D Q 19 March. 2008LSC-Virgo meeting1 Status of Data Quality in Virgo D. Verkindt, LAPP-CNRS on behalf of the Virgo DQ team (M. Bizouard, L. Bosi, S. Chatterji,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 S5 Environmental Disturbances: August ‘06 Robert Schofield, U of O Erik Katsavounidis (MIT), Laura Cadonati (MIT), Michele Zanolin (MIT), Dennis Ugolini.
Advertisements

S3/S4 BBH report Thomas Cokelaer LSC Meeting, Boston, 3-4 June 2006.
For the Collaboration GWDAW 2005 Status of inspiral search in C6 and C7 Virgo data Frédérique MARION.
GWDAW 16/12/2004 Inspiral analysis of the Virgo commissioning run 4 Leone B. Bosi VIRGO coalescing binaries group on behalf of the VIRGO collaboration.
GWDAW, Dec 2003 Shawhan, Christensen, Gonzalez1 LIGO Inspiral Veto Studies Peter Shawhan (LIGO Lab / Caltech) Nelson Christensen (Carleton College) Gabriela.
G Z 1 Block-Normal, Event Display and Q-scan Based Glitch and Veto Studies Shantanu Desai for Penn. State Burst Group And Glitch Working Group.
LIGO- G Z March 22, 2006March 2006 LSC Meeting - DetChar 1 S5 Spectral Line Catalogue Status Keith Thorne (PSU) for the Spectral Line Catalogue.
S5 Data Quality Investigation Status John Zweizig LIGO/Caltech LSC/Virgo DetChar Session Baton Rouge, March 21, 2007.
Veto Analysis Marina Del Prete Corso di Dottorato dell’ Universita’ di Siena It is a gravewave? Or did something locally create this ? Seismometer Dark.
Stefan Hild 1LSC/Virgo meeting, Baton Rouge, March 2007 Method for a safe statistical veto using IFO channels Stefan Hild (AEI Hannover) LSC/Virgo meeting,
VSR1 summary - post VSR1 Commissioning plans E. Tournefier (LAPP-CNRS) LSC-Virgo meeting Oct 22 nd, 2007.
Glitch Group S5 Activities LSC LSU, Baton Rouge August 15, 2006 G Z L. Blackburn, L. Cadonati, S. Chatterji, J. Dalrymple, S. Desai,
Detector Characterization in GEO 600 by Alicia M. Sintes-Olives on behalf of the GEO-DC team Universitat de les Illes Balears
Max-Planck-Institut für Gravitationsphysik (Albert-Einstein-Institut) Institut für Atom- und Molekülphysik Detector Characterization of GEO 600 during.
Status of Virgo Gabriele Vajente INFN Pisa and Scuola Normale Superiore di Pisa On behalf of the Virgo Collaboration 11 th Gravitational Wave Data Analysis.
LIGO-G Z Detector characterization for LIGO burst searches Shourov K. Chatterji for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration 10 th Gravitational Wave.
LIGO-G Z Detector Characterization SummaryK. Riles - University of Michigan 1 Summary of Detector Characterization Sessions Keith Riles (University.
Virgo Commissioning update Gabriele Vajente for the Virgo Collaboration LSC/VIRGO Meeting – MIT 2007, July LIGO-G Z.
3 May 2011 VESF DA schoolD. Verkindt 1 Didier Verkindt Virgo-LAPP CNRS - Université de Savoie VESF Data Analysis School Data Quality and vetos.
LIGO- G Z 03/23/2005LSC Meeting March BlockNormal Near-Online S4 Burst Analysis Keith Thorne Penn State University Relativity Group (Shantanu.
Adapting matched filtering searches for compact binary inspirals in LSC detector data. Chad Hanna – For the LIGO Scientific Collaboration.
LIGO-G Z Detector Characterization SummaryK. Riles - University of Michigan 1 Summary of Detector Characterization Sessions Keith Riles (University.
Data Quality Vetoes in LIGO S5 Searches for Gravitational Wave Transients Laura Cadonati (MIT) For the LIGO Scientific Collaboration LIGO-G Z.
1 Data quality and veto studies for the S4 burst search: Where do we stand? Alessandra Di Credico Syracuse University LSC Meeting, Ann Arbor (UM) June.
The Analysis of Binary Inspiral Signals in LIGO Data Jun-Qi Guo Sept.25, 2007 Department of Physics and Astronomy The University of Mississippi LIGO Scientific.
Glitch Group S5 Activities Laura Cadonati for the Glitch Working Group LSC meeting, Hanford March 21, 2006 G Z.
GRBs & VIRGO C7 run Alessandra Corsi & E. Cuoco, F. Ricci.
LIGO-G Z April 2006 APS meeting Igor Yakushin (LLO, Caltech) Search for Gravitational Wave Bursts in LIGO’s S5 run Igor Yakushin (LLO, Caltech)
GWDAW11, Postdam 18th-21th December 2006 E. Cuoco, on behalf of Virgo collaboration 1 “Data quality studies for burst analysis of Virgo data acquired during.
