5Feb07 Beijing GDE meeting 1 S2 Task Force Status (String test definition) Tom Himel.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
9Apr07 Fermilab Steering Group 1 S2 Task Force Status (String test definition) and High Priority R&D Items Tom Himel.
Advertisements

Reliability Engineering (Rekayasa Keandalan)
The Multiple Regression Model Prepared by Vera Tabakova, East Carolina University.
6-Nov-06 FALC Resource Board Global Design Effort 1 Report from the GDE Barry Barish Caltech / GDE 6-Nov-06.
20-Nov-06 FALC - KEK Global Design Effort 1 GDE Report Barry Barish Caltech / GDE 20-Nov-06 RDR Design Freeze.
BDS GDE context LC-ABD2 : WP4 - Beam Line Design 12 th April 2007, LC-ABD Plenary, RHUL Deepa Angal-Kalinin ASTeC, The Cockcroft Institute.
1-Dec-06 HEPAP Univ. Subpanel Global Design Effort 1 ILC Report Barry Barish Caltech / GDE 1-Dec-06 RDR Design Freeze.
20 April 06 P5 - SLAC Global Design Effort 1 ILC Update from the GDE Barry Barish GDE Caltech.
7-Feb-07 GDE/ACFA Closing Beijing Global Design Effort 1 Summary of GDE Meeting and Future Actions Barry Barish 7-Feb-07.
1 Product Reliability Chris Nabavi BSc SMIEEE © 2006 PCE Systems Ltd.
The RDR Report Odyssey Nan Phinney SLAC for N^3 team of editors.
Proposal for a new UNECE regulation on recyclability of motor vehicles Informal Document GRPE Reply to the Comments of the Russian Federation Informal.
Global Design Effort U.S. ILC Cost Translation R. Stanek, et al. Vic Kuchler 1/26/07.
Gek 16/6/041 ITRP Comments on Question 19 GEK 9/06/04 19) For the X-band (warm) technology, detail the status of the tests of the full rf delivery system.
February 26, 2007 Global Design Effort 1 Most recent in Beijing BDS/IR talk, February 4, 2007:
Global Design Effort Americas Region Efforts and Resources Mike Harrison GDE.
RDR Report Writing Nan Phinney SLAC for RDR team of editors.
HLRF DRAFT Global Design Effort 1 Defining EDR* Work Packages [Engineering Design Report] Ray Larsen SLAC ILC Division for HLRF Team DRAFT April.
27-March-10 LCWS10 - Beijing Global Design Effort 1 Barry Barish LCWS10 - Beijing 27-March-10 “Cost Containment” for the TDR.
Global Design Effort ILC: From RDR to EDR or “How to Spend the Money” Nick Walker GDE.
Cryomodule Design and R&D during the EDR phase Robert Kephart With input from the T4 CM Collaboration.
1 The Design & Value Costs SRF Technology The XFEL as a Prototype Japan as a Host International Linear Collider Status Mike Harrison.
RDR Report Writing Nan Phinney SLAC. 7/20/06 VLCW06 Global Design Effort 2 GLC Report Working model is the 2003 GLC Report ch 4-7
CLIC Implementation Studies Ph. Lebrun & J. Osborne CERN CLIC Collaboration Meeting addressing the Work Packages CERN, 3-4 November 2011.
Operations, Test facilities, CF&S Tom Himel SLAC.
Global Design Effort 1 Possible Minimum Machine Studies of Central Region for 2009 Reference, ILC Minimum Machine Study Proposal V1, January 2009 ILC-EDMS.
DESY_ILCW07 Global Design Effort-CF&S 1 Beam Delivery System & Interaction Region Fred Asiri CF&S Point of Contact.
6-7 April 06 MAC Review Global Design Effort 1 The Global R&D Board Bill Willis GDE Columbia University.
CLIC-ILC WG Oxford, Jan 10 Slide 1 CLIC – ILC General Issues WG, Update BackgroundChargeStatusPlans.
VI. Regression Analysis A. Simple Linear Regression 1. Scatter Plots Regression analysis is best taught via an example. Pencil lead is a ceramic material.
