1 The Real Costs of e-Learning What are they? How can we find out? Professor Paul Bacsich UK eUniversities Worldwide Limited Presentation to Venezualan.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Measuring social added value A model for public authorities
Advertisements

1 Calculating the costs of Information technology in higher education Paul Bacsich, Sheffield Hallam University £ + £ = £ ??
Joint Information Systems Committee Supporting education and research JISC Conference 2006 Keynote: Dr Liz Beaty, Director (Learning and Teaching), HEFCE.
A Masters in Education in eLearning The University of Hull.
Wynne Harlen. What do you mean by assessment? Is there assessment when: 1. A teacher asks pupils questions to find out what ideas they have about a topic.
Supporting Further and Higher Education Linking Digital Libraries and Virtual Learning Environments Paul Bailey Programme Manager, JISC Development Group.
Creating Collaborative Models of Course Development and Delivery Inma Álvarez Open Meeting on Less Widely Taught Languages University of London, 15 th.
The Costs of Networked Learning An Interactive Workshop Charlotte Ash and Professor Paul Bacsich, Sheffield Hallam University.
Challenges in Improving Course Delivery Technology in Developing Countries: The Case of the IDE at UNISWA By Prof. C. W. S. Sukati 1.
Higher Education Academy Update Lawrence Hamburg, Assistant Director and Head of e-learning HeLF: Wed 2 April 2008.
PERFORMANCE FOR ALL The Project & the System. A HE project co-ordinated by University of Bristol, open to HE internationally. Developing the requirements.
DIGITAL MEDIA INSTITUTE hypermedia laboratory Finnish Virtual University TAMPERE UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY A Multidisciplinary evaluation framework and.
Designing and Implementing Learning Technology Projects – A Planned Approach Professor Mark Stiles and Dr Jenny Yorke Staffordshire University EFFECTS/ELT.
Janet Williams, Peter Nelson, Sheffield Hallam University SWIPE : Cross-national curriculum development for globalised praxis.
Assessment IT Sligo Nov Concerns about assessment Both new and experienced lecturers can be worried about how best to assess students! What.
IVETTE:Implementation of virtual environments in training and in education Targeted Socio-Economic Research Programme Mario Barajas University of Barcelona.
Using networked technologies to support staff development 1.Some definitions. 2.Where are we now? 3.Some potential benefits/applications. 4.Issues to consider.
Working together to support new environments for learning. Working with staff to support innovation. Alison Hudson Centre for Multimedia.
University of Jyväskylä – Department of Mathematical Information Technology Computer Science Teacher Education ICNEE 2004 Topic Case Driven Approach for.
Weighing Air: Measuring the Costs of Learning Technology in the UK. A Planning Framework. Charlotte Ash - Sheffield Hallam University, UK.
Integrating Project Work into Distance Education Courses Prof. Dr. Ing. habil. Christian-Andreas Schumann University of Zwickau, Germany International.
UK Higher Education Institutions - How Flexible, How Virtual, How Soon? Charlotte Ash, (Professor Paul Bacsich), Online Educa ‘99.
LECTURER OF THE 2010 FIRST-YEAR STUDENT: How can the lecturer help? February 2010.
Cost-benefits of (e-)learning Paul Bacsich, Director of Special Projects UK eUniversities Worldwide Limited WCBF/London, September 2003.
Diana Laurillard Head, e-Learning Strategy Unit Overview of e-learning: aims and priorities.
The 2nd International Conference of e-Learning and Distance Education, 21 to 23 February 2011, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia Prof. Dr. Torky Sultan Faculty of Computers.
Developing a Strategy for Technology Enhanced Learning at UEL.
New Advanced Higher Subject Implementation Events
Margaret J. Cox King’s College London
1 Beyond the Library: i-Skills for University Administration © Netskills, Quality Internet Training, Newcastle University Partly.
Improving Corporate Governance in Malaysian Capital Markets – The Role of the Audit Committee Role of the Audit Committee in Assessing Audit Quality.
Technology Leadership
