The Revised State Plan Template BACKGROUND, CHANGES, AND FOCUS OF THE INSTITUTE.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Trends in Number of High School Graduates: National
Advertisements

PARTISAN CONTROL AND STATE DECISIONS ABOUT OBAMACARE FULL GO STATES (n = 22) Arkansas Michigan CALIFORNIA MINNESOTA COLORADO NEVADA CONNECTICUT New Hampshire.
Hwy Ops Div1 THE GREAT KAHUNA AWARD !!! TEA 2004 CONFERENCE, MOBILE, AL OCTOBER 09-11, 2004 OFFICE OF PROGRAM ADMINISTRATION HIPA-30.
The West` Washington Idaho 1 Montana Oregon California 3 4 Nevada Utah
TOTAL CASES FILED IN MAINE PER 1,000 POPULATION CALENDAR YEARS FILINGS PER 1,000 POPULATION This chart shows bankruptcy filings relative to.
Discrimination Complaint Log Evaluation Phase I Pir Ahmad USDOL - Civil Rights Center.
BINARY CODING. Alabama Arizona California Connecticut Florida Hawaii Illinois Iowa Kentucky Maine Massachusetts Minnesota Missouri 0 Nebraska New Hampshire.
U.S. Civil War Map On a current map of the U.S. identify and label the Union States, the Confederate States, and U.S. territories. Create a map key and.
Chart 6. 12: Impact of Community Hospitals on U. S
Relative Value System Update Committee (RUC) AMDA Efforts Charles Crecelius MD PhD FACP CMD.
State Plan Template: Part E 5 YEAR GOALS, OBJECTIVES, EXPECTED OUTCOMES 5-YEAR LOGIC MODEL ANNUAL WORK PLAN.
This chart compares the percentage of cases filed in Maine under chapter 13 with the national average between 1999 and As a percent of total filings,
Autor: Mgr. Zdenka Mléčková Zpracováno pro: 5. ročník.
Fasten your seatbelts we’re off on a cross country road trip!
Map Review. California Kentucky Alabama.
Judicial Circuits. If You Live In This State This Is Your Judicial Circuit Alabama11th Circuit Alaska 9th Circuit Arkansas 8th Circuit Arizona 9th Circuit.
1 Overview: The Federation of State Beef Councils.
1. AFL-CIO What percentage of the funds received by Alabama K-12 public schools in school year was provided by the state of Alabama? a)44% b)53%
The United States.
It’s been 18 years… 1996 Purchasing Power compared to cents to the dollar. What $1.00 could buy in 1996 now costs $1.48.
Medicare Advantage Enrollment: State Summary Five Slide Series, Volume 2 July 2013.
Directions: Label Texas, Arkansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Tennessee, Alabama, Georgia, Florida, South Carolina, North Carolina, Virginia--- then color.
 As a group, we thought it be interesting to see how many of our peers drop out of school.  Since in the United States education is so important, we.
Program Name or Ancillary Texteere.energy.gov 2009 NASCSP Annual Conference Weatherization Assistance Program: The Federal Perspective September 16, 2009.
CHAPTER 7 FILINGS IN MAINE CALENDAR YEARS 1999 – 2009 CALENDAR YEAR CHAPTER 7 FILINGS This chart shows total case filings in Maine for calendar years 1999.
Social Security Administration’s EDR Partnership Update Presented by: Robin Fearce Robin Fearce SSA Project Officer for Electronic Death Registration Initiative.
Study Cards The East (12) Study Cards The East (12) New Hampshire New York Massachusetts Delaware Connecticut New Jersey Rhode Island Rhode Island Maryland.
Hawaii Alaska (not to scale) Alaska GeoCurrents Customizable Base Map text.
US MAP TEST Practice
Session Session 29-2 Updating Your Eligibility Status.
Education Level. STD RATE Teen Pregnancy Rates Pre-teen Pregnancy Rate.
Sponsored by the National Center for Education Statistics U.S. Department of Education as a component of the National Cooperative Education Statistics.
TOTAL CASE FILINGS - MAINE CALENDAR YEARS 1999 – 2009 CALENDAR YEAR Total Filings This chart shows total case filings in Maine for calendar years 1999.
The United States is a system that can be broken into 5 major parts or regions.
Can you locate all 50 states? Grade 4 Mrs. Kuntz.
1st Hour2nd Hour3rd Hour Day #1 Day #2 Day #3 Day #4 Day #5 Day #2 Day #3 Day #4 Day #5.
The United States Song Wee Sing America.
Expanded State Agency Use of NMLS
Presidential Primaries
The United States.
Supplementary Data Tables, Utilization and Volume
Maps.
Physicians per 1,000 Persons
USAGE OF THE – GHz BAND IN THE USA
EVVE Implementation – August 2013 Northern Mariana Islands
Chart 6. 12: Impact of Community Hospitals on U. S
Table 3.1: Trends in Inpatient Utilization in Community Hospitals, 1992 – 2012
Name the State Flags Your group are to identify which state the flag belongs to and sign correctly to earn a point.
GLD Org Chart February 2008.
EVVE Vital Records Implementation Northern Mariana Islands
Membership Update July 13, 2016.
Table 3.1: Trends in Inpatient Utilization in Community Hospitals, 1987 – 2007
State Adoption of Uniform State Test
The States How many states are in the United States?
State Adoption of NMLS ESB
Supplementary Data Tables, Trends in Overall Health Care Market
AIDS Education & Training Center Program Regional Centers
Table 2.3: Beds per 1,000 Persons by State, 2013 and 2014
Regions of the United States
DO NOW: TAKE OUT ANY FORMS OR PAPERS YOU NEED TO TURN IN
Supplementary Data Tables, Utilization and Volume
Introductions by Region…
Presidential Electoral College Map
WASHINGTON MAINE MONTANA VERMONT NORTH DAKOTA MINNESOTA MICHIGAN
Expanded State Agency Use of NMLS
CBD Topical Sales Restrictions by State (as of May 23, 2019)
Percent of adults aged 18 years and older who have obesity †
In 2006, approximately 46% of all AIDS cases among adults and adolescents were in the South, followed by the Northeast (26%), the West (16%), and the Midwest.
AIDS Education & Training Center Program Regional Centers
USAGE OF THE 4.4 – 4.99 GHz BAND IN THE USA
Presentation transcript:

The Revised State Plan Template BACKGROUND, CHANGES, AND FOCUS OF THE INSTITUTE

Background on Revisions Draft performance measures are being piloted ◦The Performance Measures Pilot Group is currently “testing” the draft measures, and reporting on the measures provided an opportunity to review the State plan template The State plan template is the foundation for reporting activities and results in the Annual Program Performance Report (APPR) ◦Clarification(s) to the current template were needed ◦Format improvements will allow DD Councils to better report the information AIDD needs

Template Revisions Let’s take a look at the revisions to the State plan template In the packet, you will find the following: Revised State Plan Template Summary of changes for the revised State plan template

Section I and Section II Section I: Council Identification ◦DD Council membership category codes have been updated to include gender, geographical, and race/ethnicity data points ◦DD Council staff information has been expanded to include gender, race/ethnicity, and voluntary disability data Section II: Designated State Agency ◦No changes

Section III: Comprehensive Review and Analysis Part A. State Information – no changes Part B. Portrait of the State Services ◦Gather input directly from culturally diverse group(s) of people with developmental disabilities and their families; ◦Include information about the status of people with developmental disabilities from culturally and linguistically diverse backgrounds; ◦Include any information about disparities related to specific areas. Part C. Analysis of State Issues and Challenges ◦Identify populations in the State/Territory that are unserved and underserved; ◦Describe the process used to identify the unserved and underserved population; ◦Describe the rationale used to identify the population(s) over others.

