Exploring Cognitive Demands of Mathematical Tasks Milwaukee Public School Bernard Rahming Mathematics Teaching Specialist

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Implementing the CCSS 8:30-8:40 Introductions & quick background
Advertisements

Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning
Mathematics Instruction: Planning, Teaching, and Reflecting
Welcome! 1 Conduct this experiment. –Place 10 red cards and 10 black cards face down in separate piles. –Choose some cards at random from the red pile.
Increasing the cognitive demand in the classroom Rachel Linney Aoife Kelly.
Learning Outcomes Participants will be able to analyze assessments
1 Learning to Do the Mathematical Work of Teaching Deborah Loewenberg Ball Hyman Bass, Tim Boerst, Yaa Cole, Judith Jacobs, Yeon Kim, Jennifer Lewis, Laurie.
Common Core Standards, K – 12 Kentucky Core Academic Standards Mathematics 1.
Developing Mathematics PD Sessions: Planning Conversations and Instructional Decisions that Lead to Improved MKT in District Leaders. National Council.
Choosing Tasks that Encourage Students to Use Mathematical Practices.
Teach a Same Lesson: Teach a Same Lesson: A Professional Development Strategy in China Jun Li Deakin University
Congruency to Math Standards How do we successfully monitor and support our teachers when we can’t be an expert in every content area?
Classroom Assessments Based On Standards (CABS) WMC State Mathematics Conference Green Lake, Wisconsin Leadership Pre-conference April 30, 2008 Beth Schefelker,
Teacher Quality Workshops for 2010/2011
Our Learning Journey Continues Shelly R. Rider.
Orchestrating Mathematical Discussions October 7, 2014 Welcome to Day 1! Please take 2 dot stickers and place one on each line to represent your class.
Math Assessments Increasing Rigor February 20, 2013 & February 21, 2013.
Digging into the Instructional Design Laura Maly Bernard Rahming Cynthia Cuellar Rodriguez MTL Session, September 20, 2011.
Common Core State Standards in Mathematics: ECE-5
Making Proficiency in Math Soar to Greater Heights November 2, 2006 Claudia Ahlstrom.
Problem Solving, Protocols and Practice through the Ages Wisconsin Mathematics Council Wisconsin Mathematics Council 41 st Annual Conference 41 st Annual.
Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning
How Do You Know Students Learned What You Just Taught? Lee Ann PruskeRosann Hollinger Bernard Rahming Mathematics Teaching Specialists, Milwaukee Public.
The Standards for Mathematical Practice
Day Three. What standards were addressed yesterday? MELT wiki: melt-institute-resources.wikispaces.commelt-institute-resources.wikispaces.com.
More Rigorous SOL = More Cognitively Demanding Teaching and Assessing Dr. Margie Mason The College of William and Mary Adapted from
High Cognitive vs. Low Cognitive 1. An effective mathematical task is needed to challenge and engage students intellectually. 2.
1 Mathematics Tasks for Cognitive Instruction Based on research from the Quasar Project found in Implementing Standards-Based Mathematics Instruction:
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning Tennessee Department of.
Mathematics Teacher Leader Session 1: The National Mathematics Strategy & Modelling Exemplary Teaching 1.
Engaging Students in High Level Cognitive Tasks Marjorie Graeff April 21, 2010 Division of Teaching & Learning.
SHIFTING FROM MATHEMATICAL WORKSHEETS TO MEANINGFUL TASKS FACILITATED BY: CYNTHIA BELL NUMERACY SPECIALIST LITERACY ASSISTANCE CENTER.
1 Improving Teaching and Learning Through Questioning Lee Ann Pruske Bernard Rahming Rosann Hollinger Sharonda M. Harris March 16 & 18, 2010 MTL Meeting.
Materials Beliefs Cut-up beliefs Answer key Adjusting support tool Tasks activity Martha’s carpeting problem (on ppt) Fencing problem (labels) 3-5 tasks.
Math rigor facilitating student understanding through process goals
