Session Materials  Wiki 

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations

Advertisements

The Baldrige Model of Performance Excellence A framework for continuous improvement.
Kansas Educator Evaluation Bill Bagshaw Asst. Director Kansas State Department of Education February 13, 2015.
Gathering Evidence Educator Evaluation. Intended Outcomes At the end of this session, participants will be able to: Explain the three types of evidence.
WELCOME – RIG 2 - Session 1 September, 2012 OESD 114 RIG 2 - Session 1.
PSESD Teacher Principal Evaluation Project Regional Implementation Grants October 25, pm.
TPEP Teacher and Principal Evaluation Process Bellevue Chamber of Commerce Presentation January 15, 2015 Presented by: Dr. Patty Siegwarth: Bellevue School.
The Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and Support Systems April Regionals Multiple Measures: Gathering Evidence 1.
The Massachusetts Model System for Educator Evaluation Training Module 5: Gathering Evidence August
September 2013 The Teacher Evaluation and Professional Growth Program Module 2: Student Learning Objectives.
Teacher: Decide what to teach Decide what to assign Decide how to assess Decide how to grade In the end, convey how the kids did compared to each.
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project Preparing and Applying Formative Multiple Measures of Performance Conducting High-Quality Self-Assessments.
Matt Moxham EDUC 290. The Idaho Core Teacher Standards are ten standards set by the State of Idaho that teachers are expected to uphold. This is because.
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Module 2: Using Instructional and Leadership Frameworks in Educator Evaluation 1 March 2013.
Session Materials  Wiki
Session Materials Wireless Wiki
Principal Evaluation in Massachusetts: Where we are now National Summit on Educator Effectiveness Principal Evaluation Breakout Session #2 Claudia Bach,
Welcome What’s a pilot?. What’s the purpose of the pilot? Support teachers and administrators with the new evaluation system as we learn together about.
1 Let’s Meet! October 13,  All four people have to run.  The baton has to be held and passed by all participants.  You can have world class speed.
Materials for today’s session  Shared website – Wiki   Wireless.
February 8, 2012 Session 3: Performance Management Systems 1.
Student Growth 2.0 Fall,  Face-to-Face Sessions  Student Growth 2.0  Rater Agreement Practices  TPEP/ Washington State Learning Standards.
Update on Teacher Principal Evaluation System (TPEP) Implementation July, 2014.
Session Materials  Wiki   Wireless  Network: OpenAir  Password:
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation 1.
Teacher/Principal Evaluation Pilot Legislative Update Michaela Miller TPEP Program Manager OSPI TPEP RIG Update March 15th, 2012 Jim Koval TPEP Program.
Welcome! Classroom and Lab Management for CTE Part 2 Please write your first name on your name tent! Spring, 2014 Presenters: Judy Hammann and Ann Tebo.
Session Materials  Wiki 
Why principal evaluation? Because Leadership Matters!
Materials  Wiki 
TAP TAP Basics (Preparing for Success in a TAP School) [PSTS]
Educator Growth and Professional Development. Objectives for this session The SLT will…  Have a thorough understanding of High Quality Standard 5: Educator.
Name Workshop Facilitator Instructional Leadership: Creating Demand.
Student Growth in the Washington State Teacher Evaluation System Michelle Lewis Puget Sound ESD
NEW TEACHER PRINCIPAL EVALUATION. RACE TO THE TOP AND ESSB 5895  The principles guiding the change  Quality teaching and leading is critically important.
Collaboration Grants Design 101 Salem November 21 st, 2013.
Intro to TPEP. A new evaluation system should be a model for professional growth, supporting collaboration between teachers and principals in pursuit.
Using Teacher Evaluation as a Tool for Professional Growth and School Improvement Redmond School District
Materials for today’s session  Shared website – Wiki   Wireless.
Professional Development PLC Lead Training Cultural Shifts: Rethinking what we do and why we do it Together, we can make a difference.
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project Update 11/29/12.
Session Materials  Wiki
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Program Introduction to Principal Evaluation in Washington 1 June 2015.
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project Introduction to Teacher Evaluation in Washington 1 June 2015.
Professional Learning Teams Cascade High School September 18, 2015.
Professional Development PLC Lead Training Together, we can make a difference.
TPEP Teacher & Principal Evaluation System Prepared from resources from WEA & AWSP & ESD 112.
Th e Heart of TPEP: Learning Centered Conferencing Michelle Lewis John Hellwich TPEP.
Materials  Wiki 
BISD Update Teacher & Principal Evaluation Update Board of Directors October 27,
Changes in Professional licensure Teacher evaluation system Training at Coastal Carolina University.
RIDE Educator Evaluation System Design ACEES Meeting December 6, 2010.
Student Learning Objectives 1 SCEE Summit Student Learning Objectives District Professional Development is the Key 2.
Materials  Wiki 
Write on sticky note, how you implemented the exit slip strategy. What does this tell you about your students?
Materials  Wiki 
Family Involvement and School wide PBIS/Tier 2 Portions of this presentation from: Iowa Department of Education Iowa Behavior Alliance PIRC.
March  Third annual 2141 Club meeting  Recognizing new members  Introductions  Developing a support network.
Materials for today’s session  Shared website – Wiki   Wireless.
Session Materials  Wiki   Wireless  Network: OpenAir  Password:
Materials for today’s session  Shared website – Wiki   Wireless.
Purpose of Teacher Evaluation and Observation Minnesota Teacher Evaluation Requirements Develop, improve and support qualified teachers and effective.
Implementing the Professional Growth Process Session 3 Observing Teaching and Professional Conversations American International School-Riyadh Saturday,
Instructional Leadership Supporting Common Assessments.
Student Growth 2.0 NCESD Fellows November 17 th,
A Productive Partnership
Kansas Educator Evaluation
Educator Evaluation and TPEP in Washington State Changes to the law for Procedures for Evaluation are now addressed in: RCW 28A.405 WAC.
NORTH CAROLINA TEACHER EVALUATION INSTRUMENT and PROCESS
Presentation transcript:

Session Materials  Wiki 

Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation 2

Session Norms  Be present  Participate actively:  Ask questions  Share connections  Listen  Work together as a community  Invite and welcome contributions of every member 3

System Components

Outcomes  Share progress and resources  Learn about the results pyramid and consider impact on culture  Understand working definition of rater agreement and resources available  Begin to design and flesh out a professional development plan  Update Communication Plan

District Updates  What has occurred in your TPEP work since we last met?  Communication with stakeholders  Resources created or found  Other thoughts/ideas that might be helpful to other RIG districts 6

TPEP Core Principles 7 1. The critical importance of teacher and leadership quality 2. The professional nature of teaching and leading a school 3. The complex relationship between the system for teacher and principal evaluation and district systems and negotiations 4. The belief in professional learning as an underpinning of the new evaluation system 5. The understanding that the career continuum must be addressed in the new evaluation system 6. The system must determine the balance of “inputs or acts” and “outputs or results”

Rater Agreement and PD Resources  Stage 1 training: Feb 6-7, various locations, no charge. Register on Events Manager.  Stage 2 training: subject to legislative funding  AWSP training: Training_for_Principals&Template=/CM/HTMLDisplay.cfm &ContentID=19950

Team Planning Ideas  Update Communication Plan: Who else needs this information?  Continue to work on professional development plan  Continue to identify decisions that need to be made given the “rules” and suggested teacher evaluation process and begin decision making process.  Continue working to identify measures and evidence.  Other topics relevant for your team

Student Growth: Teacher 1. Review the student growth rubrics. What artifacts and evidence might a teacher share with an evaluator to demonstrate proficiency on the student growth rubrics? 2. What are some question prompts that might be used at the beginning of the year to help a teacher set goals and use multiple measures to monitor student growth? 3. What are some question prompts that might be used at the end of the year to help a teacher evaluate progress towards goals? 4. What common district assessments do you already use in your district? Please place an asterisk next to the assessments that would be most relevant for the student growth portion of the evaluation. 5. Which grades and subject areas would need to develop classroom- based assessments or develop new common formative-assessments in order to measure student growth? 6. Based on your discussion, what are some of the decisions that will need to be made in order to implement the student growth portion of the evaluation?

Student Growth: Principal 1. Review the student growth rubrics. What artifacts and evidence might a principal share with an evaluator to demonstrate proficiency on the student growth rubrics? 2. What are some question prompts that might be used at the beginning of the year to help a principal set goals and use multiple measures to monitor student growth? 3. What are are some question prompts that might be used at the end of the year to help a principal evaluate progress towards goals? 4. What common district assessments do you already use in your district? List, then place an asterisk next to the assessments that would be most relevant for the student growth portion of the principal evaluation. 5. Based on your discussion, what are some of the decisions that will need to be made in order to implement the student growth portion of the principal evaluation?

Student Growth Please record your team’s responses in the shared space: Teacher: Principal: