Probabilistic Monitoring of Streams Below Small Impoundments in Tennessee Debbie Arnwine Water Pollution Control 615-532-0703

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Biological Response of Two North Central PA Streams After Flood of September 2011 Fred Rogers CWI, Supervisor Dr. Mel Zimmerman Introduction: Within Pennsylvania,
Advertisements

The Barton Springs Part of the Edwards Aquifer: Basic physical and hydrologic characteristics pertinent to permitted discharges Raymond Slade, Jr, Certified.
Nelly Smith EPA Region 6. - Develop or revise bacteria reduction program for consistency with new TMDL requirements and allocations - Develop or revise.
Clearwater River Habitat/Bioassessment
Watershed System Physical Properties Stream flow (cfs) Stream Channel Pattern Substrate Chemical Properties pH Dissolved Oxygen Temperature Nutrients Turbidity.
EKOSISTEM AIR TAWAR Freshwater ecosystems
Adem.alabama.gov Incorporating NPS Intensive Surveys into ADEM’s Monitoring Strategy Southeastern Water Pollution Biologists’ Association Meeting Lake.
Examples for Mitigation Category 1 and 2 Streams.
Hydrology River Ecosystems and Humans. Dimensions of river ecosystems Longitudinal Lateral Vertical Temporal 2.
Missouri Nutrient Criteria Plan Mark Osborn October 20, 2005.
Freshwater ecosystems
Pomme de Terre Lake Water Quality Summary Pomme de Terre Lake Water Quality Summary US Army Corps of Engineers Environmental Resources Section.
Hydrologic Issues in Mountaintop Mining Areas Ronald Evaldi, USGS-WSC, Charleston, WV Daniel Evans, USGS-WSC, Louisville, KY Hugh Bevans, USGS-WSC, Charleston,
Metric (Family Level) Standard Best Value (95 th or 5 th percentile) Worst Possible Value Expected Response to Degradation Total Taxa180 EPT Taxa120 %EPT91.90.
Fresh Water Systems Parkside Junior High 2010/11 Mrs. Doig-Gray and Mrs. Friesen.
US EPA Region IV Surface Coal Mining Field Activities Adventures in Mountain Top Mining / Valley Fill Chris Decker.
Measures of Water Quality. Introduction  The United States Geographical Survey monitors waterways all over the country, tracking all of the most important.
How do humans affect watersheds, the hydrologic cycle and stream ecology ? AKA management implications.
Site Classification for Re-calibration of the Alabama Index of Stream Macroinvertebrate Condition Ben Jessup and Jen Stamp Tetra Tech, Inc. SWPBA November.
What It All Means: What we monitor Why we monitor those things Why it matters to monitor those things How to use the data Water Quality and Volunteer Monitoring:
Natural vs. Modified Habitat Primary Headwater Habitat Streams Headwater Habitat Evaluation Index.
Developing Monitoring Programs to Detect NPS Load Reductions.
Dr. Matt Helmers Assistant Professor and Extension Agricultural Engineer Dept. of Agricultural and Biosystems Engineering Iowa State University How is.
STREAM ECOSYSTEMS.
Materials Transport & NSCD Material Classes Velocity to Transport Relationships York NSCD Restoration PSY CCREP.
To determine how a manmade structure, an overpass, effects aspects of stream water quality and discharge.
Alexander J. Smith, Barry P. Baldigo, Mike R. McHale New York State Department of Environmental Conservation.
Nicole Reid, Jane Herbert, and Dean Baas MSU Extension Land & Water Program W. K. Kellogg Biological Station Transparency tube as a surrogate for turbidity,
Basics River continuum – transition from headwaters to large river Main variables on life: temperature, bottom type and water chemistry Temperature is.
NC Division of Water Quality Water Quality Assessments and Local Watershed Plans.
Oregon Case Studies Ryan Johnson. Studies  The response of impounded sediment to a culvert replacement project on Sutter Creek, a tributary of Honey.
Principles of River Ecology New Mexico Watershed Watch Teacher Training September 2004 by Richard Schrader.
By Mary Waters, Texas Stream Team. Outline  About the Arroyo Colorado  Basic information (geography)  History  Major uses  Water quality summary.
How do humans affect watersheds and the hydrologic cycle ?
Lakes, Ponds Wetlands, Streams, Rivers, and Groundwater
Development of a Southeastern Reference Stream Monitoring Network Debbie Arnwine Water Resources, TDEC
 Sustainability Master Plan  Effect of Runoff on Stream  Negative Effect on Lake Carnegie  Final Pre-Restoration Assessment  Why this first order.
Sammamish River Diel Dissolved Oxygen and pH Study September 21, 2005.
Stream macroinvertebrate responses to landscape variables; an evaluation of rapid bioassessment techniques using a statistical modeling approach. Declan.
Stream Ecosystem Assessment Group 1 Camp Caesar August 2003.
Trends in Precipitation and Stream Discharge over the Past Century for the Continental United States Andrew Simon 1 and Lauren Klimetz 1,2 1 USDA-ARS National.
Adem.alabama.gov ADEM’s Monitoring Summary Reports Alabama – Tombigbee CWP Stakeholders Meeting Montgomery, Alabama 3 February 2010 Lisa Huff – ADEM Field.
Comparison of Benthic Invertebrate Communities Upstream and Downstream of Proposed Culvert Installations in Alabama Amy C. Gill USGS, Alabama Water Science.
Nutrient and Sediment Loading in Sougahatchee Creek and the Impacts on Aquatic Biota Report submitted to West Point Stevens and the Cities of Auburn and.
Ch. 1: “Watersheds and Wetlands” Lesson 1.5: “Factors That Affect Wetlands and Watersheds” Part 2.
PCWA Study Plan Physical Habitat Characterization Study Plan –Geomorphology Study Plan –Riparian Habitat Mapping Study Plan –Aquatic Habitat Characterization.
Warm Up Complete the text dependent questions for the Water Scarcity text. Do your own work. Homework: Read 16C-21C answer ?’s 1-3, 5 p22C Read 24C-31C.
Case Study Development of an Index of Biotic Integrity for the Mid-Atlantic Highland Region McCormick et al
STREAM MONITORING CASE STUDY. Agenda  Monitoring Requirements  TMDL Requirements  OCEA Initial Monitoring Program  Selection of Parameters  Data.
New Mexico Watershed Watch Your school name and river name This project funded by the NM Dept. Of Game & Fish and the Sports Fish Restoration Program.
Middle Fork Project AQ 3 – Macroinvertebrate and Aquatic Mollusk Technical Study Report Overview May 5, 2008.
-Aquifers -Springs -Ponds -Lakes -Creeks/Streams -Rivers -Wetlands Makes up < 3 % of water on earth.
Development of Nutrient Water Quality Standards for Rivers and Streams in Ohio Ohio EPA ORSANCO, October 20, 2009 George Elmaraghy, P.E., Chief.
Think about answering the questions: Who? What? Where? When? Why? How? Before your volunteers begin collecting data.
Topic #3 Fresh Water Systems Topic #3 – Fresh Water Systems Less than 1% of the world’s water supply is available for drinking, cooking and other purposes.
Dissolved Oxygen Pollution Types.
EVALUATING STREAM COMPENSATION PERFORMANCE: Overcoming the Data Deficit Through Standardized Study Design Kenton L. Sena (EPA VSFS Intern), Joe Morgan,
WATER QUALITY.
Which Way to the Sea?.
5.2 Detection and Monitoring of Pollution
Challenges Facing Riparian Ecosystems
Freshwater Lesson 1-4.
Biological Assessment of Pond Health
Water Testing Project for the North Fork River
Simplified Hydrologic (Water) Cycle
The Work of Streams.
Defining and Targeting High Flows
Freshwater Systems = <1 % of Earth’s total water!
Aquatic Ecology Envirothon
Little River Ditches Watershed Monitoring
Presentation transcript:

Probabilistic Monitoring of Streams Below Small Impoundments in Tennessee Debbie Arnwine Water Pollution Control

2003 probabilistic study of 75 streams downstream of small impoundments Macroinvertebrates Nutrients Dissolved Oxygen Temperature pH Suspended Solids Iron and manganese Habitat Flow and morphology Periphyton Density

Over 195,000 small man-made lakes and ponds in Tennessee 1,302 recorded in databases Potential for public access (safe dams) Built after 1992 (ARAP)

Site Selection Random Selection 75 impounded streams < 250 acres

Perennial stream with sufficient flow (during recon) to provide macroinver- tebrate habitat.

Suitable habitat to use TDEC’s semi- quantitative protocols Rooted Bank Habitat Riffle Kicks

Comparable bioregion and size to existing reference streams or project- specific reference

Upstream Reference not Feasible Impoundment flooded entire headwaters Second impoundment immediately upstream Drainage area upstream not 80% within same bioregion. Stream size too small upstream of impoundment.

One upstream site was suitable.

Minimum observable impacts not associated with impoundment

Impoundments built for agricultural purposes were included. Livestock pens built on dam.

Accessible

Site reconnaissance (200 recons to get 75 sites)

Site Characterization Impounded (50%) Surface Discharge (69%) Forested Drainage Area (77%) 2 nd Order Stream (53%) < 50 acres (70%)

Macroinvertebrate Samples Semi-quantitative Single Habitat Spring and Fall Tennessee Macroinvertebrate Index (TMI) Taxa Richness EPT Richness %EPT %OC NCBI %Dominant %Clingers Ky % Nutrient Tolerant

95% Failed to Meet Biocriteria

Individual Biometrics

Dominant taxa indicative of nutrients and/or sluggish flow Fall: Dominant = Cheumatopsyche and Glyptotendipes spp. Spring: Dominant = Lirceus, Parametriocnemus and Polypedilum spp.

Example of biological data pre and post impoundment

FLOW 52% insufficient flow to sustain aquatic life at least one season (25% dry).

Precipitation generally at or above 25 year average

Headwater reference sites had adequate flow every season.

Comparison of discharge types

Geomorphology 49% relative stable channels typical of ecoregion 24% “G-type” –deeply entrenched, unstable banks, heavy sediment loads

20% E-Type in response to lack of flow. Small channel cut within original stream bed.

Dominant bed material becomes smaller below impoundments EcoregionReferenceImpounded 65SandSilt 66,67,68, 69Boulder/CobbleGravel 71Bedrock/CobbleGravel 74SandSilt

HABITAT 70% of sites failed overall habitat

Dissolved Oxygen Based on instantaneous day time measurement

DO Measurements do not tell the whole story. Instantaneous measurement during daylight hours. Presence of algae at most sites indicates possible large diurnal swings. 17% of sites supersaturated. Percent saturation at 77% of sites below 10th percentile of reference data.

TEMPERATURE 11% of sites exceeded criteria. 72% above fall reference temps.

pH 5% of sites had low pH

Suspended Solids 50% of sites had elevated suspended solids. Land use associated with small impoundments contributes to the problem.

Iron and Manganese 61% of sites above recommended iron criterion of 1000 ug/L 93% of sites above reference levels for manganese

Nutrients 41% exceeded NO2+NO3 criteria at least one season. 75% exceeded total phosphorus criteria at least one season.

Periphyton

Detailed Report (or at the back of the room!) Probabilistic Monitoring of Streams Below Small Impoundments in Tennessee

QUESTIONS? Debbie Arnwine Water Pollution Control