Cascadia Subduction Zone Earthquakes and Critical Infrastructure Workshop Edward Perez, FERC Background - Part 12D Report. - Every 5 years. - Top-to-bottom.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SÄTEILYTURVAKESKUS STRÅLSÄKERHETSCENTRALEN RADIATION AND NUCLEAR SAFETY AUTHORITY Seismic experience in Finland VN/RA/01 Task 1&2 Workshop Hanoi, October.
Advertisements

2013 Northwest Hydro Operators Forum 1 Risk-Informed Decision Making – FERC Perspective David Lord, P.E., D2SI Dam Safety Risk team – Portland, Or Natural.
Ground Motions Geotechnical Earthquake Engineering: Steve Kramer
Earthquakes along the West Coast and the Cascadia Subduction Zone.
1 Scoggins Dam Overview of Seismic Risk July 18, 2012.
Prague, March 18, 2005Antonio Emolo1 Seismic Hazard Assessment for a Characteristic Earthquake Scenario: Integrating Probabilistic and Deterministic Approaches.
IRENG07 1 Seismic Consideration Discussion for The Interaction Region Fred Asiri-SLAC.
Modeling Seismic Response for Highway Bridges in the St. Louis Area for Magnitude 6.0 to 6.8 Earthquakes J. David Rogers and Deniz Karadeniz Department.
1 The Central and Eastern United States Seismic Source Characterization for Nuclear Facilities Project (CEUS-SSC): Updating Seismic Source Models for the.
American Samoa Seismic Hazard Maps Mark D. Petersen, Stephen C. Harmsen, Kenneth S. Rukstales, Charles S. Mueller, Daniel E. McNamara, Nicolas Luco, and.
1 Central Coastal California Seismic Imaging Project California Energy Commission Workshop Dr. Stuart Nishenko PG&E April 27, 2015.
Deterministic Seismic Hazard Analysis Earliest approach taken to seismic hazard analysis Originated in nuclear power industry applications Still used for.
Spring INTRODUCTION There exists a lot of methods used for identifying high risk locations or sites that experience more crashes than one would.
GMSM Methodology and Terminology Christine Goulet, UCLA GMSM Core Members.
Seismic/Eruption Teaching Modules Lawrence W. Braile Sheryl J. Braile Teaching About Earthquakes.
Abstract Detection of active faults and seismic hazards in the Seattle area is problematic, owing to thick surficial deposits and abundant vegetative cover.
Name: Matthew Moore Organization: Western Oregon University Phone: Intraplate crustal faulting is a result of.
Seismic/Eruption Lawrence W. Braile Using the Seismic/Eruption Program in Teaching Larry Braile IRIS GSA Earthquake.
1 2 Outlines Earthquakes in the Manhattan area “Big” ones Small ones Earthquakes and earthquake hazard Causes of earthquakes Why Manhattan had earthquakes.
Characterization of Ground Motion Hazard PEER Summative Meeting - June 13, 2007 Yousef Bozorgnia PEER Associate Director.
Overview of NGA Database, Model Development to Date, and Next Steps PEER-NGA Workshop April 12, 2005.
Time-dependent seismic hazard maps for the New Madrid seismic zone and Charleston, South Carolina areas James Hebden Seth Stein Department of Earth and.
Selection of Time Series for Seismic Analyses
April Exploring a collaboration between Caltech and the Singaporean government Forecasting giant earthquakes of the Sumatran subduction zone and.
Roberto PAOLUCCI Department of Structural Engineering
Forecasting Earthquakes ・ Difference between Predictions and Forecasts ・ Earlier Efforts in Earthquake Prediction ・ Long-term Probability Estimates.
Earthquakes An earthquake is shaking or movement of the Earth. They are caused by plate tectonics.
WA ST Dept. of Ecology Dam Safety Office Draft Seismic Practice Jerald LaVassar 1, Lead Engineer July
Seismic Hazard Assessment for the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
New earthquake category Nature 447, (3 May 2007) | doi: /nature05780; Received 8 December 2006; Accepted 26 March A scaling law for slow.
Earthquake Hazard Session 1 Mr. James Daniell Risk Analysis
FEASIBILITY STUDY OF A REGIONAL EEW SYSTEM FOR THE EASTERN CARIBBEAN REGION ZUCCOLO Elisa, SALAZAR Walter, DI SARNO Luigi, FARRELL Anthony, GIBBS Tony,
