SunGuide SM Software Development Project Status Meeting February 23, 2005 CDRL

February 23, 2005SunGuide Status Meeting 2 Agenda TimeItemLead 8:30 – 8:35Introductions Liang Hsia 8:35 – 8:45License Updates: TxDOT and FDOT MDX JPA WSDOT TOU Lee County Oracle Software Support Agreement Liang Hsia 8:45 – 9:10TMC and Software Deployment Schedule Updates D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 D6 D7 MDX Turnpike Enterprise Lee County 9:10 – 9:30Project Status Report Steve Dellenback 9:30 – 10:00Factory Testing Acceptance Testing Results Steve Dellenback 10:00 – 10:15Break 10:15 – 10:45New Requirement Discussion Steve Dellenback / John Bonds 10:45 – 11:30C2C Communications:  SunGuide C2C Capability  Communications Alternatives  Video Decoding: Hardware versus Software Steve Dellenback / Walt Townsend/ Jim Mosser 11:30 – 11:50Software Demonstration Steve Dellenback / Walt Townsend 11:50 – 12:00Open Discussion / Action Item Summary All

February 23, 2005SunGuide Status Meeting 3 Introductions

February 23, 2005SunGuide Status Meeting 4 Agenda TimeItemLead 8:30 – 8:35Introductions Liang Hsia 8:35 – 8:45License Updates: TxDOT and FDOT MDX JPA WSDOT TOU Lee County Oracle Software Support Agreement Liang Hsia 8:45 – 9:10TMC and Software Deployment Schedule Updates D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 D6 D7 MDX Turnpike Enterprise Lee County 9:10 – 9:30Project Status Report Steve Dellenback 9:30 – 10:00Factory Testing Acceptance Testing Results Steve Dellenback 10:00 – 10:15Break 10:15 – 10:45New Requirement Discussion Steve Dellenback / John Bonds 10:45 – 11:30C2C Communications:  SunGuide C2C Capability  Communications Alternatives  Video Decoding: Hardware versus Software Steve Dellenback / Walt Townsend/ Jim Mosser 11:30 – 11:50Software Demonstration Steve Dellenback / Walt Townsend 11:50 – 12:00Open Discussion / Action Item Summary All

February 23, 2005SunGuide Status Meeting 5 License Updates SwRI / FDOT Sublicense –License executed on August 29, 2003 before the contract started. –License updated on September 5, 2003 covering distribution source code to other Florida governmental entities. –TxDOT informed SwRI on January 22, 2004 that TransGuide software was on “hold”. –License amended on April 12, 2004 (to support District 2 and name change) –SwRI provided FDOT with draft language on September 10, 2004 to include other Florida government entities

February 23, 2005SunGuide Status Meeting 6 License Updates For a FDOT / TxDOT partnership to occur two things are needed: –MOU and License: FDOT provided TxDOT with comments and legal opinion on March 2, 2004 TxDOT provided FDOT with draft MOU and License on March 16, 2004 FDOT forwarded draft MOU & License to TxDOT on October 18, 2004 FDOT corresponded with TxDOT & SwRI in January 2005 –TxDOT Software License (solves TransGuide license issue) TxDOT provided FDOT with a license on June 30, 2004 (included previous FDOT requests for content). FDOT signed license on August 10, TxDOT acknowledged the receiving of the FDOT signed license on August 23, TxDOT signed license on August 30, 2004 and sent to FDOT on September 20, FDOT Requested TransGuide software on October 4, FDOT Received TransGuide software on October 19, 2004.

February 23, 2005SunGuide Status Meeting 7 License Updates - continued FDOT / WsDOT Term of Use (TOU): –WsDOT provided FDOT with standard TOU on February 11, –FDOT provided recommendation on to WsDOT on March 13, –FDOT provided comments to the WsDOT’s Office of General Counsel’s August 21, –WsDOT began working on FDOT’s comments on August 26, –FDOT requested status on September 14, 2004, October 7, 2004 and November 5, –FDOT & WsDOT attorneys and project managers had teleconference on November 30, –New Option: WsDOT would license to “Southwest Patents” “Southwest Patents” would license to FDOT This resolves the indemnification issue

February 23, 2005SunGuide Status Meeting 8 License Updates - continued FDOT / MDX Joint Program Agreement (JPA) –FDOT provided MDX with preliminary JPA on December 3, –MDX provided FDOT with draft final JPA on June 23, –FDOT worked on Locally Funded Agreement and MDX JPA. –FDOT forwarded updated JPA and sublicense to MDX on October 26, 2004 –FDOT developed a draft Software General and On-Site Support Agreement to address MDX’s software support concerns on February 11, 2005.

February 23, 2005SunGuide Status Meeting 9 License Updates - continued SwRI / FDOT / Lee County Sublicense –Lee County provided FDOT with official letter for participation on July 27, 2004 –FDOT and SwRI started documentation preparation on July 30, 2004 –SwRI provided FDOT with draft language on September 10, 2004 –FDOT forwarded sublicense to Lee County on October 26, 2004 FDOT issued iFlorida Data Collection Process (DCP) notice to proceed on September 8, GDT License: –System Planning Office and Office of Information Systems are finalizing the license agreement on September 14, –Kevin Thibault approved the $130,000 GDT Procurement on October 19, 2004

February 23, 2005SunGuide Status Meeting 10 License Updates - Oracle continued Transportation Management CenterDate RequiredOIS Licensed ProcessorCurrent License Duration District 1 Ft. Myers RTMCSun 12/31/062 District 1 Sarasota RTMCSat 12/31/11 District 2 Jacksonville RTMCSun 12/31/06210/3/03 to 10/3/08 District 3 Pensacola RTMCMon 12/31/07 District 3 Tallahassee RTMCWed 12/31/08 District 4 Ft. Lauderdale RTMCMon 1/31/05210/3/03 to 10/3/08 District 4 West Palm RTMCMon 12/31/12 District 5 Orlando RTMCMon 12/31/074 District 6 Miami RTMCThu 6/30/05210/3/03 to 10/3/08 District 7 Tampa RTMCSun 4/30/06210/3/03 to 10/3/08 Lee County RTMCSat 12/31/05 Miami-Dade Expressway RTMCThu 6/30/052 Statewide TMC & Testing LabTue 5/31/05210/3/03 to 10/3/08 Turnpike Pompano RTMCMon 12/31/12 Turnpike Turkey Lake RTMCMon 12/31/12

February 23, 2005SunGuide Status Meeting 11 License Updates – Support Agreement Software general and on-site support requirements were discussed on December 7, 2004 Draft final Software General and On-Site Support Agreement has been forwarded to SwRI on February 11, 2005

February 23, 2005SunGuide Status Meeting 12 Agenda TimeItemLead 8:30 – 8:35Introductions Liang Hsia 8:35 – 8:45License Updates: TxDOT and FDOT MDX JPA WSDOT TOU Lee County Oracle Liang Hsia 8:45 – 9:10TMC and Software Deployment Schedule Updates D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 D6 D7 MDX Turnpike Enterprise Lee County 9:10 – 9:30Project Status Report Steve Dellenback 9:30 – 10:00Factory Testing Acceptance Testing Results Steve Dellenback 10:00 – 10:15Break 10:15 – 10:45New Requirement Discussion Steve Dellenback / John Bonds 10:45 – 11:30C2C Communications:  SunGuide C2C Capability  Communications Alternatives  Video Decoding: Hardware versus Software Steve Dellenback / Walt Townsend/ Jim Mosser 11:30 – 11:50Software Demonstration Steve Dellenback / Walt Townsend 11:50 – 12:00Open Discussion / Action Item Summary All

February 23, 2005SunGuide Status Meeting 13 Reports by Deployment and Possible Integration Schedule District 4 District 6 MDX District 7 District 1 Lee County District 2 District 5 District 3 Turnpike Enterprise

February 23, 2005SunGuide Status Meeting 14 District 4 Schedule February 14, 2005: Video wall RFP, completion 120 days after NTP April 22, 2005: 7 CCTV available August 12, 2005: 45 CCTV available October 2005: Complete I/95/I595 Video Monitor System

February 23, 2005SunGuide Status Meeting 15 District 6 RTMC April 2005: Ramp metering subsystem testing and SunGuide Software Milestone Demonstration planned August : I-95 Package B project completion 1 st Quarter 2006: Ramp Meters operations

February 23, 2005SunGuide Status Meeting 16 MDX Schedule April 7, 2003MDX sent letter to ITS Office about participating in SunGuide SM Project April 25, 2003FDOT Responded, Welcoming MDX’s participation December 3, 2003FDOT provided MDX with a draft Joint Program Agreement August 2005 SunGuide SM Software Release 2 deployment at MDX October 2005 MDX TMC Operational

February 23, 2005SunGuide Status Meeting 17 District 7 RTMC November 2005Building Construction Finish SunGuide April 2006SunGuide SM Software Deployment

February 23, 2005SunGuide Status Meeting 18 District 2 RTMC FY 2004I-95 N ITS Improvement FY 2006SunGuide Deployment (Tentative) FY 2004I-95 N ITS Improvement FY 2006SunGuide SM Deployment (Tentative)

February 23, 2005SunGuide Status Meeting 19 District 5 RTMC FY 2004 Orlando RTMC retrofit and upgrade September 8, iFlorida Data Collection Process December 2005 FY iFlorida C2C between Districts 2 and 5

February 23, 2005SunGuide Status Meeting 20 Turnpike RTMC March 2004: SunNav 1.1 Test April 2004: SunNav 1.2 Development June 2005 : Observe D 4, D 6, & MDX C2C Deployment

February 23, 2005SunGuide Status Meeting 21 District 1 May 2005 I-75 Safety Barrier System upgrade December 2006 SunGuide SM Deployment at Ft. Myers RTMC FY 2011 (2005) Sarasota RTMC

February 23, 2005SunGuide Status Meeting 22 District 3 FY 2007 Pensacola RTMC FY 2008 Tallahassee RTMC

February 23, 2005SunGuide Status Meeting 23 Lee County Bridge Incident Management July 27, 2004 Lee County Public Works sent letter to FDOT indicating Lee County’s participation in SunGuide Software Project August 2005 SunGuide Software deployment

February 23, 2005SunGuide Status Meeting 24 C2C Schedule February 16, 2004SunGuide SM and C2C Project Team completed Interface Control Document (ICD) February 20, 2004SunGuide SM and C2C Project Coordination Teleconference March 9, 2004SunGuide SM & C2C Project Coordination Meeting June, 2005C2C deployment among Districts 4, 6, and MDX

February 23, 2005SunGuide Status Meeting 25 Agenda TimeItemLead 8:30 – 8:35Introductions Liang Hsia 8:35 – 8:45License Updates: TxDOT and FDOT MDX JPA WSDOT TOU Lee County Oracle Software Support Agreement Liang Hsia 8:45 – 9:10TMC and Software Deployment Schedule Updates D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 D6 D7 MDX Turnpike Enterprise Lee County 9:10 – 9:30Project Status Report Steve Dellenback 9:30 – 10:00Factory Testing Acceptance Testing Results Steve Dellenback 10:00 – 10:15Break 10:15 – 10:45New Requirement Discussion Steve Dellenback / John Bonds 10:45 – 11:30C2C Communications:  SunGuide C2C Capability  Communications Alternatives  Video Decoding: Hardware versus Software Steve Dellenback / Walt Townsend/ Jim Mosser 11:30 – 11:50Software Demonstration Steve Dellenback / Walt Townsend 11:50 – 12:00Open Discussion / Action Item Summary All

February 23, 2005SunGuide Status Meeting 26 Project Web Site

February 23, 2005SunGuide Status Meeting 27 Release-Oriented Development Approach

February 23, 2005SunGuide Status Meeting 28 Status of Release 1 Development Activities Release 1 development complete: –Financial status: Allocated: $3,850,778 Spent: $3,763,222 Remaining: $87,556 –Of the remaining funds, $47,252 will be needed for training and approximately $10,000 for PBF invoices not yet processed Efforts remaining: –Training material: Classes were added (R2 classes were moved up to R1) Material will be ready prior to a deployment

February 23, 2005SunGuide Status Meeting 29 Status of Release 2 Activities Ramp Metering: –Design completed –Development in complete –TSS driver complete –RM driver in process –Undergoing initial integration testing in San Antonio Emergency Evacuation: –Design initiated –Development initiated Data Archive –Design Completed –Development Completed –Undergoing integration testing in San Antonio Web Server –Design mostly complete –Development in process HAR –Design complete –Development in process Center-to-Center –Design initiated –Development in process RWIS –Design initiated –Development in process Safety Barrier –ICD Complete –Design initiated Inventory and Maintenance –Will be initiated soon Optional Service: –iFlorida Data Collection Process (DCP): Waiting for acceptance testing

February 23, 2005SunGuide Status Meeting 30 Deliverable Status SwRI waiting for FDOT comments: –Version Description Document Future documents to be provided by SwRI: –Updated Training Plan –Training Material All documents delivered to FDOT are available on the project web site.

February 23, 2005SunGuide Status Meeting 31 Cost Status (as of 1/21/05) Release 1: –Allocated: $3,850,778 –Spent: $3,763,222 –Remaining: $87,556 Release 2: –Allocated: $2,651,361 –Spent: $673,901 –Remaining: $1,977,819 Deployments: –Allocated: $397,292 –Spent: $7,750 Support - on-site support and FDOT directed support (thru 6/2012): –Allocated: $1,175,558 –Spent: $0 (costs started 2/1/05)

February 23, 2005SunGuide Status Meeting 32 Spending Curves

February 23, 2005SunGuide Status Meeting 33 Spending Curves - continued

February 23, 2005SunGuide Status Meeting 34 Spending Curves - continued

February 23, 2005SunGuide Status Meeting 35 Schedule Status Current areas of concern: –Documents: None –Software: None To be scheduled: –District 4 deployment –Milestone Demonstration –Trailblazer testing –Ramp Metering testing –District 6 deployment

February 23, 2005SunGuide Status Meeting 36 Schedule Status – continued Last Reporting Period

February 23, 2005SunGuide Status Meeting 37 Schedule Status - continued Current Reporting Period

February 23, 2005SunGuide Status Meeting 38 Schedule Status - continued Requirements refinement: –Additional requirements being evaluated by FDOT –Schedule will be updated once requirements are complete Future status meetings that need to be confirmed: –March (will be held during Florida ITS Working Group meeting in Miami) –April 5, 2005 –May 10, 2005 –June 7, 2005 Future reviews that need to be scheduled: –Release 2 Software Design Review

February 23, 2005SunGuide Status Meeting 39 Agenda TimeItemLead 8:30 – 8:35Introductions Liang Hsia 8:35 – 8:45License Updates: TxDOT and FDOT MDX JPA WSDOT TOU Lee County Oracle Liang Hsia 8:45 – 9:10TMC and Software Deployment Schedule Updates D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 D6 D7 MDX Turnpike Enterprise Lee County 9:10 – 9:30Project Status Report Steve Dellenback 9:30 – 10:00Factory Testing Acceptance Testing Results Steve Dellenback 10:00 – 10:15Break 10:15 – 10:45New Requirement Discussion Steve Dellenback / John Bonds 10:45 – 11:30C2C Communications:  SunGuide C2C Capability  Communications Alternatives  Video Decoding: Hardware versus Software Steve Dellenback / Walt Townsend/ Jim Mosser 11:30 – 11:50Software Demonstration Steve Dellenback / Walt Townsend 11:50 – 12:00Open Discussion / Action Item Summary All

February 23, 2005SunGuide Status Meeting 40 Factory Acceptance Testing Tested Release Testing performed on January 11, 12, and 13, 2005 Testing participants included –FDOT Central Office (and their contractors) FDOT District 4 (and one of their contractors) and Miami-Dade Expressway Authority (MDX) Testing process: –Test steps contained in the SunGuideSM Software Integration Case Procedures (SICP) document –SCIP was structured as a series of test cases with each having one or more test steps

February 23, 2005SunGuide Status Meeting 41 Example Test Case

February 23, 2005SunGuide Status Meeting 42 Testing Results 51 test cases with 214 test steps The test steps were written against 229 requirements. Summary of the results: –Total of 47 (out of 51 test cases) passed in their entirety –Issues arose with 12 test steps from 4 test cases: 2 failed (requirement SUB6.2.1 and SUB6.3.1): will be waived by FDOT because the available hardware will not support the FDOT requirement (the software issued the proper command but the hardware devices do not implement the feature) 4 failed (requirements SUB3.3.4 and SUB3.3.5): because a numeric “2” was displayed rather than “TWO” when response plans for incidents were generated 1 failed (requirement FEAT1.6.12): this was an umbrella test cases that could not be passed if any other failures were noted; once the above failures are addressed this test case should pass 5 were skipped (requirements 8.3.5, 8.3.6, 8.3.7, 8.3.8, and ) because the test steps were too low-level for accurate verification: the tests will run after FDOT modifies the requirements to include GUI level access to the required functionality

February 23, 2005SunGuide Status Meeting 43 Testing Results - continued Of the 229 requirements tested, the above issues can be summarized with respect to the requirements as follows –3 requirements failed (the “2” versus “TWO”) –2 requirements will be waived because hardware vendors do not support functionality (relating to camera presets and power on/off) –5 requirements were not tested (test cases skipped) because the level of detail was too extensive to evaluate

February 23, 2005SunGuide Status Meeting 44 Moving Forward FDOT performed a variety of ad hoc tests to evaluate the system; summary: –Several software errors were identified (that were not part of the testing) – SwRI has addressed these –Significant rework of the IM GUI has been performed (NO changes to subsystems have been made) –Conclusion was that the GUI as implemented did not provide an IM environment that was acceptable, FDOT to develop additional requirements to modify/enhance functionality No deployment date yet selected until enhancements can be addressed

February 23, 2005SunGuide Status Meeting 45 Agenda TimeItemLead 8:30 – 8:35Introductions Liang Hsia 8:35 – 8:45License Updates: TxDOT and FDOT MDX JPA WSDOT TOU Lee County Oracle Liang Hsia 8:45 – 9:10TMC and Software Deployment Schedule Updates D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 D6 D7 MDX Turnpike Enterprise Lee County 9:10 – 9:30Project Status Report Steve Dellenback 9:30 – 10:00Factory Testing Acceptance Testing Results Steve Dellenback 10:00 – 10:15Break 10:15 – 10:45New Requirement Discussion Steve Dellenback / John Bonds 10:45 – 11:30C2C Communications:  SunGuide C2C Capability  Communications Alternatives  Video Decoding: Hardware versus Software Steve Dellenback / Walt Townsend/ Jim Mosser 11:30 – 11:50Software Demonstration Steve Dellenback / Walt Townsend 11:50 – 12:00Open Discussion / Action Item Summary All

February 23, 2005SunGuide Status Meeting 46 Agenda TimeItemLead 8:30 – 8:35Introductions Liang Hsia 8:35 – 8:45License Updates: TxDOT and FDOT MDX JPA WSDOT TOU Lee County Oracle Liang Hsia 8:45 – 9:10TMC and Software Deployment Schedule Updates D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 D6 D7 MDX Turnpike Enterprise Lee County 9:10 – 9:30Project Status Report Steve Dellenback 9:30 – 10:00Factory Testing Acceptance Testing Results Steve Dellenback 10:00 – 10:15Break 10:15 – 10:45New Requirement Discussion Steve Dellenback / John Bonds 10:45 – 11:30C2C Communications:  SunGuide C2C Capability  Communications Alternatives  Video Decoding: Hardware versus Software Steve Dellenback / Walt Townsend/ Jim Mosser 11:30 – 11:50Software Demonstration Steve Dellenback / Walt Townsend 11:50 – 12:00Open Discussion / Action Item Summary All

February 23, 2005SunGuide Status Meeting 47 New Requirements Identified Categories: (FDOT ITS Section has circulated these requirements for comments on February 2, 2005) –Immediate needs: IM and IM GUI GUI/Map CCTV Subsystem and CCTV GUI TSS Subsystem and TSS GUI DMS Subsystem and DMS GUI Message Queuing –Long term needs: IM and IM GUI GUI/Map Driver Data and GUIs DMS Subsystem CCTV Subsystem and CCTV GUI CCTV Keyboard Status Logger Executive Handler Status: –Evaluated by SwRI and implementation pending FDOT direction

February 23, 2005SunGuide Status Meeting 48 IM and IM GUI Purpose: –IM Performance requirements being introduced to SunGuide SM –Modify the SunGuide SM IM functionality to meet newly defined user needs Proposed Requirements: Status –IM GUI screens (no subsystem changes) have been made to greatly facilitate data entry TM009From the time an operator confirms an incident, it shall be possible to create an incident record, verify the information listed below, set lane blockage indications, select appropriate Dynamic Message Signs, and place a message on up to 8 directly connected signs within 60 seconds. Required basic information consists of: Incident Description, Route, Direction, Cross Street, Lane Configuration TM014RAn incident record shall contain a text field for entry of Milepost location information. TM005R1The incident response plan shall suggest signs all signs within the incident search radius that face a direction of travel approaching the incident location. TM001WWhen an incident is created from a congestion alert associated with a detector link, or when manually created by an operator clicking on a detector link, the following information in the incident form shall be filled in automatically: Route (main road), direction, cross street, lane configuration, Milepost TM012When a new incident is created, it shall automatically be assigned a sequential Incident ID number. This number shall appear along with the textual incident ID in every place that it appears. TM001W1 When a data field in an incident form requires entry of a time and/or date, the current time and/or date shall appear as the default entry, if appropriate for the field.

February 23, 2005SunGuide Status Meeting 49 GUI/Map Purpose: –Modify the SunGuide SM Map/GUI functionality to meet newly defined user needs Proposed Requirements: ID001AThe SunGuide system shall provide audible notification of congestion alerts for logged-on operators. GS007It shall be possible to relocate incident icons using a drag-and-drop methodology DM006DMessage Library entries shall be sorted in alphanumeric order within a library. DM007DWhen choosing a message from a message library, the system shall accept letters typed by the operator, and scroll the message list to the first message matching these letters. GS009CCTV camera icons shall change color to indicate operational status.

February 23, 2005SunGuide Status Meeting 50 CCTV Subsystem and CCTV GUI Purpose: –Do not require a user to explicitly request a lock Proposed Requirement: TV003S1A “lock” shall be acquired when a camera is selected if no other user holds a “lock”.

February 23, 2005SunGuide Status Meeting 51 TSS Subsystem and TSS GUI Purpose: –Add detector stations to the map display Proposed Requirement: GS008The map shall display icons at the location of each detector station. The icon shall change color to indicate the detector’s operational status. The status colors shall be configurable.

February 23, 2005SunGuide Status Meeting 52 DMS Subsystem and DMS GUI Purpose: –Add additional status information requests to the DMS poll process –Display additional data to the user in the GUI Proposed Requirements: DM003D1The information requested in the regular periodic poll of DMS devices shall include basic error information from the device, including but not limited to Pixel, Lamp, Temperature and Fan errors. For NTCIP devices, this shall be accomplished by utilizing the "short error status" object. DM003D2If any errors (including but not limited to Pixel, Lamp, Temperature or Fan errors) are reported during the regular polling of a DMS device, the system shall: generate an operator alert, change the color of the icon for the DMS device on the map to a configurable color. DM003D3The DMS status form shall provide a way to request and display the following extended status information from the signs: fan status, pixel errors, sign temperatures, power supply status

February 23, 2005SunGuide Status Meeting 53 Message Queuing Purpose: –Add additional queuing levels to SunGuide SM (the system currently has two level) –Provide tools to manage the queue Proposed requirements: DM004The SunGuide system shall support a priority-based queue for messages. DM005MThe system shall support 256 message priority levels DM006MIf a message is placed in the queue with a higher priority than the currently active message, the higher- priority message shall be displayed on the device. DM007MWhen a message is removed from the queue, the message with the next highest priority shall be activated. DM007M1If the queue for a device becomes empty, the device shall blank. DM008MThe system shall allow the operator to specify a priority level when activating a message manually. DM009MThe default priority level for manual message activation shall be the highest priority level DM010MThe default priority level for messages included in an automatic sequence shall be the lowest priority level. TM007RThe queue status screen shall provide the following: 1) a display of the contents of the message queue, including message, priority, and associated incident ID, if any, for each message in the queue. 2) the ability to remove individual messages from the message queue. 3) a “blank” button that removes all the messages from the queue

February 23, 2005SunGuide Status Meeting 54 IM and IM GUI Purpose: –Variety of IM (and GUI) modifications Proposed requirements: DM011MThe system shall provide a mechanism for prioritizing messages placed by the IM system based on distance from the incident, with messages on signs closer to the incident being given higher priority. TM010When an incident is closed, the response plan associated with the incident shall be cancelled. TM006RWhen a response plan is cancelled, all messages that were part of the response plan shall be removed from the queues of the Devices in which they were placed. IM008An incident shall have ownership characteristic in that the person who is managing the incident shall be identified as the owner of the incident and the owner shall be displayed when incident status is displayed. TM011See new requirements at end of document IM001OOnly the "owning" operator shall be able to make changes to an incident IM002OOperators shall be able open incidents that they do not own with read-only access. IM003OThere shall be a "Take Ownership of Incident" privilege that allows an operator with this privilege to take ownership of any incident. IM004OOwnership of each incident shall be displayed in the incident list. IM005OIt shall be possible to filter the incident list by owner IM006OThe system shall periodically sound an audible alarm at all logged-on workstations if there is any active incident without an owner. IM006O1The audible alarm shall sound for 5 seconds and then shut off for a programmable period of time from 5 seconds to 2 minutes. IM007OThe system shall provide a mechanism for the operator that owns an incident to hand it off to a different operator.

February 23, 2005SunGuide Status Meeting 55 IM Sign Selection Algorithm Algorithm is more complex due to the “generic” nature of SunGuide SM (i.e. work for an road network) What algorithm should be deployed? Assume Signs Deployed Across Region (hypothetical placement for discussion) Incident on Northbound Lanes

February 23, 2005SunGuide Status Meeting 56 IM Sign Selection Algorithm - continued SunGuide SM uses CHART rules and draws circles to select signs Would signs on the corridor (same direction) be acceptable? – this is easy!

February 23, 2005SunGuide Status Meeting 57 IM Sign Selection Algorithm - continued How should signs me selected on connecting corridors? Corridors immediately connected to the corridor with the incident are fairly easy. How about the corridors that are at least one corridor removed from the corridor in question?

February 23, 2005SunGuide Status Meeting 58 Map/GUI Purpose: –Restrict to a user only being logged into one workstation –List username on title bar –Support additional configuration of color preferences Proposed requirements: Status: –Username has been added to the map title bar WS008If a user is logged on at one workstation, any attempt to log on the same user ID at another location shall be rejected. WS009The system shall display the currently logged on username somewhere in the browser window or in the title bar of the window. GS009CThe colors associated with device status icons shall be configurable. WS008If any device control commands issued by the operator fails, the failure shall be indicated by a “error” warning message in the status message window, this include errors caused by authorization failures. GS009C1All color choices shall be made using a methodology similar to the standard Windows color selection dialog. GS010The operator workstation display shall be able to display a legend indicating the color chosen for each color- configurable item.

February 23, 2005SunGuide Status Meeting 59 Driver Data and GUIs Purpose: –The SunGuide requirements specify the collection of more data at the driver level than display at the GUI level. This requirement would provide more data to the user. Proposed requirement: WS011The GUI shall provide a way to display all data available from the device driver for each device.

February 23, 2005SunGuide Status Meeting 60 DMS Purpose: –Mark IV device does not implicitly support a default page time –When a sequence is configured in SunGuide, spelling conflicts are performed at configuration time (and not when the sequence executed Proposed Requirements: Status: –Default page time has been added as a configuration parameter to the Mark IV device driver DM004DEach DMS device driver shall have configurable default page on and off times. DM005DIf the Dynamic Message Sign subsystem detects a word list conflict in a message being activated as part of a sequence, the system shall alert the operator of the conflict and prompt for a decision, just as if the message had been activated manually

February 23, 2005SunGuide Status Meeting 61 CCTV Subsystem and CCTV GUI Purpose: –Modify the camera locking scheme currently implemented –Provide access to menus on NTCIP capable cameras –Support user configuration of joystick buttons Proposed requirements: TV003S2Operator activation of any camera motion control shall automatically request a lock on the camera. TV003S3The automatically-requested camera lock shall automatically time out after a configurable amount of time. TV003D1The CCTV GUI shall support activating and operating camera menus for NTCIP CCTV devices. TV001D1The GUI shall allow user configuration of joystick button functions

February 23, 2005SunGuide Status Meeting 62 CCTV Keyboard Purpose: –Provide an alternative CCTV control and video switch device Requires user to work with “numeric ids” SwRI has deployed AD2088 support in Texas (Houston TranStar) Proposed requirements: Specific model required TV001D1Support external CCTV keyboard/joystick device connected to serial port on workstations

February 23, 2005SunGuide Status Meeting 63 Status Logger Purpose: –Centralized logging of error messages –Viewer that provides filtering capability to restrict data displayed Proposed requirements: EX004LStatus log viewer shall support queries across multiple log files. EX005LThe system shall delete log files when they age beyond a configurable number of days.

February 23, 2005SunGuide Status Meeting 64 Executive Handler (EH) Purpose: –Performs process control –Performs health and status checks Proposed requirements: Status: –Number of retries already added: when installing SunGuide SM the administrator is prompted for the “retry” value. EX003FIt shall be possible to configure the maximum number of retries that the executive handler shall perform when attempting to restart a failed application. It shall also be possible to configure the number of minutes over which the retry counter is maintained. (for example, stop after 3 retries in 1 minute). EX010The executive handler application shall utilize windows credentials to verify rights to execute.

February 23, 2005SunGuide Status Meeting 65 Agenda TimeItemLead 8:30 – 8:35Introductions Liang Hsia 8:35 – 8:45License Updates: TxDOT and FDOT MDX JPA WSDOT TOU Lee County Oracle Software Support Agreement Liang Hsia 8:45 – 9:10TMC and Software Deployment Schedule Updates D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 D6 D7 MDX Turnpike Enterprise Lee County 9:10 – 9:30Project Status Report Steve Dellenback 9:30 – 10:00Factory Testing Acceptance Testing Results Steve Dellenback 10:00 – 10:15Break 10:15 – 10:45New Requirement Discussion Steve Dellenback / John Bonds 10:45 – 11:30C2C Communications:  SunGuide C2C Capability  Communications Alternatives  Video Decoding: Hardware versus Software Steve Dellenback / Walt Townsend/ Jim Mosser 11:30 – 11:50Software Demonstration Steve Dellenback / Walt Townsend 11:50 – 12:00Open Discussion / Action Item Summary All

February 23, 2005SunGuide Status Meeting 66 Center-to-Center (C2C) Communications Two types of C2C communications required: –Data: Status information Command/control requests (includes CCTV control and video switching requests) Being implemented in Release 2 of SunGuide SM –Video (motion): Transport of motion video a function of hardware and not SunGuide SM software Being addressed by “Florida ITS SunGuide SM C2C Network” project

February 23, 2005SunGuide Status Meeting 67 SunGuide SM C2C Capability Status support: –Traffic data (network) –DMS –CCTV –Video snapshots –HAR –Incident –RWIS Command/control support: –DMS –CCTV –HAR

February 23, 2005SunGuide Status Meeting 68 Communication Alternatives Motivation: –Video exchange between centers facilitates traffic management operations –“Border” video allows agencies to share costs of common surveillance points –Statewide emergency operations desires video from many agencies Major problem: –How do you exchange motion video between centers that have different “formats” (e.g. analog, digital, vendor differences, etc.)

February 23, 2005SunGuide Status Meeting 69 Video Formats: MPEG-2 versus MPEG-4

February 23, 2005SunGuide Status Meeting 70 Possible Solution Following participants met and have worked on a proposed solution: –FDOT C2C Project Team (PBF) –FDOT SunGuide SM Team (SwRI, ITS-Siemens) –FDOT Central and District Offices’ review Optimal solution’s characteristics: –Utilize the existing FDOT wide area network (microwave based) – capacity constrained –Develop a “DMARK” between a center and the C2C infrastructure that is technology “neutral” (analog was the choice) – this is termed “trans-coding” –Enable SunGuide SM software to initiate switching requests

February 23, 2005SunGuide Status Meeting 71 Proposed C2C Infrastructure

February 23, 2005SunGuide Status Meeting 72 General Comments Barco Video Wall: –Utilizes a custom hardware card (which has a lot of custom software installed) to decode multiple vendor’s video streams –Each card supports up to 4 simultaneous MPEG-2 video streams –Each card supports up to 3 simultaneous MPEG-4 video streams –SwRI requested if Barco could provide a “software version” of their Argus card – the answer was they could not provide.

February 23, 2005SunGuide Status Meeting 73 SwRI Observations: IP Video Codec Compatibility 1. VBrick 4200 Encoder Primary Destination Packet Payload Size set to VBrick 4200 Encoder Secondary Destination Stream Type set to Elementary Stream and Packet Payload Size set to VBrick 5200 Decoder Network Packet Ordering set to Disabled. 4. Coretec VCX4200E Encoder Stream Type set to Transport. 5. Coretec VCX4200E Encoder Stream Type set to Elementary. 6. Coretec VCX4200E Encoder Stream Type set to Program (the default).

February 23, 2005SunGuide Status Meeting 74 Decoding: Hardware versus Software Hardware decoding: –Dedicated video decoder –Monitor (typically analog connected) to decoder –SunGuide SM supports switching of a limited set of IP Video decoders –Issue: compatibility of codecs –Cost: dedicated decoder and monitor Software decoding: –Utilize Windows application to decode video –SwRI evaluated software decoding: works great with vendor specific tools – cross vendor support is weak –Issues: Compatibility of video streams Performance impact on host computer “Remote” (e.g. SunGuide SM ) control is not typically supported –Cost: computer (sustain 2-3 simultaneous video streams)

February 23, 2005SunGuide Status Meeting 75 Decoding: Hardware versus Software - continued SunGuide SM could support a switching decoding application (VBrick has one that could work for some encoders with minor modification but the source code is proprietary) SwRI believes that a MPEG-4 solution would be easier and more cost effective (more native Windows support is available) Specific requirements need to be identified

February 23, 2005SunGuide Status Meeting 76 Agenda TimeItemLead 8:30 – 8:35Introductions Liang Hsia 8:35 – 8:45License Updates: TxDOT and FDOT MDX JPA WSDOT TOU Lee County Oracle Software Support Agreement Liang Hsia 8:45 – 9:10TMC and Software Deployment Schedule Updates D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 D6 D7 MDX Turnpike Enterprise Lee County 9:10 – 9:30Project Status Report Steve Dellenback 9:30 – 10:00Factory Testing Acceptance Testing Results Steve Dellenback 10:00 – 10:15Break 10:15 – 10:45New Requirement Discussion Steve Dellenback / John Bonds 10:45 – 11:30C2C Communications:  SunGuide C2C Capability  Communications Alternatives  Video Decoding: Hardware versus Software Steve Dellenback / Walt Townsend/ Jim Mosser 11:30 – 11:50Software Demonstration Steve Dellenback / Walt Townsend 11:50 – 12:00Open Discussion / Action Item Summary All

February 23, 2005SunGuide Status Meeting 77 Software Demonstration

February 23, 2005SunGuide Status Meeting 78 Example Screen Changes Better utilize “multiple monitor” workstations Utilize native HTML to improve performance (lose some visual capabilities provided by SVG) Work in progress

February 23, 2005SunGuide Status Meeting 79 Agenda TimeItemLead 8:30 – 8:35Introductions Liang Hsia 8:35 – 8:45License Updates: TxDOT and FDOT MDX JPA WSDOT TOU Lee County Oracle Software Support Agreement Liang Hsia 8:45 – 9:10TMC and Software Deployment Schedule Updates D1 D2 D3 D4 D5 D6 D7 MDX Turnpike Enterprise Lee County 9:10 – 9:30Project Status Report Steve Dellenback 9:30 – 10:00Factory Testing Acceptance Testing Results Steve Dellenback 10:00 – 10:15Break 10:15 – 10:45New Requirement Discussion Steve Dellenback / John Bonds 10:45 – 11:30C2C Communications:  SunGuide C2C Capability  Communications Alternatives  Video Decoding: Hardware versus Software Steve Dellenback / Walt Townsend/ Jim Mosser 11:30 – 11:50Software Demonstration Steve Dellenback / Walt Townsend 11:50 – 12:00Open Discussion / Action Item Summary All

February 23, 2005SunGuide Status Meeting 80 Action Item Recap NumberPersonAction