Exploring Cognitive Demands Part 2 Rosann Hollinger Lee Ann Pruske Sharonda M. Harris Bernard Rahming January 20, 28, 2010 Math Teacher Leader Meeting.
© 2013 University Of Pittsburgh Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning Making Sense of Numbers and Operations Fraction Standards via a Set.
Algebraic Reasoning Content Academy—Grade 5 Round Rock ISD Learning by Doing® Sami Briceño.
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER Study Group 7 - High School Math (Algebra 1 & 2, Geometry) Welcome Back! Let’s.
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning Tennessee Department of.
Math & Science Collaborative Analyzing Mathematical Tasks and the Mathematical Task Framework.
Teaching Math for Learning: Standards-Aligned System, Secondary Mathematics, Year 2.
Welcome! 1 Conduct this experiment. –Place 10 red cards and 10 black cards face down in separate piles. –Choose some cards at random from the red pile.
Classroom Interactions in Science and Math # 02: Tasks in Interaction.
From Skip Counting to Linearity: How Do We Get There? Mathematics Teaching Specialists, Milwaukee Public Schools Astrid Fossum,
Representation: Getting at the heart of mathematical understanding Wisconsin Mathematics Council Green Lake Annual Conference Thursday, May 6, 2010 Sarah.
USING DIGITAL OPEN-SOURCE EDUCATION RESOURCES IN THE SECONDARY MATHEMATICS CLASSROOM Presented by Dr. Paul Gray Chief Curriculum Officer Cosenza & Associates,
Developing and Using Meaningful Math Tasks The Key to Math Common Core Take a moment to record on a sticky: What is a meaningful Math Task?
Building Teachers Capacity to Create and Enact Tasks that Engage Students in Challenging Mathematical Activity Peg Smith University of Pittsburgh Teachers’
FALL 2011 MATHEMATICS SOL INSTITUTES Debbie Delozier, Stafford County Public Schools Fanya Morton, Stafford County Public Schools Kathryn Munson, Chesterfield.
Analyzing Mathematical Tasks. Developed under the auspices of the NSF-funded ESP Project (ESI ) -- Directed by Margaret Smith, University of.
Amy Jones Lewis November 2010 Green River Regional Educational Cooperative MathPLUS Content Day 1: Student-Centered Problem Solving.
Developing and Using Meaningful Math Tasks The Key to Math Common Core Take a moment to record on a sticky: What is a meaningful Math Task?
Problem Based Learning 102 How can we ensure maintenance of a high level of cognitive demand from our students?
Materials l Ppt slides (5) as handout Tasks books for principals Form for data collection Form for additional input Outcomes for project by session (Eoline)
© 2013 UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH LEARNING RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT CENTER Supporting Rigorous Mathematics Teaching and Learning Enacting Instructional Tasks:
Thinking about the ways students encounter mathematics.
Classroom Discourse and Classroom Practice Pandora Bedford Rosann Hollinger Bernard Rahming Hank Kepner Connie Laughlin October 12 & 14, 2010 MTL Meeting.
1 Principal Investigators: Carol E. Malloy, Ph.D. Jill V. Hamm, Ph.D. Judith L. Meece, Ph.D.
CCSSO – Cross-State Mathematics Teacher Leaders: IA, MT, ND, SD Facilitator Name and Location Strategies for Modifying Existing Math Tasks to Increase.
Good Morning!   Please find a seat at a table that has materials.   We hope you have your Common Core Math binder with you. If you don’t, please go.
Helping Students Examine Their Reasoning
Are All Math Tasks Created Equally?
Elementary and Middle School Mathematics Chapter Reflections: 1,2,3,5,6 By: Amy Howland.
Are All Math Tasks Created Equally?
MATHEMATICAL TASKS TO SKILLS
Are All Math Tasks Created Equally?
Exploring Explicit Instruction: Think Aloud
Mathematical Tasks, Cognitive Demand and Higher Level Mathematics
Presentation transcript:

Exploring Cognitive Demands of Mathematical Tasks Milwaukee Public School Bernard Rahming Mathematics Teaching Specialist April 16, 2011 National Council of Teachers of Mathematics Indianapolis, IN Developed by the Milwaukee Mathematics Partnership (MMP) with support by the National Science Foundation

2 Agenda Participants will :  Develop their understanding of cognitive demand levels of mathematical task  Engage in activities of identifying cognitive demand levels of mathematical tasks  Discuss factors of maintenance and decline of mathematical tasks during setup and implementation. Developed by the Milwaukee Mathematics Partnership (MMP) with support by the National Science Foundation

3 Success Criteria We will be successful if at the end of the session..  We understand and can identify the features of the levels of cognitive demand of mathematical tasks.  We can articulate the factors of maintenance and decline of cognitive demand levels during setup and implementation. Developed by the Milwaukee Mathematics Partnership (MMP) with support by the National Science Foundation

4 Building Academic Vocabulary Discuss with your shoulder partner what you think Cognitive Demand is. What picture comes to mind when you think of Cognitive Demand? Developed by the Milwaukee Mathematics Partnership (MMP) with support by the National Science Foundation

5 Cognitive Demand… “The kind and level of thinking required of students in order to successfully engage with and solve the task.” Stein, Smith, Henningsen, & Silver, (2009) Developed by the Milwaukee Mathematics Partnership (MMP) with support by the National Science Foundation

6 Reading: “Analyzing Mathematics Instructional Tasks” Individually read the entire article. Each person share one idea from the article at your table. Developed by the Milwaukee Mathematics Partnership (MMP) with support by the National Science Foundation

7 Four Levels of Cognitive Demand in Mathematical Tasks Low Level Cognitive Demands  Memorization Tasks  Procedures Without Connections to understanding, meaning or concepts Tasks High Level Cognitive Demands  Procedures With Connections to understanding, meaning or concepts/Tasks  Doing Mathematics Tasks Stein, Smith, Henningsen, & Silver, (2009)

8 Table Group Sort Activity Lay out the 4 green category cards Deal out the 8 blue Mathematical Task Cards to everyone in the group. Refer to the “Task Analysis Guide” for criteria. As you place your Mathematical Task cards into a category, explain your reasoning. Help each other justify the placements. Developed by the Milwaukee Mathematics Partnership (MMP) with support by the National Science Foundation

Table Group Sort Activity Sample activity cards were adapted from Stein, Smith, Henningsen, & Silver, (2009). “Implementing standards-based mathematics instruction: A casebook for professional development”. 2 nd Edition, pg. 9, Fig

10

11 Cognitive Demands and Features Sample Tasks TaskLevel of Cognitive Demand Explanation of Categorization Features ADoing MathematicsThere is no pathway suggested by the task. The focus is on looking for the underlying mathematical structure. Requires an explanation Uses manipulatives Involves multiple steps Uses a diagram Developed by the Milwaukee Mathematics Partnership (MMP) with support by the National Science Foundation

12 Reflection Respond to the following:  Which of the four levels of cognitive demand are you most comfortable with -why?  Which one do you understand the least -why?  Something I want to know more about is…? Developed by the Milwaukee Mathematics Partnership (MMP) with support by the National Science Foundation

13 Four Levels of Cognitive Demand in Mathematical Tasks Low Level Cognitive Demands Memorization Tasks Procedures Without Connections to understanding, meaning or concepts Tasks High Level Cognitive Demands Procedures With Connections to understanding, meaning or concepts Tasks Doing Mathematics Tasks

14 Mathematical Tasks Framework Figure 1.3 TASKS As they appear in curricular/ instructional materials TASKS As set up by teachers TASKS As implemented by students Student Learning A representation of how mathematical tasks unfold during classroom instruction. (Stein & Smith, 1998, Mathematics Teaching in the Middle School)

Factors associated with the decline of High- Level cognitive Demand Students press teacher to reduce complexity of the task, explicit steps Teacher rescue students from struggle Teacher shifts emphasis from meaning, concepts, or understanding to correctness or completeness of answer Not enough time or too much time Classroom management 15 (Adapted from Stein & Smith, 199 Stein, Smith, Henningsen, & Silver, (2009)

Factors associated with the maintenance of High-Level Cognitive Demand Scaffolding of student thinking and reasoning Students provided with means of monitoring their own progress Teachers of capable students model high- level performance Task build on students’ prior knowledge Sufficient time to explore 16 (Adapted from Stein, Smith, Henningsen, & Silver, (2009))

17