Liberalism: Conclusion Lecture 14. The Question of the Month How Can Countries Move from Anarchy, War of All Against All, to Cooperation? Security Dilemma.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Power and Weakness By: Robert Kagan. Introduction Europe claims that the United States resorts to force more quickly and that it sees the world as divided.
Advertisements

Unit 2 Activity 10 Alliances and International Organizations.
WORLD POLITICS – Lecture MULTIPOLAR STABILITY IN LIBERALISM (2): After Pax Americana (Charles Kupchan)
1 Regional Financial Integration: Opportunities and Challenges Dr. Aslim Tajuddin Deputy Governor Bank Indonesia Regional Financial Integration: Opportunities.
International Organizations. Internationalization Globalization Conflict and cooperation on the international scale Reducing conflict and enhancing cooperation.
To What Extent Should We Embrace Internationalism?
The best US foreign policy is one based on contemporary understandings of realism. Such a policy would be more successful, particularly in avoiding wars,
The Rise of Brazil and South America March 25, 2014.
Today  Updates: Kenya and Chad  Simulation: your country assignments  The Cold War, /91 Causes of the Cold War  Cuban Missile Crisis  The.
POLS 425 U.S. Foreign Policy U.S.-China Relations: How Should the U.S. Deal with a Rising Power?
Neo-realists – neo-liberals The debate to date. Neo-realism Neo-Liberalist.
Chapter 5 Power, Conflict, and Policy
Institutions and their role in shaping European Security
Liberalism in Western Europe Lecture 11. Variations on a Liberal Theme One Might Say that Liberalism on a Global Scale, as Embodied in the UN, Has Not.
BARACK OBAMA AND THE POLITICS OF HOPE (?). RATIONALES FOR ALTERNATIVES U.S. loss of “soft power” Continuing frustration in Latin America Importance of.
The Cold War State of tension and hostility between the United States and the Soviet Union because of differences in political and economic philosophies.
Introduction to Liberalism Lecture 8. War in the Contemporary State System “The Culture of Death.” Boutros Boutros-Ghali (Former Secretary-General of.
Goals of Foreign Policy
Global Governance Institutions
BIRTH OF THE COLD WAR ERA.  U.S. and western Europe vs. The Soviet Union  Ideological and strategic influence around the world  Primarily fought in.
Political Culture Where does it come from? What difference does it make?
“A Love-Hate Affair” 1.What has been the relationship between Bush and the U.N.? What is the reason for this? 2.List 3 criticisms of the U.N. 3.Who pays.
The Black Sea Region: New Challenges and Opportunities for Regional Cooperation ( ANALYSES from Ukraine) prof. Grygorii Perepelytsia.
Power Transition Theory and U.S.-China Relations Professor David Skidmore September 28, 2010 University of Macau.
U.S. Interests in the Middle East. Regional Stability U.S. policy in the Middle East from the 1940s through the 1960s was a defensive measure to protect.
Chapter 15 Comparative International Relations. This (that is the LAST!) Week.
Political Regimes.
Security Sector Governance and European Integration Pál Dunay Geneva Centre for Security Policy.
Chapter The United States + The World. Goals of Foreign Policy.
The Liberal Order or Empire? Security co-binding: together against common threats. Forced to stay together? Penetrated hegemony: leadership role for the.
Non-State Actors in Inter-state Systems IGOs, NGOs, and World Movements.
International Organizations
War in The Democratic Republic of Congo Lecture 13.
Liberalism. Introduction Liberalism – Historical alternative to realism Promotes peace in the international system through set norms, procedures and institutions,
1 Understanding Global Politics Lecture 4: Neo-Realism/ Structural Realism.
Outline of Course: Security and International Relations Theory and Practice The course is divided into three parts –1) Part one explains why the nation-state.
Foreign Policy & International Trade
Liberalism 朴世峻 Basic Liberal Assumption 1. A positive view of human nature 2. A conviction that international relations can.
International Relations Managing Interdependence and Domestic Politics March 18 th, 2003.
WHY DO STATES DO WHAT THEY DO? THE REALIST (I.E., THE DOMINANT) PERSPECTIVE States have primacy as unitary intl. actors (while leaders come and go, states.
Introducing the IR Paradigms 1: Liberalism(s) in IR Prepared for Junior International Politics Class at NENU, Fall 2015.
Claudia s. de Windt Project Attorney, OAS/FIDA Toward a Right of Participation in the Americas: From Rio to Quebec Presentation at the Resource Persons.
Liberal alternatives International Security in the Modern World Masaryk University in Brno 1-2 July 2012 Věra Stojarová.
The West and the Rest. 3 main themes: The world’s cultural diversity in the age of globalization – does it breed conflict and impede cooperation? The.
Chapter 30 Russia and Eastern Europe. Why did the liberal experiment in Russia Fail and Lenin’s revolution succeed?
Section 4: Foreign Aid and Alliances The United States works with other nations to keep the peace and to ensure political stability around the world. American.
International System International Relations. Basic concepts What is IR? Who are the actors/players in IR? Why they behave in a certain way? What quality.
Foreign policy in Action. Long term goals of US foreign policy 1. National security Main goal of US foreign policy is to preserve the security of US.
Presentation by Dr. Kevin Lasher. TrumanKennan.
Supranational Organizations  Supranationalism involves nations putting aside their own interests to work towards the good of the collective.  The well-being.
HOLT, RINEHART AND WINSTON A MERICAN GOVERNMENT HOLT 1 International Relations Section 1: Collective Security Section 2: Economic Interdependence Section.
C hap t er 1: Why Study IR? Lecturer: Som Savuth MPS and B.Ed. h.
Foreign Policy GOVT Module 16.
Resident Representative
Chapter XXXI The Cold War & Decolonization
Alternatives to Realism: Pluralist Liberalism and Globalism
Week14: The U.s. and East asia.
THE RISE OF CHINA - Power, Institutions and the Western Order -
Lecture 8.1 LIBERALISM A. Alternative to realism
Introduction to International Relations
Lessons for the 21st Century
Systemic & Dyadic Explanations of Interstate Conflict
World Politics Under a system of Anarchy
DO NOW Why did America not like the Soviet Union after WW2?
The Cold War: Post-WWII Era
The Challenge of Interdependence
Theories of International Relations
Theories of International Relations
IR Theory No Limits Debate.
International Organizations
Presentation transcript:

Liberalism: Conclusion Lecture 14

The Question of the Month How Can Countries Move from Anarchy, War of All Against All, to Cooperation? Security Dilemma (Prisoner’s Dilemma) Emphasizes Difficulties Created by Inability to Make Binding Commitments within the Anarchic State System. –Applies to Relations between nations –Applies to Relations between groups within nations

The Liberal Solution International Institutions Facilitate International Cooperation Cooperation Can Promote Social and Economic Integration Democratic Institutions Promote Non- Violent Dispute Settlement –Respect for Rule of Law –Domestic Constraints on Use of Force

The Interaction Matters A Global Society emerges from continuous social and economic interactions among democratic governments within international institutions. Global Society makes war less likely –by providing fewer reasons to fight –By providing alternative means for conflict resolution.

Liberalism and Life in the West High degree of social and economic integration. All countries are Democratic Interaction among them takes place in highly institutionalized environment A “Liberal Peace?”

Liberalism and Life in the Rest of the World Less social and economic interaction. Non-Democratic or, where Democratic, “new” Democracies Weak International Institutions War.

Are the Liberals Right? Experience of Western Europe Suggests that the Liberals Have a Point. Experience Elsewhere Suggests that Mearsheimer and the Realists Have a Point. Both Right? –Once Created Liberal Orders are Successful –But, it’s Very Hard to Create Liberal Orders.

U.S. Foreign Policy in the 20 th Century Power Transition: Hegemon Can Structure State System However it Likes. U.S. in 20 th Century Has Used its Power to Attempt to Create a Liberal Order in International Politics. Rhetorical Commitment: 14 Points and Atlantic Charter Lay Out Vision of an International System Based on Democracy, International Organization, and Economic Interdependence. Behavior Consistent With These Goals: Creation of United Nations, Creation of GATT/Bretton Woods and Economic Interdependence, Process of Decolonization and Democratization.

Cold War Complicated U.S. Ability to Achieve Some of these Objectives. Cold War Can Be Seen As a Soviet Challenge to America’s Liberal Vision. –The Soviet Union Not Friendly Toward Market-Based Capitalism or Liberal Representative Democracy. –Preferred in their Place Soviet-Style “Command” Economies and “Communist” Regimes. U.S. Diverted From Creating Liberal Order by Perceived Need to Defend Existing Achievements Against Soviet Challenges. –Consistent Support of Democracy and Effectiveness of UN are Victims of this Diversion.

The 21 st Century? Order and Stability in International Politics Requires Structure. –Need to “Solve” the Security Dilemma. –American Hegemony Can Play an Important Role in Solving this Dilemma and Promoting Stability. –Might Be Achieved Through Unilateral Coercive Use of American Military Power (Realism). –Or, Might Be Achieved Through Multilateral Use of American Power to Foster Democracy, Promote Economic Interdependence, and Strengthen International Institutions (Liberalism). Is the U.S. Willing to Use its Power to Support and Maintain a Liberal International State System?

Saudi Arabia Source: IMF Financial Statistics

Pakistan Egypt Saudi Arabia United States Source:

“Riot” Defined As: The number of any violent demonstration or clash of more than 100 citizens involving the use of physical force. Source: Arthur S. Banks Cross National Time-Series Data Archive

The Liberal Solution Create Greater Economic Opportunity Political Reform Toward More Representative Forms of Government Both of which Point to “Nation Building”