The Need to Justify Our Actions Chapter 6 The Need to Justify Our Actions

Chapter Outline I. Maintaining a Stable, Positive Self-Image

Maintaining a Stable, Positive Self-Image One of the most powerful determinants of human behavior is the need to preserve a stable, positive self-concept.

Maintaining a Stable, Positive Self-Image The Theory of Cognitive Dissonance Leon Festinger originated the concept of cognitive dissonance, defining it as inconsistency between two thoughts. Cognitive dissonance may arise when a person engages in an act that is discrepant from one’s self-concept.

Maintaining a Stable, Positive Self-Image The Theory of Cognitive Dissonance Cognitive dissonance is the feeling of discomfort caused by information that is discrepant from your customary, typically positive, self-concept. Experiencing dissonance motivates an attempt to reduce it.

Maintaining a Stable, Positive Self-Image The Theory of Cognitive Dissonance

Maintaining a Stable, Positive Self-Image Rational Behavior Versus Rationalizing Behavior The need to reduce dissonance and maintain self-esteem produces thinking that is rationalizing rather than rational.

Maintaining a Stable, Positive Self-Image Decisions, Decisions, Decisions Postdecision dissonance is aroused after we make any important decision; it is reduced by enhancing the attractiveness of the chosen alternative and devaluating the rejected alternative.

Maintaining a Stable, Positive Self-Image Decisions, Decisions, Decisions One way to engage in postdecision dissonance reduction is to proselytize, recommending your decision/behavior to others.

Maintaining a Stable, Positive Self-Image Decisions, Decisions, Decisions The more permanent a decision, the greater the need to reduce dissonance after making it. Feeling that one’s decision is irrevocable may lead to falling prey to a sales technique called lowballing. Lowballing makes the customer feel compelled to pay a higher price for an item after first agreeing to pay a much lower price.

Maintaining a Stable, Positive Self-Image Decisions, Decisions, Decisions Dissonance reduction following a difficult moral decision can cause people to behave either more or less ethically in the future, because people’s attitudes will polarize in the attempt to justify the ethical choice they made.

Maintaining a Stable, Positive Self-Image Justify Your Effort What happens when a person voluntarily works hard and the goal doesn’t seem worth it after all? People are unlikely to change their self-concept to believe they were unskilled or foolish; instead they change their attitude towards the goal and see it positively. This is called the justification of effort.

Maintaining a Stable, Positive Self-Image Justify Your Effort

Maintaining a Stable, Positive Self-Image The Psychology of Insufficient Justification When people attempt to reduce their dissonance by changing something about themselves, for example their attitudes, they are using internal justification. When people attempt to explain their dissonant behaviors by focusing on reasons that reside outside of themselves, for example being paid a large sum of money, they are using external justification.

Maintaining a Stable, Positive Self-Image The Psychology of Insufficient Justification Counterattitudinal advocacy is the process by which people are induced to state publicly an attitude that runs counter to their own attitude. If there is no external justification for counterattitudinal advocacy, a person’s attitude may change in accordance with the view that was expressed publicly.

Maintaining a Stable, Positive Self-Image Counterattitudinal Advocacy, Race Relations, and Preventing AIDS Harsh punishments teach us to try to avoid getting caught, and thus require constant vigilance to be effective. In contrast, insufficient punishment induces dissonance about why one is not engaging in the behavior, and inspires dissonance reduction by devaluing the forbidden activity or object.

Maintaining a Stable, Positive Self-Image Counterattitudinal Advocacy, Race Relations, and Preventing AIDS When attitude change occurs due to insufficient reward or punishment, it becomes very enduring. Both insufficient punishment and insufficient justification lead to self-persuasion, a long-term form of attitude change that results from attempts at self-justification.

Maintaining a Stable, Positive Self-Image Counterattitudinal Advocacy, Race Relations, and Preventing AIDS

Maintaining a Stable, Positive Self-Image Counterattitudinal Advocacy, Race Relations, and Preventing AIDS

Maintaining a Stable, Positive Self-Image Counterattitudinal Advocacy, Race Relations, and Preventing AIDS Insufficient external justification is justification that is sufficient to produce the behavior, but insufficient for people to believe that they were “forced” through external justifications to do it.

Maintaining a Stable, Positive Self-Image Good and Bad Deeds Dissonance theory and folk wisdom suggest that we like people not for the favors they have done us but for the favors we have done for them.

Maintaining a Stable, Positive Self-Image Good and Bad Deeds If we harm someone, this induces dissonance between our actions and our self-concepts as decent people; to resolve this dissonance, we may derogate or dehumanize our victims.

Maintaining a Stable, Positive Self-Image Good and Bad Deeds We are more likely to derogate people we have harmed if they are innocent victims. Derogating victims by dehumanizing them may lead to a continuation or escalation of violence against them.

CONNECTIONS

Chapter Outline II. Variations on the Theme of Self-Justification

Variations on the Theme of Self-Justification The basic premise of cognitive dissonance theory is that people have a fundamental need to maintain a stable and positive sense of self.

Variations on the Theme of Self-Justification Self-Discrepancy Theory Self-discrepancy theory holds that people are motivated to maintain a sense of consistency among their beliefs and perceptions of themselves, and become distressed when there is a discrepancy between the “actual self” and an “ideal” or “ought” self.

Variations on the Theme of Self-Justification Maintaining our Self-Image Self-evaluation maintenance theory holds that one’s self-concept can be threatened by another individual’s behavior, and that the level of threat is determined by both the closeness of the other individual and the personal relevance of the behavior.

Variations on the Theme of Self-Justification Maintaining our Self-Image Dissonance arising when a friend outperforms oneself in a cherished domain can be resolved by (1) distancing oneself from the friend; (2) changing how relevant the domain is to one’s self-definition; or (3) improving one’s performance to outshine the friend’s performance.

Variations on the Theme of Self-Justification Self-Affirmation Theory Self-affirmation theory suggests that people will reduce the impact of a dissonance arousing threat to their self-concept by focusing on and affirming their competence on some dimension unrelated to the threat.

Chapter Outline III. Why Would Anyone Want to Maintain a Poor Self-Image?

Why Would Anyone Want to Maintain a Poor Self-Image? Confirming Our Self-Concept or Enhancing It? Self-verification theory is a theory suggesting that people have a need to seek confirmation of their self-concept, whether the self-concept is positive or negative.

Chapter Outline IV. Some Final Thoughts on Dissonance: Learning from our Mistakes

Some Final Thoughts on Dissonance The rationalization trap is the potential for dissonance reduction to produce a succession of self-justifications that can ultimately result in a chain of unintelligent or immoral actions.

Chapter Outline V. Heaven’s Gate Revisited

Heaven’s Gate Revisited Making an important decision and investing heavily in that decision can evoke a high degree of cognitive dissonance and a strong need to justify behavior. One of the most powerful forces influencing the members of the Heaven’s Gate cult was the great amount of cognitive dissonance they experienced.