The Ring of Fire consists of chains of active volcanoes around the Pacific. What type of plate boundary are these volcanoes adjacent to? 1.Transform 2.Convergent.
Updating Models of Earthquake Recurrence and Rupture Geometry of the Cascadia Subduction Zone for UCERF3 and the National Seismic Hazard Maps Art Frankel.
Real World Applications of USGS EQ Science: Stacy Bartoletti Degenkolb Engineers Structural Engineers Association of Washington Cascadia Region Earthquake.
Updating the Guidelines for the Seismic Design of Highway Bridges Status update for the Mid-America Ground Motion Workshop February 2003.
Feasibility Level Evaluation of Seismic Stability for Remedy Selection Senda Ozkan, Tetra Tech Inc. Gary Braun, Tetra Tech Inc.
Earthquakes (Chapter 13). Lecture Outline What is an earthquake? Seismic waves Epicenter location Earthquake magnitude Tectonic setting Hazards.
IMPLEMENTATION OF SCEC RESEARCH IN EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING ONGOING PROJECTS SCEC PROPOSAL TO NSF SCEC 2004 RFP.
Major Ongoing Ground Motion Research Programs at PEER Yousef Bozorgnia, Ph.D., P.E. PEER, University of California, Berkeley.
Cascadia Subduction Zone By: Zana Burnett. Cascadia Subduction Zone The Cascadia Subduction zone is a type of convergent plate boundary that stretches.
Probabilistic Ground Motions for Scoggins Dam, Oregon Chris Wood Seismotectonics & Geophysics Group Technical Service Center July 2012.
Attempting to Reconcile Holocene And Long-Term Seismicity Rates in the New Madrid Seismic Zone Mark Zoback – Stanford University NASA World Wind looking.
Nonlinear Performance and Potential Damage of Degraded Structures Under Different Earthquakes The 5 th Tongji-UBC Symposium on Earthquake Engineering “Facing.
Epistemic Uncertainty on the Median Ground Motion of Next-Generation Attenuation (NGA) Models Brian Chiou and Robert Youngs The Next Generation of Research.
Mid-Columbia Coordinated Hydro Operations Model John C. Howard CddHoward Consulting Ltd. CEATI 2009.
1 Ivan Wong Principal Seismologist/Vice President Seismic Hazards Group, URS Corporation Oakland, CA Uncertainties in Characterizing the Cascadia Subduction.
Earthquakes. Sounds of Earthquakes nds.phphttp://earthquake.usgs.gov/learning/listen/allsou nds.php.
Seismic Sources CEE 431/ESS465. Seismic Sources Identification Geologic evidence Field reconnaissance Trench logging Test pits, borings Airphoto interpretation.
Ground-Motion Attenuation Relationships for Cascadia Subduction Zone Megathrust Earthquakes Based on a Stochastic Finite-Fault Model Nick Gregor 1, Walter.
The theory of plate tectonics states that the lithosphere is divided into 12 large sections (plates) and about 20 smaller ones. These plates ‘float’ on.
Seismic Hazard Analysis for Guam & the Northern Mariana Islands Chuck Mueller U.S. Geological Survey Golden, Colorado, USA.
Earthquakes Hazards in North America A. Both plate boundary and within plate earthquakes Most of these are at ancient (former) plate boundaries now buried.
Giant Earthquakes in the Pacific Northwest
Follow along on your blank map to put 22 cities, rivers, lakes, and geographic features in and around the state… (use the satellite image version, or the.
Images courtesy of Google Earth (top), and USGS (bottom).
NGA-East Tentative Plan
Lecture on Earthquakes result from Seismic Waves
Philip J. Maechling (SCEC) September 13, 2015
Changing Earth lesson 6D
Foreshock(Mj6.5) Main shock(Mj7.3) 28 hrs later
Earthquake Hazards in Western Washington
SICHUAN EARTHQUAKE May 12, 2008
Dr. Praveen K. Malhotra, P.E.
Deterministic Seismic Hazard Analysis
Measuring Earthquakes
End-Users Needs in Seismic Hazard Analysis
March 21-22, University of Washington, Seattle
Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Analysis
Presentation transcript:

Cascadia Subduction Zone Earthquakes and Critical Infrastructure Workshop Edward Perez, FERC Background - Part 12D Report. - Every 5 years. - Top-to-bottom review of safety. - Accept/Supplement - Remedial Action. - Safe or not? - Seismic Load case - Stay up to speed with latest science. - Update analyses as needed.

