None Low Moderate High Very High (>0 to 3) (>3 to 20) (>20 to 50) (>50) Annual Effective Dose (mSv per year)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Radiation safety in CT.
Advertisements

Radiation safety in CT.
Low dose vs. Diagnostic CT Chris Semine MD 1/11/11
What You Should Know About Radiation and Nuclear Medicine
CARDIOVASCULAR IMAGING WITH COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY(CT)
Q.1 Radiation dose of CT scan of Head and Neck is equivalent to : A. 50 chest x-rays B. 100 chest x-rays C. 150 chest x-rays D. 200 chest x-rays.
Lower Dosage CT-guided Lung Biopsy Protocol Maintains Quality, Minimizes Exposure Jeremy Collins, MD Pegah E, Lewandowski RJ, Yaghmai V, Nemcek jr AA,
Radiation and Pregnancy ©Health Physics Society. Medical X-Ray Exams Radiation exposure that is extra- abdominal will not contribute significant radiation.
Business: Cell/Text: Presented by: Thomas J. LaRocca, M.S., D.A.B.R. Medical Physicist
Petra Lewis MD Professor of Radiology and OBGYN Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth.
The scientific unit of measurement for radiation dose, commonly referred to as effective dose, is the millisievert (mSv)
Biologic Effects. Biological Interactions Radiation Ultrasound MRI.
Radiation Exposure from X-ray and CT Examinations Evan Lum.
EBT CLINICAL UPDATE November EBT Clinical Applications CARDIAC IMAGING Coronary Artery Calcium Scanning Coronary Electron Beam Angiography (EBA)
Chapter 16 CPT Radiology.
Medical Machinery What is the difference between a
Special Radiographic examination
Radiology Research at BUMC Jorge Soto, MD Vice Chair Research, Radiology Associate Professor, Radiology 12/19/07.
Multislice CT Coronary Angiography
Biological response and radiation safety practices
Early Lung Cancer Screening: An Update of the Current Evidence
Screening for Coronary Artery Calcium with Computed Tomography: Angiography and Intervention in Patients with Scores Over 400 Screening for Coronary Artery.
LECTURE – 1 – RHPT – 485 READING IN MEDICAL IMAGING LEVEL - 8
October 27, 2009MDCH/RSS CON Seminar 1 Computed Tomography (CT) Proposed Rules for Radiation Safety John Ferris, Health Physicist Radiation Safety Section.
Radiation Dose in MS-CT coronarography Ladislav Pavic, MD, PhD Sunce Clinics Zagreb / Sarajevo Croatia / Bosnia & Herzegovina.
Radiation Dosimetry of the Patient
Optimizing Patient Radiation Dose
2006 CRCPD NEXT survey of Computed Tomography David Spelic, Physicist Center for Devices and Radiological Health Food and Drug Administration.
RADIAL ARTERY The route for the unwary. Uptake of New Procedures Volume Time.
Diagnostic Tools HB Signs Subjective observations (things that are observed or measured by another person) Examples: ▫Rash ▫Blood in urine ▫Vomiting.
Radiophamaceuticals in Nuclear Cardiac Imaging Vasken Dilsizian, M.D. Professor of Medicine and Radiology Director of Cardiovascular Nuclear Medicine and.
1 / 36Radiation Safety - JUAS 2014, X. Queralt 1.Definitions 2. Effects of the ionization radiation 3. Natural background 4. Medical application 5.Rules.
Diagnostic Imaging Tests  MRI  CT  Ultrasound  PET scan  Mammography  X-ray.
VIII.3. Optimization of Protection for Medical Exposures in Nuclear Medicine 2. Dose to patient Postgraduate Educational Course in Radiation Protection.
Diagnostic Imaging Modalities Diagnostic Imaging CAT/CTMRIPETUltrasound X-rays Radiography.
Part 2.
RADIATION PROTECTION OF THE YOUNG PATIENT: Kenya perspective
The Application of Multi-detector Computed Tomography in RVOT Ablation in BRUGADA’ s Syndrome Paweena Mapinta R.T, Cardiac Imaging Unit, Bangkok Heart.
Radiation Protection Procedures
1 As Clinical Anatomy RADIOLOGY. COURSE GOALS  Understand basics of image generation.  Relate imaging to gross anatomy.  See clinical relationship.
06/02/2016radiation safety - level 51 Radiation safety level 5 Frits Pleiter.
NUCLEAR MEDICINE.  High Energy Photon  Ionizing Radiation --Radiopharmaceutical  Exposes Detector  Projection Data  Dynamic / Physiologic Here we.
Population of 4D Computational Phantoms for CT Imaging Research and Dosimetry W. Paul Segars, PhD Carl E. Ravin Advanced Imaging Labs Duke University.
IS THERE A RATIONAL APPROACH TO RADIATION RISK? Philip F. Judy Ph.D. Department of Radiology Brigham and Women's Hospital New England AAPM Chapter Meeting.
 Coronary artery disease (also called CAD) is the most common type of heart disease. It is also the leading cause of death for both men and women in.
CARDIAC CT IN SCREENING FOR CAD Hossein Nademi MD CARDIOLOGIST JAVADOL-A-EME HEART HOSPITAL OCT
Requesting Imaging Examinations Sue Coull Quality & Safety Manager Imaging & Nuclear Medicine Departments.
Radiation in pregnancy Kangnam CHA General Hospital Cho Yeonkyung.
Cancer Education Day Lung Cancer Screening Update Kirenza Francis, MD, FRCPC, DABR Windsor Radiological Associates May 13, 2016.
Date of download: 6/18/2016 Copyright © The American College of Cardiology. All rights reserved. From: Cardiovascular Imaging Payment and Reimbursement.
Medical Imaging. X-ray Radiography 2-D projection image created from difference in x-ray absorption rates between tissues 2-D projection image created.
Radiology Resident Physics Course
HEALTH CARE STATISTICS AND RESEARCH HEPR 410
Diagnostic Imaging Medical Interventions
Part XII Homeland security.
Effective doses of ionizing radiation from medical procedures
Patient exposure trends and problems in implementing ALARA
Applications of Diagnostic Imaging Computed Tomography
Applications of Diagnostic Imaging Nuclear Medicine
Advanced Radiographic Imaging & Special Procedures
Pima Medical Institute Online Education
Pima Medical Institute Online Education
Radiation Dose from Diagnostic Computed Tomography in Saskatchewan
Monitoring Pregnant Technologist
Pima Medical Institute Online Education
Orthopedic History & Physical Examination.
Patient Preferences for Coronary CT Angiography with Stress Perfusion, SPECT, or Invasive Coronary Angiography Our intraindividual comparison in 16 sites.
Effective Dose From MPI by Geographic Region Stratified by Gender Box and whisker plots illustrating the median effective dose for women and men in each.
Presentation transcript:

None Low Moderate High Very High (>0 to 3) (>3 to 20) (>20 to 50) (>50) Annual Effective Dose (mSv per year)

Overall Study Population No. Subjects With ≥1 Imaging Procedures Using Ionizing Radiation No. (%) Annual Effective Radiation Dose from Medical Imaging Procedures (mSv) Mean (±SD)Median (IQR) All subjects (68.8)2.4(±6.0)0.1( ) Age groups (49.5)1.0(±3.5)0.0( ) (65.7)1.6(±4.5)0.1( ) (72.1)2.0(±5.1)0.2( ) (74.9)2.6(±6.0)0.3( ) (78.2)3.3(±6.9)0.4( ) (79.5)4.1(±7.9)0.5( ) (85.9)5.2(±9.1)0.9( ) Gender Men (57.9)2.3(±6.1)0.0( ) Women (78.7)2.6(±5.9)0.3( )

Low ≤3 mSv/year Moderate >3 to 20 mSv/year High >20 to 50 mSv/year Very-High >50 mSv/year All individuals Age groups Gender Men Women Annual Rates of Low, Moderate, High, and Very-High Radiation Exposures per 1000

ProcedureDose (mSv) Annual Dose /person Proportion of Overall Radiation 1. Myocardial perfusion imaging % 2. CT of the abdomen % 3. CT of the pelvis % 4. CT of the chest % 5. Diagnostic cardiac catheterization % 6. X-ray of the lumbar spine % 7. Mammography % 8. CT angio of the chest (non-coronary) % 9. Upper GI series % 10. CT of the head/brain % 11. Percutaneous coronary intervention % 12. Bone scan (nuclear) % 13. X-ray of the abdomen % 14. CT of the cervical spine % 15. CT of the lumbar spine % 16. Chest x-ray % 17. Thyroid uptake scan % 18. Intravenous urography % 19. CT of the neck % 20. Cardiac resting ventriculography %

Distribution of Total Radiation Exposure by the Type of Imaging Procedure

Distribution of Total Radiation Exposure by Anatomic Site of the Imaging Procedure

Distribution of Total Radiation Exposure by Location of Service of the Imaging Procedure