Team Force Field Leslie Chapman Scott Cornman Adam Johnson Richard Margulieux Brandon Phipps.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Israeli Universal Spacecraft Bus Characteristics and Design Trade-Offs
Advertisements

Nanoparticle Electric Propulsion for Space Exploration Phys 483 Monday, March Team 1: Perry Young, Kiyoshi Masui, Mark Hoidas, Andrew Harris.
LightSail.
The Edge of the Solar System The Oort Cloud. What is the Oort Cloud? Spherical area between 5,000 and 100,000 AU from the sun (Kuiper belt ends at 55.
Low-thrust trajectory design ASEN5050 Astrodynamics Jon Herman.
6. Space research and exploration of space increases our understanding of the Earth‘s own environment, the Solar System and the Universe. 4. Rapid advances.
Low Energy, Low Cost Swift A design experiment June 2010.
Early Universe Gamma Ray Burst Detection Scientific Rationale The first generation of stars were very important for the conditions of the early.
NEO Surveyor Thomas M. Randolph Jet Propulsion Laboratory
SATELLITES What They Do and How They Work Michael J. Mackowski Aerospace Engineer October 2013 With Updates from Shawn Shepherd.
National Aeronautics and Space Administration Jet Propulsion Laboratory California Institute of Technology Stardust NExT Tim Larson, Project Manager EPOXI.
EGR 4347 Analysis and Design of Propulsion Systems
Attitude Determination and Control
The Lander is at a 25 km Lunar altitude and an orbital period of approximately 110 minutes. After separation occurs the Lander is completely self sufficient.
Project X pedition Spacecraft Senior Design – Spring 2009
Spacecraft Propulsion Dr Andrew Ketsdever Lesson 13 MAE 5595.
Gateway to Space AJ - 1 Mechanical System Design & the StarLight Project Andy Jarski Mechanical Systems Engineer Ball Aerospace & Technologies.
Josephine San Dave Olney 18 August, July 1999NASA/GSFC/IMDC2  Appears to be Feasible  Requirements  Coarse Pointing baselined on NGST  Future.
S/C System Design Overview Robert G. Melton Department of Aerospace Engineering.
Part 4: Exploration 1. Reaction Engine  An engine, such as a jet or rocket engine, that ejects gas at high velocity and develops its thrust from the.
Launch System Launch Vehicle Launch Complex Orbit Insertion Orbit Maneuvers.
Today’s APODAPOD  Read NASA website:  solarsystem.nasa.gov solarsystem.nasa.gov  IN-CLASS QUIZ THIS FRIDAY!!  Solar Lab, Kirkwood, Rooftop this week.
NASA Missions. The Moon APOLLO (1963 – 1972) Goal: To put a man on the Moon Apollo 8 and 10: Orbited Moon Apollo 11 – 17 (except 13): Landed on Moon.
1 Project Name Solar Sail Project Proposal February 7, 2007 Megan Williams (Team Lead) Eric Blake Jon Braam Raymond Haremza Michael Hiti Kory Jenkins Daniel.
Two Interesting (to me!) Topics Neither topic is in Goldstein. Taken from the undergraduate text by Marion & Thornton. Topic 1: Orbital or Space Dynamics.
1/30/20081 MESSENGER First Mercury Flyby First Mercury Flyby January 14, 2008 Speaker: Marilyn Lindstrom Program Scientist, NASA Headquarters NASA Museum.
Spacecraft Instruments. ► Spacecraft instrument selection begins with the mission description and the selected primary and secondary mission objectives.
Engineering Means having to deal with failure Missions to Mars as an example of try, try, try again…
Solar Orbiter. Contents The mission The mission The orbit The orbit The instruments The instruments VIM: Visible-light Imager and Magnetograph VIM: Visible-light.
Attitude Determination and Control System
Enabling Technology Development: High cadence imaging spectrograph development Low mass/power instrumentation Advanced communication/DSN for future deployment.
Chapter 24 Space Vehicular Systems. Objectives After reading the chapter and reviewing the materials presented the students will be able to: Identify.
Tielong Zhang On behalf of the CGS Team in the Institute of Geology and Geophysics, Chinese Academy of Science Spacecraft System and Payload China Geomagnetism.
Intelligent Robotics Group NASA Ames Research Center Intelligent Robotics Group NASA Ames Research Center Planning for the Mapping and Exploration of Human.
Space Exploration- Tools
Satellites and Launch Vehicles. “Gee Whiz” Facts Number of satellites currently in orbit is over 900 Satellites orbit at altitudes from 100 miles (Low.
© Lavochkin Association, 2013 Ganymede Lander mission overview.
Mark Baker Mario Botros Terry Huang Erin Mastenbrook Paul Schattenberg David Wallace Lisa Warren Team Ptolemy.
STEREO - Solar Terrestrial Relations Observatory Mission STEREO STEREO Science Team Meeting May 2, 2005 Presented by Edward Reynolds APL STEREO Project.
Bits and Pieces. Spacecraft Systems Propulsion –Already discussed Communications Science instruments Power.
The Solar System Chapter 6 COPY DOWN THE LEARNING GOALS ON PG SKIP 5 LINES BETWEEN EACH!
Preliminary Design of NEA Detection Array Contractor 2 Kim Ellsworth Brigid Flood Nick Gawloski James Kim Lisa Malone Clay Matcek Brian Musslewhite Randall.
Welcome to the Party! Why are we here? Celebrate the beginning of Dawn's year-long exploration of new worlds! Share in the excitement as we see something.
Spacecraft Trajectories You Can Get There from Here! John F Santarius Lecture 9 Resources from Space NEEP 533/ Geology 533 / Astronomy 533 / EMA 601 University.
Contractor 3. I. Launch III. Formation Alignment with Star Pictures Data downlink Stationkeeping II. Deployment IV. Deorbit.
1 Weekly Summary Asteroid Sample Return Spring Semester March 5, 2008 Ashley Chipman.
Competition Sensitive Dennis Asato June 28, 2001 XSuperNova / Acceleration Probe (SNAP) Propulsion.
PARKINSON-SAT EA 469 Spacecraft Design Joe Campbell Thomas Dendinger Greg Lewis Paul Lwin.
ROCKET PROPULSION LECTURE 1: INTRODUCTION Propulsion Lecture 1 - INTRODUCTION.
Computational Modeling of Hall Thrusters Justin W. Koo Department of Aerospace Engineering University of Michigan Ann Arbor, Michigan
Henry Heetderks Space Sciences Laboratory, UCB
AAE450 Spring 2009 Brian Erson Attitude Control Systems Trans Lunar Phase Alternative Design Comparison [Brian Erson] [Attitude] 1.
AVAT11001: Course Outline Aircraft and Terminology
PTAR Presentation Jonathan DeLaRosa, Jessica Nelson, Ivan Morin, JJ Rodenburg, & Tim Stelly Team Cronus.
NASA Missions. The Moon APOLLO (1963 – 1972) Goal: To put a man on the Moon Apollo 8 and 10: Orbited Moon Apollo 11 – 17 (except 13): Landed on Moon.
Final Version Gary Davis Robert Estes Scott Glubke Propulsion May 13-17, 2002 Micro Arcsecond X-ray Imaging Mission, Pathfinder (MAXIM-PF)
ERV Team 2 Final Report Alicia Cole-Quigley James Gilson Erin Hammond Domenic Marcello Matt Miller Jeff Rosenberger.
Characteristics of remote sensing satellites. Satellites generally vary in their architecture Usually remote sensing satellites are having two plateforms.
1 Asteroid Sample Return AEM 4332 FDR 5/7/2008 Becky Wacker Carla Bodensteiner Ashley Chipman John Edquist Paul Krueger Jessica Lattimer Nick Meinhardt.
Newton’s thought experiment: orbital velocity. Surface escape velocities Planet V escape, ft/sec Mercury13,600 Venus33,600 Earth36,700 Moon7,800 Mars16,700.
Preliminary Platform Design for KuaFu-A
Solar Probe Plus Scheduled to be launched in 2018 Solar Probe Plus will come closer to the Sun than any spacecraft has ever flown - and what it finds could.
Unit D – Space Exploration
Scientific Mission Applications
Europa Kaitlyn Young.
Henry Heetderks Space Sciences Laboratory, UCB
Lunar Descent Trajectory
CHEOPS - CHaracterizing ExOPlanet Satellite
Propulsion Jon Lewis Mike Rhee 8/19/99
Presentation transcript:

Team Force Field Leslie Chapman Scott Cornman Adam Johnson Richard Margulieux Brandon Phipps

Presentation Outline  Introduction  Mission Objectives  Background Mission  Mission Profile  Trade Tree  Spacecraft  Mission Profile  Lander  Orbiter  Communication Link and Command & Data Handling  Advantages

Introduction Mission Objectives Primary Objectives –Determine the trajectory of Apophis –Determine the seismology of Apophis Secondary Objectives –Laser mapping of Apophis –Close imaging of Apophis

Introduction Galileo –Successful approach of 951 Gaspra, 243 Ida and Dactyl –Solid state imager, Near IR spectrometer Dawn –3 DS1 Xenon Ion Engines, 3 Visual sensors, Visual and IR spectrometer, Gamma Ray and Nuetron spectrometer Phobos 1,2 –Unsuccessful study of Phobos and Deimos –Two landers, hopper, long-lived, spectrometer, seismometer, penetrometer –Orbiter houses IR, visual, Near IR spectrometer, Gamma, X-ray sensors Deep Impact –Successful flyby and impact event of comet 9p/Tempel, extended mission to 85P/Boethin –High Resolution Imager, Medium Resolution Imager, Impactor Targeting Sensor, Infrared Spectroscope –650kg/370kg impacter Past Missions

Introduction NEAR Shoemaker –Successful orbit and landing on Eros, communicated for 2 weeks before being shutdown –Mass: 487kg –Approach Distance: 200km, 35km, 5-6km, 2-3km, land at m/s –Reaction wheels and hydrazine thrusters, 1800 W solar power, Ni-Cd battery pack, IMU, gyros, sun sensors and star tracker –X-ray/gamma ray spectrometer, Near-infrared imaging spectrograph, Multi-spectral camera fitted with a CCD imaging detector, Laser rangefinder, Magnetometer, Radio science experiment to determine gravity field JAXA Hayabusa –Successful heliocentric orbit near and two close approaches to Itokawa, failed deployment of MINERVA, on return trajectory to Earth –Mass: 380kg (MINERVA: 591g) –Approach Distance: 20km, 44m, ? –4 Xenon Ion Engines, Reaction wheels (failed on orbit), thrusters –Multiband imaging camera, Laser altimeter, Near-infrared spectrometer, X-ray spectrometer Past Missions

Trade Tree Launch Vehicle Piggyback with Government Piggyback with Private LV Use exclusive LV

Trade Tree Propulsion Earth escape Rendezvous with Apophis ChemicalLow Thrust Solar Sails Electrical

Power Solar Fuel CellsNuclearRTG Trade Tree

Electric Cold Gas Chemical Momentum Devices Hall’s Effect ThrustersPPTBipropellantMono AugmentedTraditionalReaction WheelCMG 3-Axis Attitude and Translational Control Trade Tree

Proximity Operations Complete LanderComplete Stand-off Combination of stand-off to deploy Trade Tree

OrbitStand-off Complete Stand-off MultipleSingleMultipleSingle

Trade Tree Partial Deployment Main Lander with Orbiting Link Main Orbiter with Lander(s) Orbiter - Radios -Camera -Solar Panels Lander ― Transponder ― Camera ― Laser mapping device ― Seismology detector ― Radio ― Solar Panels Orbiter - Radios - Transponder -Camera -Laser mapping device -Solar Panels Lander -Transponder -Seismology detector -Radio -Solar Panels

Trade Tree Complete Lander MultipleSingle

Landing Systems Barbed Attachment Hooks Impactor Harpoon and Winch Skids Pyramid Design Cubic Design Trade Tree Gossamer Net

Mission Critical Components Tracking Architecture Transponder(s) on Lander(s) Transponder on Stand-off Vehicle Seismic Measurement Method Active Ping and Listen Passive Seismometer Trade Tree

System Description Orbiter with Landers –Rendezvous with Apophis –Landers deploy to Apophis – kg to Earth Orbit –~100 kg at Apophis

System Description Earth Operations –Launch –Start-up and system checkout Trajectory –Plane change and escape velocity burn –Orbit transfer burn and course corrections Initial Apophis Operations –Stand-off at safe distance –Initial imaging, mapping, data transfer –Landing site selection from Earth Apophis Close Approach and Deployment –Incremental Approach to Apophis –Hover above Apophis surface, deploy landers –Orbiter return to heliocentric orbit –Landers deploy, gather initial data and transfer Earth Close Approach Event –Tracking with transponders –Orbiter to Earth and Apophis attitudes –Shifting morphology seismometer readings –Data transfer to Earth Mission Profile

The Landing Problem Close approach of Apophis by orbiter Spring loaded deployment of landers Orbiter Apophis Surface

Lander Sub-systems and Instruments Step 1Step 2Step 3 Landers –Open Tetragon to automatically orient –Equipped with: 1)Shallow pitch drill 2)Acoustic equipment 3)Cross-link radio 4)Transponder 5)Solar panels

Orbiter Subsystems Orbiter Systems –Power: Solar Panels Stable, established source of energy No consumables Limited Degradation 1 kW requires ~7 m 2

Orbiter Subsystems Reaction Wheels –Minimum of 3 reaction wheel assemblies –Provide X,Y, & Z attitude control –Controlled from 1 control box Pulsed Plasma Thruster –Attitude control, low thrust maneuvers –Solid Propellants –High I sp, low impulse –Uses ionized, accelerated plasma 1.Energy Storage Unit 2.Ignitor 3.Fuel Rod 4.Plasma Accelerator

Orbiter Instruments Laser mapping device Transponder Star Tracker IMU, Gyros Radios –Crosslink with landers –Uplink –Downlink High bandwidth Low bandwidth Imagers –Near IR –Visual

Communication Link and Command & Data Handling Communication Link Uplink radio Downlink radio Cross-link Transponders Earth Command and Data Handling Solid state storage devices Semi-autonomous (command to begin programmed events) Ability to upload new command sets

Advantages: Landing System Redundancy: multiple landers can be deployed Landing orientation does not matter Hooks on all vertices discourage rebound off surface Robust landing structure to protect delicate equipment Spring loaded deployment results in low reaction force on orbiter Optical equipment remains on orbiter to avoid impact of landing

Advantages: Orbiter Subsystems Solar Panels –Proven technology –Stable energy source Semi-autonomous command –Allows for actions with limited communication –Flexibility Communications Link –Constant line of sight Imaging –B/W for low data rates –Near IR for composition data 3-Axis Control –Reaction Wheels Small, prebuilt assemblies No consumables –PPT Small form factor High I sp Low Impulse Tracking Scheme –Constant line of sight –Large power source –Simple transformations

Questions ?