Texas Education Agency Updated 2011. F-2 FOUNDATION.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Definitions Innovation Reform Improvement Change.
Advertisements

Characteristics of Effective Schools By: Wendy Jaye Popescu.
WV High Quality Standards for Schools
Practice Profiles Guidance for West Virginia Schools and Districts April 2012.
Supporting Continuous Improvement in Low Achieving Schools West Virginia Department of Education Division of Educator Quality and System Support August.
Quality teaching requires strong professional learning communities. Collegial interchange, not isolation, must become the norm for teachers. Communities.
Professional Learning Communities Connecting the Initiatives
Accreditation Process Overview Presented By: The Saint John Vianney Accreditation Team Chris Gordon Pam Pyzyk Courtney Albright Dan Demeter Gloria Goss.
Parents as Partners in Education
Planning, Implementing and Evaluating Continuous School Improvement Using the High Quality Standards for Schools Federal Programs Fall Directors Conference.
TOSS-BFK Administrators’ Evaluation Crosswalk to School-wide Changes
S-1 SUPERVISION. S-2 Instructional Leadership Development Framework for Data-driven Systems QUALITY STUDENT PERFORMANCE ETHICS AND INTEGRITY Curriculum/Instruction/
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
OM-1 ORGANIZATIONAL MANAGEMENT. OM-2 ORGANIZATIONAL MANAGEMENT Instructional Leadership Development Framework for Data-driven Systems QUALITY STUDENT.
1 The Nebraska Leadership Initiative Overview of Rationale and Research A Collaboration between NCSA, NDE, and ESUs.
Becoming a High Impact Board Susan Salter Director of Board Development Alabama Association of School Boards.
Values (How must we behave to reach our vision?) Mission ( Why do we exist?) Vision (What must our school become ?)
Estándares claves para líderes educativos publicados por
Comprehensive Curriculum Framework for Tiered Instruction: A Response to Intervention Model Sarah Jackson, M.Ed. Sandra Hess Robbins, M.Ed. Sanna Harjusola-Webb,
Ohio Improvement Process (OIP) Facilitating District-wide Improvement in Instructional Practices and Student Performance.
Revised Illinois Professional Teaching Standards Rori R. Carson Western Illinois University.
Ensuring Quality and Effective Staff Professional Development to Increase Learning for ALL Students.
February 8, 2012 Session 4: Educational Leadership Policy Standards 1 Council of Chief School Officers April 2008.
Practicing the Art of Leadership: A Problem Based Approach to Implementing the ISLLC Standards, 4e © 2013, 2009, 2005, 2001 Pearson Education, Inc. All.
Professional Growth= Teacher Growth
CONNECTICUT ACCOUNTABILTY FOR LEARNING INITIATIVE Executive Coaching.
Models of Instructional Leadership
School Leadership Evaluation System Orientation SY13-14 Evaluation Systems Office, HR Dr. Michael Shanahan, CHRO.
Developing School-Based Systems of Support: Ohio’s Integrated Systems Model Y.S.U. March 30, 2006.
Session Materials  Wiki
Welcome What’s a pilot?. What’s the purpose of the pilot? Support teachers and administrators with the new evaluation system as we learn together about.
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
Introduction to Home/School Compacts
CIV 1 Lincoln County Administrators Total Instructional Alignment.
Special Education Chairpersons as Instructional Leaders Facilitating Proper IEPs for Continuous Improvement Process in Student Academic Performance.
ISLLC Standard #2 Implementation
PD-1 PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT. PD-2 PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT Instructional Leadership Development Framework for Data-driven Systems QUALITY STUDENT PERFORMANCE.
Timberlane Regional School District
{ Principal Leadership Evaluation. The VAL-ED Vision… The construction of valid, reliable, unbiased, accurate, and useful reporting of results Summative.
1 SINA Implementation Action Plan Professional Development Assessment Evaluation Questions Requires ongoing Specifies Monitors Student Success Teacher.
CommendationsRecommendations Curriculum The Lakeside Middle School teachers demonstrate a strong desire and commitment to plan collaboratively and develop.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
Technology Needs Assessment Presentation for Los Fresnos HS
Intro to TPEP. A new evaluation system should be a model for professional growth, supporting collaboration between teachers and principals in pursuit.
The Power of Professional Learning Communities at Work 2009 Hanover County Public Schools Leadership Conference.
Dallas Independent School District Technology Plan Ronald R. Pugh ET8011 May 15, 2011.
Agenda Introductions Objectives and Agenda Review Research Review Taking Stock Collect evidence Principal Practices & the Rubric End-of-the-Year Looking.
CCP-1 COMMUNICATION AND COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIPS. CCP-2 COMMUNICATION AND COMMUNITY PARTNERSHIPS Instructional Leadership Development Framework for Data-driven.
R.B. STEWART MIDDLE SCHOOL REFINING OUR FOCUS BULLDOG 20/20 Professional Learning Communities (PLCs)
Readiness for AdvancED District Accreditation Tuscaloosa County School System.
Archived Information The information in this presentation is archived for historical and research purposes only.
What do you need for your learning? Think about a time outside of education where you learned to do something successfully….
Texas STaR Chart School Technology and Readiness.
American Association of School Administrators The Principal as Leader May 9,
Kimberly B. Lis, M.Ed. University of St. Thomas Administrative Internship II Dr. Virginia Leiker.
FACE Symposium Michele P Brooks M.Ed Assistant Superintendent, Office of Family & Student Engagement Boston Public Schools.
SACS-CASI Accreditation and the Library Media Program in Public Schools Laura B. Page.
Ohio Improvement Process (OIP) Facilitating District-wide Improvement in Instructional Practices and Student Performance.
A HANDBOOK FOR PROFESSIONAL LEARNING COMMUNITIES AT WORK CHAPTERS 1-3 Learning by Doing.
Welcome to Central Middle School
Leading Learning in a School & District Dr. Brad Balch, Indiana State University Mrs. Leslie Ballard, AdvancED Indiana
Connecticut Accountability for Learning Initiative District and School Capacity Building Leadership No Child Left Behind Partnerships & Professional Learning.
Angela M. Rios EDU 660 September 12,  Shared decision making leads to better decisions  Shared instructional leadership includes ◦ the supervisor.
AVID Leading College & Career Readiness Districtwide - Transforming Student Outcomes AVID's mission is to close the achievement gap by preparing all students.
KLA - ISLN Updates January Introducing the Content Specialists.
Continuous School Improvement Planning: Developing a School Improvement Plan October 24, 2011 Intermediate Unit 1 Instructional Support Services.
Tell Survey May 12, To encourage large response rates, the Kentucky Education Association, Kentucky Association of School Administrators, Kentucky.
Note: In 2009, this survey replaced the NCA/Baldrige Quality Standards Assessment that was administered from Also, 2010 was the first time.
Outcomes By the end of our sessions, participants will have…  an understanding of how VAL-ED is used as a data point in developing professional development.
Presentation transcript:

Texas Education Agency Updated 2011

F-2 FOUNDATION

F-3 Welcome to Instructional Leadership Development  Please be sure you have signed in.  Help yourself to coffee, etc.  Please introduce yourself to your “new friends” at your table.  Take a minute to look through your materials. FOUNDATION

F-4 Setting the Stage for Our Work Together  Introductions  Ground Norms  Logistics  Materials FOUNDATION

F-5 Goals of Instructional Leadership Development  Recognize that all decisions should lead to quality learning for all students to support student achievement and a vision that assures “Learning for All”.  Recognize the importance of utilizing systems thinking to make decisions.  Understand the role as an instructional leader in the system.  Apply a framework for continuous improvement to school organization and individuals in order to promote student success.  Identify and utilize four critical elements in understanding and making decisions about Teaching and Learning.  Use data to guide decision making. FOUNDATION Leaders will be able to:

F-6 Years of Experience Line-Up , etc. FOUNDATION

F-7 A Vision for Success of My Student My Special Student FOUNDATION

F-8 A Vision of Success for ALL TEXAS Students Success for EACH Texas Student FOUNDATION

F-9 Successful Students (+)Successful Teachers (+)Successful Leaders Effective Schools Successful Students Must Have Successful, Effective Teachers Successful Teachers Must Have Successful, Effective Leaders FOUNDATION

F-10 Definition of an Effective School “An Effective School is one in which all the students learn the specified curriculum regardless of factors in their backgrounds which have ordinarily been identified as those which prevent such learning.” —Lawrence Lezotte —Learning for All FOUNDATION

F-11 —Ron Edmonds —Effective Schools for the Poor We already know more than we need to do that. “We can, whenever and wherever we want, successfully teach all children whose schooling is of interest to us. Whether or not we do it must depend on how we feel about the fact that we haven’t so far.” FOUNDATION

F-12 What DO we know that effective schools DO? FOUNDATION

F-13 Clear & Focused Mission Strong Instructional Leadership Climate of High Expectations for Student Success Positive Home-School Relations Frequent Monitoring of Student Progress Safe & Orderly Environment Opportunity to Learn & Student Time on Task Effective School Correlates FOUNDATION

F-14 Learning for All—A Vision for ALL Texas Students FOUNDATION

F-15 Key Concepts of Systems Thinking FOUNDATION

F-16 What kind of system needs to be in place to assure success for all students in a classroom? What kind of system needs to be in place to assure success for all students on the campus? What kind of system needs to be in place to assure success for all students in the district? What kind of system needs to be in place to assure success for all students in the state? Thinking About Systems Thinking FOUNDATION

F-17 What conclusions can you draw about the changes in the state system? Do you see any patterns in the state system? Texas Education: A Work in Progress FOUNDATION

F-18 Continuous Improvement Process Moves the State Toward the Vision Where the State is Where the State needs to be FOUNDATION

F-19 Continuous Improvement Process Needs Assessment Data collection Analysis Goals & Objectives Strategies & Activities Professional Development & Sustained Support Implementation Who? What? What do we need? Ongoing Formative Evaluation Quality Summative Evaluation Student Performance FOUNDATION

F-20 Where Do We Stand as a State? Review pp. H-F-17–20 and highlight any data that impacts your campus. Analyze reading data (H-F-21) and share observations at your table. Analyze math data (H-F-22) and share. Analyze writing data (H-F-23) and share. FOUNDATION

F-21 Instructional Leadership Development Framework for Data-driven Systems QUALITY STUDENT PERFORMANCE ETHICS AND INTEGRITY Curriculum/Instruction/ Assessment Supervision Professional Development Organizational Management CULTURE Communication and Community Partnerships Learner-CenteredHigh Expectations CollaborativeContinuous Improvement FOUNDATION

F-22 Instructional Leadership Development Framework for Data-driven Systems QUALITY STUDENT PERFORMANCE ETHICS AND INTEGRITY Curriculum/Instruction/ Assessment Supervision Professional Development Organizational Management CULTURE Communication and Community Partnerships Learner-CenteredHigh Expectations CollaborativeContinuous Improvement FOUNDATION

F-23 Ethics and Integrity: An effective instructional leader models and supports honesty, responsibility, fairness, respect for individual differences, and compliance with the spirit and intent, as well as the letter, of the law. ILD Framework: Foundation FOUNDATION

F-24 Ethics and Integrity ILD Framework: Foundation Find the Review of Literature in your notebook and turn to the first section, Ethics and Integrity. Quickly read a “sampling” of the citations and select two or three to highlight and share at your table. FOUNDATION

F-25 Instructional Leadership Development Framework for Data-driven Systems QUALITY STUDENT PERFORMANCE ETHICS AND INTEGRITY Curriculum/Instruction/ Assessment Supervision Professional Development Organizational Management CULTURE Communication and Community Partnerships Learner-CenteredHigh Expectations CollaborativeContinuous Improvement FOUNDATION

F-26 Learner-Centered: Views all members of the learning community as lifelong, successful learners. Based on High Expectations: Expects everyone to work to ensure a safe, respectful, inclusive, risk-taking, and academically rich environment in which all stakeholders accept accountability for the success of all students. Collaborative: Views teamwork, collegiality, and a sense of community as necessary for maximizing the goal of success for all. Based on Continuous Improvement: Views continuous planning, monitoring, evaluation, and assessment of progress as essential to the goal of continuous and ever-improving success for all. ILD Framework: Culture An effective instructional leader models, encourages and creates conditions/attributes in the school culture that are: FOUNDATION

F-27 Instructional Leadership Development Framework for Data-driven Systems QUALITY STUDENT PERFORMANCE ETHICS AND INTEGRITY Curriculum/Instruction/ Assessment Supervision Professional Development Organizational Management CULTURE Communication and Community Partnerships Learner-CenteredHigh Expectations CollaborativeContinuous Improvement FOUNDATION

F-28 Where do the things that effective schools do fit on this framework? FOUNDATION

F-29 CONGRATULATIONS! You’ve just been named the new principal of... Lone Star Middle School FOUNDATION

F-30 Continuous Improvement Process Needs Assessment Data collection Analysis Goals & Objectives Strategies & Activities Professional Development & Sustained Support Implementation Who? What? What do we need? Ongoing Formative Evaluation Quality Summative Evaluation Student Performance FOUNDATION

F-31 “Quality school systems...constantly improve the appropriateness and responsiveness of their services. Key elements that make this improvement possible are: information gathering and analysis…” —American Association of School Administrators — Creating Quality Schools FOUNDATION

F-32 Needs Assessment Data Collection Analysis Lone Star Middle School Quality Student Performance FOUNDATION

F-33 Campus Profile  Scan the Lone Star Middle School profile on pp. 1–6 in the data packet.  Discuss the question, “What do we know about Lone Star Middle School?”  Each group selects one highlight.  Groups chart areas of strength and areas for improvement. FOUNDATION

F-34 Guiding Questions  What additional data do you need?  Based on the information you have at this time, what are the implications for Lone Star Middle School? FOUNDATION

F-35 Campus Composite  Read through the campus composite data on pp. 7–8 in the data packet and discuss initial impressions in your group.  What additional insights have you gained about Lone Star Middle School?  Add additional areas of strength and areas for improvement to your charts. FOUNDATION

F-36  What additional data do you need?  Based on the information you have at this time, what are the implications for Lone Star Middle School? Guiding Questions FOUNDATION

F-37 Accountability Data Tables  Read through the accountability tables on pages 9-13 in the data packet and discuss initial impressions with your group.  Add areas of strength and areas for improvement to your charts. FOUNDATION

F-38  What additional data do you need?  Based on the information you have at this time, what are the implications for Lone Star Middle School? Guiding Questions FOUNDATION

F-39 Continuous Improvement Process Needs Assessment Data collection Analysis Goals & Objectives Strategies & Activities Professional Development & Sustained Support Implementation Who? What? What do we need? Ongoing Formative Evaluation Quality Summative Evaluation Student Performance FOUNDATION

F-40 Characteristics of a Measurable Objective  Who?  What?  When?  To what extent? FOUNDATION

F-41 Nonacademic Objective Ninety percent of parent/guardian responses on an annual climate survey will be favorable toward Lone Star Middle School. FOUNDATION

F-42 Academic Objective FOUNDATION

F-43 Continuous Improvement Process Needs Assessment Data collection Analysis Goals & Objectives Strategies & Activities Professional Development & Sustained Support Implementation Who? What? What do we need? Ongoing Formative Evaluation Quality Summative Evaluation Student Performance FOUNDATION

F-44 Instructional Leadership Development Framework for Data-driven Systems QUALITY STUDENT PERFORMANCE ETHICS AND INTEGRITY Curriculum/Instruction/ Assessment Supervision Professional Development Organizational Management CULTURE Communication and Community Partnerships Learner-CenteredHigh Expectations CollaborativeContinuous Improvement FOUNDATION