2 Cascadia Subduction Zone Earthquakes and Critical Infrastructure Workshop Edward Perez, FERC Two significant seismic reports currently under review. -Probabilistic Hazard Analyses For Mid- Columbia Dams. -EWEB: Seismic Hazard Assessment, Carmen-Smith and Leaburg-Walterville Projects. -Ground motions higher than previous studies. - Results may affect other FERC projects.

2012 PROBABILISTIC SEISMIC HAZARD ANALYSES PROJECT FOR THE MID-COLUMBIA DAMS Prepared for Public Utility Districts of Chelan, Douglas, and Grant Counties February 2012 Chelan Dam Wells Dam Rocky Reach Dam Priest Rapids Dam Wanapum Dam Rock Island Dam

Also currently under FERC review:

Seismic Hazard Assessment Carmen-Smith and Leaburg Walterville  EWEB requested to conduct comprehensive seismic hazard assessment (previous Part 12D studies indicated very low ground motions).  Info needed for Part 12 Subpart D Reports and new fish passage facility design.  Consistent framework for seismic evaluation of existing and proposed facilities.  DSHA,MCE, and PSHA  Located along McKenzie River east of Eugene, OR.  CSZ ( interface and intraplate) and 20 crustal sources.  Intraplate in Oregon?  Nason McCullough, CH2M-Hill

FERC review: Crustal Faults  Use the most current mapped fault dimensions and locations, as documented in the USGS Fault and Fold Database.  Use the USGS mapped fault length with the Wells and Coppersmith (1994) relationships to estimate maximum moment magnitude.  Use a random crustal (normal fault) event located 15 km from the project site to be consistent with recommendations in northern Oregon Cascades.  Crustal sources: Use the geometric mean of all five GMPE relationships (2008 NGA’s).  Use the median (50th percentile) motions for low activity or low slip rate sources and 84th percentile for high activity or high slip rate sources. As no crustal faults have been identified within the vicinity of EWEB facilities with high activity or slip rates, the 50th percentile motions should be used unless additional evidence of higher activity/slip rates is found.

Seismic Recomendations Subduction Zone Interface Source  Use the bottom of the transition zone as used by the USGS national seismic hazard mapping to determine the site-to-source distance.  Use a maximum M W 9.0.  Use the 84 th Percentile motions – given that this source has an average recurrence interval on the order of about 500 years, it is prudent to use the 84 th percentile ground motions.

Seismic Recommendations Subduction Zone Intraplate Source  Use the most recent information to determine the closest site-to-source distance to the top of the Juan de Fuca plate.  Use a maximum M W 7.2.  Use the median (50 th percentile) motions – given that this source has no historical activity of engineering interest (M W greater than 5.0), an anomaly for intraplate sources worldwide.  Recommendation: There is geologic evidence that the Intraplate source may not be capable of generating earthquakes of engineering interest; therefore, use the median ground motions.

EWEB Projects Include

Crustal Seismic Sources

Random Crustal Seismic Source

Interface & Intraplate Seismic Sources

Intraplate Seismic Sources

Juan de Fuca Plate Distances

Leaburg-Walterville Results

Carmen-Smith Results

Earthquake Time Histories Spectrally match target spectra for each source:  Median Crustal Envelope  84 th Percentile Interface Envelope  Median Intraplate Envelope Primarily match at range of interest (7 sec)

Earthquake Time Histories Considered Motions:  Interface:  1978 Miyagi-Oki  1985 Mexico  1985 Chile  2010 Chile  Intraplate:  1949 Olympia  1965 Puget Sound  2001 Nisqually  1974 Peru  1997 Mexico  Crustal:  1980 Irpinia, Italy  1979 Norcia, Italy  1975 Oroville  1992 Little Skull Mtn, Nevada  1980 Mammoth Lakes  1983 Borah Peak, Idaho