Debater Orientation 제 1 회 알바트로스 + 영어토론대회 설명회. What do you learn today? Structure & Logistics Basics of debate Adjudication Rules.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Debaters briefing.
Advertisements

Debaters briefing.
Adjudication briefing. format of tournament rules practicalities.
Adjudication briefing. adjudication team andy hume john paul toner meg osullivan rob silver.
How to Judge a BP Debate at the Heart of Europe BP Track 2013
Lincoln – Douglas Debate
Introduction to British Parliamentary Debate China Debate Education Network:
1. 2 Thank you!! We can’t do this without you You are performing a teaching role in the lives of our students YOU make it possible for young people to.
DIEFENBAKER XXXI A briefing for debaters and judges Directors: Garrett Richards and Angela Jansen.
Judge’s Briefing Here!. So you want* to become a Debate Judge? *were forced by your kid.
ADJUDICATORS’ FUNCTIONS Decide which team has won. Decide the best speaker. State the reasons for the decision (oral adjudication). Provide constructive.
Prepared by Jason Hong, David Miko and the University of Calgary Debate Society.
We couldn’t do it without you! This Brief Presentation Will Cover Five Talking Points That Will Train You To Be Great Judges Style of Debate Role Of.
Basic Debating Skills.
An introduction to Asian Parliamentary and Australs-Style Debating
Basic Training. What is debating? LUDS practice British parliamentary debate that is: A structured argument about a certain topic (motion) Between two.
RDA Under-14 Debate Championships 2012 GENERAL BRIEFING 19 th MAY 2012.
Team Policy Debate Orientation
ALWAYS REMEMBER Speech & Interpersonal Communication Enhancement Unit, IIUM.
Adjudication Briefing AdjCore of Japan BP Table of Contents ●Basic Rule ●Role of Adjudicator ●Process of Adjudication ●Criteria of Adjudication.
Debate Pointers A debate Exhibition. Case case: set of arguments supported by evidences anatomy of a case: definition: clarifies the motion/limits debate.
FORMAT (RULES AND PROCEDURES) OMS INSIGHTS Parliamentary Debate.
2 Thank you!! We can’t do this without you You are making an investment You are performing a teaching role in the lives of our students YOU make it possible.
BP DEBATING: STRUCTURE & ROLE FULFILMENT Speaker’s Development, Week 2 Karolien Michiels.
An introduction to Asian Parliamentary and Australs-Style Debating Brett Frazer October 15, 2014 Cheongna Dalton School.
Debating 101. What’s the deal?  3v3  Affirmative team and Negative team  30 minutes prep  Each team comes up with arguments to support or oppose the.
Introduction to University Debate Dylan Williams – Fall 2015 University of Alberta Debate Society 1.
Role Fulfillment TRAINING SESSION 21 OCT Plan  Announcements  Quick review of last time’s stuff  Positions and their roles  How to prepare for.
Individual Policy Debate Orientation. Volunteers Make it Happen! 2 We can’t do this without you. You are making an investment. You are performing a teaching.
EJVED 09. Getting to know debating Debating is a clash of argumentations among the Government team and Opposition team Everything starts from the word.
Introduction to British Parliamentary Debate China Debate Education Network:
Role of Speakers. So, debating is.... Reason-giving, Decision-making Not fighting, not oratory, not English proficiency Persuasion.
Debate-Public Speaking 7 th Grade Communication Arts.
debate is all about arguing between affirmative/government team and negative/opposition team upon a motion. Affirmative  support the motion Negative.
Presentation by Jessica Prince March 13, 2010 The Pre-competition for the 14 th FLTRP Cup National English Debating Competition 1.
Prepared by Jason Hong, David Miko and the University of Calgary Debate Society.
Welcome to Debating  Introduction  2008 changes  Speaker roles  Types of debates  Coaching tips  Draw announcement for the Senior Competition.
British Parliamentary Debating Course Presented for CPUT by Piet Olivier.
Lincoln Douglas Debate Orientation
World Schools Debate: an Introduction
Public Forum Debate A quick guide.
Basic Debating Skills.
DEBATE SEMINAR: JOVED SURABAYA 2016
World schools debate championships 3 vs 3 format
9/8/2018 Worlds Style Briefing
Lincoln Douglas Debate Orientation
Debate & Adjudication Briefing
Lincoln Douglas Debate Orientation
Debate Orientation.
Basic Debating Skills.
Quebec Student Debating Association Judge’s Briefing.
Lincoln Douglas Debate Orientation
Introduction to British Parliamentary Debating Rachmat Nurcahyo,M. A
Sixth Debate of the Semester
HI LANGUAGE INSIDE TOURNAMENT 2016
Lincoln Douglas Debate Orientation
Roles In Debating Week 2.
NUDC KOPERTIS BOBY-ANGGI-OMAR
Debating Seminar Universitas Mataram
Científico Gabriel Ciscar, nº 1
Technical Meeting English Debate Competition Mechanical Language Club
Científico Gabriel Ciscar, nº 1
Public Speaking Contest
DEBATE AND PUBLIC SPEAKING
National University Debating Championship Kopertis IV 2019
Lincoln Douglas Debate Orientation
Lincoln Douglas Debate Orientation
Parliamentary Debate Orientation
Lincoln Douglas Debate Orientation
Debate Orientation.
Presentation transcript:

Debater Orientation 제 1 회 알바트로스 + 영어토론대회 설명회

What do you learn today? Structure & Logistics Basics of debate Adjudication Rules

Preliminary Rounds Round 1 Round 2 Round 3 The BIG Picture Based on win/loss and speaker points Main Break Rounds Semi-Finals Grand Finals

20 MIN Preparation time will be given. 3 Motions under one unified theme Impromptu Rounds

What to do with 3 motions? Rank your preferences Negotiate!!! as soon as you meet your opponents in your room Don’t cheat!!! Show your choices together at once.

