Yi-Wen Wang 指導教授: 鍾榮富 MA1C0103 鄭雅文

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Sruti Akula (PhD ELE) EFL University Developing academic reading skills through strategy training.
Advertisements

When the bartender asked, "How's it going, Norm
This is exactly what you will be tested on! Are you ready?
Assessment Assessment should be an integral part of a unit of work and should support student learning. Assessment is the process of identifying, gathering.
Presentations.
Depth and Complexity An RUSD Best Practices GATE Tune-Up.
FOOTPRINTS OF FREEDOM Elementary UCI History ProjectFall 2012.
WORKING TOGETHER ACROSS THE CURRICULUM CCSS ELA and Literacy In Content Areas.
Intellectual Challenge of Teaching
Topic: Unit Development Objectives 1. Students will be able to negotiate with the teacher about a topic they are going to deal with. 2. Students will be.
Common Core State Standards Professional Learning Module Series
Assessing Listening. Problems of Lang. Assessment A problem: performance = competence? In language assessment we intend to assess a person’s competence.
Major Outcomes of Science Instruction
TEACHER TRAINING WORKSHOPS Module 1: Methodology Unit 3: “Teaching Listening Comprehension”   © English Highway Language Center 2012.
Session 6: Writing from Sources Audience: K-5 Teachers.
Science Inquiry Minds-on Hands-on.
Advisor: Dr. Raung-fu Chung Graduate: Ju-chuan Chen.
Top Ten Tips for teachers preparing students for the academic version of IELTS Sam McCarter Macmillan Online Conference 2013.
Every Student Prepared for the Future EXPLORE, PLAN, The ACT Test Specifications.
CURRICULUM ALIGNMENT Debbi Hardy Curriculum Director Olympia School District.
Dr. MaLinda Hill Advanced English C1-A Designing Essays, Research Papers, Business Reports and Reflective Statements.
Implication of Gender and Perception of Self- Competence on Educational Aspiration among Graduates in Taiwan Wan-Chen Hsu and Chia- Hsun Chiang Presenter.
Today we will learn: Daily TEKS Objectives April 1, 2014.
A study on the effects of phonics instruction on the decoding and encoding performances of junior high school EFL students in Taiwan Advisor: 鍾榮富教授 Author:
Literacy Initiative Public Schools of Robeson County.
LEARNING PRIORITY OF TECHNOLOGY PROCESS SKILLS AT ELEMENTARY LEVEL Hung-Jen Yang & Miao-Kuei Ho DEPARTMENT OF INDUSTRIAL TECHNOLOGY EDUCATION THE NATIONAL.
STAR Reading is a computer-adaptive assessment that is designed to give teachers accurate, reliable and valid data quickly so they can make good decisions.
Change Karen Crisco Leslie Key Emily Rone Kasey Verneer.
1 Project of Reading Course Development Designer: Erin M Instructor: Mavis Shang Date: 06/09/2008.
T 7.0 Chapter 7: Questioning for Inquiry Chapter 7: Questioning for Inquiry Central concepts:  Questioning stimulates and guides inquiry  Teachers use.
Chapter 3: ESL (ELL) Assessment Assessing Academic Reading.
1 Issues in Assessment in Higher Education: Science Higher Education Forum on Scientific Competencies Medellin-Colombia Nov 2-4, 2005 Dr Hans Wagemaker.
1 English Reading (I) 英文閱讀 (一) 99 學年度第一學期 莊媖纓 老師 ( 應用外語系 ) Office: TEL:
Writing Objectives Including Bloom’s Taxanomy. Three Primary Components of an Objective Condition –What they’re given Behavior –What they do Criteria.
The comparison of reading comprehension tests between the elementary level GEPT and BCET 2 NA1C0004 I-Pei Tsai.
Based on the work of Heidi Hayes Jacobs and Susan Udelhofen
West GeaugaRocksOhioTest.
SRI & Lexile Measures. Using Lexile Levels and SRI Data for Improving Reading Instruction.
Academic Vocabulary. Analysis The process or result of identifying the parts of a whole and their relationships to one another.
WEDNESDAY, SEPTEMBER 3, 2014 SKILLS STRATEGIES. READING BEFORE Set a purpose for reading Ask questions Predict Use prior knowledge.
COUNCIL OF CHIEF STATE SCHOOL OFFICERS (CCSSO) & NATIONAL GOVERNORS ASSOCIATION CENTER FOR BEST PRACTICES (NGA CENTER) JUNE 2010.
THE KAPLAN MODEL DEPTH AND COMPLEXITY IN LITERATURE By April Payne.
Today we will learn: Daily TEKS Objectives February 26, 2014.
Effects of Explicit Reading Strategy Instruction on EFL Students’ Reading Anxiety and Comprehension 明示閱讀策略教學對 EFL 學生閱讀焦慮 與理解的影響 指導教授:鍾榮富 博士 研究生:李秋美 2011,
Common Core.  Find your group assignment.  As a group, read over the descriptors for mastery of this standard. (The writing standards apply to more.
CREATING AN ACTIVE LEARNING ENVIRONMENT Using Inquiry and Primary Sources.
TYPE OF READINGS.
National Science Education Standards. Outline what students need to know, understand, and be able to do to be scientifically literate at different grade.
COURSE AND SYLLABUS DESIGN
Depth of Knowledge: Elementary ELA Smarter Balanced Professional Development for Washington High-need Schools University of Washington Tacoma Belinda Louie,
By: Harvey Silver R. Thomas Dewing Matthew Perini.
Exploring the Literacy Standards: CCSS & Main Idea.
English Reading Guidance with Learning Portfolio Analysis Ting-Ting Wu Graduate School of Technological and Vocational Education, National Yunlin University.
Session 2 English Language Proficiency Benchmarks Assessment Primary Professional Development Service.
GENERATION Z THE 8 SECOND GENERATION. THIS GROUP OF JUNIORS HAVE NEVER TAKEN THE TAKS TEST TOOK EOC ENGLISH I ENGLISH II ALGEBRA 1 BIOLOGY 1 WILL TAKE.
Common Core.  Find your group assignment.  As a group, read over the descriptors for mastery of this standard. (The writing standards apply to more.
Dr Anie Attan 26 April 2017 Language Academy UTMJB
IB Assessments CRITERION!!!.
Creating an Active Learning environment
Creating an Active Learning environment
Grade 6 Outdoor School Program Curriculum Map
Developing Listening strategies
EPAS Educational Planning and Assessment System By: Cindy Beals
English Language Proficiency Benchmarks Assessment
Reading Objectives.
“When Music Offends” Read 180 Unit Four.
Norman L Webb.
Teaching Listening Comprehension
Test Content Specifications
Basic Academic Reading Strategies
Presentation transcript:

Yi-Wen Wang 指導教授: 鍾榮富 MA1C0103 鄭雅文 The Comparison of Reading Comprehension Tests Between the Elementary Level GEPT and BCET Yi-Wen Wang 指導教授: 鍾榮富 MA1C0103 鄭雅文

Introduction Wei (1995) noted that English education in Taiwan placed its exclusive attention to students’ reading and writing ability in the past. However, with the birth of the educational reform – the Grade 1-9 Curriculum, four language skills receive the equal values in the classroom English instruction (Chang, 2002).

Introduction The writer of this study addresses the issue of reading abilities from three major aspects in the following: (1) the readability scores and their corresponding difficulty levels in the reading extracts, (2) the correlation between the reading topics and the difficult levels in the comprehension tests, and (3) the reading skills measured in the passage-based reading comprehension tests.

Purpose of Study The purpose of this study is to investigate the correlation of the reading tests between the BCET and the Elementary Level GEPT. Specifically, the study is conducted for the following purposes: To investigate the correlation of the reading topics between the elementary GEPT and BCET, To explore the difficulty levels of reading extracts between the elementary GEPT and BCET, To determine the kinds of reading skills which English tests exert the powers upon the EFL classroom instruction in high school.

Research Questions Which topics have been encompassed in the Elementary Level GEPT and BCET reading comprehension tests respectively? Which reading passages are relatively difficult in terms of the comparsion between Flesch Reading Formula and the Fry Reading Formula, the Elementary Level GEPT or BCET? Is there any difference of the assessed reading skills between the Elementary Level GEPT and BCET?

