Week 9 Subsystem Design Review MSD P14045 10/29/13 Emily Courtney, JR Daley, Alex Hebert, Greg Roeth & Martha Vargas.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
NXT 2-Motor Car Adapted from Physics by Design, Second Edition, by Barbara Bratzel, College House Enterprises, 2007 MAXA ROBOTICS 2011.
Advertisements

Greg Beau SerajAnanya. Outline  Project overview  Project-specific success criteria  Block diagram  Component selection rationale  Packaging design.
Mast Storage Rack NNSY Sean Ellis, Philip Crist, Max Carpenter, Gershom Obeng.
DIT Equipment Inc. Sharky Splitter. High productivity 90 metric ton of force (100 short ton) on a 48” wide split. Split in 2 seconds (including an 8”
P14045: Mobile Pediatric Stander System Design Review.
Moving Armor Target (MAT) Track Jacob Feist Cleon Stanley Thomas Hutton Sladana Lazic 03/30/2006.
Matt Last, Rob VanderVennen, Matt Rozema, Dan Evans.
An Intro to Robots and Computer Programming
EDGE™ Final Project Presentation P09141 – Satellite Thermal Heater Controller Anthony Berwin (Mechanical Engineer)
MICE RFCC Module Update Allan DeMello Lawrence Berkeley National Lab MICE CM26 at Riverside California March 26, 2010.
Conceptual Design Review Senior Design
Electrical and Computer Engineering Irregular Object Dimensioning System Advisor: Professor Neal Anderson Michael Baccari Peter Bian Michael Coughlin Avi.
EIGHTH GRADE ROBOTICS KITTATINNY REGIONAL HIGH SCHOOL MR. SHEA Introduction to Robotics Day4.
Detailed Design Review Project P13363 Members: Justine Converse (IE) James Cover (CE) Alexander Eschbach (EE) Jason Hang (ME) Ashley Trode (EE) Guide:
Electrical and Computer Engineer Large Portable Projected Peripheral Touchscreen Team Jackson Brian Gosselin Jr. Greg Langlois Nick Jacek Dmitry Kovalenkov.
ISA–The Instrumentation, Systems, and Automation Society Omega Tube Design Extends the Usability of Coriolis Technology in Mass Flowmetering Applications.
Power Generation for the Better Water Maker: Subsystems Design Review October 29, 2013.
P14045: Mobile Pediatric Stander Greg Roeth Emily Courtney Alex Hebert John Daley Martha Vargas.
A L k Into Motherboards By Amy Madden. How It Is Made The progression that a motherboard goes through is composed of three main different processes Design.
Adapted for STLP Camp ‘09 Mobile Robots Why do robots need to move?
From Research Prototype to Production
Coding for the FIRST Tech Challenge: RobotC
Prepared By: Rania hasan Enas hamadneh Cnc machine.
Cequent Group “The Development Of A Tie Down Ratchet Group 2 Stephen Smith Otto Gerdeman Adam Schmitz.
Shutter Timing and Flash Synchronization System Joel Hoffa Shaun Pontsler November 10, 2005 Advisor: Professor Herr.
D-R Compressor Cell RIT Senior Design Team P13458 Systems Design Review.
Automatic Shift Controls for ATV Sponsored by: Joel Notaro Polaris Industries Advised by : Professor George Slack Project Family: Modular, Scalable, Open.
Heather Beam Thomas Bean Megan Chapman Steven Geiger Kimberly Keating.
Table of Contents Project Overview (brief explanation of leukodystrophy) Reviewed customer needs Reviewed engineering specs Detailed system lay out Mechanical.
Gravity Fed System Team Members: Chris Kulbago, Lauren Pahls, Ted Rakiewicz, Patrick O’Connell, Sarah Salmon, James Brinkerhoff Group Number: P
Agenda This Week –Ch –Skip Lab, No Quiz Next Week –Finish 29, No Quiz –Review Following –Exam II on Monday (2 weeks) –April 6 th [Or previous Friday.