Non-silent Round YES! Silent Round NO! You may receive feedback for silent preliminary rounds after the break announcement. For silent elimination rounds, you may receive it right after results are announced. Do we receive feedback?

PUNCTUALITY! PUNCTUALITY! PUNCTUALITY! Things to prepare! Notepad, pens & pencils, stopwatch, almanac & dictionary Dress Code: No flip flops or pajamas! Tournament

Registration Roll Call Matchups & Motion Release Write down who your opponent is, which bench your team is on, your room and judge Tournament

If you are government, Prepare inside the debate chambers. If you are opposition, SORRY…… have to prepare outside Tournament

Prep time is over… PROPOSITION OPPOSITION PODIUM

Speaker’s Role

PropositionOpposition PMLO DPMDLO GROR CONSTRUCTIVE

Prime Minister DEFINITION –What is a motion? –What is a definition? A set of words implying or directly stating a particular issue/issues that is presented to the audience for consideration An unambiguous and simple set of statements that identifies the central issue of the debate, clarifies all necessary terms, establishes all necessary parameters for discussion, and presents a definitive picture of the stance of the Government side Topic + Position Fair & Neutral Debating Grounds

THW – This House Would THS – This House Supports THBT – This House Believes That THW assassinate dictators. THS free trade. THBT plus size models do more harm than good to society. Examples of Motions

THBT we should militarily intervene to protect human rights. Who? NATO What? General Assembly resolution w/ support of P-5 members When? Genocide, ethnic cleansing or any kind of massive HR abuses Where? Wherever (Sudan, Zimbabwe, etc) How? Ground level or surgical strikes Why? To prevent exacerbation of SQ and b/c of overwhelming moral imperative as global citizens Example of Definition

Rebuts to the PM Definition, team stance, team split, arguments What is team stance? Leader of Opposition

Rebuts to the previous speaker(s) Delivers remaining arguments DEVELOPMENT! Deputies

Statement of why Your team won & Their team lost Reply Speakers REPLY Our team wins today because we had stronger rebuttals, better manner, were more good-looking And…

Any questions?

Understandin g the Rules

What is a definition? explaining the words within the motion in order to clarify the debate topic ex) THBT stars do more harm than good. Definition

DO NOT: Place set Time set Wholly unreasonable Squirrel-Against the spirit of the motion Truism Definition

Definitional Challenge Who: the LO What: the opposition comes up with its own definition and denies the definition that the government provides When: the government has set an unfair definition which falls under the five “don’t do” categories How: the opposition must provide why the definition that government presented fails and set alternative definition for the house Definition

Adjudicators HATE definitional challenges The debate becomes a complete mess! Both sides have a higher burden and a tougher job in engaging with each other The opposition must be VERY careful in using this card and the Government must be as objective, fair and considerate as possible! Definition

What is a POI? Point(s) of Information A short, clear question, clarification, or comment offered by the opposing team to the speaker on the podium Should not go over 15 seconds Adjudicator will call “Out of Order” if you stand up too often or go over 15 seconds while giving POI Points of Information (POIs)

Timing – A POI should be: Given only during constructive speeches Given before/after the “protected” time 0~1 minute /CLAP/ protected time 1~4 minute /CLAP/ RAISE POIs 5~6 minute /CLAP x2/ protected time 6~6:30 minute – Wrap Up! 6:30 ~ /Clapclapclap…….STOP!!!/ Points of Information (POIs)

Offering POIs (“Bench” team) Rising up from your seat Giving notification: hand gestures and/or vocal As many as possible, but do not stand up too often!! About 2~4 per speaker Points of Information (POIs)

Accepting/Rejecting POIs (Speaker on the Podium) Accepting: Answer and/or respond Rejecting by giving notification: hand gestures and/or vocal At least 2 The debater on the podium has FULL control of POIs Points of Information (POIs)

Fair-play Materials Accessing the Internet Communicating, in any form, with any persons beyond their registered teammates after the impromptu round motion has been released, prepared round team-pairings have been released, or during the debate round with any persons in the audience Cheating

Understanding the Adjudicators

1.What are the judging criteria? 2.Who are the adjudicators? 3.How do I evaluate the adjudicators? Table of Contents

Judging Criteria Logic, Relevancy, Response to POIs… Content (Matter) 40% Vocal clarity, Eye contact, Sincerity, Gestures… Style (Manner) 40% Organization, Offering POIs, Role fulfillment… Strategy (Method) 20%

Score Range StandardOverall Score Style (/40) Content (/40) Strategy (/20) Exceptional Good Improvement Needed

The Adjudicators went through… The CAP’s Selection Debating/ Adjudicating Experience Adjudication Education/TEST Knowledge of debate rules

Single Chair Panel Shadow judge Types of judges?

Turn in the Adjudicator Feedback Form! Your chance to tell us your opinion about the judges! Evaluating the Judges Debaters turn in the feedback The CAP reviews the feedback The CAP takes necessary actions Judges’ scores are recorded in the tab

Q&A