Health Impact Assessment on the Benefits of Reducing PM 2.5 Using Mortality Data from 26 European Cities Introduction The proposed draft of the new European.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
APHEIS Air Pollution and Health: A European Information System Bertil Forsberg, Sylvia Medina, Antoni Plasència, Ross Anderson, Lucia Artazcoz, Klea Katsouyanni,
Advertisements

APHEIS Air Pollution and Health: A European Information System to Assess the Health Impact of Air Pollution Sylvia Medina, Antoni Placencia, Hans-Guido.
Case Study: Costing the Health Impacts of Air Pollution in Bristol Dr Clare Beattie.
Assessing Disease Frequency
Markus Amann The RAINS model: Modelling of health impacts of PM and ozone.
EURAQHEM Perspective and suggestions for optimization Leendert van Bree Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency (MNP)
Department of Engineering and Public Policy Carnegie Mellon University Integrated Assessment of Particulate Matter Exposure and Health Impacts Sonia Yeh.
NERAM V, Vancouver, October 2006 Dr. Michal Krzyzanowski Regional Adviser, Air Quality and Health WHO Regional Office for Europe European Centre.
Indicatoren voor gezondheidsimpact van fijn stof en ozon: DALYs en externe kosten Jurgen Buekers & Rudi Torfs 05/04/2011.
Health Effects and Impact Assessment of Air Pollution Ferran Ballester AREHNA Workshop Kos Island, 3-5 May 2003.
APHEIS 2 Air Pollution and Health: A European Information System A Health Impact Assessment of Air Pollution In 26 European Cities Emilia Maria Niciu 1,
Use of PM Airbase data for Health Impact Assessment - experiences of the APHEIS project - Hans-Guido Mücke WHO Collaborating Centre, Berlin on behalf.
Nicole Iroz-Elardo, PhD, ud4h Andrea Hamberg, Oregon HIA Program National HIA Meeting USING QUANTITATIVE.
Environmental Health: Risk Assessment and Risk Management Michael Brody, PhD Senior Environmental Scientist 2 December 2011 Almaty, Kazakhstan.
Haluza D (1), Moshammer H (1), Medina S (2), Perez L (3), Forsberg B (4)* (1) Medical University of Vienna, (2) InVS Paris, (3) Swiss TPH, Basel, (4) Umea.
Air pollution and its impact on health: Comparing findings in China with findings in Europe and the USA Kristin Aunan, CICERO CCICED, October 29, 2007,
An example of how the environment may contribute to health disparities: Estimates of mortality that could be prevented if Interior and Northern British.
The Impact of Air Pollution on Human Health Fernando Holguin MD MPH Associate Professor of medicine and Pediatrics Director, Clinical and Translational.
Air Quality Health Risk Assessment – Methodological Issues and Needs Presented to SAMSI September 19, 2007 Research Triangle Park, NC Anne E. Smith, Ph.D.
Ontario Medical Association Smog-Health Workshop? John Wellner Director, Health Policy, OMA.
Reinhard Mechler, Markus Amann, Wolfgang Schöpp International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis A methodology to estimate changes in statistical life.
Task Force on Health Recent results - Particulate matter Michal Krzyzanowski TFH Chair Head, Bonn Office European Centre for Environment and Health WHO.
1 Accounting for Death in the Tri-national Impact Assessment UN / ECE Symposium, London 18 th / 19 th February 2001 Nino Künzli, MD PhD Assistant Professor.
 HEALTH IMPACT OF AIR QUALITY MANAGEMENT EFFORTS DESIREE M. NARVAEZ, MD, MPH DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH MANILA, PHILIPPINES.
Activities and research plans related to Ecoinformatics Ecoinformatics2006 Ispra, JRC, 19 January 2006 DG SANCO Health Information Unit Artur FURTADO.
U.S. EPA DISCLAIMER EPA strongly cautions that these study results should not be used to draw conclusions about local exposure concentrations or risk.
Air Pollution and Health: An introduction Ferran Ballester.
WHO European Centre for Environment and Health Overview of health impacts of particulate matter in Europe Michal Krzyzanowski WHO ECEH Bonn Office Joint.
