Cooperation between SSO and JPO through use of standardization documents in patent examination Yu Kochi Deputy Director Administrative Division Japan Patent.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SOS Interop II Sophia Antipolis, September 20 and 21, 2005 IPRs and standards: some issues Richard Owens Director, Copyright E-Commerce Division Philippe.
Advertisements

United States Patent and Trademark Office – IP5 Foundation Projects: why are they necessary for work sharing and what challenges are IP5.
PCT REFORM: Why It Is Needed and What Lies Ahead Charles A. Pearson Director Office of PCT Legal Administration.
Disclaimer: The information provided by the USPTO is meant as an educational resource only and should not be construed as legal advice or written law.
0 Progress Report on Work for Establishing Mechanisms for Feedback and Analysis on WOISAs /ISRs 9 February 2014 PCT/MIA Quality Subgroup Meeting.
Comparison between JP & US new patent systems - First (inventor) to file, exception to loss of novelty, and grace period - NOBUTAKA YOKOTA KYOWA PATENT.
Jordanian Patent Office Experience in Cooperating with WIPO in the field of Search & Examination Prepared by Presented by Dr. Lina Haddad Zain AL Awamleh.
The United States Patent and Trademark Office Bob Olszewski, Director TC 2900 United States Patent and Trademark Office.
September 14, U.S.C. 103(c) as Amended by the Cooperative Research and Technology Enhancement (CREATE) Act (Public Law ) Enacted December.
Disclaimer: The information provided by the USPTO is meant as an educational resource only and should not be construed as legal advice or written law.
Cooperative Research and Technology Enhancement (CREATE) Act By Paul Fleischut SENNIGER POWERS.
JPO Updates JPAA International Activities Center Fujiko Shibata AIPLA Mid-Winter Institute IP Practice in Japan Committee Pre-Meeting Seminar.
ISMT 520 Lecture #6: Protecting Technical and Business Process Innovations Dr. Theodore H. K. Clark Associate Professor and Academic Director of MSc Programs.
Patent Offices and SDOs cooperation
Patent What is Patent? What we can patent? How one write and file the Patent. What is the Role of Patent Office in granting the Patent? Why to go for patent?
The Camp Audit “Keep your friends close and your auditor closer”
The U.S. Patent System is Changing – A Summary of the New Patent Reform Law.
1 Patent Harmonization: Substantive Patent Law Treaty (SPLT) aspect Kay Konishi Kay Konishi, Patents Committee APAA Japan Group APAA 50 th Council Meeting.
1 United States Patent and Trademark Office Revised PCT International Search and Preliminary Examination Guidelines Biotech/ChemPharm Customer Partnership.
Novelty/Patentability Search. What is a Novelty Search? A novelty (patentability) search is performed to reveal prior art that can affect the patenting.
Mai 2007 Francis Hagel – Intellectual Property Manager 1 QUALITY OF PATENTS: A MATTER OF INFORMATION INPUTS Francis Hagel Intellectual Property Manager.
1 PROPOSAL FOR PROCEDURES AND SCOPE OF SHA DATA COLLECTION UNDER THE CO-OPERATION BETWEEN OECD, EUROSTAT AND WHO 7 th Meeting of Health Accounts Experts.
February 19, Recent Changes and Developments in USPTO Practice Prepared by: Office of Patent Legal Administration (OPLA) Robert J. Spar, DirectorJoni.
Utility Requirement in Japan Makoto Ono, Ph.D. Anderson, Mori & Tomotsune Website:
1 1 Interview Practice Within the USPTO. 2 2 Topics Effective Interviews Reaching Agreement Requesting Interviews Issues Discussed Documenting Interviews.
Overview OTL Mission Inventor Responsibility Stanford Royalty Sharing Disclosure Form Patent View Inventor Agreements Patent.
Recent developments in patents statistics and data bases at EPO and OECD EPIP – Bocconi February 24-25, 2006 Dominique Guellec OECD.
1 Patent Law in the Age of IoT The Landscape Has Shifted. Are You Prepared? 1 Jeffrey A. Miller, Esq.
EARTO – working group on quality issues – 2 nd session Anneli Karttunen, Quality Manager VTT Technical Research Centre of Finland This presentation.
Japan Audit & Supervisory Board Members Association (JASBA) Explanatory Memorandum on the Audit & Supervisory Board Members (The companies without Audit.
2011 Japanese Patent Law Revision AIPLA Annual Meeting October 21, 2011 Yoshi Inaba TMI Associates.
