Planning Effective Mathematics Instruction in a Variety of Educational Environments David Allsopp, Ph.D. University of South Florida Allsopp, Kyger, and.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Performance Assessment
Advertisements

Empowering Learners through the Common Core State Standards
Teaching Math to Students with Disabilities Present Perspectives.
Provincial Report Cards Mathematics Grades 1 to 12.
NWSC November Math Cohort Meeting WELCOME! Nancy Berkas Cyntha Pattison.
Connecting to Curriculum
Empowering Young Learners through the Standards for Mathematical Practice Juli K. Dixon, Ph.D. University of Central Florida
Educators Evaluating Quality Instructional Products (EQuIP) Using the Tri-State Quality Rubric for Mathematics.
Dallas Independent School District Conrad High School August 2013.
Common Core State Standards—Mathematics Introduction/Overview 1 Cathy Carroll
Presented by Diane Burtchin Adapted from the book “Math Intervention: Building Number Power with Formative Assessments, Differentiation, and Games” by.
5 Pillars of Mathematics Training #1: Mathematical Discourse Dawn Perks Grayling B. Williams.
Introduction 1.How do you use technology now? 2.What helps? 3.What hinders? Definition of Technology Computers Software Internet Digital cameras and camcorders.
Intervention Resource Guide. Math Intervention Courses Address foundational math skills – Whole numbers – Addition, Subtraction, Multiplication, Division.
HOW CAN WE, AS TEACHERS SUPPORT OUR STRUGGLING SCHOLARS SO THAT THEY CAN STILL HAVE SUCCESS? Accommodating Struggling Learners in Mathematics.
Grade 1 Mathematics in the K to 12 Curriculum Soledad Ulep, PhD UP NISMED.
MT LEBANON SCHOOL DISTRICT Elementary Mathematics Program.
Mathematics Mastery Parent Information. A belief and a frustration Success in mathematics for every child Close the attainment gap Mathematics Mastery.
Boot Camp Spring  Choose a class and complete a Context for Learning for this class. (It can be the same class as the literacy tasks, but YOU MUST.
Module 1: A Closer Look at the Common Core State Standards for Mathematics High School Session 2: Matching Clusters of Standards to Critical Areas in one.
Concept Attainment Inquiry Lessons.  Is used to teach concepts, patterns and abstractions  Brings together the ideas of inquiry, discovery and problem-solving.
Mathematics Dynamic Assessment: Finding Out What You Need To Know In Order To Make Effective Mathematical Instructional Decisions David H. Allsopp, Ph.D.
Session 4 Pulling it All Together Building a Solid Number Foundation Strategies for Education Assistants 1.
Math Foundational Services SHIFT 1: Focus October 9, 2014 Cindy Dollman & Joe Delinski The PROE Center.
Understanding the Shifts in the Common Core State Standards A Focus on Mathematics Wednesday, October 19 th, :00 pm – 3:30 pm Doug Sovde, Senior.
Three Shifts of the Alaska Mathematics Standards.
Dates:Tuesdays, Jan 7 – Feb 11
2012 OSEP Project Directors Conference Washington, DC July 24, 2012 Russell Gersten, Ph.D. Director, Instructional Research Group Professor Emeritus, University.
Vision: Every child in every district receives the instruction that they need and deserve…every day. Oregon Response to Intervention Vision: Every child.
Nicole Paulson CCSSO Webinar March 21, 2012 Transition to the Common Core State Standards in Elementary Math.
1 National Council of Supervisors of Mathematics Illustrating the Standards for Mathematical Practice: Getting Started with the Practices Investigations.
Elementary Math: Principals Professional Development Fall 2011.
Piedmont K-5 Math Adoption May 29, Overview What Elementary Math Looks Like Historical Perspective District Philosophy Process and Criteria Why.
Mathematical Understanding: An Introduction Fuson, Kalchman, and Bransford.
Don’t Take OSE-EIS for Granted – Part 2 OEAA 2006 Conference Sessions 34 and 40.
“Unwrapping” the Standards Presented by The Leadership and Learning Center Adapted for RITTI Training.
Write all group member names and numbers on ½ paper and bring to front table.
Elementary Math: 2 nd Grade Professional Development January 2012.
Misunderstood Minds 1.
Math Standards  NCTM  Common Core State Standards for Math (CCSSM)  Needs of Diverse Learners.
High Quality Math Instruction
Common Core Standards Madison City Schools Math Leadership Team.
The Trouble with Fractions. The Four Big Ideas of Fractions The parts are of equal size There are a specific number of parts The whole is divided The.
Understanding the Common Core State Standards March 2012 These slides were taken from: and I have deleted.
Mt. Diablo Unified School District Elementary Mathematics Adoption Buy Back Day Thursday, August 27, 2009.
Elementary Math: Grade 5 Professional Development Fall 2011.
National Math Panel Final report 2008 presented by Stanislaus County Office of Education November 2008.
Instructional Design. CRITICAL CONCEPTS Scaffolding Instruction Collaboration & Teaming Individualization Data-based decision making Inclusion & Diversity.
Symbol Cards Accountable Talk Jig Saw Accountable Talk: Text Based discussion Creating our virtual classroom Stage 1 – Setting the stage for Learning –Goals,
1 Math 413 Mathematics Tasks for Cognitive Instruction October 2008.
Differentiating Math Instruction: Project EQUAL Small Group Instruction Responding to Learners’ Needs.
*Please sit with your grade level. You will leave today with a clear picture of…  What Math Workshop looks like (review)  How to integrate the Common.
K-8 Mathematics Standards Content Training Rate of Change Grades 6-12.
Common Core Confessions of a Math Teacher. So, what is this Common Core thing all about? The standards define the knowledge and skills students should.
Using Data and Grouping to Teach All Students All the Time—Differently!
Differentiating Math Instruction: Project EQUAL Small Group Instruction Responding to Learners’ Needs.
Connecting the Characteristics Margaret Heritage UCLA/ CRESST Attributes of Other Characteristics of Effective Instruction and Assessment for Learning.
Structuring Learning. Agenda Structuring learning. Structuring lab sessions. Engagement. Critical Thinking. Ideas for structuring learning. Activity.
Oregon’s Second Annual GED Summit Creating Promise, Designing Success Thank you to our sponsors:
COMMON CORE STANDARDS C OLLEGE - AND C AREER - READINESS S TANDARDS North East Florida Educational ConsortiumFall 2011 F LORIDA ’ S P LAN FOR I MPLEMENTATION.
COMMON CORE STANDARDS C OLLEGE - AND C AREER - READINESS S TANDARDS North East Florida Educational ConsortiumFall 2011 F LORIDA ’ S P LAN FOR I MPLEMENTATION.
Balanced Math Overview
CHAPTER 1 Teaching Mathematics in the 21 st Century.
MATH BY MEAGHAN, ROWEN, ELSIE. CONTENT LIST ▪ INTRODUCTION : Past vs Present ▪ SELECTING APPROPRIATE MATH : Math Standards ▪ RESEARCH ON MATH INSTRUCTION.
Mastery for Maths Parent Workshop
Instruction for Students Struggling with Math
Math Standards Math 120—Algorithms for Arithmetic
WHAT IS LIFE LONG LEARNING IMPORTANCE OF LIFE LONG LEARNING
Math Standards Math 120—Algorithms for Arithmetic
Biker Model Lesson: Discussion
Presentation transcript:

Planning Effective Mathematics Instruction in a Variety of Educational Environments David Allsopp, Ph.D. University of South Florida Allsopp, Kyger, and Lovin (2007). Teaching Mathematics Meaningfully. Paul H. Brookes Publishing.

Essential Questions What is the target mathematics concept? What did I learn from my mathematics dynamic assessment (or other pre-unit assessment) What is my instructional hypothesis (what students know, don’t know, and why) How do students think about these ideas differently from adults and how can I use this information to inform instruction? How will I differentiate the instructional needs of my students? Allsopp, Kyger, and Lovin (2007). Teaching Mathematics Meaningfully. Paul H. Brookes Publishing.

Essential Questions What authentic contexts will I use? How will I introduce/model the target concept to the whole class? How will I differentiate the instructional/scaffolding/extension (generalization and adaption) needs of my students? How will I provide practice opportunities that promote proficiency/maintenance? How will I evaluate my students’ learning and determine the effectiveness of my instruction? Allsopp, Kyger, and Lovin (2007). Teaching Mathematics Meaningfully. Paul H. Brookes Publishing.

Planning for Responsive Mathematics Instruction Consider what students know, don’t know, and why Consider stages of learning Determine differentiated instruction needs/objectives Select authentic contexts Plan whole class instruction Plan differentiated instruction Plan practice opportunities Plan how you will evaluate learning and your instruction Allsopp, Kyger, and Lovin (2007). Teaching Mathematics Meaningfully. Paul H. Brookes Publishing.

Adapted from: Allsopp, D., Teaching Mathematics Meaningfully, 2007 Making mathematics accessible through responsive teaching Understanding & teaching The big ideas in math AND The big ideas for DOING math Understanding learning characteristics/ barriers for students with difficulties In mathematics Continuously assessing learning To make informed instructional decisions Model for Meaningful Mathematics Instruction Pre- Assessment Formative Assessment Summative Assessment

Big Ideas of Mathematics ~Number & Operations ~Algebra ~Geometry ~Measurement ~Data analysis & probability Processes for Doing Mathematics ~Problem Solving ~Reasoning & Proof ~Connections ~Communications ~Representation Responsive Teaching Framework for Differentiating Mathematics Instruction

Core Instruction: The areas to be studied in mathematics from pre-kindergarten through eighth grade should be streamlined Proficiency with whole numbers, fractions, and certain aspects of geometry and measurement are the foundations for algebra. Conceptual understanding, computational and procedural fluency, and problem solving skills are equally important and mutually reinforce each other. Students should develop immediate recall of arithmetic facts to free the "working memory" for solving more complex problems. What we know… National Math Panel

Adding it Up, National Research Council, p. 117, 2007 In order for students to be successful in mathematics, each of these intertwined strands must work together.

How programs are designed is critical! - Spiral vs. Strand design -Traditional vs. Explicit -Use of scaffolding to increase mastery & generalization of skills/strategies vs. demonstrate & replicate -Prior knowledge: Instruction in related vocabulary and review of mastered prerequisite skills vs. assumption of prior knowledge -Examples & non-examples -Sequencing of skills (macro/micro) -Progress monitoring vs. “wait and see”

Time to Reflect… Individual Think-Write What are some of the characteristics of my core math program? Mix and Match 2

Summarizing CRA Results Based on C-R-A Assessment Mrs. Carsen concludes students: oHave difficulty representing fractions that are >, <, or = using unlike denominators oHave difficulty determining >, <, or = using symbols between fractions with unlike denominators (abstract, representational) oHave some ability to do this with fractions that have natural relationships (1/2 and 2/4, 4/6 and 2/3-abstract) oHave difficulty relating written fractions to drawings (Lack concept of the meaning of a fraction) oDifficulty with concept of “equivalent area” of whole to part when drawing

MDA Results Hypothesis SA ZD JD AD RF FJ RJ SK NM JM XM TR JT TW FFFMIMMFIIIFMMFFFMIMMFIIIFMM IIIMMMMIMMMIMMIIIMMMMIMMMIMM IIIIMIIIMMMIIIIIIIMIIIMMMIII MMMMMMMMMMMIMMMMMMMMMMMMMIMM IIIMMMMIMMMIMMIIIMMMMIMMMIMM MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM

Instructional Hypothesis What’s it all about? Provides you with a focused approach to teaching that specifically addresses the needs of your students based on the results of a mathematics dynamic assessment.

Instructional Hypothesis Context: What Students Can Do: What Students Can’t Do: Reason: “Given _____________________, Students can _______________ Students cannot _____________ Because ____________________” Keep It Simple!

Given two fractions… Students are able to… determine >, <, and = when fractions have like denominators at concrete, representational and abstract levels. Students are unable to… determine >, <, and = when fractions have unlike denominators at concrete, representational and abstract levels. …because they lack understanding of the area that fractions represent Instructional Hypothesis

MDA Results Hypothesis SA ZD JD AD RF FJ RJ SK NM JM XM TR JT TW FFFMIMMFIIIFMMFFFMIMMFIIIFMM IIIMMMMIMMMIMMIIIMMMMIMMMIMM IIIIMIIIMMMIIIIIIIMIIIMMMIII MMMMMMMMMMMIMMMMMMMMMMMMMIMM IIIMMMMIMMMIMMIIIMMMMIMMMIMM MMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMM Given a set of 2 fractions, the majority of my students can determine >, <, and = when fractions have like denominators at the C R & A levels; however they cannot determine >, <, and = when fractions have unlike denominators because they lack understanding of the area that fractions represent.

Consider Stages of Learning: A Framework for Understanding How Struggling Learners Learn Entry level AcquisitionProficiencyMaintenanceGeneralizationAdaption InitialAdvanced Accuracy Rate Retention Stages of Learning Extension To focus instruction, it is important to know at what stage of learning students are with respect to the target math concept/skill…

Planning for Responsive Mathematics Instruction Determine differentiated instructional needs/objectives Allsopp, Kyger, and Lovin (2007). Teaching Mathematics Meaningfully. Paul H. Brookes Publishing.

Planning for Responsive Mathematics Instruction Determine differentiated instructional needs/objectives Allsopp, Kyger, and Lovin (2007). Teaching Mathematics Meaningfully. Paul H. Brookes Publishing.

Planning for Responsive Mathematics Instruction Select Authentic Context Plan whole class instruction Select Authentic Context Plan whole class instruction Allsopp, Kyger, and Lovin (2007). Teaching Mathematics Meaningfully. Paul H. Brookes Publishing.

Planning for Responsive Mathematics Instruction Plan differentiated instruction Plan practice opportunities Plan differentiated instruction Plan practice opportunities Allsopp, Kyger, and Lovin (2007). Teaching Mathematics Meaningfully. Paul H. Brookes Publishing.

Planning for Responsive Mathematics Instruction Plan evaluation of learning and instruction Plan practice opportunities Allsopp, Kyger, and Lovin (2007). Teaching Mathematics Meaningfully. Paul H. Brookes Publishing.

Planning for Responsive Mathematics Instruction Plan evaluation of learning and instruction Allsopp, Kyger, and Lovin (2007). Teaching Mathematics Meaningfully. Paul H. Brookes Publishing.

Planning for Responsive Mathematics Instruction Plan differentiated instruction Allsopp, Kyger, and Lovin (2007). Teaching Mathematics Meaningfully. Paul H. Brookes Publishing.

Planning for Specific Learning Barriers of Students Allsopp, Kyger, and Lovin (2007). Teaching Mathematics Meaningfully. Paul H. Brookes Publishing.