Student Launch Project Flight Readiness Review April 21, 2014.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Cornell Rocketry PDR.
Advertisements

Preliminary Design Review. Rocket & Payload Schematic.
Northwestern University Space Technology and Rocketry Society (NUSTARS) NASA Student Launch Flight Readiness Review March 16, 2015.
Preliminary Design Review University of Colorado Boulder NASA Student Launch
U NIVERSITY OF F LORIDA T HE M OST I NTERESTING R OCKET IN THE W ORLD.
P RELIMINARY D ESIGN R EVIEW University of North Dakota Frozen Fury Rockety Team.
Critical Design Review NASA University Student Launch Initiative University of Nebraska–Lincoln
Student Launch Project Preliminary Design Review January 10, 2014.
Illinois Space Society Tech Team USLI CDR Presentation.
U NIVERSITY OF F LORIDA PDR P RESENTATION. O UTLINE Project Organization Vehicle Design Payload Design Recovery System Simulations Future Work.
Project Λscension. Vehicle Dimensions Weight: 19.6 Ib Length: in (9 ft. 4.5 in) Diameter: 6 in Fin Semi-Span: 6 in.
St. Vincent – St. Mary CDR Presentation NASA Student Launch Initiative.
NASA CDR Presentation Spring Grove Area High School.
St. Vincent – St. Mary FRR Presentation NASA Student Launch Initiative.
UAA Rocketry Critical Design Review Presentation.
NASA SLI 2010 Mulberry Grove High School Flight Readiness Review Measurement of UVB Radiation Absorption by Cloth Material at Different Altitudes and Measurement.
Student Launch Project Critical Design Review February 28, 2014.
Flight Readiness Review. Intimidator 5: 5” diameter, 10’ length, 47 lbs  Motor: Aerotech L1300R 4556 N-Sec of impulse  Predicted altitude 5203’- RockSim.
Critical Design Review. Intimidator 5: 5” diameter, 10’ length, 45 lbs  Motor: Aerotech L1300R 4556 N-Sec of impulse  Predicted altitude RockSim.
Flight Readiness Review Atomic Aggies. Final Launch Vehicle Dimensions Diameter 5.5” Overall length: inches Approximate Loaded Weight: lb.
Critical Design Review of “Mach Shock Reduction” Phase II January 2008 Statesville, NC.
Illinois Space Society Tech Team USLI FRR Presentation.
Rocket Based Deployable Data Network University of New Hampshire Rocket Cats Collin Huston, Brian Gray, Joe Paulo, Shane Hedlund, Sheldon McKinley, Fred.
Student Launch Project Critical Design Review February 28, 2014.
Rocket Based Deployable Data Network University of New Hampshire Rocket Cats Collin Huston, Brian Gray, Joe Paulo, Shane Hedlund, Sheldon McKinley, Fred.
 Vehicle dimensions, materials, and justifications  Static stability margin  Plan for vehicle safety verification and testing  Baseline motor selection.
Flight Readiness Review Team Hawaii. Vehicle Properties Diameter (in)6 inches Length (in)127 inches Gross Liftoff Weight (lb)50.25 lb Launch Lug/button.
3/19/09. Animal Motor Works (AMW) K475WW High Power Rocket Motor. 54 mm casing, 40.3 cm long, 2.9 seconds burn time, 1394 N-sec total impulse, and
The Rocket Men Project One Giant Leap. Final Launch Vehicle Dimensions Rocket Length in. Rocket Mass- 171 oz. Top Body Tube Length in. Bottom.
University of Arkansas Senior Project- When Pigs Soar.
The Comparative Analysis of Airflow Around a Rocket.
FRR Presentation IF AT FIRST YOU DON’T SUCCEED, TRY AGAIN… AND AGAIN AND AGAIN AND AGAIN.
Flight Readiness Review Student Launch Initiative SCS Rocket Team Statesville Christian School April 2, 2008.
The Comparative Analysis of Airflow Around a Rocket.
University of Florida Rocket Team Critical Design Review Presentation.
Critical Design Review Presentation Jan. 20, 2011.
Harvard-Westlake Rocketry Club SLI FRR.
Critical Design Review- UCF Jeremy Young Anthony Liauppa Erica Terry, Emily Sachs Kristen Brightwell Gillian Smith 1.
Atomic Aggies CDR. Final Launch Vehicle Dimensions Diameter 5.5” Overall length: inches Approximate Loaded Weight: lb.
Flight Readiness Review “Analysis of Atmospheric gamma radiation as a Function of Altitude by means of Scintillator Probe” St. Thomas High School, Houston,
Project Ares University of Central Florida NASA Student Launch 1/28/2015.
The Rocket Men Project One Giant Leap. Dimensions Rocket Length in. Rocket Mass- 171 oz. Top Body Tube Length in. Bottom Body Tube Length-
D EPARTMENT OF M ECHANICAL AND A EROSPACE E NGINEERING HIGH POWERED ROCKETRY CLUB PDR PRESENTATION 1.
Hemodynamics Star Splitters 4-H Club Two Rivers, WI Hemodynamics.
HARDING UNIVERSITY FLYING BISONS A Study of Atmospheric Properties as a Function of Altitude Flight Readiness Review.
University Student Launch Initiative Preliminary Design Review University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign Team Rocket.
NUSTA RS NASA Student Launch MAV Challenge 2016 Preliminary Design Review 6 November 2015 Northwestern University | 2145 Sheridan Road | Evanston, IL
NUSTA RS NASA Student Launch MAV Challenge 2016 Critical Design Review 15 Janurary2015 Northwestern University | 2145 Sheridan Road | Evanston, IL
January 14,  Length: inches  Diameter: 6 inches  Mass: oz. / lbs.  Span: 22 inches  Center of Gravity: inches 
FAMU PDR Presentation. Table of Contents Vehicle dimensions, materials, and justifications Static stability margin Plan for vehicle safety verification.
Critical Design Review Presentation Project Nova.
D EPARTMENT OF M ECHANICAL AND A EROSPACE E NGINEERING HIGH POWERED ROCKETRY CLUB CDR PRESENTATION 1.
Critical Design Review Presentation Alabama Rocket Engineering Systems (ARES) Team The University of Alabama.
Flight Readiness Review UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH ALABAMA CONNER DENTON, JOHN FAULK, NGHIA HUYNH, KENT LINO, PHILLIP RUSCHMYER, & ANDREW TINDELL MENTOR : RICHARD.
UCF_USLI Preliminary Design Review David Cousin Freya Ford Md Arif Drew Dieckmann Stephen Hirst Mitra Mossaddad University of Central Florida.
Project Aegis Preliminary Design Review Team Members:
Preliminary Design Review Presentation
College of Engineering
Critical Design Review Presentation
2018 First Nation Launch - Flight Readiness Review
Sounding Rocket CDR Team Name
Final Readiness Review
Mars Rover CDR Team Name
2019 First Nation Launch – FRR Virtual Review
2019 First Nation Launch – PDR Virtual Review
2019 First Nation Launch – Oral Presentation
2019 First Nation Launch – CDR Virtual Review
Plantation High SL team 1
2019 First Nation Launch – Oral Presentation
Presentation transcript:

Student Launch Project Flight Readiness Review April 21, 2014

Team Structure

Presentation Overview Final Launch Vehicle Final Motor Selection Static Stability/ Mass Margin Recovery System Full Scale Test Flight Verifications Integrated Research Payload

Final Launch Vehicle Design and Dimensions

Key Design Features Launch Vehicle Sections Voltmeter/ CubeSat, Hazard Detection, Multi-Staging Fin Style Launch Vehicle Separations Booster Section, Drogue Bay/ Detachable Bulkhead

Forward Section - CubeSat Nose Cone Voltmeter CubeSat

Avionics/Payload Section - Hazard Detection Avionics/ Payload components Hazard Detection System Drogue bay disengagement

Booster/Sustainer Section - Multi-Staging Booster section disengagement Fin Style and attachment Positive Motor Retention

Motor Description MotorBrandEngine Code DiameterLengthBurn TimeTotal Impulse Maximum Thrust MainCesaroniK Vmax 98mm in1.53s2432Ns996 N SustainerCesaroniL985TT54mm19.33 in2.7s2678 Ns1589 N

Thrust Curve of Motors

Table of Motor Events EventTime (s)Altitude (ft)Velocity (ft/s) Motor Ignites000 Main Motor Burnout Main Motor Separation Sustainer Ignites if within critical angle off of the Z-axis Sustainer Burn Out Apogee247000<20

Static Stability Margin Stability Margin Center of GravityCenter of Pressure With Booster in98.0 in Without Booster in72.8 in

Thrust-to-Weight Ratio and Rail Exit Ascent Analysis With Booster SectionWithout Booster Section Rail exit velocity (ft/s)64- Max velocity (ft/s) Max Mach number Max acceleration (ft/s 2 ) Peak altitude (ft) Thrust-to-Weight Ratio7:16:1

Mass Statement and Mass Margin SubsystemMass (lbs)Mass Limit (lbs) Propulsion (Including: motor mounts and centering rings) Structure (Including: body tube, coupling tubes, bulkheads, nose cones, fin sets) Recovery (Including: main parachute, drogue parachute, detachable components parachutes) Payload (Including: avionics bays, electrical components) Miscellaneous (Including: Paint scheme, dressings/coatings) Total

Parachute Sizes and Descent Rates ParameterDrogueMainBooster Diameter (in) Deployment Altitude (ft) Velocity at Deployment (ft/s) >2054>20 Descent Rate (ft/s) Harness Length (ft) Shroud Line Length (in)

Kinetic Energies ParachuteParachute Size Vehicle Section Mass of Section Descent Rate Kinetic Energy Booster60 inchesBooster Section 6 lbs22.6 ft/s50 ft-lbs Mini Avionics Bay 3 lbs22.6 ft/s24 ft-lbs Drogue85 inchesDrogue & Main Bay 29.5 lbs54 ft/s-- Drogue Bay 11 lbs17.5 ft/s52.6 ft-lbs Main120 inchesAvionics Bay 8 lbs15 ft/s28 ft-lbs Main Section 8.5 lbs15 ft/s30 ft-lbs

Predicted Drift from Launch Pad 0 mph5 mph10 mph15 mph20 mph 0 ft.1050ft.2284ft.3654ft.4515 ft. Predicted Altitude 0 mph5 mph10 mph15 mph20 mph 7089ft.7078ft.7043ft.6981ft.6888ft.