Section III continued Part D. Rationale for Goal Selection ◦Given that the DD Act provides a broad mandate to address needs in the State, it is essential that Councils prioritize their work. ◦Not all the issues identified and analyzed in Parts B and C can be addressed by the Council. Include a brief explanation of how the Council prioritized issues to be addressed in the Plan.

Section III continued Part E: 5-Year Goals For each 5-year goal, the DD Council will identify the ◦Goal(s), Objective(s), and Expected Outcome(s) ◦This is a major change, as activities, collaborators, areas of emphasis, strategies, and timelines are not included in this section. ◦An annual work plan will be developed by the DD Council (hang on…a few more slides) Included in the DD Council’s goals are the following: ◦Self-advocacy goal(s) and/or objective(s) ◦Targeted disparity goal(s) and/or objective(s) ◦Collaboration goal(s) and/or objective(s) 5-year Logic Model

Section IV: Evaluation Plan No major changes to the format Additional guidance is provided on the following: ◦Include separate information on the self-advocacy goal and/or objectives and the three required elements ◦Include the process to track progress towards reducing the targeted disparity

Section V: Projected Council Budget No changes

Section VI: Assurances No changes However….DD Council can attach a signed, scanned copy of the Assurances and keep the original on file in the DD Council office.

Section VII: Public Input and Review No changes Note: Language access is required in Title VI, Section 601, of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 ◦Resource: ◦What is limited English proficiency? ◦Meaningful access to program and activities by LEP persons

New! The Annual Work Plan Background ◦AIDD recognized that DD Council work has many moving pieces and parts; many are outside of the DD Council’s control. ◦DD Council’s cannot predict (with accuracy) 5 years in advance Result ◦DD Councils will submit annual work plans for the first two years (due August 15, 2016) ◦DD Councils will submit annual work plans for the third and fourth years (due January 1, 2018) ◦DD Councils will submit an annual work plan for the fifth and final year (due January 1, 2019) Check out the timeline for the template handout in your packet!

How will this affect DD Councils? PROCESS Plan DoEvaluateAdjust BENEFITS OF ANNUAL WORK PLAN DD Councils can reflect on the previous year’s activities and results and update the following year annual work plan to more accurately reflect the DD Council’s work and planning; Allows a DD Council to more accurately forecast activities for an upcoming year

Areas of focus for this morning Unserved and Underserved Targeted Disparity goal or objective with corresponding activities What do we know? We know that DD Councils analyze the barriers to full participation of unserved and underserved groups of people with DD and their families What we don’t know is what the obvious work is to reduce or resolve those barriers to services, supports So the element was enhanced *Collaboration was enhanced to ensure DD Councils engaged in a planning process with the DD Network partners because it was not evident that collaboration efforts in the 5-year plans were pre-planned for inclusion into the 5-year State plan.

Small Group Assignments - Morning Group 1 Leaders: Angela, Sara, Margie, Brian, Shannon, and Calob Alaska; Arizona; Connecticut; Florida; Hawaii; Illinois; Louisiana; Maine; Mississippi; Nebraska; New Mexico; Ohio; South Carolina; Texas; Vermont; Washington State, Wyoming Group 2 Leaders: Sheryl, Becky, Sherry, Kari, Fil, and Ann Arkansas; California; Colorado; District of Columbia; Georgia; Guam; Iowa; Kansas; Massachusetts; Michigan; New Hampshire; North Carolina; Oregon; Pennsylvania; South Dakota; Utah, Wisconsin Group 3 Leaders: Allison, Cheryl, Robin, Jim, Jessica, and Alicia American Samoa; Delaware; Idaho; Kentucky; Maryland; Missouri; New Jersey; New York; North Dakota; Northern Mariana Islands; Puerto Rico; Tennessee; Virgin Islands

Feedback Additional information What information do you need? What information do you need to assist in communicating these updates to your Council members? Areas for clarification Other?