LSC glitch group report Shourov K. Chatterji for the LSC glitch group LSC/Virgo meeting 2007 October 24 Hannover, Germany LIGO-G Z.
1 Hierarchical glitch classification analysis. Soma Mukherjee CGWA, UTB LSC/Virgo Det Char, Baton Rouge, March 21, 2007 LIGO-G
Status of coalescing binaries search activities in Virgo GWDAW 11 Status of coalescing binaries search activities in Virgo GWDAW Dec 2006 Leone.
Franco Carbognani, EGO LSC-Virgo Meeting May 2007 Status and Plans LIGO-G Z Software Management.
1 LESSONS FROM VIRGO+ May 17th 2010 E. Calloni for the Virgo collaboration.
Searching for Gravitational Waves from Binary Inspirals with LIGO Duncan Brown University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration.
D Q 20 Oct. 2007Quality flags, D.Verkindt1 Quality flags in Virgo Data Base D. Verkindt, LAPP On behalf of the Virgo « data quality task force »
HACR at Virgo: implementation and results Gabriele Vajente 12 th ILIAS WG1 meeting Geneva, March 29 th -30 th 2007.
S5 BNS Inspiral Update Duncan Brown Caltech LIGO-G Z.
1 Status of Search for Compact Binary Coalescences During LIGO’s Fifth Science Run Drew Keppel 1 for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration 1 California Institute.
Martin Hewitson and the GEO team Measuring gravitational waves with GEO600.
Gabriele Vajente ILIAS WG1 meeting - Frascati Noise Analysis Tools at Virgo.
Joshua Smith, Elba, Italy Elba, Italy Joshua Smith for the GEO 600 team Picture of GEO in stormy weather?? Or pics of tractors with.
May 29, 2006 GWADW, Elba, May 27 - June 21 LIGO-G0200XX-00-M Data Quality Monitoring at LIGO John Zweizig LIGO / Caltech.
Status of Virgo GWDAW12 Status of Virgo GWDAW Dec Leone B. Bosi INFN and University of Perugia (Italy) On behalf of the Virgo Collaboration.
LIGO-G Z Detector Characterization SummaryK. Riles - University of Michigan 1 Summary of Detector Characterization Sessions Keith Riles (University.
Results From the Low Threshold, Early S5, All-Sky Burst Search Laura Cadonati for the Burst Group LSC MIT November 5, 2006 G Z.
LSC meeting – Mar05 Livingston, LA A. Di Credico Syracuse University Glitch investigations with kleineWelle Reporting on work done by several people: L.
GWDAW91Thursday, December 16 First Comparison Between LIGO &Virgo Inspiral Search Pipelines F. Beauville on behalf of the LIGO-Virgo Joint Working Group.
S.Klimenko, LSC, Marcht 2005, G Z BurstMon diagnostic of detector noise during S4 run S.Klimenko University of Florida l burstMon FOMs l S4 run.
LIGO-G050197LSC Collab. Mtg, LHO, August 16,20051 S4 Data Quality & S5 Preview John Zweizig LIGO/Caltech.
Sensitivity of Virgo E. Tournefier (LAPP-CNRS) LSC-Virgo week May 23 rd,2007 LIGO-G Z.
Igor Yakushin, December 2004, GWDAW-9 LIGO-G Z Status of the untriggered burst search in S3 LIGO data Igor Yakushin (LIGO Livingston Observatory)
3/21/2007 LIGO-G Z S5 Data Quality Investigation Status John Zweizig LIGO/Caltech LSC/Virgo DetChar Session MIT, July 25, 2007.
November, 2009 STAC - Data Analysis Report 1 Data Analysis report November, 2009 Gianluca M Guidi Università di Urbino and INFN Firenze for the Virgo Collaboration.
1 Detector Monitoring requirements ( V.Dattilo for the EGO Operations Group ) ( with the collaboration of S.Braccini)  Short history  Current status.
Searching the LIGO data for coincidences with Gamma Ray Bursts Alexander Dietz Louisiana State University for the LIGO Scientific Collaboration LIGO-G Z.
Edwige Tournefier for the Virgo Collaboration The status of Virgo.
LIGO-G05????-00-Z Detector characterization for LIGO burst searches Shourov K. Chatterji For the LIGO Scientific Collaboration 10 th Gravitational Wave.
Data Analysis report November, 2009 Gianluca M Guidi
Inspiral Glitch Veto Studies
Back-scattered light noise in Virgo 2nd Science Run data
Advanced Virgo Detector Monitoring and Data Quality
Methods and Milestones
S5 First Epoch BNS & BBH Inspiral Update
Status of Virgo GWDAW Dec 13-16
LIGO S6 Detector Characterization Studies
LIGO Scientific Collaboration meeting
S2/S3 Glitch Investigation Update
Burst Figure of Merit Julien Sylvestre LSC Meeting, March 2004
John Zweizig LIGO/Caltech
Presentation transcript:

D Q 19 March. 2008LSC-Virgo meeting1 Status of Data Quality in Virgo D. Verkindt, LAPP-CNRS on behalf of the Virgo DQ team (M. Bizouard, L. Bosi, S. Chatterji, E. Cuoco, G. Guidi, P. Hello, G. Hemming, N. Leroy, F. Marion, D. Verkindt)

D Q 19 March. 2008LSC-Virgo meeting2 DQ flags currently available DQ lists for data analysis Current tools (to download and combine DQ flags) Ongoing activities and next steps

D Q 19 March. 2008LSC-Virgo meeting3 Virgo Data Base Main repository of the DQ flags: VDB (a MySQL database developed by L. Bosi)

D Q 19 March. 2008LSC-Virgo meeting4 Current DQ flags

D Q 19 March. 2008LSC-Virgo meeting5 Category 1: –V1:DARKF_MISS –V1:HREC_MISS_VH1 * –V1:RAWFRAME_MISS –V1:PRE_LOCKLOSS_10S –V1:INJECTIONS –V1:GC_MISFUNCTIONING –V1:LOCK_UNLOCKED –V1:MAINTENANCE Category 2: –V1:COIL_NEWE_SAT –V1:SSFS_CORR_SAT –V1:MISSAMPLES –V1:POWER_STAB_OFF –V1:EARTHQUAKE –V1:GROUND_50HZ –V1:FRAMEH_QUALITY12_VH1* –V1:HREC_BADQUALITY_VH1 * Stable DQ flags *: depends on the h(t) processing version Thus, name contains the h(t) version number VH1 Missing “GW” channels Severe misfunctioning Overflow and ITF control problems Environmental problem h(t) quality

D Q 19 March. 2008LSC-Virgo meeting6 Quality flags information

D Q 19 March. 2008LSC-Virgo meeting7 Example of DQ flag : GROUND_50Hz Use Q triggers on MABDCEXX, MABDNEXX, MABDWEXX XX=01,02,03 Set high threshold (well above the usual magnetometers glitching level) Coincidence between at least 2 different buildings OR of coincidences  ~100 events for VSR1  dead time: % Exemple: July 15-21th Effect on the burst Q online triggers Some dark fringe glitches are in coincidence with strong glitches in magnetic probes at 50Hz simultaneoulsy in all buildings (CE, NE and WE). 50 Hz ground issues?

