellulose) UT has developed a modeling framework to rigorously evaluate the potential and selected impacts.

Approach Dynamic model of the U.S. agricultural sector (POLYSYS) –POLYSYS contains major crops, livestock, food and feed markets, major cropland classes –305 geographic regions –Anchored to 2006 USDA baseline –Allocates land based on relative profits

Approach Modify POLYSYS –Extend the baseline to 2025 –Add cellulose feedstocks Endogenous feedstocks include corn stover, wheat straw, and switchgrass Exogenous feedstocks include forest logging residues, forest other removals, primary mill residues –Add bioenergy technologies Ethanol from corn grain and cellulose Biodiesel from soybeans Electricity from cellulose

Corn Stover Major Assumptions Include: –Continuous corn rotation –Current tillage mix with increasing no-till over time –Control erosion at <T –Collected as large, round bales

Wheat Straw Major Assumptions Include: –Continuous wheat rotation –Current tillage mix with increasing no-till over time –Control erosion at <T –Collected as large, round bales

Switchgrass RegionAnnual Increases in Yield Lake States1.00 percent Corn Belt1.75 percent Northeast1.25 percent Appalachia2.50 percent Southeast3.00 percent North Plains1.25 percent South Plains1.00 percent

Forest Residues Combined logging residues and other removals (land clearing, pre-commercial thinnings). Quantities from USDA Forest Service Forest Inventory Analysis database Estimated collection costs using traditional forestry equipment Forest Residue Supplies (million dry tons) $20/dt$30/dt$40/dt$50/dt

Mill Residues Quantities and current uses from USDA Forest Service Forest Inventory Analysis database Costs based on estimated prices needed to attract mill residues from current uses Mill Residues (million dry tons) $20/dt$30/dt$40/dt$50/dt

Bioenergy Technologies Conversion Costs & Yields (feedstock and co-product values not included) Year 2005Year 2015Year 2025 ETOH from Corn2.7 gal/bu $0.55/gal 2.7 gal/bu $0.55/gal 3.0 gal/bu $0.55/gal ETOH from Cellulose67-70 gal/dt $1.47/gal gal/dt $0.73/gal gal/dt $0.73/gal Biodiesel from Soybeans1.4 gal/bu $0.436/gal 1.4 gal/bu $0.436/gal 1.4 gal/bu $0.436/gal Electricity from Cellulose (co-fire) kwh/dt $0.0036/kwh kwh/dt $0.0032/kwh kwh/dt $0.0032/kwh

Bioenergy/Bioproduct Demand Demand Quantities (above baseline) Year 2006Year 2015Year 2025 Ethanol (billion gallons) Biodiesel (billion gallons) Electricity (billion kWh) Excess feedstocks used for co-fire Bioproducts (billion lbs) Not included

Scenario Constraints Bioenergy demand must be met regardless of cost Baseline food, feed, and export demands must be met –Forage supplies lost due to shift of pasture acres to other crops must be met by increased hay production

Results—Feedstock Use Year 2006Year 2015Year 2025 ETOH from Corn (billion bu) ETOH from Cellulose (million dt) Ag Residue Switchgrass Wood Wastes Total = Total = Biodiesel from Soybeans (million bushel) Electricity from Cellulose (million dt) Ag Residue Switchgrass Wood Wastes

Results — Bioenergy/Bioproduct Production Costs (Feedstock Cost and Co-Product Credits Included) Year 2006Year 2015Year 2025 ETOH (combined corn and cellulose)($/gal) Biodiesel ($/gal) Electricity ($/kwh)

Results—Changes in Crop Prices Year 2006Year 2015Year 2025 Corn ($/bu)2.28 (+0.13) 2.56 (+0.14) 3.01 (+0.75) Soybeans ($/bu)4.67 (+0.07) 6.52 (+0.90) 7.48 (+2.25) Wheat ($/bu)3.06 (+0.01) 3.86 (+0.29) 4.22 (+0.78) Switchgrass/ Cellulose ($/dt) (+20.00) (+48.68) (+65.07)

Results—Changes in Farm Income ( Million Dollars ) Year 2006Year 2015Year 2025 Change in Crop Income (value – expenses + government payments) (crop residues included) ,732+19,742 Change in Income from Switchgrass 0+4,686+15,351 Changes in livestock sector income—Analysis still underway. Substitution of feed co-products and need for forage are important components and are not well represented in current analysis. Likely to be negative.

Distribution of Net Returns Year 2025Year 2015

Results—Changes in Crop Acres (millions) Year 2006Year 2015Year 2025 Corn (+1.6) 80.7 (-0.3) Soybeans (-2.7) 62.5 (-8.0) Wheat (-3.9) 52 (-10.9) Other Major Grain Crops (-0.4) 29.1 (-2.23) Switchgrass027.2 (+27.2) 48.8 (+48.8) Pasture acres decline and hay acres increase to meet forage needs

Closing Comments Based on the assumptions in the analysis, sufficient quantities of biomass resources exist to meet significant increases in biofuel production. Large-scale production of biofuels will require, and result in, a paradigm shift in agriculture.