Learning design as a foundation for the future success of e-learning Diana Laurillard 2007 European LAMS Conference University of Greenwich 5 July 2007.
Developing a result-oriented Operational Plan Training
1 E-tools for e-Universities Copyright, 2001 © Sheffield Hallam University Professor Paul Bacsich Sheffield Hallam University Great Britain.
A New Cost Analysis Model for Networked Learning Charlotte Ash Sheffield Hallam University, UK.
1 e-Learning: markets and pricing Understanding them? Paul Bacsich “Financial considerations for e-learning projects”, Birmingham, March 2004.
The Hidden Costs of Networked Learning The Impact of a Costing Framework on Educational Practice Professor Paul Bacsich and Charlotte Ash Sheffield Hallam.
Bruce White Ruth Geer University of South Australia.
INNOWATER Introduction to Business Proposition Toolkit July 2013.
Prepared and presented by Reda Saad El-Mahdy Ahmed Bin Hanbal Independent Secondary School for Boys And “SEC Curriculum Standards”
Selection of Web-based tools for global e-Universities and implications for WWW research Professor Paul Bacsich Sheffield Hallam University Great Britain.
Towards a European network for digital preservation Ideas for a proposal Mariella Guercio, University of Urbino.
1 The Costs of e-Learning Presentation and Workshop Professor Paul Bacsich Dipoli, 23 March 2004, Finland.
Qualifications Update: Higher Accounting Crowne Plaza Glasgow 10 December 2013 Qualifications Update: Higher Accounting Crowne Plaza Glasgow 10 December.
Commissioning Self Analysis and Planning Exercise activity sheets.
Presenting Evidence to meet the Graduating Teacher Standards at the conclusion of Edprac 608 The use of MyPortfolio.
1. Housekeeping Items June 8 th and 9 th put on calendar for 2 nd round of Iowa Core ***Shenandoah participants*** Module 6 training on March 24 th will.
Costs of e-learning in HE - and the benefits Professor Paul Bacsich Sheffield Hallam University, UK.
Results The final report was presented to NICE and published by NICE and WHO. See
Instructional Technology Master of Education 1. LEARNING OBJECTIVES 1) Explain what an LMS is. 2) Differentiate between some types of LMS. 3) Identify.
Implementing Inquiry Based Science Teaching Through Teacher Networks The SINUS model for educational development in Germany Matthias Stadler, Kiel (Germany)
E-learning in Higher Education Professor Paul Bacsich Sheffield Hallam University Ramkhamhaeng University 27 February 2002.
+ The continuum Summative assessment Next steps. Gallery Walk – the Bigger Picture Take one post it of each of the 3 colours. Walk around a look at the.
1 Evaluating the Quality of the e-Learning Experience in Higher Education Anne Jelfs and Keir Thorpe, Institute of Educational Technology (IET), The Open.
UK eUniversities: eLearning Research Centre and the Community Professor Paul Bacsich Director of Special Projects UK eUniversities Worldwide Limited.
FYITS – Students Mktg Briefing Nov 2010 BSc (Hons) Engineering Management Nature of Course The course seeks to equip students with management knowledge.
Strengthening the Strategic Cooperation between the EU and Western Balkan Region in the field of ICT Research Key Barriers & Challenges in ICT Research:
Professor Paul Bacsich and Charlotte Ash Sheffield Hallam University.
The Costs of Networked Learning Academic Director: Professor Paul Bacsich Project Manager: Charlotte Ash Researchers: Kim Boniwell & Leon Kaplan With.
Kathy Corbiere Service Delivery and Performance Commission
Government of Nepal Ministry of Education National Center for Educational Development.
EVIDENCE BASED POLICY RECOMMENDATIONS – TAKE AWAY LESSONS ON HOW TO PROGRESS EFFECTIVE ALCOHOL EDUCATION BETSY THOM Drug and Alcohol Research Centre MIDDLESEX.
LEMAIA PROJECT Kick off meeting Rome February 2007 LEMAIA: a Project to foster e-learning diffusion Pietro RAGNI LEMAIA PROJECT Rome, 11 april.
School Effectiveness Framework Professional Learning Communities Professor Alma Harris Michelle Jones.
EQuality: a learning cycle for elearning territories eLearning Regions & Cities 2004 La Rochelle May 2004.
Developing the Guided Learner Journey
Ian D. Rotherham Professor of Environmental Geography,
The Second Elearning Workshop
Learning design as a foundation for the future success of e-learning
Presentation transcript:

1 The Real Costs of e-Learning What are they? How can we find out? Professor Paul Bacsich UK eUniversities Worldwide Limited Presentation to Venezualan Delegation,16 March 2004

2 Contents  Key issues in a borderless world  UK Transparency Review  Activity Based Costing [CNL2]  Activities for Networked Learning [CNL1]  Application to e-learning

3 Key issues - and a challenge  There is now increasing agreement on the methodologies of costing e-learning  So why is there a dilemma where education see “No Significant Difference” whereas training sees “Return on Investment”?  The challenge is to find a uniform evaluation methodology, including costs, which copes with a world without borders…  Borders are not only geographic

4 UK Transparency Review  HEFCE Initiative - and other Funding Councils  Focus on costs of research and teaching  Compulsory  Reports on 5 main activities: T 2 R 2 O  Uses “Activity Based Costing” terminology  Uses Activity Time Sheets  Phased implementation, mainly led by research-intensive universities

5 Transparency - conclusions  It has been a useful if painful exercise for universities and funding agencies  Pressure is increasing on research funding agencies to raise the overheads they allow as real costs become clear BUT, in reference to the “eternal dilemma”  It does not seem to have led to operational conclusions  Because it is not detailed enough?

6 Scope of CNL2 project  Sarah Heginbotham (SHU then UKeU then Canada)  Funded by JISC (Joint Info Systems Cttee)  From CNL1: Recommendation that activity- based costing be trialled in a university  Chose the School of Computing and Management Sciences at Sheffield Hallam University, UK  6 months project, started summer 2000  Transparency Review was going on also

7 Cooper and Kaplan - ABC  Developed in 1988 as an alternative costing methodology at Harvard Business School  They argued that traditional costing distorted product costs  “peanut butter spread” approach  There is a cost to all activities carried out within an organisation  e.g. transport of peanuts  Activity costs should be distributed to products in relation to their use of resources

8 Advantages of ABC  Gives more than just financial information  “Fairer” system of overhead allocation  Accountability of central services e.g. IT  Highlights cross-subsidisation  Recognises the changing cost behaviour of different activities as they grow and mature  Can provide data for other initiatives  e.g. Transparency Review and Quality

9 Disadvantages of ABC  Data collection can be costly and time consuming  Initially it can be challenging to collect the data you want  Need to determine appropriate and acceptable cost drivers  ABC is a more complex system than traditional management accounting  and relies on that being done well !

10 CNL2 Conclusions  ABC does work in HE and will be increasingly used in institutions, especially “ABC-lite/ABM”  It works on different levels within the institution  Suitable software and professional support is essential, in the early days at least  Academic scepticism can be overcome  Costings data needs to be placed in context

11 Networked Learning - CNL1  Paul Bacsich  and Charlotte Ash (now in public sector “Best Value” programme)  Sheffield Hallam University, UK  6 month study (in )  Funded by JISC  Aim - to produce a planning document and financial schema that together accurately record the Hidden Costs of Networked Learning

12 Examples of Hidden Costs  Increased telephone call and printing bills for students due to Internet usage  Entertainment expenses “necessarily” incurred by academic staff at conferences but not reimbursed by the Institution  Administrator time answering student queries  Support costs of a new Learning Environment  Costs of content - “created in one’s spare time”  Costs of institutional collaboration  Costs of conformance to standards

13 Mega-activities for teaching: Lifecycle model  Cost items recorded from literature  All current educational and training costing models analysed (Rumble, Bates, etc)  Traditional financial accounting analysed  Consultation with academic staff  Various cyclic models proposed, leading to...

14 Course Lifecycle Model Planning and Development Production and Delivery Maintenance and Evaluation Three-phase model of course development

15 Breakdown of three- phase model (activities)

16 Financial Schema - “Stakeholders”

17 Conclusions from CNL1 In order to accurately record the Costs of Networked Learning you must have a sectorally-accepted method of what costs to record and how, in place from the start, which takes into account all stakeholders and uses Activity Based Costing within a framework of phases of the course development life cycle

18 What are the True Costs?  Q: What is the rate per study hour?  Different kinds of study hours:  Active engagement with specifically created “teaching” material (expensive)  Thinking, conversation  Doing assessment  Studying “resource” e-content (cheaper)  Surfing the open web (cheapest, but worst?

19 Rough guide - rule of thirds  1: Study of “engaging” multimedia  2: Study of existing or slightly modified learning resources  3: Working on assignments (maybe in collaboration)  Costs (US, UK and Germany)  average $12000 per m/m hour, but v. large   10% of this for simple material  could one aim for $1000 per hour?

20 Content development 1  Determine the level of demand  Produce an outline plan of the courseware  Conceptualise the subject knowledge  Structure and design the learning experience to be provided by the courseware materials  Decide interactivity with the learner, the level and ways of building tutorial support into the material itself and the links with other materials.

21 Content development 2  Decide the formative assessment exercises and the ways of providing feedback to the learner (and to the tutor if appropriate)  Decide the summative assessment associated with each module  Establish a range for the possible levels of on-line tutor support for each module.  Consider the interface between the learning programme and its sub-parts and the administrative support software tools

22 Consortia - Critical Success Factors  High “binding energy”  may come from top-down or funding-driven  but more likely from friendship or shared vision  does not depend much on legal aspects  Organisational homogeneity or managed diversity  Linguistic and cultural similarity  Stratification  “Safely far away” [Source: TL-NCE, UNESCO report]

23 Other topical questions  Will research advances reduce costs?  Will Open Source reduce costs?

24 Research  This may be too much of a personal view  I have been conference organiser, evaluator, reviewer,...  Look at impact from EU research work  Look at impact of work elsewhere  UK  TL-NCE (Canada)  US  Australia, New Zealand, Singapore Hong Kong….

25 Research conclusions  European research: FP3 set the scene; FP4 added little, FP5 more promising  Canadian work credible and integrated, but lacks evidence of scalable approaches  Too much gap between computing theorists and industrial-strength pedagogic practice  few theorists in universities are seriously active in e-learning services  US is very synchronous and transmissive, paradigms that do not fit a time-poor world

26 What research might reduce costs?  Focus on co-operative learning  Start with basic asynchronous “BBS” model  Allow new models to be supported, especially those with business potential  Develop scalable approaches  more focus on automated assessment?  Support multiple media and devices using same content  Develop more effective learning esp time-effective

27 Can e-learning save time?  travel time  reduce “time on task”  by “better” training (25-40%)  by individualised training...  by using “time of the 3rd kind”  Time 1 : on duty - used to be called “at work”  Time 2 : off duty (not at work)  by consolidating time fragments

28 Open source issues  Exemplars:  Linux, MIT, Canadian, Finnish, IMS, UK interest  Purpose:  Challenge commercial vendors  Facilitate research by providing flexible system  Cheaper?  Yes, to buy  No, to support (scalability, robustness?)  Few successful large e-learning players use “pure” open source, but several use modified

29 Features of a uniform cost-aware evaluation methodology  Costing basis must be clear  To gain political buy-in and breadth (multi- sector, etc), depth will be small  Students treated as people not only learners  Focus on level of knowledge and skill gained  Focus on time issues, not only time on task  time 1, time 2, time 3 - and differential value?  More feasible when there is a more uniform curriculum or exams (as in schools)

30 Details about CNL costings projects - At thanks to support from SHU and JISChttp:// Professor Paul Bacsich