Ambient air pollution and waste incineration in Poland – Intereg 3 Programme National Institute of Hygiene, Warsaw, Poland, 11 May 2006 Dr. hab. Michal.
Why is Air Pollution a Global Public Health Problem? Daniel Krewski, PhD, MHA McLaughlin Centre for Population Health Risk Assessment NERAM Colloquium.
1 EU Public Health Programme Work on Environment and Health Giulio Gallo Health & Consumer Protection Directorate Public Health and Risk Assessment Health.
Task Force on Health - a short update 19th EIONET workshop on AQ assessment Bern 1 October 2014 Frank de Leeuw, Valentin Foltescu ETC/Air Pollution and.
Air Resources Board California Environmental Protection Agency Air Quality Effects of Trap-Related Emissions John DaMassa April 18, 2002 Originally Presented.
WHO European Centre for Environment and Health HEALTH RISKS OF PARTICULATE MATTER AIR POLLUTION An overview for the 41 st Session of GRPE M. Krzyzanowski.
1 California Environmental Protection Agency Follow-up to the Harvard Six-Cities Study: Health Benefits of Reductions in Fine Particulate Matter Air Pollution.
WAY FORWARD AND THE ROLE OF THE REGIONAL CENTER ON HEALTH IMPACT ASSESSMENT Regional Center for Air pollution Impact on Health Department of Occupational.
P. Otorepec, M. Gregorič IVZ RS Use of rutinely collected air pollution and health data on local level for simple evaluation of health impact.
THE PEP Sub-regional workshop September 2013 Health effects of particulate matter: Policy implications for EECCA countries Marie-Eve Héroux Technical Officer,
The effects of PM 10 and PM 2.5 on health of children in Dhaka Assoc. Professor Frank Murray Murdoch University Perth, Australia.
1 - HIA of long term exposure to particulate air pollution: sensitivity of results to the correction of PM10 levels measured with TEOM French Air Pollution.
Copernicus Institute of Sustainable Development The 14th Annual Community Modeling and Analysis System (CMAS) Conference Co-benefits of energy efficiency.
Environment 1 The current work on Air Quality Indicators Best needed “ Population exposure” vs. Best available “Population weighted concentrations” Ute.
Impact of Air Pollution on Public Health: Transportability of Risk Estimates Jonathan M. Samet, MD, MS NERAM V October 16, 2006 Vancouver, B.C. Department.
Air pollution and its impact on health: Comparing findings in China with findings in Europe and the USA Kristin Aunan, CICERO CCICED, October 29, 2007,
Health impacts of existing and planned coal-fired power plants in Thailand Lauri Myllyvirta coal and air pollution specialist Greenpeace.
Working Group on Effects, 29th Session, September 2010 Task Force on Health: Results: PM Michal Krzyzanowski TFH Chair WHO/Europe, European Centre.
WHO European Centre for Environment and Health Scientific and technical issues: the role of the World Health Organization Michal Krzyzanowski WHO ECEH.
Co-benefits of mitigating global greenhouse gas emissions for future air quality and human health J. Jason West Department of Environmental Sciences &
Opening Remarks -- Ozone and Particles: Policy and Science Recent Developments & Controversial Issues GERMAN-US WORKSHOP October 9, 2002 G. Foley *US EPA.
Benefit transfer in valuing the costs of air pollution Gordon Hughes The World Bank & NERA UK.
Markus Amann International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis Cost-effectiveness Analysis in CAFE and the Need for Information about Urban Air Quality.
Project title: Health Impact assessment (HIA) of air-pollution- abatement action plans Koldo Cambra. Department of Health. Basque Government. Spain.
A Decision Framework for Vehicle Inspection and Maintenance Programs Using Health Benefit Analysis Ying Li University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill,
Metrics for Health, Development and the Environment Christopher JL Murray Institute Director.
Air Pollution, Cycling, and Health Emilia Hanna Air Pollution Campaigner Friends of the Earth Scotland Presentation to Spokes Public Meeting 13 June 2016.