Seminar Industrial Property Protection Prague, 4 June 2003 Patent Protection in Europe Heidrun Krestel Liaison Officer Member States Co-operation Programmes.
July 18, U.S.C. 103(c) as Amended by the Cooperative Research and Technology Enhancement (CREATE) Act (Public Law ) Enacted December 10,
PCT FILING - ADVANTAGES© Dr. S. Padmaja, Managing Partner, iProPAT June 21, 2012.
Yoshiki KITANO JPAA International Activities Center AIPLA Annual Meeting, 2014 IP Practice in Japan Committee Pre-Meeting Seminar Post-Grant Opposition.
Post Grant Review to be introduced in Japan JPAA International Activities Center Fujiko Shibata January 29, 2013 AIPLA Mid-Winter Institute IP Practice.
Jeju, 13 – 16 May 2013Standards for Shared ICT Patent Offices and SDOs cooperation development Dr Michel Goudelis, Director Telecommunications, EPO Document.
New Sections 102 & 103 (b) Conditions for Patentability- (1) IN GENERAL- Section 102 of title 35, United States Code, is amended to read as follows: -`Sec.
Amendments to the Work Permit Rules: Problematic Issues Alex Nisengolts 28 April 2011.
Chris Fildes FILDES & OUTLAND, P.C. IP Practice in Japan Committee Pre-Meeting AIPLA Annual Meeting, October 20, 2015 USPTO PILOT PROGRAMS 1 © AIPLA 2015.
Takeo Nasu JPAA International Activities Center AIPLA 2015 Mid-Winter Institute IP Practice in Japan Committee Pre-Meeting Seminar Updates of Post Grant.
Patent Searching Basics Patrick M. Torre, Ph.D. November 18, 2015.
JPO’s Initiatives for World‘s Best Examination Quality January, 2015 JAPAN PATENT OFFICE.
Derivation Proceedings Gene Quinn Patent Attorney IPWatchdog.com March 27 th, 2012.
NATIONAL CONFERENCE Intellectual Property Policies for Universities and Innovation dr. sc. Vlatka Petrović Head, Technology Transfer Office Acting Head,
Trends Relating to Patent Infringement Litigation in JAPAN
Recent Japanese Cases Regarding Standard Essential Patents and FRAND Licensing Declaration AIPLA-IPHC Meeting April 11, 2013 Shinji ODA Judge, Intellectual.
Inventive Step in Japan and my personal reflection Dr. Shoichi Okuyama Okuyama & Sasajima AIPPI Japan January 2015 Orlando, Florida 1.
Summary of GSC-13 IPR WG Meeting Tom Goode, ATIS IPR WG Chair DOCUMENT #:GSC13-CL-05r1 FOR:Presentation SOURCE:Tom Goode, IPR WG Chair AGENDA ITEM:3.4.
The Impact of Patent Reform on Independent Inventors and Start-up Companies Mark Nowotarski (Patent Agent)
Machinery & Metals Examination Bureau Metals Examination Division EXAMINATION PRACTICE IN KIPO.
FISCO2 – Financial and Scientific Coordination Work Package dedicated to ENSAR2 management WP leader: Ketel Turzó WP deputy: Sandrine Dubromel ENSAR2 Management.
WIPO Patent Search. DO I NEED A PATENT SEARCH ? A patent search is a good idea but it costs money upfront. Deciding whether to spend the money on a patent.
Process of getting a patent -Inolyst. Contents ▪ What can be patented? ▪ Getting started with patent filing ▪ Step 1: Patent Search ▪ Step 2: Patent Drafting.
Protection of Trade Secret in Future Japanese Patent Litigation
Japan’s activities for achieving the world’s fastest and highest quality examination system Atsushi Kimura Assistant Director International Cooperation.
PATENT Designed and Developed by IP Laboratory, MNNIT Allahabad , Uttar Pradesh, India.
SDOs and Patent Offices : Interface improvement
Patent application procedure (…and costs)
TTC Activities on IPR in Standards
Options to Protect an Invention: the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT) and Trade Secrets Hanoi October 24, 2017 Peter Willimott Senior Program Officer WIPO.
SDOs and Patent Offices : Interface improvement
April, 2015 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [TG4s Teleconference Opening Information.
Milena Lonati PD Quality Management DG2, European Patent Office
February, 2015 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [TG4s Teleconference Opening Information.
What are the types of intellectual property ?
What are the types of intellectual property?
September, 2015 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [TG4s Teleconference Opening Information.
Summary of GSC-13 IPR WG Meeting
February, 2015 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission Title: [TG4s Teleconference Opening Information.
Presentation transcript:

Cooperation between SSO and JPO through use of standardization documents in patent examination Yu Kochi Deputy Director Administrative Division Japan Patent Office GSC IPR Working group meeting 20 th April, 2015

1. Use of standardization documents in patent examination Benefit of the cooperation Importance of standardization documents as prior art Impact of standardization documents to patent examination Opinions of user of patent system 2. Necessary condition to use standardization documents Publicly-available Status of standardization documents Access to standardization documents 1 Contents

2 1. Use of standardization documents in patent examination

Benefit of the cooperation Both SSOs and JPO can obtain benefits when JPO use standardization documents as prior art for patent examination. Benefit for SSOs and its members - Suppression of the number of SEPs through patent applications that do not have novelty or inventive step are rejected - Contributors to standard development can take part in standard setting process without worries Benefit for JPO and user of patent system - Quality assurance in patent examination 3

New technology A Similar technology A’ Patent applications filed by third parties Flow of time Patent applications filed by true inventors Filing application Draft standards for new technology A (published) Contributions or proposals for standards by true inventors Importance of standardization documents as prior art 4 Filing application (not published) Publication of application (at 18 months from the filing) Patent application A’ is refused by the standardization document Standardization document

5 Impact of standardization documents to patent examination (1) ※ It is rare that multiple standardization documents are cited in a decision of refusal, so this statistics is almost equivalent to the number of rejected patent applications with examiner’s opinion by standardization documents.

In JPO, in a year, with approximate estimation, ・ The number of decision of refusal with examiners opinion is about ・ 1000 in refusals are based on standard documents ⇒ 1000/50000 = 2 % of refusals are based on standardization documents In the technical field of communication, ・ Share of communication field in total patent application is about 5% ・ The number of refusal in communication field is estimated to 2500 (5% of 50000) ・ Most of standardization documents that JPO use is related to communication technology ⇒ 1000/2500 = 40% of refusals are base on standardization documents 6 Impact of standardization documents to patent examination (2)

Opinions of major patent applicants 7 JPO interviewed 10 Japanese company as major patent applicants as well as participants of SSOs about use of standardization documents for patent examination The result is, ・ 10 in 10 company agreed that JPO promotes to use standardization documents ・ Some company answered that standardization documents in the field of ICT is important for patent examination

2. Necessary condition to use standardization documents 8

Publicly-Known Status of standardization Documents (1) In order to use standardization documents for patent examination as prior art that can deny patentability of someone’s application, ・ Publicly-available Status in Japanese patent Act should be confirmed ・ The date of issue should be shown 9

Publicly-available Status of Standard Documents (2) ConditionPublicly-available Status On free website anyone can accessYes On sale for anyoneYes Member of the SSO only, but anyone can be a member Yes Documents are distributed in SSO meeting. Anyone can join the meeting and obtain the documents Yes Documents are confidentialNo 10 Validity of publicly-available Status Note: This table shows concept, but actually the publicly-available status of each document is carefully considered in case by case basis

Access to standardization documents For standardization documents that have “publicly-available status”, it can be used in patent examination as prior art. JPO would like SSOs to provide us the access to documents for patent examination. 11

12 Thank you very much. 12