Chris Borgmeier, Dave McKay, Anne Todd, Celeste Dickey, Rob Horner October
Clarify evaluation questions for effective decision making around discipline and school climate Define critical features for organizing the data Define data sources needed ◦ Pbseval for discipline, SIS for achievement & attendance Define the cycles and timelines for data collection and reporting
Guide Decision Making ◦ Plan ◦ Progress monitor ◦ Inform Change/Need Visibility/Support FUNDING Celebrate accomplishments
How many schools are adopting PBIS? ◦ What percentage of schools in state, region/district? SET, TIC, BoQ How many schools are implementing SWPBIS at criteria? SET, TIC, BoQ Are schools implementing SWPBIS perceived as safe? School Safety Survey What are discipline patterns? SWIS What are attendance patterns? SIS What are achievement patterns? SIS, State Testing scores DIBELS, AIMS Web
Written Documents ◦ Visual/Graphic Display ◦ Easy to Read Oral Reports/presentations ◦ Status reports Website ◦ Post surveys and other resources ◦ Schedule reminders to school to complete survey Make fair comparisons ◦ Account for 20% change in attendance ◦ Calculate per 100 students ◦ Percent of total ◦ Account for days of week if used for report
District/ Regional Leadership Team Meetings ◦ To guide decision making Quarterly, annually Monitor Progress Annual Action Planning School Board Meetings State Leadership Team Meetings State/regional conferences Newsletters Establish a rhythm
Measure Year OneYear 2Year Three Q1Q2Q3Q4Q1Q2Q3Q4Q1Q2Q3Q4 EBS Survey X Team Checklist (TIC) XXXXX SET or BoQ XXX Classroom Self- Assessment XXXX CISS XXXX I-SSET or I-BoQ XX An Evaluation Model for School-wide PBS Designed for a school or cohort of schools
SWIS + PBS Surveys + PBS Eval
Online survey application for school teams and staff (free of charge) ◦ ◦ Complete Local Coordinator Form and submit to PBS Applications Manager 1235 UO Eugene, Oregon PBS Surveys 5 different measures for schools to use that measure the: ◦ percent of implementation of SW-PBS ◦ risk and safety factors ◦ Rates of office discipline referrals ◦ Each of the 5 measures are used at different times and for different purposes
Team Implementation Checklist EBS Self-Assessment Survey School Safety Survey Benchmarks of Quality SET
PBSEval™ is ◦ a web-based progress monitoring service that permits specific district and state-level organizations such as the Licensee to monitor and review selected area-wide administrative data and generate automated reports (collectively “Data”) in a manner that does not disclose personally identifiable information Accessing PBS Eval ◦ License agreement State $1000/year District $500/year ◦ Participate in 90 minute training
284 schools 674 schools as of 10/24/08 There are 1239 public schools in Oregon
SET’s x Year Elementary Schools (K-6)
Elementary Schools TIC’s x Year from OR MS
SET’s x Year Middle School
SET’s x Year High School
Nat’l Elem Mean.39 ODR/100/ Day Nat’l MS Mean.97 ODR/100/ Day
Outcome Data ODR Suspension/Expulsion LRE Attendance Academic Achievement School climate surveys Staff retention Implementation Data Self Assessment SET
Outcome Data Academic Achievement State Test Scores CBM/ DIBELS/ EZ CBM/ AimsWeb LRE Attendance Implementation Data PET-R Healthy Systems Checklist In Program Assessments School/ Classroom Observations
Across Schools/District-wide Data ◦ SWIS won’t do it ◦ Capabilities of new SAMI? ◦ PBS Surveys won’t do it Can access all data but have to compile it your self ◦ DIBELS Survey ◦ PBS Eval ◦ Other programs -- eSIS? Etc? ◦ Need some Excel skills
Carol Sadler
16 Schools, 12,000 students ◦ 10 elementary, 1 charter, 3 middle, 2 high Special Programs participation ◦ 1,200 Special Education (10%) ◦ 1,800 English Language Learners (15%) ◦ 1,500 Talented and Gifted (12%) Socio-economic status ◦ Title 1 in 5 elementary schools Free/Reduced ranges from 7% to 58%
T-TSD’s SET Scores, years 9 and 10!
. 52 T-TSD’s rates of discipline referrals,
.45
.16
For 5 th grade students who have attended T-T since kindergarten or first grade (i.e., intact groups) 94% met or exceeded OSA Reading/Literature benchmark in
~80% of Students ~15% ~5% (Walker, et al. 1996) 80% received NO referrals; 90% received 0-1 referrals 8% received 2-5 referrals 1% received 6 or more referrals
Dave McKay and Scott Perry