D Q 19 March. 2008LSC-Virgo meeting8 DQ lists for analysis Burst and inspiral groups are studying vetos and DQ flags. They decide which flags are interesting, which time window need to be applied around each segment and which DQ lists suit their analysis. - For each analysis, information is provided through a web page:  containing list of DQ flags of each category used for this analysis  pointing to combined lists of those flags  updated each time a stable DQ flag is added or modified in VDB

D Q 19 March. 2008LSC-Virgo meeting9 DQ lists for Bursts

D Q 19 March. 2008LSC-Virgo meeting10 DQ lists for Bursts

D Q 19 March. 2008LSC-Virgo meeting11 DQ combined list from web UI

D Q 19 March. 2008LSC-Virgo meeting12 DQ list for Bursts

D Q 19 March. 2008LSC-Virgo meeting13 DQ combined list from ASCII file

D Q 19 March. 2008LSC-Virgo meeting14 Example of study using DQ combined list Studies on burst Q online triggers (M. Bizouard) Generate Cat 1 + Cat 2 combined DQ list and apply it to burst Q triggers to see what remains at high SNR JulyAugust few remaining very high SNR …. under study Same thing done with PC and inspiral triggers …

D Q 19 March. 2008LSC-Virgo meeting15 Current DQ tools A web interface to VDB :

D Q 19 March. 2008LSC-Virgo meeting16 Current DQ tools A nice feature of this web interface : list of DQ flags concerned by a given time period

D Q 19 March. 2008LSC-Virgo meeting17 Current DQ tools A C++ toolkit : VDBtk_segments (package VDB v0r4p2 can be retrieved from Virgo CVS repository) - To download or upload DQ segments lists - To combine DQ segments lists - To compute deadtimes Example: to download a combined list of segments VDBtk_segments -expr ‘V1:DARKF_MISS{0,0}+V1:MAINTENANCE{0,0}’ -omode idlTC

D Q 19 March. 2008LSC-Virgo meeting18 On going activities  Turn into DQ flag the “BMS” event by event vetoes developed for burst & inspiral  Understand periods with a higher events rate at high SNR (environmental disturbance? low frequency noise upconversion?)  Turn into a DQ flag the vetos on “dust events” developed using the quadrature signal (Pr_B1_ACq) ?  Turn into DQ flag seismic events (glitches < 1s) seen in the seismic probes?  Produce DQ flags using the information provided by the Online Detector Monitoring system

D Q 19 March. 2008LSC-Virgo meeting19 BMS events BMS = Beam Monitoring system Misfunctioning of one of the 4 piezos  input beam jitters and glitches on the dark fringe signal around ~200Hz Problem discovered in June and fixed in July 18 th. Beginning of VSR1 is strongly affected Short events <100 ms Event by event vetoes developed by P. Hello (burst) and G. Guidi (inspiral) May turn them into a DQ flag

D Q 19 March. 2008LSC-Virgo meeting20 Noisy periods to be understood 5 -6 july july 2007 Triggers from Q online

D Q 19 March. 2008LSC-Virgo meeting21 On going activities  Turn into DQ flag the “BMS” event by event vetoes developed for burst & inspiral  Understand periods with a higher events rate at high SNR (environmental disturbance? low frequency noise upconversion?)  Turn into a DQ flag the vetos on “dust events” developed using the quadrature signal (Pr_B1_ACq) ?  Turn into DQ flag seismic events (glitches < 1s) seen in the seismic probes?  Produce DQ flags using the information provided by the Online Detector Monitoring system

D Q 19 March. 2008LSC-Virgo meeting22 Next steps - Official release of stable DQ flags (this week) - Continue to improve the access tools (VDB web interface and VDBtk_segments) - Check of “unstable” DQ flags  EOL_QRATE, LC_FAILURE, LC_FAILURE_NI, LC_FAILURE_WI, B5_SAT - Investigate new DQ flags for category 2 and 3 - Finalize the “Burst DQ list” and “Inspiral DQ list” web pages - Continue to exchange information with LSC about DQ flags repositories and tools (already help from S. Chatterji and discussions between L. Bosi and D. Brown) - Finalize automatization (real time upload of some segments lists like ScienceMode, Injections…)

D Q 19 March. 2008LSC-Virgo meeting23 More information – More people - Weekly telecon on Thursday at 4pm (CET). - Need to increase the DQ team: people from data analysis groups and from Virgo commissioning are welcome! - Expertise from LSC is also very welcome! For more information: