UAA/APU CONSORTIUM LIBRARY 2008 LIBQUAL RESULTS. Number of Respondents UAAAPU Undergraduate1,388 Graduate267 Faculty233 Library Staff33 Staff157 Total2,078.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
LibQUAL+ in the local context: results, action and evaluation Selena Lock & Stephen Town Cranfield University 6th Northumbria International Conference.
Advertisements

The LibQual+ CUL Assessment Working Group Jeff Carroll Joanna DiPasquale Joel Fine Andy Moore Nick Patterson Jennifer Rutner Chengzhi Wang January.
LibQUAL+ in the UK & Ireland: five years experience J. Stephen Town and Selena Lock, Cranfield University.
Library Service Quality Survey Results Yeo Pin Pin Li Ka Shing Library April 2013.
Listening To Our Users Queen’s 2010
LibQUAL+ The Arizona State University Libraries’ Experience.
Student Satisfaction Geneva College Student Satisfaction Inventory (SSI: Noel-Levitz) 1997 to 2013.
2006 LibQUAL+ Survey Results Information Services Concept Review on Assessment November 9, 2006.
1 Wymagania informacyjne uzytkownikow bibliotek akademickich 21 wieku Maria Anna Jankowska University of Idaho Library Biblioteki XXI wieku. Czy przetrwamy?
TAMU 2012 Enrollment Undergrads40,100 Graduates9,600 Professional527 Faculty3,810 TAMU HSC 2012 Enrollment Undergrads206 Graduates959 Professional1,121.
TM Project web site Quantitative Background for LibQUAL+ for LibQUAL+  A Total Market Survey Colleen Cook Bruce Thompson January.
LibQUAL+ and Beyond: Using Results Effectively 23 rd June 2008 Dr Darien Rossiter.
Japanese Studies in the United States: Continuities and Opportunities Patricia G. Steinhoff.
LibQUAL + ™ Data Summary An overview of the results of the LibQUAL+™ 2003 survey with comparisons to the 2001 survey.
LibQUAL Tales from Past Participants Vanderbilt University Library Flo Wilson, Deputy University Librarian
LibQUAL+ ® Survey Results Presented by: Selena Killick ARL/SCONUL LibQUAL+ Administrator Cranfield University Introduction to LibQUAL+
Alice’s Adventures in LibQual-Land Kitty Tynan Assistant Director for Public Services CUA Libraries All illustrations from The Victorian Web: A Tenniel.
The votes are in! What next? Introduction to LibQUAL+ Workshop University of Westminster, London 21st January 2008 Selena Killick Association of Research.
Reliability and Validity of 2004 LibQUAL+™ Scores for Different Language Translations Martha Kyrillidou Colleen Cook Bruce Thompson ALA Annual Conference.
Background on the SCONUL LibQUAL+ implementation Stephen Town, Cranfield University.
New Ways of Listening To Our Users: LibQUAL+ Queen’s.
Getting Staff Involved in Assessment at the University of Connecticut Libraries Brinley Franklin 17 August 2009.
How to participate in LibQUAL+ and effectively utilise the data.
Data Summary July 27, Dealing with Perceptions! Used to quantifiable quality (collection size, # of journals, etc.) Survey of opinions or perceptions.
LibQual 2013 Concordia University Montréal, Québec.
Faculty Survey Results Buswell Memorial Library, 2014.
 Large-scale, web-based, user-centered assessment of library service effectiveness across multiple institutions.  Co-developed by ARL and Texas A&M University,
January 22, 2007 ALA Midwinter, Seattle Emmanuel d’Alzon Library Assumption College LibQUAL+ Results: What Now? Dr. Dawn Thistle Director of Library Services.
Frank Haulgren Collection Services Manager & Assessment Coordinator Western Libraries Lite 2010 Survey Results.
Testing the LibQUAL+ Survey Instrument James Shedlock, AMLS, Dir. Linda Walton, MLS, Assoc. Dir. Galter Health Sciences Library Northwestern University.
Perspectives from two UK institutions Stephen Town University of York, UK LibQUAL+ Exchange Florence, 2009.
Background on the SCONUL LibQUAL+ implementation Stephen Town, Cranfield University.
January 17, 2005 Brinley Franklin Vice Provost, University Libraries University of Connecticut Libraries LibQual+™ Management Information.
UAA/APU CONSORTIUM LIBRARY 2011 LIBQUAL RESULTS APU Faculty Assembly – February 15, 2012.
Service priority alignment in Association of Research Libraries (ARL) member libraries Damon Jaggars & Shanna Smith University of Texas at Austin Jocelyn.
 Large-scale, web-based, user-centered assessment of library service effectiveness across multiple institutions.  Co-developed by ARL and Texas A&M University,
Effectively utilising LibQUAL+ data J. Stephen Town.
LibQUAL+ Finding the right numbers Jim Self Management Information Services University of Virginia Library ALA Conference Washington DC June 25, 2007.
Re-Visioning the Future of University Libraries and Archives through LIBQUAL+ Cynthia Akers Associate Professor and Assessment Coordinator ESU Libraries.
June 25, 2007 ALA Washington, DC Emmanuel d’Alzon Library Assumption College Using Your LibQUAL+ Results Dr. Dawn Thistle Director of Library Services.
How to participate in LibQUAL+ and effectively utilise the data.
Background on the SCONUL LibQUAL+ implementation Stephen Town, Cranfield University.
Columbia University. Data source LibQUAL Service Quality Survey –Administered on a three-year cycle since 2003 –Adequacy Gap Scores from the 22 core questions.
Texas State University LibQUAL Survey 2015 Core Survey Section IC 1-8 Information Control Ray Uzwyshyn Director, Collections and Digital Services Texas.
Library Satisfaction Survey Results Spring 2008 LibQUAL Survey Analysis User Focus Team (Sharon, Mickey, Joyce, Joan C., Paula, Edith, Mark) Sidney Silverman.
LibQual at UAB Lister Hill Library Pat Higginbottom Associate Director for Public Services
LibQUAL Survey Results Customer Satisfaction Survey Spring 2005 Sidney Silverman Library Bergen Community College Analysis and Presentation by Mark Thompson,
LibQual+ Spring 2008 results and recommendations Library Assessment Working Group 11/19/2008 Library Faculty Meeting.
Monmouth University LibQUAL Survey Results Lead to Improvements in Library Services October 31, 2007 Eleonora Dubicki
School of something FACULTY OF OTHER Leeds University Library LibQUAL+ at Leeds - one year on Pippa Jones Head of Customer Services, Leeds University Library.
TM Project web site Presented by Colleen Cook June 26, 2004 Orlando, FL ALA.
Focus on SCONUL Institutions: Cranfield University – DCMT Campus Stephen Town.
LibQUAL + ™ 2004 Data Summary An overview of the results of the LibQUAL+™ 2004 survey with comparisons to past surveys.
LibQUAL+ ® Survey Results Presented by: Martha Kyrillidou Senior Director, Statistics and Service Quality Programs Association of Research.
Our 2005 Survey Results. “….only customers judge quality; all other judgments are essentially irrelevant” Delivering Quality Service : Balancing Customer.
Listening to the Customer: Using Assessment Results to Make a Difference.
LibQual Survey. The CUC Group Resp.% Calvin College & Theological Seminary1, % Cedarville University Centennial Library % Geneva College %
Libraries at the University of Massachusetts Amherst
BY DR. M. MASOOM RAZA  AND ABDUS SAMIM
Results and Comparisons for SCONUL
International Results Meeting LibQUAL+TM
LibQUAL+® 2008 A summary of results from the Consortium of Church Libraries and Archives.
LibQUAL+ in the UK & Ireland: five years experience
What Do Users Think of Us? Mining Three Rounds of Cornell LibQUAL Data
ITHAKA S + R Faculty Survey:
Reading Radar Charts.
Organization of modern academic libraries activities
Using LibQUAL+® as a Foundation for the Library’s Support of
Using the LibQUAL+ Survey to Inform Strategic Planning
LibQual+ Survey Results 2002
Presentation transcript:

UAA/APU CONSORTIUM LIBRARY 2008 LIBQUAL RESULTS

Number of Respondents UAAAPU Undergraduate1,388 Graduate267 Faculty233 Library Staff33 Staff157 Total2,078 Undergraduate100 Graduate29 Faculty27 Library Staff1 Staff14 Total171

APU Respondents by Discipline  Highest return rates were from:  Environmental Studies  Marine Biology  Liberal Studies  Education  Outdoor Studies

UAA Respondents by Discipline  Highest return rates were from:  Health Sciences/Nursing  Social Sciences/Psychology  Business and Economics  Education

Library Use Summary  APU Library Use  UAA Library Use

Questions  21 Core Questions covering 3 dimensions  Affect of Service  Library as Place  Information Control  5 Local Questions per Institution  3 General Satisfaction Questions  5 Information Literacy Outcomes Questions

APU Radar Charts Core Questions

APU Local Questions Question TextSuperiorInadequate Using the library for researchGraduate Students Librarians teaching me how to effectively use the electronically available databases, journals, and books Faculty Convenient service hours Librarians providing help that both assists in finding the information needed now, and improves skills useful in future information searches The library collection provides information resources reflecting diverse points of view Faculty

UAA Radar Charts Core Questions

APU Radar Charts Core Questions

UAA Local Questions Question TextSuperiorInadequate Ease of use of electronic resourcesLibrary Staff Teaching me how to locate, evaluate, and use information Convenient service hours A secure and safe placeLibrary Staff Timely delivery of the articles and documents that I need Library Staff

Overall Results for Core Questions

Areas of Superior Service and Inadequate Service IDStatementUser Group LP1Library space that inspires study and learningAF LP2Quiet space for individual activitiesAF, AS LP3A comfortable and inviting locationAG LP5Community space for group learning and group study AS, LS AS6Employees who deal with users in a caring fashionAF IDStatementUser Group IC2A library website enabling me to locate information on my own AG IC3Printed material I need for my workAF IC4Electronic information resources I needAG IC7Making information accessible for independent useAF IC8Print and/or electronic journal collections I require for my work AG, AF, UG, UF, AS3Employees who are consistently courteousLS Areas of Superiority Areas of Inadequacy

General Satisfaction Questions Satisfaction QuestionAPU Mean ScoreUAA Mean Score In general, I am satisfied with the way I am treated at the library (SD 1.81) 7.63 (SD 1.46) In general, I am satisfied with library support for my learning, research, and/or teaching needs (SD 1.72) 7.30 (SD 1.58) How would you rate the overall quality of the service provided by the library? 7.34 (SD 1.48) 7.49 (SD 1.29)

Information Literacy Outcomes Questions APU Mean ScoreUAA Mean Score The library helps me stay abreast of developments in my field(s) of interest (SD 1.72) 6.36 (SD 1.79) The library aids my advancement in my academic discipline or work (SD 1.75) 6.99 (SD 1.64) The library enables me to be more efficient in my academic pursuits or work (SD 1.70) 7.10 (SD 1.63) The library helps me distinguish between trustworthy and untrustworthy information (SD 1.95) 6.53 (SD 1.83) The library provides me with the information skills I need in my work or study (SD 1.82) 6.75 (SD 1.75)

Comment Coding Affect of ServiceInformation ControlLibrary as PlaceOtherRating S1 CirculationC1 Book collectionsP1 AtmosphereO1 GeneralN Negative S2 ILL C2 E-journals, databases collectionsP2 Building/FacilitiesO2 OtherP Positive S3 Library hoursC3 Access to physical collectionsP3 Facilitates quiet study S Suggestion S4 Staff Behavior C4 Access to online collectionsP4 Safety Q Quotable S5 Reference services P5 Security S6 Classroom teaching P6 Study space S7 Online Catalog P7 Ease of Use – layout and signage S8 Computer equipment P8 Parking S9 Non-computer Equipment P9 Other Place/Env related S10 Policies S11 Website S12 Other service

Top Comment Categories General Parking Staff Behavior Ease of Use – Layout and Signage Atmosphere ILL UAAAPU General Staff Behavior Buildings/Facilities Library Hours Book Collections Study Space

Comment Text  Representative Comments for both institutions are available on pages of the LibQUAL 2008 Preliminary Results Summary.  Comment spreadsheets for both institutions are available on the library’s website under – About the Library.

Thank You  Special thanks to the following people for assisting with LibQUAL 2008  Carl Hild  Marilyn Barry  Page Brannon  Electra Enslow  Asia Bauzon  Kristi Powell  Carol Douthit  Arlene Schmuland  Steve Rollins  The Library Advisory Committee

WHERE DO WE GO FROM HERE?