Test Plans and Procedures Test PurposeTest Status Full-Scale Test Flight To ensure safe stage separation and sustainer motor ignition during flight In Progress Smart Ignition Device To ensure that the sustainer ignition charge will be inhibited if the rocket off of the vertical. Completed Booster Section Separation Ground Test To ensure booster section can separate from main bay with attachment scheme Complete Airstart TestTo ensure Raven3 has appropriate output current to airstart sustainer Complete

Full Scale Flight – 1 st Test

Full Scale Flight Test Data

Recovery System Testing Test PurposeTest Status To ensure design of parachute can withstand forces Completed – Successful To determine velocity that the parachute will fly, and impact force of different rocket sections Completed – Successful To test static ejection charges of full scale parachutes Completed – Successful To demonstrate durability of bulkhead attachment scheme within the rocket. Completed – Successful

Electrical Component Testing ComponentTest PurposeTest Status Microcontrollers including the Raspberry pi and Arduinos To test functionality and programming logic Completed RockeTiltometer and Raven 3 altimeters To test functionality and accuracy Completed VoltmeterTo test functionality and accuracy Completed XBee Pro 900To test functionality and communication between systems Completed GPS units for separable sections To test functionality and accuracy Completed

Summary of Requirements Verification Launch Vehicle RequirementStatus Rocket must not fly higher than 20,000 ft. AGLComplete Rocket must carry a scientific payloadComplete Rocket must have dual altimetersComplete Rocket must have dual deploy recovery systemComplete Rocket must be reusable on the day of recoveryComplete Rocket must land within 5000 ft. of the launch pad assuming 20 mph wind Complete Students must do all critical design and fabricationComplete Team must use a launch and safety checklistComplete Rocket must use a commercially available, certified motor Complete Rocket must be capable of being prepped for launch in less than 2 h Complete Rocket must be able to remain in a launch-ready configuration for at least 1 h Complete Rocket must attain an altitude between ft.Complete Drogue parachute successfully deploys at apogee and main at 1200 ft. Complete Rocket must be compatible with a 1.5’’ launch railComplete

Key Design Features of the Payload Hazard Detection System Lateral Vibrations In line System (LVIS) Tesseract

Payload Design and Dimensions Hazard Detection/Avionics Bay

Payload Design and Dimensions LVIS MotorBrandEngine Code DiameterLengthBurn TimeTotal Impulse Maximum Thrust MainCesaroniK Vmax 98mm in1.53s2432Ns996 N SustainerCesaroniL985TT54mm19.33 in2.7s2678 Ns1589 N

Payload Design and Dimensions Designed to measure the magnitude of accumulated triboelectric charge on the surface of the nose cone at carious altitudes Time stamp all altitudes and charge measurements to assist in post flight analysis Tesseract

Tesseract Payload Overview The system can be broken down into three separate subsystems: Voltmeter CubeSat Ground Station The nose cone will be coated with MGM Chemicals 838 Total Ground Carbon Conductive Coating

Payload Integration Hazard Detection/Avionics Bay

Payload Integration LVIS Locations of Raven3 Avionics Bay Above the Sustainer Mini-Avionics Bay Raven3 diagram from manufacturer’s website Raven3 on payload sled

Payload Integration LVIS Electrical schematic of RockeTiltometer2 with Raven3 Image of RockeTiltometer2 with connections

Payload Integration Tesseract

Interfaces with Ground Systems Internal Interfaces Nose cone and payload sections All-threads Bulkhead-like centering rings Nut locks Drogue bay, avionics bay, main bay, sustainer section, booster section and mini parachute bay. #2-56 nylon shear pins (x2 for each section) External Interfaces 1515 rail buttons

Summary of Requirements Verification Payload PayloadRequirementStatus Hazard DetectionBulkhead covering camera must be detachableComplete Hazard DetectionPayload must be capable of detecting landing hazardsComplete Hazard DetectionData must be transmitted to the ground in real timeIncomplete LVISMotor staging must perform properlyComplete LVISPayload must record lateral vibrations in the airframeComplete LVISData must be recoverableComplete TesseractPayload must be able to record a potential differenceComplete TesseractPayload must record altitudeComplete TesseractData must be stored and recoverableComplete

Questions?