Specialization project Project title “Practical modeling and PI-control of level processes” Student Ingrid Didriksen Supervisor Krister Forsman.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Tuning of PID controllers
Advertisements

CHE 185 – PROCESS CONTROL AND DYNAMICS
Optimization of parameters in PID controllers Ingrid Didriksen Supervisors: Heinz Preisig and Erik Gran (Kongsberg) Co-supervisor: Chriss Grimholt.
Figure 19: Plot and frequency analysis for modifications to Skogestad’s settings for G 1 (s). (setpoint step = 1, disturbance step = 1)
Specialization project 2012 Temperature control of an unstable chemical reactor By Ola Sæterli Hjetland Supervisors: Sigurd Skogestad, Krister Forsman.
Design of LFC using Optimal Control Theory The optimal controller is designed to minimize the quadratic performance index of the following form For linear.
Numbers
Controller Tuning: A Motivational Example
Chemical Process Controls: PID control, part II Tuning
Practical plantwide process control: PID tuning
PID Tuning and Controllability Sigurd Skogestad NTNU, Trondheim, Norway.
PSE and PROCESS CONTROL
Alternative form with detuning factor F
Department of Chemical Engineering,
Dynamic Response Characteristics of More Complicated Systems
Simple rules for PID tuning Sigurd Skogestad NTNU, Trondheim, Norway.
Resistance to Frequency Converter Amol Mupid Andrew Ricketts.
Resistance to Frequency Converter Amol Mupid Andrew Ricketts.
Interacting vs. Noninteracting Systems
Håkon Dahl-Olsen, Sridharakumar Narasimhan and Sigurd Skogestad Optimal output selection for batch processes.
Input-output Controllability Analysis Idea: Find out how well the process can be controlled - without having to design a specific controller Reference:
PID controller Time domain Laplace domain
Controllability of Processes with Large Gains Sigurd Skogestad Antonio C. B. de Araújo NTNU, Trondheim, Norway August, th Nordic Process Control.
Lec 12. PID Controller Design PID Controller Ziegler-Nichols Tuning Rule Reading: 10.1, 10.2, TexPoint fonts used in EMF. Read the TexPoint manual before.
1 The improved SIMC method for PI controller tuning Chriss Grimholt Sigurd Skogestad NTNU, Trondheim, Norway Reference: C. Grimholt and S. Skogestad, “The.
1 1 Vinicius de Oliveira | an intelligent adaptive anti-slug control system for production maximization Vinicius de Oliveira Control and Automation Engineering.
1 Modelling of Biodiesel Production Marianne Øien Supervisors: Sigurd Skogestad and Chriss Grimholt.
Optimal PI-Control & Verification of the SIMC Tuning Rule
Tip Position Control Using an Accelerometer & Machine Vision Aimee Beargie March 27, 2002.
Economic Plantwide Control using
10-1 人生与责任 淮安工业园区实验学校 连芳芳 “ 自我介绍 ” “ 自我介绍 ” 儿童时期的我.
Presentation Title.
Presentation Title.
Probably© the smoothest PID tuning rules in the world: Lower limit on controller gain for acceptable disturbance rejection Sigurd Skogestad Department.
Model SIMC-tunings Tight control Smooth control Level control
Advanced process control with focus on selecting economic controlled variables («self-optimizing control») Sigurd Skogestad, NTNU 2016.
Modeling and Control of Heat Networks with Storage:
Stian Aaltvedt Supervisors: Sigurd Skogestad Johannes Jäschke
Introduction to PID control
Course PEF3006 Process Control Fall 2017 Lecture: Process dynamics
Yahoo Mail Customer Support Number
Title 1  Our experience drives us forward 2.
Most Effective Techniques to Park your Manual Transmission Car
How do Power Car Windows Ensure Occupants Safety
Controller Tuning: A Motivational Example
مراقبت خانواده محور در NICU
عمل الطالبة : هايدى محمد عبد المنعم حسين
Supervision and control and control in management of organization
دانشگاه شهیدرجایی تهران
Course PEF3006 Process Control Fall 2018 Lecture: Process dynamics
أنماط الإدارة المدرسية وتفويض السلطة الدكتور أشرف الصايغ
SPECIALIZATION PROJECT TKP 4550
تعهدات مشتری در کنوانسیون بیع بین المللی
Figure 19: Plot and frequency analysis for modifications to Skogestad’s settings for G1(s). (setpoint step = 1, disturbance step = 1)
THANK YOU!.
Function Notation “f of x” Input = x Output = f(x) = y.
بسمه تعالی کارگاه ارزشیابی پیشرفت تحصیلی
Group 1 Group 1 Group 1 Group 1 word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word word.
Thank you.
Thank you.
Averaging (or equalizing) level control
Should we forget the Smith Predictor?
Interacting vs. Noninteracting Systems
Averaging (or equalizing) level control
Presentation Title Your information.
TITLE OF THE PRESENTATION
PID Controller Design and
Performance and Robustness of the Smith Predictor Controller
PID control of unstable chemical reactor
Presentation transcript:

Specialization project Project title “Practical modeling and PI-control of level processes” Student Ingrid Didriksen Supervisor Krister Forsman

Objective Level controllers in a chemical plant Obtain process models by use of historical data Obtain better tuning for the PI-controllers Apply theory in practice

The Problem Poor tuning in level controllers Kc and τ I for all the level controllers

Why? Problem with poor tuning Oscillations Process output and set point

Desired Smooth control Buffer tanks

How?

Process model

How? Arrest time Disturbance in inflow Deviation in process output

Tuning Level controller Kc0τ I0 KcτIτI f model f Skogestad

Simulation No time delay Process output and set point Process input

With “time delay” Process output and set point Process input

Retuning Process output and set point Process input

Furture work Concider dynamics of the level controllers

Thank you for your attention!