Session Materials  Wiki   Wireless  Network: OpenAir  Password:

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
WV High Quality Standards for Schools
Advertisements

Analyzing Student Work
Implementation of the PA Core Standards. Effective Communication Guiding Principle 1 Design and establish systems of effective communication among stakeholders.
Parents as Partners in Education
WELCOME – RIG 2 - Session 1 September, 2012 OESD 114 RIG 2 - Session 1.
The Oregon Framework for Teacher and Administrator Evaluation and Support Systems April Regionals Multiple Measures: Gathering Evidence 1.
The Massachusetts Model System for Educator Evaluation Training Module 5: Gathering Evidence August
Learning Walk High Levels of Learning for All Students Quality Instruction in Every Classroom Skillful Leadership Throughout the School and District.
INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP: CLASSROOM WALKTHROUGHS
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project Preparing and Applying Formative Multiple Measures of Performance Conducting High-Quality Self-Assessments.
School Leadership Evaluation System Orientation SY13-14 Evaluation Systems Office, HR Dr. Michael Shanahan, CHRO.
Session Materials  Wiki
Session Materials Wireless Wiki
1 Let’s Meet! October 13,  All four people have to run.  The baton has to be held and passed by all participants.  You can have world class speed.
Bibb County Schools Standard 1: Vision and Purpose Standard: The system establishes and communicates a shared purpose and direction for improving.
An Overview of the New HCPSS Teacher Evaluation Process School-based Professional Learning Module Spring 2013 This presentation contains copyrighted material.
June 19 th – PLC Day June 19 th – PLC Day Year In Review – Year In Preview District Road Map District Road Map TPEP Early Release Collaboration Early Release.
February 8, 2012 Session 3: Performance Management Systems 1.
Our Leadership Journey Cynthia Cuellar Astrid Fossum Janis Freckman Connie Laughlin.
Student Growth 2.0 Fall,  Face-to-Face Sessions  Student Growth 2.0  Rater Agreement Practices  TPEP/ Washington State Learning Standards.
Examining Monitoring Data
Session Materials  Wiki 
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation 1.
Student Learning Objectives: Setting Goals for Student Growth Countywide Professional Development Day Thursday, April 25, 2013 This presentation contains.
Including Student Growth in Educator Evaluation Day 3 Monitoring and Adjusting February,
Teacher/Principal Evaluation Pilot Legislative Update Michaela Miller TPEP Program Manager OSPI TPEP RIG Update March 15th, 2012 Jim Koval TPEP Program.
Welcome! Classroom and Lab Management for CTE Part 2 Please write your first name on your name tent! Spring, 2014 Presenters: Judy Hammann and Ann Tebo.
Session Materials  Wiki 
Monitoring through Walk-Throughs Participants are expected to purpose the book: The Three-Minute Classroom Walk-Through: Changing School Supervisory.
Setting purposeful goals Douglas County Schools July 2011.
Materials  Wiki 
Name Workshop Facilitator Instructional Leadership: Creating Demand.
System Implementation and Monitoring Regional Session Spring, 2014 Resources are available at sim.abel.yorku.ca.
Teacher Evaluation and Professional Growth Program Module 4: Reflecting and Adjusting December 2013.
Putting Research to Work in K-8 Science Classrooms Ready, Set, SCIENCE.
Student Growth in the Washington State Teacher Evaluation System Michelle Lewis Puget Sound ESD
NEW TEACHER PRINCIPAL EVALUATION. RACE TO THE TOP AND ESSB 5895  The principles guiding the change  Quality teaching and leading is critically important.
Providing Leadership for Improving Mathematics Achievement NJ Abbott Secondary Initiative, Grades 6-12 Academic Rigor Gayle Mills November 14, 2005 Southern.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
Materials for today’s session  Shared website – Wiki   Wireless.
Professional Development PLC Lead Training Cultural Shifts: Rethinking what we do and why we do it Together, we can make a difference.
ISLLC Standard #2 Supporting Teacher Learning Name Workshop Facilitator.
Session Materials  Wiki
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Program Introduction to Principal Evaluation in Washington 1 June 2015.
Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Project Introduction to Teacher Evaluation in Washington 1 June 2015.
Professional Development PLC Lead Training Together, we can make a difference.
Literacy Coaching: An Essential “Piece” of the Puzzle.
Th e Heart of TPEP: Learning Centered Conferencing Michelle Lewis John Hellwich TPEP.
1. What can effective planning with technology look like? 2. How do we support our teachers in their planning in this digital age? 3. How might TPACK.
Materials  Wiki 
ISLLC Standard #1 Implementing a Shared Vision Name Workshop Facilitator.
ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.
INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP Supporting Common Assessments (Time for Common Assessments) © AZ Board of Regents, All rights reserved, 2012.
Phase IV: Taking Action and Monitoring Implementation and Impact.
Materials  Wiki 
Staff All Surveys Questions 1-27 n=45 surveys Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree The relative sizes of the colored bars in the chart.
KEEPING THE FOCUS ON STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT Stephanie Benedict Academic Development Institute & Center on Innovations in Learning.
ESD Regional Workshop Year 1 Workshop 2. Welcome Back to the Leadership Academy.
Materials  Wiki 
Materials for today’s session  Shared website – Wiki   Wireless.
Session Materials  Wiki   Wireless  Network: OpenAir  Password:
Materials for today’s session  Shared website – Wiki   Wireless.
Implementing the Professional Growth Process Session 3 Observing Teaching and Professional Conversations American International School-Riyadh Saturday,
Instructional Leadership Supporting Common Assessments.
Standard VI Teachers Contribute to the Academic Success of Students.
Lakeland Middle School Professional Learning Communities (PLC)
Building a Framework to Support the Culture Required for Student Centered Learning Jeff McCoy | Executive Director of Academic Innovation & Technology.
Educator Evaluation and TPEP in Washington State Changes to the law for Procedures for Evaluation are now addressed in: RCW 28A.405 WAC.
Parent-Teacher Partnerships for Student Success
Presentation transcript:

Session Materials  Wiki   Wireless  Network: OpenAir  Password: summer10

Washington State Teacher and Principal Evaluation Session 3: Measures and evidence 2

Session Norms  Be present  Participate actively:  Ask questions  Share connections  Listen  Work together as a community  Invite and welcome contributions of every member 3

District Updates  What has occurred in your TPEP work since we last met?  Communication with stakeholders  Resources created or found  Other thoughts/ideas that might be helpful to other RIG districts 4

System Components

Outcomes  Examine the polarities we manage in our work with TPEP  Grapple with newly developed rules and guidelines around evaluation and implications for districts  Identify decisions that need to be made by the district in order to implement the new evaluation system  Begin to design and flesh out a district process for teacher evaluation, including student growth measures  Update Communication Plan

TPEP Core Principles 7 1. The critical importance of teacher and leadership quality 2. The professional nature of teaching and leading a school 3. The complex relationship between the system for teacher and principal evaluation and district systems and negotiations 4. The belief in professional learning as an underpinning of the new evaluation system 5. The understanding that the career continuum must be addressed in the new evaluation system 6. The system must determine the balance of “inputs or acts” and “outputs or results”

Polarity Management  Dilemma or tension among two values  Requires management rather than problem solving  Either/or perspective replaced by both/and  Both values in service of a higher purpose  Both values are good and necessary  Challenge is to manage the right balance

Example 9

High Student Achievement Low Student Achievement and Evaluation Professional Growth Benefits of Professional Growth Benefits of Evaluation Consequences of focusing too much on growth Consequences for focusing too much on evaluation

In groups of three, discuss and complete the organizer for this polarity. (5 minutes) Professional Growth and Evaluation

Take a moment to reflect on the current system in your district. Is there a balance of professional growth and evaluation? What factors contribute to your current reality? What might you need in order to reach your optimal state? Team Discussion

Close Reading Jigsaw  Groups of 4 are most ideal  Suggested heterogeneous group composition  Teacher  Principal/AP  Central Office Staff  Association Leader

 Number off 1-4  As you read, highlight what is assigned to your number: 1. practices already in place in your district 2. practices that are different than current practice 3. practices that are required by law 4. practices that are not required by law but support teacher growth

Implications  Whip – Each person shares what they learned (up to 3 minutes per person)  Whip – Each person identifies one implication for the work moving forward. Record on chart paper.  Continue whip until all implications are exhausted

Break

Student Growth  As a team, choose to examine student growth for teachers or principals  Use the question prompts to guide your discussion  Choose a recorder to type your responses into the shared electronic space

Student Growth: Teacher 1. Review the student growth rubrics. What artifacts and evidence might a teacher share with an evaluator to demonstrate proficiency on the student growth rubrics? 2. What are some question prompts that might be used at the beginning of the year to help a teacher set goals and use multiple measures to monitor student growth? 3. What are some question prompts that might be used at the end of the year to help a teacher evaluate progress towards goals? 4. What common district assessments do you already use in your district? Please place an asterisk next to the assessments that would be most relevant for the student growth portion of the evaluation. 5. Which grades and subject areas would need to develop classroom- based assessments or develop new common formative-assessments in order to measure student growth? 6. Based on your discussion, what are some of the decisions that will need to be made in order to implement the student growth portion of the evaluation?

Student Growth: Principal 1. Review the student growth rubrics. What artifacts and evidence might a principal share with an evaluator to demonstrate proficiency on the student growth rubrics? 2. What are some question prompts that might be used at the beginning of the year to help a principal set goals and use multiple measures to monitor student growth? 3. What are are some question prompts that might be used at the end of the year to help a principal evaluate progress towards goals? 4. What common district assessments do you already use in your district? List, then place an asterisk next to the assessments that would be most relevant for the student growth portion of the principal evaluation. 5. Based on your discussion, what are some of the decisions that will need to be made in order to implement the student growth portion of the principal evaluation?

Student Growth Please record your team’s responses in the shared space: Teacher: Principal:

Panel

Team Planning Ideas  Update Communication Plan: Who else needs this information?  Identify decisions that need to be made given the “rules” and suggested teacher evaluation process and begin decision making process.  Continue working to identify measures and evidence.  Other topics relevant for your team