Particles in Europe Antwerp 13 & 14 th June APHEIS Air Pollution and Health : A European Information System The findings of the APHEIS study Catherine.
Co-benefits of Global Greenhouse Gas Mitigation for US Air Quality and Health J. Jason West Department of Environmental Sciences & Engineering University.
CAMBRA Koldo* 1, ALONSO Eva 1, MEDINA Sylvia 2, LE TERTRE Alain 2, CASSADOU Sylvie 2, PASCAL Laurence 2, FRANK Florian 2, DIAZ DE QUIJANO Estela 3, VALERO.
Air Quality in EEA and EECCA Europe’s Environment assessment report, th Europe’s Environment assessment report, 2007 (‘the Belgrade report’) Hans.
‘Air Monitoring and Protection Strategies in EECCA’ UNECE/WGEMA Workshop, Geneva, 11 June 2007 Dr Hans-Guido Mücke for the WHO European Centre for Environment.
Geographical and Temporal heterogeneity
Satellite Data for Health & Air Quality Applications
Air Pollution and Public Health in India
SLCP Benefits Toolkit:
UNECE WG PM Berlin May 2005 Duncan Johnstone
Traffic Pollution and its impacts on our health?
Stakeholder Expert Group on the Review of the EU Air Policy
Research connecting air quality, climate change, energy, policy and health J. Jason West Department of Environmental Sciences & Engineering University.
Bart Ostro, Chief Air Pollution Epidemiology Unit
Properties Related to Health Effects
Presentation transcript:

Health Impact Assessment on the Benefits of Reducing PM 2.5 Using Mortality Data from 26 European Cities Introduction The proposed draft of the new European Directive on ambient air quality (CAFE Directive) has generated debate regarding the establishment of appropriate PM 2.5 values. The draft proposes an annual average PM 2.5 concentration of 25 µg/m 3 by 2015, while the European Parliament proposes an annual limit value of 20 µg/m 3. In addition, the equivalent Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) standard for the U.S. is 15 µg/m 3, and the World Health Organization (WHO) guideline is 10 µg/m 3. This study estimates the potential benefits in terms of deaths that could be prevented by reducing PM 2.5 annual levels to 25, 20, 15 and 10 µg/m 3 respectively in 26 European cities in the Apheis network ( F Ballester 1, S Medina 2, P Goodman 3, E Boldo 4, A Le Tertre 2, M Neuberger 5, S Larrieu 2, N Künzli 6, K Cambra 7, K Katsouyanni 8, V Puklová 9, C Lourenço 10, I Walda 11, H Neus 12, M González 13, C Iñiguez 1, J Schwartz 14, and the contributing members of the APHEIS Network (1)Valencian School of Health Studies (EVES), Valencia. (2) Institute for Public Health Surveillance, Saint Maurice. (3) Dublin Institute of Technology, Dublin. (4) Carlos III National Institute of Health, Madrid. (5) Institute of Environmental Health, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna. (6) University of Southern California, Los Angeles. (7) Department of Health, Basque Government, Vitoria-Gasteiz. (8) University of Athens Medical School, Athens. (9) National Institute of Public Health, Prague. (10) Environmental Health Department, Lisbon. (11) Municipal Health Service Rotterdam, The Netherlands (12) Department for Science and Health Hamburg Germany. (13) Public Health Agency of Barcelona. (14) Harvard School of Public Health, Cambridge, U.S.A. Acknowledgements The Apheis programme was supported by the European Commission DG SANCO [programme of Community action on pollution-related diseases] and the participating institutions in 15 European countries. Corrected PM 10 P95 Mean P5 Converted PM 2.5 P95 Mean P5  g/m3 Figure 1. Annual levels for corrected PM 10 and converted PM 2.5 for each Apheis city Figure 2. Potential reductions (%) in the total burden of premature mortality among people age 30 years and over for different decreases in annual PM 2.5 levels in the Apheis cities. % Methods This study used the WHO methodology for Health Impact Assessment (HIA) and the Apheis guidelines for data collection and analysis. The 26 cities in the Apheis network provided population data, deaths for all causes and annual mean concentrations of PM 10 (Table 1). The HIA exposure-response functions (ERFs) for total mortality in people age 30 years and over were derived from Pope et al PM 10 measurements were corrected to fit with gravimetric methods used by Pope et al, and converted to PM 2.5 using a local conversion factor; if the latter was not available, the default European factor of 0.7 was used. Results Mean annual levels of corrected PM 10 ranged from 17.0 to 61.0 µg/m 3 (Figure 1). The derived PM 2.5 values ranged from 7.2 to 42.7 µg/m 3. Only Dublin had an annual PM 2.5 level below 10 µg/m 3, and seven cities reported PM 2.5 annual concentrations above 25 µg/m 3. Figure 2 shows the potential reductions (%) in the total burden of premature long-term mortality in people age 30 years and over for different scenarios of reduction in PM 2.5 levels. If annual PM 2.5 levels were reduced to 10 µg/m 3, all the cities but Dublin would benefit from this reduction with proportional reductions in the total burden of mortality ranging from 1.1 % (Stockholm) to 17.9 % (Rome). The combined reduction for all the cities would be 6.2%. The benefits clearly diminish when the scenarios are less ambitious, and fall to 3.7, 2.0 and 1.2 % for reductions to 15, 20 and 25 µg/m 3 respectively. Figure 3 shows the combined HIA findings. Reducing the PM 2.5 levels to 10 µg/m 3 would prevent 22,266 premature deaths per year for the 26 Apheis cities combined (95% confidence interval of 6,061-37,343). Reducing PM 2.5 concentrations to 15, 20, and 25 µg/m 3 would respectively prevent 13,291, 7,316 and 4,467 premature deaths. Discussion/Conclusions Direct PM 2.5 measurements were not used in this HIA, but a previous study showed that converted PM 2.5 levels were quite similar to direct levels in 12 cities where both measurements were available (Medina et al, 2005). However conversion factors from PM 10 to PM 2.5 in our study were somewhat heterogeneous across the cities ranging from 0.3 to 0.8. The accuracy of these estimates will improve when reliable direct PM 2.5 will be available on a routine basis in most of the cities. This study illustrates the large reduction in premature deaths that could be achieved by lowering annual PM 2.5 levels in European cities. In specific, reducing annual mean levels of PM 2.5 to 15 µg/m 3 could prevent three times more premature deaths in the Apheis cities than a reduction to 25 µg/m 3 (13,291 vs. 4,467 deaths). This number could grow by up to five times if PM 2.5 levels were reduced to 10 µg/m 3 (22,266 vs. 4,467 deaths). Although several limitations in HIA methodology have been described, its use has proven helpful in estimating the potential health impact of new environmental policies. Figure 3. Potential reductions in total annual deaths (central estimate and 95% CI) among people age 30 years and over in the 26 Apheis cities for different decreases in annual PM 2.5 levels. Scenarios for reduction of annual PM 2.5 levels (µg/m 3 ) Attributable cases and the potential reduction (%) in mortality for each scenario were estimated for each city and for the 26 cities as a whole. Scenarios of reduction of annual PM 2.5 levels to (µg/m 3 ) References Boldo E, Medina S, Le Tertre A, et al, Apheis: Health Impact Assessment of Long-term Exposure to PM(2.5) in 23 European Cities. Eur J Epidemiol Available: Pope A, Burnett R, Thun M, et al, Lung cancer, cardiopulmonary mortality, and long-term exposure to fine particulate air pollution. JAMA 287: Medina S, Boldo E, Saklad M, et al, APHEIS Health Impact Assement of Air Pollution and Communications Strategy. Third year report, Institut de Veille Sanitaire, Saint-Maurice, 232 pages. Available: Table 1. Apheis cities, demographic data, methods and factors for PM measurements 1 TSP: total suspended particulates. *Correction factor by default. # Conversion factor by default. (a) French cities: as part of the national program for PM surveillance, a specific polynomial regression has been used for correction of PM10 in each city. The coefficients of these regressions, were derived from parallel PM10 measurements within each city. (b) PM10=TSP*0.58. (c) Estimated PM2.5 by local modelling. Ref: Boldo et al, 2006; and participating cities.