Significance of Study This study aims to provide the GEPT test developers with some information which can lead to an enhancement of the test items. Teachers and educators are encouraged to find effective links between the teaching objectives in schools and the testing objectives of both tests. This study can serve as a reference for those who produce study materials for the both tests.

Methodology

Data Collection In this study, the collected English examinations are specifically referred to: The Elementary Level of General English Proficiency Test (GEPT) Basic Competence Test for junior high school students (BCET) from 2001 to 2008. This research set out to classify types of topics used in the BCETs and Elementary Level GEPTs, individually.

The Classification of the Reading Topics Listed in the Guideline of Grade 1-9 Animals       Gender equality    Parts of the body Clothing/Accessories     Health School & classes Colors        Holidays & festivals    Shapes, size & measurements Computers     Houses & apartments     Shopping Customs & lifestyle Human rights      Special events Daily routines    Interests and hobbies     Sports & exercises Eating out     Manners      Study habits or plans Occupations Money & price Time, date, month, season & year Transportation    Nature     Traveling Nation & language     Neighborhood   Weather & climate Food drinks    Numbers     Science & technology Famous or interesting places Famous or interesting people Environment & pollution Friends & personal relationship           Families, family Relationship & kinship  

Instruments used for the Data Analysis (a) the Flesch Reading Ease Formula (Davies, 1968: 188) and Fry Readability Formula (1968) to make a comparison between the statistical judgment of the textual readability levels in Elementary Level GEPTs/BCETs, and (b) a checklist of reading strategies, in this study, the checklist of reading strategies is sourced from the study by Tung Hsing-cheng (2008) who summarized multiple reading skills into two major types of categories, micro-reading skills, and macro-reading skills.

The Checklist of Reading Skills in the Reading Comprehension Test PART I. Micro-skill Reading A1. Recognize relations between parts of a text through lexical and grammatical Cohesion devices (synonyms, repetitions, anaphoric reference, logical connecters, etc.). A 2. Use context to guess meaning of unfamiliar words and idioms/phrase. A 3. Identify discourse markers. A 4. Interpret the meaning of a sentence. A 5. Interpret topic sentences. A 6. Outline logical organization of a text. A 7 Paraphrase the words or idioms/phrases in a sentence without the contextual support. A 8 Interpret a grammatical structure in a sentence. A 9 Interpret a sentence pattern in a sentence.

PART II. Macro-skill Reading B1. Discern main ideas. B 2. Use graphic references to locate required information. B 3. Outline the development of an argument. B 3-1 Identify the sequence: order of events. B 3-2 Identify the sequence: steps in a process B 4. Distinguish general statements from examples. B 5. Identify explicitly stated information. B 5-1 Find details. B 5-2 Judge fact and opinion. B 5-3 Identify the cause and effect. B 5-4 Paraphrase the stated information B 6.Make generalization. B 7. Make the inference. B 8. Classify the information. B 9. Summarize the information. B 10. Compare and contrast the information. B 11. Identify implicitly stated information. B 12. Recognize writer’s intention. B 13. Recognize the attitudes and emotions of the writer. B 14. Predict the outcomes B 15. Draw a valid conclusion. B 16 Calculations.

Conclusion It is evident that the reading topics seemed to have bearings on the instructional guidelines of the Grade 1-9 Curriculum. Both in the BCETs and the Elementary Level GEPTs, quite a number of the reading issues devoted heavy weights to the junior high school students’ daily reality.

Conclusion The number of difficult reading passages rose from the year of 2008. From then on, more reading texts were supposedly less comprehensible for the test participants. Regarding the readability levels of both tests, the reading texts were readily comprehensible for test participants given that the easy level was over eighty percentage from the year 2001 to the year 2008. Also, the BCET reading test items had the easy trend year by year and they tend to emphasize the integrative knowledge.

Conclusion As far as the reading skills were concerned, the macro-skills of reading held the central role in the BCETs (82.26%) and Elementary Level GEPTs (95%), especially the explicitly stated information covering searching details, judging facts and opinions, identifying the cause and effect and the like.