Doc.: IEEE 802.19-10/0104r0 Submission July 2010 Alex Reznik, et. al. (InterDigital)Slide 1 Channel Selection Support in TVWS Date: 2010-07-14 Authors:

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Doc.: IEEE /0046r0 Submission July 2009 Ari Ahtiainen, NokiaSlide 1 A Cooperation Mechanism for Coexistence between Secondary User Networks on.
Advertisements

Doc.: IEEE /0165r1 SubmissionPäivi Ruuska, NokiaSlide 1 Implementation aspects of a coexistence system Notice: This document has been.
Doc.: IEEE /0040r0 Submission April 2011 Miika Laaksonen, NokiaSlide 1 Coexistence Discovery Procedures Notice: This document has been prepared.
Submission doc.: IEEE /0010r0 January 2015 Sho Furuichi, SonySlide 1 Coexistence Scenario and Use Cases Date: Authors: Notice: This.
Submission doc.: IEEE /XXXXr0 Month Year John Doe, Some CompanySlide 1 Insert Presentation Title Here Date: YYYY-MM-DD Authors: Notice: This document.
Submission doc.: IEEE /0032r0 April 2015 Sho Furuichi, SonySlide 1 The new coexistence use cases for IEEE Date: Authors: Notice:
Doc.: IEEE SubmissionSlide 1 Expectation for IEEE P system from a primary protection viewpoint Notice: This document has.
Doc.: IEEE /160r0 SubmissionSlide 1 Output power management for TVWS network coexistence Notice: This document has been prepared to assist IEEE.
Doc.: IEEE /0262r1 Submission March 2010 Ha-Nguyen Tran et al., NICTSlide 1 Requirements and Amendment Regarding TVWS Database Access Notice:
Doc.: IEEE /0164r0 SubmissionSlide Protocols Notice: This document has been prepared to assist IEEE It is offered as a basis.
Doc.: IEEE /0024r0 Submission May 2006 Steve Shellhammer, QualcommSlide 1 Discussion of Coexistence Scenarios Notice: This document has been prepared.
Doc.: IEEE /0287r0 Submission March 2011 Slide 1Hyunduk Kang, et al, ETRI Overview and Issues Notice: This document has been prepared.
Doc.: IEEE /0132r0 Submission November 2011 Yunjung Yi, LGESlide 1 Comment Resolutions (CID 40, 43, 44) Notice: This document has been prepared.
Doc.: IEEE /0040r1 Submission May 2011 Miika Laaksonen, NokiaSlide 1 Coexistence Discovery Procedures Notice: This document has been prepared.
Doc.: IEEE /0002r1 Submission January 2011 Päivi Ruuska, NokiaSlide 1 Neighbor Setting Procedures Notice: This document has been prepared to assist.
Doc.: IEEE /161r0 SubmissionSlide 1 Resource management for TVWS network coexistence Notice: This document has been prepared to assist IEEE
Doc.: IEEE /0074r2 Submission May 2010 Tuncer Baykas, NICTSlide TG1 Introduction and Status Notice: This document has been prepared to.
Submission doc.: IEEE /0097r0 November 2015 Sho Furuichi, SonySlide 1 Information exchange between independent IEEE systems Date: xx.
Doc.: IEEE /0340r0 Submission April 2005 Marianna Goldhammer, AlvarionSlide 1 CBP-SG Contention Based Protocol and QoS Notice: This document.
Doc.: IEEE /0261r0 SubmissionSlide 1 Enabling Procedure of Communication in TVWS under FCC rules Notice: This document has been prepared to assist.
Submission doc.: IEEE /0011r2 January 2016 Sho Furuichi, SonySlide 1 System architecture for information exchange between independent IEEE
Doc.: IEEE /41r0 SubmissionSlide 1 P System Architecture Notice: This document has been prepared to assist IEEE It is offered.
Doc.: IEEE /20rev0 SubmissionSlide 1 P Assumptions and Architecture Notice: This document has been prepared to assist IEEE It.
Doc.: IEEE /0013r0 Submission January 2012 Mika Kasslin, NokiaSlide 1 Motivation for Monitor WSO Notice: This document has been prepared to assist.
Submission doc.: IEEE /0021r1 Janurary 2016 Chen SUN, SonySlide 1 Application scenario and text change proposal for coexistence management considering.
Doc.: IEEE /129r0 Submission September 2010 Junho Jo/Jihyun Lee, LG ElectronicsSlide 1 IEEE System description Notice: This document.
Submission doc.: IEEE /0015r0 January 2016 Sho Furuichi, SonySlide 1 Proposal for CM discovery/selection/ association as CE operation Date:
Submission doc.: IEEE /0017r0 January 2016 Sho Furuichi, SonySlide 1 Proposal on proxy coexistence service for moving WSO Date: Authors:
Doc.: IEEE /0034r3 Submission June 2009 Haiguang Wang, Shulan Feng, Jinnan LiuSlide 1 Media Independent Coexistence for Devices in TV White Spaces.
Doc.: IEEE /0037r0 Submission February 2010 Joe Kwak (InterDigital)Slide 1 TVWS Architecture for SDD Date: Authors: Notice: This document.
Doc.: IEEE −11−0506−00−004j TG4j Submission May 2011 Liang Li (Vinno)Slide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks.
Doc.: IEEE /0098r0 Submission July 2010 Alex Reznik, et. al. (InterDigital)Slide Security Procedures Notice: This document has been.
Doc.: IEEE /0019r0 Submission February 2010 Mika Kasslin, NokiaSlide 1 High Level Architecture View Notice: This document has been prepared to.
Doc.: IEEE /0013r0 Submission January 2010 Mika Kasslin, NokiaSlide 1 Coexistence architecture of Notice: This document has been prepared.
Doc.: IEEE /0085r1 Submission June 2010 Tuncer Baykas, NICTSlide TG1 and System Design Document Notice: This document has been prepared.
Doc.: IEEE m Submission ETRI July 2012 Slide 1 Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs) Submission.
Submission doc.: IEEE /0052r1 March 2016 Sho Furuichi, SonySlide 1 Supplemental document for text proposal on amendment to entity operations Date:
Doc.: IEEE /0162r0 Submission November 2010 Jihyun Lee, LG ElectronicsSlide 1 TVWS Coexistence Procedures and Protocols Notice: This document.
Submission Title: [Proposal for MAC Peering Procedure]
November 2005 doc.: IEEE /1051r0 09/06/2018
TG1 Introduction and Status
doc.: IEEE <doc#>
Proposal on system description, reference model and draft outline
TG1 Tutorial Review Date: Authors: May 2010 May 2010
Reference Model Proposal
Coexistence Mechanism
P System Architecture Date: Authors: March 2010
<May,2009> doc.: IEEE <doc .....> <July 2009>
Resource allocation principles for coexistence system
July Tutorial – Possible Solutions
PAR Comments Date: Authors: July 2010 May 2010
TG1 Introduction and Status
Submission Title: [Proposal for MAC Peering Procedure]
P System Architecture Date: Authors: March 2010
TG1 Tutorial Review Date: Authors: May 2010 May 2010
Updates to the Draft Authors:
Concept of Operation Date: Authors: July 2010
TG1 and System Design Document
doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 Month Year May 2016
Examples of deployment scenarios
July Tutorial – Possible Solutions
Logical Entities Date: Authors: September 2010
Requirements Date: Authors: March 2010 Month Year
P System Architecture Date: Authors: March 2010
Coexistence Decision Making Topologies
P System Architecture Date: Authors: March 2010
List of Remaining Proposals for Downselection
Enabling Procedure of Communication in TVWS under FCC rules
Month Year doc.: IEEE yy/xxxxr0 August 2019
Presentation transcript:

doc.: IEEE /0104r0 Submission July 2010 Alex Reznik, et. al. (InterDigital)Slide 1 Channel Selection Support in TVWS Date: Authors: Notice: This document has been prepared to assist IEEE It is offered as a basis for discussion and is not binding on the contributing individual(s) or organization(s). The material in this document is subject to change in form and content after further study. The contributor(s) reserve(s) the right to add, amend or withdraw material contained herein.

doc.: IEEE /0104r0 Submission Abstract TVWS Network has flexibility in selecting both operating channels and operating bandwidth –Network must use only unoccupied channels –Can group adjacent unoccupied channels to create a single wider BW channel This creates a coexistence problem –Channel selection process may make it easier – or harder – for other networks to gain access to higher BW channels Coexistence algorithms for channel selection/re- selection can alleviate this problem –Demonstrate how this is done using a typical architecture July 2010 Alex Reznik, et. al. (InterDigital)Slide 2

doc.: IEEE /0104r0 Submission Channel Selection Problem Example of Initial Channel Selection Problem –8 TV channels create 48 MHz of available TVWS frequency –An (with af) system selects the middle 4 channel and initiates 20 MHz operation –No other 20 MHz operation is possible (Channel Wastage) This problem may also occur if a network manager (AP, BS, etc) vacates a channel, potentially creating an unusable fragment (illustrated in a later slide) July 2010 Alex Reznik, et. al. (InterDigital)Slide 3

doc.: IEEE /0104r0 Submission Solution Outline Basic Idea –Select a center frequency as close to the edge (as far from center) of a continuous frequency band as possible as shown below: For the example considered, this opens up enough spectrum for another network operating on 20MHz bandwidth July 2010 Alex Reznik, et. al. (InterDigital)Slide 4 When ? –Initial Channel Selection –After becoming aware of the “channel wastage” problem anytime during the operation Make necessary allowances for adjacent TV broadcasts

doc.: IEEE /0104r0 Submission Example Architecture July 2010 Alex Reznik, et. al. (InterDigital)Slide 5

doc.: IEEE /0104r0 Submission Selection Procedure Available TV Channels –Query the TV White Space (TVWS) Database to get the list of available channels –The network manager (AP, BS etc) will select the bandwidth from the list –The operating bandwidth should be selected such that spectrum is not wasted as shown in slide 4. –To optimize the spectrum, the network manager needs to collect information about other networks that are present in TVWS and their operating channel Network Manager may find/acquire information about other networks through: –Sensing (if available) –Checking the CDIS for nearby TVBDs –Polling other CMs July 2010 Alex Reznik, et. al. (InterDigital)Slide 6

doc.: IEEE /0104r0 Submission Channel is available within a requested area IF –Channel is cleared for use by the Regulatory TVWS DB (at the desired power) for all points within the requested area –Channel is currently known to have acceptable “interference levels:” Transmission from neighboring devices will not cause harmful interference to any receiver within this area Transmission at desired power from transmitters anywhere within this area will not cause harmful interference to any known neighboring receiver –Sensed interference sources do not cause harmful interference to any receiver within this area What is a “requested area” –Location –Resolution/radius –Available channel is defined only w.r.t a specific “requested area” What is an “Available” Channel July 2010 Alex Reznik, et. al. (InterDigital)Slide 7

doc.: IEEE /0104r0 Submission Channel Assignment Process The coexistence manager (CM) will manage the channel assignment CM will make sure that the channels are assigned such that the bandwidth is optimized Interface B3 might be used by the CM to learn about the operating channels of APs/BSs under other CM’s This will help all the CMs to obtain a complete picture of the TV white space spectrum and optimize the spectrum if the “channel wastage” problem occurs –Example on the following slide July 2010 Alex Reznik, et. al. (InterDigital)Slide 8

doc.: IEEE /0104r0 Submission Example of operation 3 network managers (APs) operating as shown in the figure Suppose AP2 ceases to operate –Creates the “wastage problem” Solution: –CM 1 informs CM 2 via interface B3 –CM 2 sends channel change request to AP3 –AP3 replies back with channel change response Message exchange is shown in the figure: –1 : Wastage indication –2 : Channel change request –3 : Channel change response –4: Channel change indication July 2010 Alex Reznik, et. al. (InterDigital)Slide 9

doc.: IEEE /0104r0 Submission Some devices might not be able to move to the edge of the White Space spectrum due to the transmit limit when operating adjacent to a TV Broadcast Channel In this case the network should try to leave some vacant space (if possible) for some low transmit power network and then establish its network e.g. should establish its network after leaving an open spectrum for 20MHz July 2010 Slide 10Alex Reznik, et. al. (InterDigital) Adjacent TV Channel Constraint

doc.: IEEE /0104r0 Submission B2/3 Interfaces Protocol Messaging Major questions –How is channel availability information disseminated? –How does CM request that others change channels if needed A possible approach –CM/CDIS broadcast what they know about channel availability –CMs can subscribe to such broadcasts and/or request specific reports –CMs can request that a channel be freed up Response is simply an updated channel usage report back to CM Protocol success/failure –Assumes no ability to force all networks to move –Add-on of “move commands” is helpful, but does not completely solve the problem as the command would only apply to compliant networks –THEREFORE – whether a Free-Up request generated a fully successful response from all involved is best established by measurement – does a channel appear free after a request July 2010 Alex Reznik, et. al. (InterDigital)Slide 11

doc.: IEEE /0104r0 Submission Conclusions and Next Steps Introduced channel selection and assignment as an important coexistence mechanism –Defined the notion of “available” channels –Defined an algorithm for selecting a channel from among the available channels Open items –Need to address the possibility of sharing channels that are not available but are “lightly loaded” Next steps –Discussion by the group and agreement on the need and specifics of the proposed mechanism –Work out the details and develop normative text July 2010 Alex Reznik, et. al. (InterDigital)Slide 12