Kerri White, EdD Assistant State Superintendent Office of Educational Support Oklahoma State Department of Education A-F School Report Cards.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations

Advertisements

WV High Quality Standards for Schools
KtO—In a Glance Local Literacy Plan Year 2- Keystones to Opportunity.
Rules and Legislation Regarding A-F Report Cards June 2013 Jennifer Stegman, Program Manager CTB.
ACE-Achieving Classroom Excellence.  2005: Achieving Classroom Excellence Act (SB 982) ◦ Established the ACE Task Force and guiding principles  2006:
CTE and the A-F Report Card ODCTE Summer Conference 2012.
ESEA FLEXIBILITY WAIVER Overview of Federal Requirements August 2, 2012 Alaska Department of Education & Early Development.
The 10 Components of a Schoolwide Title I Program Presented by: Dr. Denise Ellis Director State and Federal Programs Dr. Ken Wagner Principal Rancho Mirage.
The Marzano School Leadership Evaluation Model Webinar for Washington State Teacher/Principal Evaluation Project.
Delta Sierra Middle School Napa/Solano County Office of Education School Assistance and Intervention Team Monitoring Report #8 – July 2008 Mary Camezon,
Drawing by Mankoff: copyright 1993 The New Yorker Magazine, Inc.
Debbie C. Hester Austin ISD July 9 & 11, 2012 Texas Turnaround Center.
Designing and Implementing An Effective Schoolwide Program
Bluebonnet Elementary School Celebrations and Recommendations for Continuous School Improvement Round Rock Independent School District Module 7 Assignment.
Bibb County Schools Standard 1: Vision and Purpose Standard: The system establishes and communicates a shared purpose and direction for improving.
Student Learning Objectives 1 Implementing High Quality Student Learning Objectives: The Promise and the Challenge Maryland Association of Secondary School.
School Progress Index 2012 Results Mary Gable- Assistant State Superintendent Division of Academic Policy Carolyn Wood - Assistant State Superintendent.
ARRA Title I: The chance of a lifetime to address our most vexing challenges Reform and Restore: Implementing the ARRA Michigan Institute for Educational.
Local Control Accountability Plan. LCAP  The Local Control Accountability Plan (LCAP) is a document that provides details regarding the District’s services,
LOUISIANA STATE SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION JOHN WHITE Tracking Readiness: Measuring High School Effectiveness in Louisiana National Conference on Student.
Improving Teaching and Learning: One District’s Journey Curriculum and Instruction Leadership Symposium February 18-20, 2009  Pacific Grove, CA Chula.
GTEP Resource Manual Training 2 The Education Trust Study (1998) Katie Haycock “However important demographic variables may appear in their association.
INSTRUCTIONAL EXCELLENCE INVENTORIES: A PROCESS OF MONITORING FOR CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT Dr. Maria Pitre-Martin Superintendent of Schools.
College Board EXCELerator Schools Site Visit Preparation.
A-F Information Night. Welcome Introductions Purpose Outline of tonight Q & A session at the end.
COMPREHENSIVE NEEDS ASSESSMENT (CNA) Schoolwide Programs.
STUDENT SUPPORT SERVICES The “Tween” Years — Increasing Academic Rigor Administrators’ Management Meeting for Exceptional Education and Student Services.
Running Creek Elementary School School Improvement Plan Damon L. Rhodes, Principal Mandy Dry, SIT Chair.
Comprehensive Plan Overview October, District Profile Mission  The mission of the Windber Area School District is through a framework of communication.
Drawing by Mankoff: copyright 1993 The New Yorker Magazine, Inc.
Student Preparation Presenter: Judith C. Marty Principal Mater Academy Charter Middle High.
ILP Intervention Plans Tutorial. Intervention Plans in the ILP The Intervention Plan module was added to the ILP in May 2009 to meet requirements of SB.
What is Title 1? O It is a federal formula grant. O It is the largest federal grant the Fayette County Public Schools receives.
Parent Information Night Oklahoma’s A-F School Grading System.
Berkshire Local School District Strategic Plan Update Fourth Update, 10/14/09.
Reform Model for Change Board of Education presentation by Superintendent: Dr. Kimberly Tooley.
September 22, 2015 Shawanna Arnold Assistant Principal Annual Title I Meeting Gullatt Elementary School Review of Title I Plan.
Federal Support for World-Class Schools Gwinnett County Public Schools 4/18/13.
Dr. Wanda Bamberg, Superintendent of Schools June 29, 2010 The Road to Broad.
Communications and Timeline Damon Gardenhire Director of Communications and Policy.
What is Title I and How Can I be Involved? Annual Parent Meeting Pierce Elementary
CTE and the A-F Report Card Tommi Leach and Kelly Arrington, ODCTE.
SHERRI YBARRA, SUPERINTENDENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION SUPPORTING SCHOOLS AND STUDENTS TO ACHIEVE.
Rowland Unified School District District Local Education Agency (LEA)Plan Update Principals Meeting November 16, 2015.
Planning for School Implementation. Choice Programs Requires both district and school level coordination roles The district office establishes guidelines,
ESEA Federal Accountability System Overview 1. Federal Accountability System Adequate Yearly Progress – AYP defined by the Elementary and Secondary Education.
2012 MOASBO SPRING CONFERENCE Missouri Department of Elementary and Secondary Education 1 April 26, 2012.
ffff Lisa Troutman, School Transformation Coach, Ed.S
Career and Academic Connections Update Superintendents’ Meeting Kelly Arrington and Tommi Leach ODCTE.
Principal – Adriene Stephenson. Enrollment – 371 General Education – 83% SPED – 17% LEP – Less than 1% African American – 75% White – 22% Asian, Hispanic,
Mr. Rickie Hopkins, Principal Ms. Treena Leecost, Assistant Principal Mr. William Reese, Assistant Principal Thompson Middle School January 12, 2012.
Elementary [166] K-8 [36] Middle [37] Secondary [1] High School [52] K-12 [1] Manhattan [53] Brooklyn [40] Bronx [18] Queens [176] Staten Island [6] 293.
The Georgia Department of Juvenile Justice Board of Education Presentation May 26, 2011.
Ms. April Hawkins, Principal Mr. Zeno Hines, Assistant Principal Mr. William McGee, Assistant Principal Ms. Angela Mosley, Assistant Principal Armstrong.
Priority School District Capacity Review Process and Results Oklahoma State Department of Education March 29, 2012.
East Longmeadow Public Schools SMART Goals Presented by ELPS Leadership Team.
Revisiting SPL/IIT/SAT/SLD AND OTHER ALPHABETIC ANOMOLIES!
Statewide System of Support For High Priority Schools Office of School Improvement.
SCEP Evaluation Albany Elementary School.
Outcomes By the end of our sessions, participants will have…  an understanding of how VAL-ED is used as a data point in developing professional development.
External Review Exit Report Campbell County Schools November 15-18, 2015.
Conversation about State Report Card November 28, 2016
Every Student Succeeds Act of 2015: Highlights and
Academic Performance Index (API) and AYP
Academic Performance Index (API) and AYP
Growth Models Oklahoma
Accountability in ESSA: Setting the Context
New Accountability System: District and Site Report Cards
Muncy School District November 9, 2015
Starting Community Conversations
Presentation transcript:

Kerri White, EdD Assistant State Superintendent Office of Educational Support Oklahoma State Department of Education A-F School Report Cards

A-F School Report Cards: Raise the Grade Together Kerri White, EdD Assistant State Superintendent Office of Educational Support Oklahoma State Department of Education

Session Objective The A-F School Report Cards provide information and an opportunity for counselors to assist teachers, principals, and families in identifying strengths and weaknesses of schools. Learn how to take the next steps with the A-F School Report Cards and “Raise the Grade Together.”

Resources

A-F Report Card Guide

Resources Oklahoma’s A-F School Grading System Frequently Asked Questions

Resources Raise the Grade Together Resource Guide For School Districts

Resources Raise the Grade Together Quick Reference Guide for Parents

A-F Report Card Components Comprised of three main sections each worth one-third of the overall grade: – Student Achievement – Student Growth – Whole School Performance

Student Achievement Section Includes all Oklahoma State Testing Program (OSTP) exams administered during the most recent school year

Student Achievement Section The 3% cap for OMAAP and OAAP are applied. At least thirty (30) students tested before a performance index is reported.

GRADES09–12 DISTRICT: EXAMPLE DISTRICTSCHOOL:HIGH SCHOOL 2012 Student Achievement (33%) Subject# of StudentsPerformance IndexLetter Grade English II/English III 4786B Algebra I/Algebra II/Geometry 6478C Biology I 29*** US History 15*** Overall 2012 Student Performance Grade 15580B

Student Growth Section Growth is divided into two sub-categories: – All students – Bottom twenty-five percent of students, if those students have not attained a proficient or advanced score. (A proposal has been submitted changing this to a true bottom 25% of students, regardless of their prior test score.)

Growth Index 30 “matched scores” needed to receive a grade for each growth section. – If less than 30 scores for the bottom 25% section, grade is based on total growth. – If there are less than 30 scores for the total growth section, the report card grade is computed using 50% Student Achievement and 50% Whole School Performance.

Overall Student Growth (17%) Subject English II 7896A Algebra I 6883B Overall 2012 Student Growth Grade 14690A Bottom Quartile Student Growth (17%) Subject English II 16*** Algebra I 15*** Overall 2012 Bottom Quartile Growth Grade 3176C GRADES09–12 DISTRICT: EXAMPLE DISTRICTSCHOOL:HIGH SCHOOL

Whole School Performance Section Components vary by grade span: elementary schools, middle schools, and high schools. – Grade span is determined based on the highest grade level included in the school site/district. (A proposal has been submitted to move buildings where the highest grade is 10 th grade to middle/junior high criteria.)

Whole School Performance Section Elementary Schools Middle Schools/Junior Highs

Whole School Performance (33%)**** Student Attendance Rate A98.2% 4(.90) =3.6 Advanced Coursework F0.0% 0(.06)=0 Dropout Rate A0.0% 4(.04)=0.16 BONUS School Climate Survey N Parent & Community Engagement Y Total Whole School Performance =3.82 A GRADES06-08 DISTRICT: EXAMPLE DISTRICTSCHOOL:MIDDLE SCHOOL

Whole School Performance Section High Schools (A proposal has been submitted to combine some of these components and distribute the weights accordingly.)

Whole School Performance (33%)**** Graduation Rate 95.5%A 4(.79)=3.16 Advanced Coursework Participation 3.0%F 0(.03)=0 AP/IB Exam Performance 0.0%F 0(.03)=0 Advanced Courses Performance 0.0%F 0(.03)=0 College Entrance Exam Participation 93.0%A 4(.03)=0.12 College Entrance Exam Performance 38.0%D 1(.03)=0.03 Eighth Grade Graduation Rate 83.1% B 3(.03)=0.09 Five Year Graduation Rate 95.5%A 4(.03)=0.12 BONUS School Climate Survey N Parent & Community Engagement Y ACE Graduation Participation Y College Remediation N Total Whole School Performance =3.64 B GRADES09–12 DISTRICT: EXAMPLE DISTRICTSCHOOL:EXAMPLE SCHOOL

SAMPLE SCHOOL School Grades and Designations can be Powerful for Schoolwide Improvement SAMPLE SCHOOL

The Way to an A: Common Practice #1 Organize Data in a Meaningful Way Types of Data – Demographics – Student Performance Results – Additional Student Achievement Data – Student Growth – Whole School Performance Data – Teacher Attendance and Other Teacher Characteristics – Student Behavior – Other Student Characteristics – Budgetary Data – Survey Data

The Way to an A: Common Practice #1 Organize Data in a Meaningful Way Comprehensive Needs Assessment – Step 1: Establish a Planning Team – Step 2: Discuss the Vision for Reform – Step 3: Identify Data Sources to Utilize for the Needs Assessment – Step 4: Create a School Profile – Step 5: Analyze the Data

The Way to an A: Common Practice #2 Develop a Written Plan Written plans get followed! Potential Improvement Strategies – Quarterly Benchmark Assessments – Professional Learning Communities – Increased Learning Time – Building Capacity – Community Schools Initiative – Family Engagement/Parental Involvement

Menu of Interventions 1.Schoolwide Interventions & Supports 2.Leadership Interventions & Supports 3.Teacher Interventions & Supports 4.Classroom Interventions & Supports 5.Parent and Community Interventions & Supports

Menu of Interventions

The Way to an A: Common Practice #3 Monitor the Implementation of the Plan Questions to Ask: – Are school personnel and other involved stakeholders completing components of the plan in a timely manner? – Are the action steps in the plan resulting in the required improvements? – Are there things that need to be removed from the plan? – Are there other things that need to be added? Oklahoma Data Reviews

The Way to an A: Common Practice #4 Use of Tools Designed to Support Improvement WISE Planning Tool Family Engagement Tool What Works in Oklahoma Schools Surveys Oklahoma School Climate Surveys iTunes U REAC 3 H Network REAC 3 H Coaches

The Way to an A: Common Practice #5 Fiscal Analysis Aligning Funds and Resources to Needs Examining Use of Federal, State, and Local Sources of Revenue Grant Opportunities: – School Improvement Grants – Reward School Grants – 21 st Century Community Learning Center Grants – STEM Grants – AP/Pre-AP Grants

Family and Community Engagement Engaging Key Stakeholders Securing Additional Resources Maximizing on Expertise Communicating: Parent Power

More Information Raise the Grade TogetherA-F Report Card Calculations Counselors’ RolesSchool Designations Family and Community Engagement