Welcome MAT 2012-2013 Cohort Special Methods of Instruction I Summer 2012 GRAD 210 Dr. Bowles, Instructor.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Understanding by Design Stage 3
Advertisements

Importance of Questioning and Feedback Technique in developing 3 Cs
Bringing it all together!
Understanding by Design Ensuring Learning through Lesson Design
Designing Instruction Objectives, Indirect Instruction, and Differentiation Adapted from required text: Effective Teaching Methods: Research-Based Practice.
Understanding by Design An Overview by Eduardo M. Valerio, Ph.D.
Universal Design for Learning (UDL). UD in Architecture a movement of designing structures with all potential users in mind incorporated access features.
A School Approach to Designing for Learning Learning Intentions : To know that purposefully designing for learning that is contextually appropriate, strengthens.
How to Integrate Students with Diverse Learning Needs in a General Education Classroom By: Tammie McElaney.
Teaching Language in Context First edition 1986 Third edition 2001
Principles of High Quality Assessment
Lesson Planning Educ 3100.
ED 3501: Curriculum and Instruction Section GHI - Fall Understanding by Design Understanding and Creating Effective Instructional Design.
Clara Fowler University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center, Houston
Planning, Instruction, and Technology
STARTALK Professional Development Course for Swahili Instructors: Theory and Practice July 19 th to 30 th, 2010 University of Wisconsin, Madison Alwiya.
What should be the basis of
MYP Training Session 3 Design: Planning & Preparation
Model Standards English as a Second Language OACE Integrated Programs Planning Project Summer 2009.
Rediscovering Research: A Path to Standards Based Learning Authentic Learning that Motivates, Constructs Meaning, and Boosts Success.
Click to edit Master title style  Click to edit Master text styles  Second level  Third level  Fourth level  Fifth level  Click to edit Master text.
1 DEVELOPING ASSESSMENT TOOLS FOR ESL Liz Davidson & Nadia Casarotto CMM General Studies and Further Education.
August 2011 Lesson Plans BCIU#22- Summer Induction.
Understanding by Design
By Weizmar Lozada. Content-based Instruction Use of content from other disciplines in language teaching. Build on students’ previous knowledge. Students.
Welcome MAT Cohort Special Methods of Instruction I Summer 2012 GRAD 210 Dr. Bowles, Instructor.
Interstate New Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (INTASC)
I’m In Activity Reflect on the morning in 1-2 sentences “I’m in”
21 st Century Teaching and Learning Designing Effective Instruction to Engage our Learners.
UDL Presentation: Sharing Ideas and Building Resources By: Vickie P. Murphy.
Thomas College Name Major Expected date of graduation address
Four Basic Principles to Follow: Test what was taught. Test what was taught. Test in a way that reflects way in which it was taught. Test in a way that.
Encompasses a broad, overall approach to instruction.
Marjorie Hall Haley, PhD - GMU1 Chapter 3 Planning for the Standards-Based Classroom.
MY E-PORFOLIO. ¨Evaluation¨… What I know…What I want to know…What I learned… -Process/formative vs product/summative evaluation -Necessary to make changes.
The Interpersonal Mode
Integrating Differentiated Instruction & Understanding by Design: Connecting Content and Kids by Carol Ann Tomlinson and Jay McTighe.
EdTPA Teacher Performance Assessment. Planning Task Selecting lesson objectives Planning 3-5 days of instruction (lessons, assessments, materials) Alignment.
21 st Century Learning and Instruction Session 3: Quality Instructional Design.
What Makes a Good Activity? Lessons from research and experience Cindy Shellito (U of Northern CO) and Cathy Manduca (SERC)
Backward Design Learning with a purpose. Today’s Essential Question How do teachers create student-centered standards-based thematic units that engage.
Backward Design Understanding by Design SAILN Tier III - Summer 2011.
Selected Teaching-Learning Terms: Working Definitions...
Understanding by Design From the work of Grant Wiggins and Jay McTighe The 3 Stages of UBD Developing a Common Language - What is a Unit.
Matthew Birtel EDUC 503 FALL 2012 November 27, 2012.
Backward Design Learning with a purpose
How Languages are Learned and Acquired
Planning Instructional Units. Planning Vital and basic skill for effective teaching Helps you feel organized and prepared Is only a guide: not carved.
Sandra GB Iturbides, M.Ed. Maritza Abreu, M.Ed..  PLEASE TURN OFF OR SILENCE YOUR CELL PHONES.  WRITE YOUR QUESTIONS ON POST IT NOTES AND PLACE ON PARKING.
ASSESSMENT FOR LEARNING DIAGNOSTIC ASSESSMENT - SONIYA JAYARAMAN.
TEACHING WITH A FOCUS ON LEARNERS One model of Differentiation: Sousa and Tomlinson (2011) Differentiation and The Brain. Purpose: Understanding Text Complexity.
21 st Century Learning and Instruction Session 2: Balanced Assessment.
Using TESOL’s Standards to Guide Instructional Design
COURSE AND SYLLABUS DESIGN
1 Taiwan Teachers’ Professional Development Series: Oral & Written Communication in your FL Classroom.
Creative Curriculum and GOLD Assessment: Early Childhood Competency Based Evaluation System By Carol Bottom.
Teaching and Learning Cycle and Differentiated Instruction A Perfect Fit Rigor Relevance Quality Learning Environment Differentiation.
“To begin with the end in mind means to start with a clear understanding of your destination. It means to know where you’re going so that you better understand.
KEYS: Chapter 3 Step-by-Step: Designing Performance Assessment Tasks.
Planning Effective 1. 2 The elements of an effective lesson design is a rich learning experience for to begin with understanding where they need to go.
Understanding by Design
Teaching and Learning with Technology
Understanding by Design
Tutorial Welcome to Module 13
Understanding by Design Ensuring Learning through Lesson Design
ACTFL's Core Practices for Effective Chinese Learning
Planning and Preparation
Key Points Chapter Two Shrum and Glisan
Presentation transcript:

Welcome MAT Cohort Special Methods of Instruction I Summer 2012 GRAD 210 Dr. Bowles, Instructor

Key Points in Chapter Three Standards-based Language Learning ▫Integration of modes of communication with meaningful content  Integration of  modes,  oral & printed cultural texts, and  content and language

Terms for Organizing Content and Planning for Instruction Goal: ▫Aim or purpose of instruction stated in broad terms Objective: also referred to as “outcome” ▫What the learner will be able to do with the language as a result of instruction Framework: ▫State document that describes goals and standards to be met by language programs

Contemporary Paradigm for Instructional Planning Objectives designed to show what students know and are able to do with the language Interdisciplinary content and culture are at the core Three modes of communication integrated into lesson design Learner is more responsible Teacher is facilitator Textbook is a resource in a wide variety of materials & tools Assessment is on-going

Brain-based Principles of Learning (Sousa, 2006) Engages the entire person (cognitive, affective, kinesthetic) The brain seeks patterns Emotions affect learning, retention, recall Past experiences affects new learning Working memory has limited capacity Lecture=lowest degree of retention Rehearsal essential for retention Practice (alone) does not make perfect Each brain is unique!

Bloom’s Taxonomy of Thinking (1950s, 2001) Levels are organized according to complexity of human thought and serves as a model for promoting higher-order thinking. It served as an early model for designing instructional objectives and curricula. ▫Lower levelsHigher levels  Remember Analyze  Understand Evaluate  Apply Create

Planning a Lesson Requirements: ▫Maximum use of TL ▫Meaningful teacher feedback ▫Integration of oral and printed authentic texts ▫Identification of interesting and pertinent content

Input and Feedback Lexical chaining—most prevalent type of input Simple syntax and multiple rephrasing; little topic development and no foundation for meaningful discussion IRE—most common form of teacher feedback ▫Teacher initiates an assertion or asks a question ▫Student responds ▫Teacher evaluates with simple phrase or asks the same question to another student IRF—preferred type of teacher feedback ▫Teacher provided feedback to encourage thinking and higher levels of performance

Authentic Oral & Printed Texts Select texts that reflect natural language use and bring content and interest to learning tasks Oller’s Episode Hypothesis Text should be motivating and structured episodically so that it is easy to reproduce, understand, and recall (1983) Carrell (1984) Readers comprehend more easily text that are organized with a problem and solution Authentic Texts  produced by members of a language and culture group for members of the same language and culture group

Integrating Language & Content Curtain and Dahlberg (2010) ▫Content-based—teacher responsible for teaching a part of the content in the TL ▫Content-related—use concepts or topics from regular curriculum in the language classroom CBI used widely in FLES and ESL programs at the early levels of language learning; promotes L2 proficiency CoBaLTT /standards/index.html

Integrating Language & Content Factors to consider ▫Content area skills & concepts that can interrelate most effectively with the language goals ▫Language competencies need to work with content ▫Cognitive skills necessary to perform the tasks in the lesson ▫Potential for integration with cultural concepts and goals (Curtain & Dahlberg, 2010)

Backward Design Model Wiggins & McTighe, 2005 ▫Top-down approach ▫Identify “understandings” that Ss will develop ▫Identify “essential questions” that Ss will answer at the end of instruction ▫Plan around “big ideas”—concepts, themes, issues ▫Three stages  Identify desired results (goal)  Determine acceptable evidence (assessment)  Plan learning experiences and instruction (planning)

Thematic Unit Planning A series of related lessons around a topic, a particular context, or a particular subject-content theme ▫Identify goal areas (5Cs) and state frameworks ▫Determine theme or context of unit ▫Describe what Ss will be able to do at the end of the unit (objectives) ▫Design performance assessments for Ss to demonstrate what they have achieved ▫Identify key elements from ACTFL performance guidelines for learners to demonstrate achievement ▫Select and design appropriate instructional strategies to teach lesson in unit ▫Identify appropriate resources to support unit theme and instruction

Daily Lesson Plan Keep in mind the principles of brain-based research and Bloom’s Taxonomy Objectives are ▫measurable and describe what Ss will be able to do in TL Stage One Identify desired results by describing “big idea” and what Ss will be able to do by the lesson’s end—who are your learners? Stage Two Identify type of evidence that will confirm Ss have produced desired results Stage Three ▫Outline the sequences of teaching and learning  Anticipatory set that may include Advanced Organizers  Teacher input  Guided practice  Individual practice  Informal assessments  Closure