Concept Report / Preliminary Technical and Cost Analysis Delivery of Treated Produced Water from Indian Basin and Dagger Draw to the Pecos River, Eddy.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Overview AST Clean water technologies was requested to design and construct an Industrial Waste water Treatment Plant with a capacity of 35 m 3 /h in.
Advertisements

Common Water Treatment Problems Hard Water -Calcium and Magnesium. Soap Scum, and Scale Build-Up. Iron - Clear (Ferrous), Red (Ferric), & Bacteria Related.
Virtual Tour of Municipal Wastewater Treatment Plant (WWTP) Prepared by Dr. Richard O. Mines, Jr., P.E. Mercer University Environmental Engineering Department.
Treatment of Waste Brine from a Brackish Reverse Osmosis Plant
Brief introduction about Segovia Segovia is a city in Spain, the capital of the province of Segovia in Castile- Leon. It is situated about an hour north.
WWTF’s MPCA Permit Renewal January 14,  Our current NPDES permit expired Sept. 30,  NPDES permits are a 5 year term.  Upon expiration,
TEXAS COMMISSION on ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY. PROPOSED STUCTURE FOR CHAPTER 217 < Subchapter A Administrative Provisions < Subchapter B Design Bases < Subchapter.
FUNDED BY THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION S ustainable and C leaner Production in the Manufacturing I ndustries of Pak istan SCI-Pak Mar Feb 2012.
Surface Water Treatment Plant
The Arsenic Rule Waste Disposal Options. Impacts on Disposal Alternatives Concentration of contaminants in the waste stream Concentration of contaminants.
IX1 Arsenic Removal by Ion Exchange Joe Chwirka - Camp Dresser & McKee Bruce Thomson - University of New Mexico
 Maximizing the Efficiency of Forward Osmosis for Sustainable Water Filtration Kaitlin Johnson School for Engineering of Matter, Transport and Energy.
HIGH EFFICIENCY SOFTENING PROCESS (HESP ® ) FOR PURIFICATION OF FLOWBACK / PRODUCED WATERS FROM HYDRAULIC FRACKING OPERATIONS “ PURIFY WATER- PROTECT THE.
20,000 Barrel Per Day Produced Water Treatment System
Lime Softening. Resources and Materials Students should review and utilize the following on-line resources:
Water Treatment Part 3 Groundwater Treatment
Biosolids Treatment and Disposal
1 REFINERY OILY RESIDUALS COST MINIMIZATION STRATEGY DSM ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICES, INC. P.O. Box Houston, TX (281)
Willamette Water Treatment Plant
Lecture# 3 Water treatment
Civil and environmental engineering Use of Abandoned Mine Drainage for Hydraulic Fracturing in Marcellus Shale Radisav D. Vidic Department of Civil and.
Fundamentals of Radium and Uranium Removal from Drinking Water Supplies Dennis Clifford University of Houston.
Making Waste Productive. Creating Energy from Waste.
Marcellus Shale Wastewaters Management by Resource Recovery Shale Gas Innovation Contest Ben Franklin Technology Partners April 13, 2012 Timothy Keister,
Petro-Canada Re-Uses Treated Edmonton Waste Water APEGGA Practice Development Event Edmonton, Alberta April 17, 2008.
The Living Machine & Leachate
CTC 450 Review Water processing.
NSF 60 - Purkiss November 30, Product Labeling Information Current Requirements of Section 3.5 The product container shall be clearly identified.
Reverse Osmosis Feed Treatment, Biofouling, and Membrane Cleaning
Water Conditioning Process
New Jersey American Water Springfield Water Treatment Plant Planning and Design.
SPWSTAC 2006 From POU to Centralized Arsenic Treatment: A Small Water System Case Study 2006 NGWA Naturally Occurring Contaminants Conference J. Mitchell.
SCI-Pak Sustainable and Cleaner production in the manufacturing industries of Pakistan FUNDED BY THE EUROPEAN COMMISSION 1 SCI-Pak Sustainable.
1 Waste Treatment, Chemical ENVE Why Treat Waste Have a RCRA Waste –TSDS –Treat instead of disposal, landfill –Treat before disposal Or treat in.
Water Softening Dr. John T. O’Connor, PE Tom O’Connor, PE
The Drinking Water Treatment Process
Ion Exchange for the Production of Cellulosic Ethanol A.Hammervold, C. Cochran, J. Belsher, K. Childress Sponsored by Trillium FiberFuels, Inc. IntroductionProject.
Radium Removal and Disposal in Wisconsin
Arsenic Treatment Technologies Christopher A. Impellitteri USEPA/ORD/WSWRD/WQMB Water Technologies for Rural Texas Tuesday, December 2, 2003.
Evaluation of Non-Traditional Sources of Cooling Water Sujoy Roy and Michael DiFilippo Tetra Tech Inc, Lafayette, CA and MND Consulting, Berkeley, CA EPRI.
C3 2.3 Water Treatment.
Review of wastewater discharge alternatives – past and present Slide presentation prepared by Stan Mills for Regular Commissioners’ Meeting of December.
U. S. Environmental Protection Agency
Considerations for Brackish Groundwater Use as a Water Supply for Small Water Systems and Municipalities Eddie C. Livingston, MSCE, P.E. Livingston Associates,
Northern Great Plains Water Consortium (NGPWC) Bakken Water Opportunities Assessment Water Resource Opportunities Meeting Bismarck, ND December 10, 2009.
1.  Residual Solids Management Plan – RSMP (2014)  Pilot-Scale Screw Press Evaluation  Residual Disposal Options  Recommendations 2.
Ion-exchange process (softener plant) Water passes through bed of natural zeolite of synthetic resin to remove hardness Calcium (Ca) and magnesium (Mg)
THE SEARCH FOR WATER USED IN HYDRAULIC FRACTURING: WATER REUSE AND REDUCING POTENTIAL EARTHQUAKE ACTIVITY April 8, 2015.
Radionuclide Regulations, Treatment and Affordability Anthony E. Bennett, R.S. Texas Commission on Environmental Quality Water Supply Division.
The Water Cycle. What are some things that you think are in your water?
EVALUATION OF MAGNETIC NANO- ADSORBENTS FOR SELECTIVELY REMOVING METALS OF VALUE FROM REVERSE OSMOSIS REJECT STREAMS Leah V. Birgen and Dr. Jonathan Brant.
Silicon Valley Advanced Water Purification Center And Future of Purified Water Use Tour Guides: Miguel Silva Tour Coordinators: Amy Fry, Michelle Pelayo-Osorio.
HOUSEHOLD WATER TREATMENT. Water Quality Problems Recommendations New source Pollution control Maintenance + inspection Treatment Explore all of them.
Phase II and Compost Facility Upgrade Projects February 16, 2012.
Course TEN-702 Industrial waste management unit-2 Lecture -13.
Water Treatment Fundamentals. Agenda MEP Fundamentals (1 st badge): Ion exchange chemistry Softener designs and options Ion exchange capacity calculations.
Wastewater Treatment. Dangers of Not Treating Wastewater-Waterborne Disease Cholera Typhoid Fever Hepatitis Amoebic Dysentery Giardiasis E.Coli 0157:H7.
Water and Lithium Recovery from Rock Springs Uplift Brines
RO Basics and System set up
AERIAL VIEW OF CETP.
Lecture (8): liquid wastes treatment (primary, vital, advanced).
RIMCON PROVIDES NATURAL RESOURCE MANAGEMENT CONSULTING TO THE MINING AND AGRICULTURAL INDUSTRIES INCLUDED ARE ZEOLITE AND OTHER INDUSTRIAL MINERAL-BASED.
Boiler System Make-up Water Primary Secondary Pretreatment
CITY OF MARSHALL CHLORIDE ISSUES September 26, 2017
Streaming Current Detectors
SPE IMPROVED ASP PROCESS USING ORGANIC ALKALI
CITY OF MARSHALL CHLORIDE ISSUES NOVEMBER 22, 2016
ENG421 (12c) – Desalination and Waste Handling
Physical/Chemical Waste Treatment
Presentation transcript:

Concept Report / Preliminary Technical and Cost Analysis Delivery of Treated Produced Water from Indian Basin and Dagger Draw to the Pecos River, Eddy County, New Mexico

R.T. Hicks Consultants Bohannon-Huston US Filter

Scope of Work Treatment and Delivery of Produced Water to the Pecos River –#1 Below Brantley Dam –#2 at Dark Canyon –#3 at Malaga Bend Obtain Preliminary EPA Effluent Limits Conceptual Design of Treatment Facility Infrastructure Plan for All Alternatives / Preliminary Maps of Alternatives Cost Estimates for Alternatives / Compare to Existing Disposal – Injection

Indian Basin Dagger Draw Carlsbad

Pecos Water Quality

Produced Water Quality 6,500 – 12,000 Total Dissolved Solids Hydrogen Sulfide – 378 mg/L NORM – Ra – 2500 pC/L Boron – 2 mg/L Free Oil – 100 mg/L

Produced Water Cations and Anions Calcium685 mg/L Magnesium293 Sodium3,281 Potasium68 Bicarbonate1,049 Sulfate2,121 Chloride4,384

Indian Basin: 70K bbl/day Dagger Draw: 21K bbl/day About the Same Flow as Black River

Concept Study Approach – Marriage of Two Options Scale-up Existing Oil Field Technology/Methods – to 60,000 bbl/day Use Large-Scale Water Treatment Technology Approach and Modify to Meet Produced Water Chemistry Realities

Pipeline Elements Brantley Dam Alignment –16 mi –18-20” diameter –Includes pump station Dark Canyon Alignment –27 mi –20-30” diameter –Gravity pipeline Malaga Bend Alignment –51 mi –20-24” diameter –Gravity pipeline

Option A Comply with all the effluent requirements identified in the preliminary list from EPA Treat all the produced water in the area Evaluate two different sludge handling alternatives Mechanical dewatering and off-site landfill On-site sludge lagoon/landfill

Option B Meet only the TDS requirement of < 5000 mg/L Eliminate those wells with high TDS concentrations Treat (RO) approximately 85 percent of the produced water Include on-site sludge lagoon/landfill May require creative permits

Proposed Treatment Process Walnut Shell Filter Walnut Shell Filter Lime Softener Lime Softener Cartridge Filters Cartridge Filters High pH SWRO High pH SWRO Belt Press Belt Press Acid Regen System Acid Regen System NaOH Regen System NaOH Regen System FeCI3 Ca(OH)2 Na2CO3 NaOH Dewatered Sludge for Disposal Backwash Waste Spent Regenerant Waste IN Disposal Well To Pecos SWRO Reject Waste Backwash Feed Multimedia Filtration Multimedia Filtration Weak Acid Cation Exchanger Weak Acid Cation Exchanger

Option A Effluent = 500 mg/L TDS

Option B Effluent TDS = 5000 mg/L

Option C- Potash Industry? Maybe No Reverse Osmosis to reduce TDS Hydrogen Sulfide Treatment Required Petroleum residual treatment? Pipeline to Carlsbad and connect to existing lines

Pipeline Costs Pipeline Length (mi) Capital Cost ($) < 26,152,700 O&M Cost ($/Yr) 8,000 Cost / Barrel 0.04 Cost / 1000 gal 0.93 Cost / Ac-ft

Treatment of H 2 S At this scale, maybe $ $0.07/bbl At smaller scale actual H 2 S treatment is at least 20 cents/bbbl SWAG of total costs for delivery to potash industry: Cents/bbl

Existing Cost for Injection Capital costs are already amortized (about cents/bbl) O&M costs are about 5 cents/bbl Gas production is in decline, < 10 years of production remains, no additional capital for disposal Bottom Line: Treatment and Delivery must meet the 5 cents/bbl existing cost

What Did We Learn? Treatment and delivery to the Pecos River might have been economically viable BEFORE the oil and gas producers sunk large capital costs for injection However, must reduce costs below the predicted cents/ bbl for Option B The Tax Incentive (8 cents/bbl for 5 years) is not sufficient to overcome economics

Delivery to Potash Industry? Might be economically viable IF gas/water production continues for more than 10 years The Tax Incentive (8 cents/bbl for 5 years) is not sufficient, given the uncertainties of gas and water production The Government could fund the pipeline, charge for water delivery, and hope for a payback (in water transport fees, by continued agriculture, and > 10 year life.)

What is Next? Wyoming Coal Bed Methane - Big George The Next Indian Basin Gas Field New Treatment Technologies “Out of the Box” Thinking About Water Management A Willingness to Sacrifice Some Water Quality for More Water Quantity

R.T. Hicks Consultants Bohannon-Huston US Filter