through Introduction  Particle Imaging Velocimetry (PIV) uses a sheet laser beam to illuminate particles that cross the sheet.  The particles.
M icro A ir V ehicle Wing Deployment System April 7, 2005 MAV erick S olutions Todd Adkins Leroy Cohen Jr. Adam Hollrith Brian Moore Sponsored by: Eglin.
Final Presentation Senior Design II November 19, 2013 MyBand Fitness [1]
CLIC Module meeting, 22/08/2011 N. Chritin (EN/MME) Cradles design for CLIC module supporting system (EDMS )  General principle  Main inputs an.
P16221 – FSAE Shock Dynamometer Preliminary Detailed Design Review November 13, 2015.
PUC Creo Challenge Fall 2015 Challenge-Using Graph Features Your company, Eastern Glass Platform Co., has a contract to build a cantilevered all-glass.
ClearVision Final Presentation Senior Design 1. Team Members Travis Ann Nylin Electrical Engineer System Testing Schematic Data-Logging and Retrieval.
MAST STORAGE RACK Philip Crist Max Carpenter Sean Ellis Gershom Obeng.
Bicycle Power Meter P16214 I love the bike blender!!!!
E-NABLE Hand Test Rig P16061 David Schwartz, Tia Parks, Shannon Barry, Samantha Mason, Charles Rumfola.
P16680: AATech Universal Oil and Bag System Subsystem Design Review 10/20/15.
An Autonomous Self-Parking Vehicle William Whitney (Mentor: Dr. Jeff Gray) Background: NXT and Robot C The vehicle was constructed using the Lego Mindstorms.
Application Development in Engineering Optimization with Matlab and External Solvers Aalto University School of Engineering.
1 Chapter 4 The Laws of Motion Classes of Forces Contact forces involve physical contact between two objects Field forces act through empty.
Section 1: Mission Overview Mission Statement Mission Objectives Expected Results System Modifications Functional Block Diagrams 2.
Wire and Cathode Planes - Current Concept (work in progress) PPD Internal Review – 2 nd Part April 19 th, 2005 Rafael Silva FLARE Fermilab Liquid Argon.
Group 18 Chen Zhang Client: Professor Frank Yin Sept. 30, 2015 Smart Walker Project PRELIMINARY PRESENTATION.
Motor Assisted Wheelchair Design Review 10/01/15.
Structural Integrity UNDERSTAND STRUCTURAL STRENGTH OF LOAD BEARING COMPONENTS IN MECHANICAL SYSTEM.
R16601: Glass Fab Wire Saw Integration/Roadmap. “Glass Fab, Inc. is currently looking to replace their wire glass cutting saw with a smaller, more efficient.
P10203 LV1 MOTOR CONTROLLER FINAL REVIEW MAY 14, 2010 Electrical: Kory Williams, Adam Gillon, Oladipo Tokunboh Mechanical: Louis Shogry, Andrew Krall.
ROBOTC for CORTEX Teacher Training © 2011 Project Lead The Way, Inc. Automation and Robotics VEX.
Planetary Lander PDR Team Name
P07307: Controls for Dynamic Suspension
OVERVIEW Impact of Modelling and simulation in Mechatronics system
Programming Part 2 Mod Kit
Computer Case Houses computer components
P13045 Mobile Pediatric Stander
P17082 Biomechanical Elbow Model Detailed Design
RIT Senior Design Team P13458 Systems Design Review 1/18/13
HEMODYNAMIC SIMULATOR II P09026
Angel Hambrecht, Justin Kibler, Nate Watts, and Maxine Laroche
What is Input "Any data or instruction that is entered into a computer is called input". This data or instruction can come directly from end user or.
Active Reciprocating Compressor Valve Assembly P16452
Cnc machine Presented By:.
Detailed Design Review Solar Thermal Water Heater
Detailed Design Review: P18001
Preliminary Detailed Design Review: P18001
Check out the Stand BiMEE website here:
Presentation transcript:

Week 9 Subsystem Design Review MSD P /29/13 Emily Courtney, JR Daley, Alex Hebert, Greg Roeth & Martha Vargas

Agenda Major Tasks Since Week 6 Subsystem Progress Analysis Next Steps Week 9 Project Presentation – 10/29/13 2

Major Tasks 1. Develop a single system (kit) for both the red and blue stander a.Wheel System b.Tray System 1.Develop legacy code to work on the new Stellaris Launchpad 1.Assure Bluetooth connection functionality *image from blog.mindjet.com Week 9 Project Presentation – 10/29/13

Wheel System Goal: Replace the ugly, roughly machined plastic adapter on the stander with a new part. Design this new part in such a way that is an easy bolt-on replacement. Changes/Updates: More accurate shapes and dimensions based on measurements of the blue stander. Essentially mimics the existing bracket in its attachment to the stander and wheel assembly Week 9 Project Presentation – 10/29/13

Wheel System Week 9 Project Presentation – 10/29/13

Preliminary Engineering Analysis Assumptions: Treated bracket as curved beam Constant, rectangular cross- section with minimum dimensions Force value is max rated capacity plus weight of stander itself. Max Stress of 742.2psi is located on the inside of the curved section Week 9 Project Presentation – 10/29/13

Preliminary Engineering Analysis - Impact Assumptions: Same beam analysis as before Force is based off of dropping the empty stander from a height of 2ft. Max Stress of psi is located on the inside of the curved section. I am currently unsure of the accuracy or feasibility of this analysis Week 9 Project Presentation – 10/29/13

Wheel System - Next Steps Get manufacturability consultation Analyze the sleeve section FEA of the part Finalize drawings Select material and manufacturing process Week 9 Project Presentation – 10/29/13

Tray System Requirements: Movement left, right, forward, and backwards Dimensions: 8 x 14 inches o Ability to be seen over Easy Adjustment Streamlined Design Week 9 Project Presentation – 10/29/13

Tray System - Demo Week 9 Project Presentation – 10/29/13

Tray System Assumptions: -Simple Cantilevered Beam -Single Solid Component -Equilibrium Ultimate Tensile Strength of Aluminum: 39,900 lb/in 2 (Source: Brunner Enterprises, Inc.) Week 9 Project Presentation – 10/29/13

Tray System - Next Steps Developing/Selecting Actuator Hinge System Transition to Overall Electronics Packaging Week 9 Project Presentation – 10/29/13

Electrical System Schematic Week 9 Project Presentation – 10/29/13

Software Risks Straight Travel -built in libraries for using quadrature encoders for velocity capture Processor Change -taken care of by Launchpad/Stellaris -more time consuming will be cleaning legacy code Bluetooth Connection -need a dummy system, or a prototype part, preferably the wt12 UART connection to stander controls -can also use USB mini-b connection on the launchpad Week 9 Project Presentation – 10/29/13

Software Flow One Loop, that is interrupted periodically to debounce the input buttons and triggers a refresh of the speed settings Week 9 Project Presentation – 10/29/13

Software Flow (con) Week 9 Project Presentation – 10/29/13

Software Flow (con) Week 9 Project Presentation – 10/29/13

Week 9 Project Presentation – 10/29/13

Launchpad LMF4-232-H5QD vs. LMF4-120-H5QR Both have 32k SRAM and 256k Flash Same architecture, -the supporting libraries are sound Code is compatible -needs cleaning for references to peripherals that don’t exist Week 9 Project Presentation – 10/29/13

Controls Week 9 Project Presentation – 10/29/13

Controls Week 9 Project Presentation – 10/29/13

Week 9 Project Presentation – 10/29/13

Controls Week 9 Project Presentation – 10/29/13

Controls Next Steps: ●Review Electrical System breakdown with experts in field (Professors) ●Use Texas Instrument’s Code Composer for preliminary code development ●Test code on current (Blue stander) button set-up. ●Combine different subsystems Week 9 Project Presentation – 10/29/13

Preliminary Bill of Materials Week 9 Project Presentation – 10/29/13

Accomplished vs Planned Accomplished: Basic tray system design for both standers. Preliminary analysis of wheel mount adapter. Define previous groups electrical system. Establish that the Launchpad will be a suitable replacement uC. Designed basic modular control systems’ code flow. Created a preliminary B.O.M. Planned: Packaging Solutions Bluetooth Touch Screen Overlay development (code organization, analysis of compatibility between ucontrollers and initial testing) Week 9 Project Presentation – 10/29/13

Remaining Questions: 1.How to guarantee straight travel? 2.How will we make sure the stander runs smoothly? 3.How will the Automated tray work? 4.Maintain max allowable weight? 5.How long will the response time of the controls (stander/remote) take? 6.How will we test touchscreen overlay? 7.How can we improve the current bump sensor? 8.Begin battery/controller packaging design Week 9 Project Presentation – 10/29/13

Questions? Week 9 Project Presentation – 10/29/13