Global Design Effort DR Session Introduction S. Guiducci (LNF) ILC10, Beijing 27 March 2010.
CLIC TDR Task Force CLIC Zero, cost & schedule considerations R. Corsini.
Aug 23, 2006 Half Current Option: Impact on Linac Cost Chris Adolphsen With input from Mike Neubauer, Chris Nantista and Tom Peterson.
CFS / Global – 04 Aug, 2010 PM Report: SB2009: –ADI meeting 23.07: Parameter tables with low energy / low power operation –BA Workshop Planning CFS participation.
22 September 2006 Global Design Effort 1 The Global R&D Board Status Bill Willis GDE Columbia University.
Global Design Effort - CFS DESY Accelerator Design and Integration Meeting 1 ACCELERATOR INTEGRATION AND DESIGN MEETING CONVENTIONAL FACILITIES.
Conventional Facilities and Siting GG Global Design Effort BILCW 07 - Beijing1 Conventional Facilities and Siting Global Group Summary Report.
On S1Global Writeup S1G Writeup Meeting Nobu Toge 1.
SCRF Cavity WebEx Meeting May 17, 2010 Reports from PM (10 min.) – Brief report from ILC-PAC – Industrialization workshop as IPAC satellite meeting, Kyoto,
Global Design Effort: Controls & LLRF Americas Region Team WBS x.2 Global Systems Program Overview for FY08/09.
Beijing ILC Workshop Global Design Effort 1 The S0S1 Taskforce: an Example of the Complexity for the ILC R&D Environment Lutz Lilje DESY.
Tor Raubenheimer KEK Mtg Goals KEK January 19 th, 2006.
Global Design Effort Main Linac Technology System Kick-off Meeting Cavity Summary 20 Sept 2007 DESY Marc Ross.
1 May 06 LCFOA - SLAC Global Design Effort 1 ILC Global Design Effort Barry Barish GDE Caltech.
ILC 2007 Global Design Effort 1 Planning Damping Rings Activities in the Engineering Design Phase Andy Wolski Cockcroft Institute/University of Liverpool.
1 of 5 CONVENTIONAL FACILITIES & SITING GROUP PROGRESS OVERVIEW J.L. Baldy, A. Enomoto, V. Kuchler V. KUCHLER GDE Executive Committee Meeting
Global Design Effort1 September 20-22, 2006 MAC Review Response to 1 st MAC Mtg Barry Barish GDE.
Beijing ILC Workshop Global Design Effort 1 Main Linac EDR: Cavity & Cryomodule Discussion Lutz Lilje DESY.
ILC EDMS Selection Committee Progress Report Tom Markiewicz SLAC 29 November 2005.
Americas Regional Planning Exercises Tor Raubenheimer SLAC Beijing GDE Meeting February 4 th 2007.
CFS / Global – 09 June, 2010 PM Report: SB2009: –4 two-day workshops form the core of ‘TOP LEVEL CHANGE CONTROL’ –  as advised by AAP, PAC and etc –Written.
Main Linac Technology (MLT) Meeting To be held through WebEx July 13, 2007.
Tests on production cryomodules Bob Kephart Sept 30, 2006.
S2 Progress Report for EC H. Padamsee and Tom Himel For the S2 Task Force.
19Jul06 Vancouver GDE meeting 1 S2 Task Force Status (String test definition) Tom Himel.
Global design effort Americas 1 FY08-09 ILC-Americas planning G. Dugan ILC-Americas Planning meeting SLAC Sept. 13, 2006.
The Evolving ILC Project
EDR Planning, Cost Review and Technical Risk Analysis
Availsim runs and questions
Main Linac EDR: Cavity & Cryomodule Discussion
Notes on Ramp-Up and Production
Charge for the Technical Board Members of the Tesla Technology Collaboration (TTC)
2. SCRF General Preparation for the AD&I Preparation for AAP Review
ILC Global Design Effort
Barry Barish GDE Caltech
The S0S1 Taskforce: an Example of the Complexity for the ILC R&D Environment Lutz Lilje DESY Beijing ILC Workshop Global Design Effort.
DR Session Introduction
ILC - Global Design Effort
Reliability, MPS, Operations and Tuning Work Packages
Presentation transcript:

5Feb07 Beijing GDE meeting 1 S2 Task Force Status (String test definition) Tom Himel

5Feb07 Beijing GDE meeting 2 Contents Review of previous progress presented in Valencia New progress and further conclusions

5Feb07 Beijing GDE meeting 3 Members Hasan Padamsee (Co-Chair) Tom Himel (Co-Chair) Bob Kephart Chris Adolphsen Hitoshi Hayano Nobu Toge Hans Weise Consultants: Sergei Nagaitsev, Nikolai Solyak, Lutz Lilje, Marc Ross, Daniel Schulte

5Feb07 Beijing GDE meeting 4 Task force set up by the Global R&D board –What are the reasons and goals of a system test? Start with TRC R2 list. –Determine how many RF units are needed as a system test before ILC construction –Do they need to be in a string? –Is beam needed? Had reached preliminary conclusions by Valencia meeting Expected final report in early January 2007 Wiki page available off the linearcollider.org website via the Global R&D board wiki or at: Review of Valencia report mid

5Feb07 Beijing GDE meeting 5 The minimum size system test needed to confirm the performance of a new design is a single RF unit with ILC like beam. As many tests are statistical in nature, a longer string test with several RF units or multiple tests with one RF unit would be better. As construction of the project starts, a larger second phase system test will be needed to check the final manufactured components. One of the possible scenarios is to build a test linac with contributions of a total of several RF units from the three regional teams of the final consolidated ILC linac system design. It is S2’s intention to make recommendations on the suitable scale of this effort by the time of its final report. Preliminary conclusions at Valencia Not

5Feb07 Beijing GDE meeting 6 Progress Full first draft of report was completed Jan 18, Went to R&D board and got approval on Jan 26. Sent to the EC on Jan 26. We chose to be non-exact in specifying the size of phase 2: As construction of the project starts, a test facility (or facilities) will be needed to qualify manufactured RF unit components of the final consolidated ILC linac system design. These components may be built at industries in different regions. One of the possible scenarios is to build a test string with contributions of a total of several RF units from the three regional teams. There are many factors that will influence the choice of the size of the string and whether the goals can be accomplished instead through several smaller tests or one long string. These factors will be coupled to the future industrialization strategy adopted for ILC main linac components. Therefore we cannot at this stage determine the ideal scale of this second phase of system tests.

5Feb07 Beijing GDE meeting 7 Another way to estimate phase 2 size Assume that the probability of a failure occurring in a cryomodule is distributed as 1/time, so the probabilities of a failure occurring between 1 day and 20 days, between 20 days and a year, and between a year and 20 years are roughly equal. This corresponds to the leading edge of the bathtub curve (infant mortality) and ignores the trailing edge caused by items wearing out and the flat bottom of the curve due to steady-state failures. Before construction begins, assume we want to show that less than 10% of the cryomodules that survive the first day will fail in 20 years. Thus we would tolerate roughly 3% failures in each of the three times periods noted above. To show that the failure rate will not exceed 3% in each of these periods, we would need to test roughly 30 cryomodules for 20 days or 15 cryomodules for a year. The latter is more reasonable, that is, under these assumptions the phase 2 test would be the operation of 5 RF units for a year. While this model is very crude and has questionable assumptions, it probably does set the right scale for the size of a phase 2 system test.

5Feb07 Beijing GDE meeting 8 Incredibly rough Phase 1 cost estimate per system test Phasen CM n RF CM cost (M$) RF cost (M$) Basic Infrastruc. cost (M$) Cost Sum (M$) Subtotal Non-beam related facilities15 Beam related facilities35 Total

5Feb07 Beijing GDE meeting 9 Next steps We are virtually done Studies of industrialization aspects will need to be started in earnest. Test facilities associated with industrialization will also need to be defined. The RDB has already discussed extending the S2 task force to examine these issues. No good deed goes unpunished.