1 Measures to improve the environment and the countryside by supporting land management Ministry of Rural Development Department of Agricultural Development.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Axis 2: Environment/land management DG AGRI, October 2005 Rural Development
Advertisements

Position of biodiversity in future CAP Nina Dobrzyńska Department for Direct Payments Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development, Poland Ryn, 29th September.
Czech Rural Development Programme for forestry.
WHAT CAN SRDP DO FOR CROFTING AND SMALL UNITS?. Partners Crofting CommissionCrofting Commission Scottish Crofting FederationScottish Crofting Federation.
Rural Development Fund in Wallonia, Natura 2000 and Biodiversity Financing Natura 2000 workshop Belgium Th. Walot (UCL-ELIA)
1 The new EU Regulation on Rural Development Support by the European Agricultural Fund for Rural Development (EAFRD) and its implementation in Germany.
Agriculture and Environment Future of European Rural Development. Cracow, 30 November – 1 December 2005 Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Development.
10. Workshop ERFP Uppsala, June 4, 2005 ERFP collaboration with EU - Lobbying in Bruxelles Hermann Schulte-Coerne.
EU Wetland conservation policy. Communication on the Wise Use and Conservation of Wetlands (1995) => first European document dedicated exclusively.
Andrzej Babuchowski Agriculture and Fisheries Section Permanent Representation of the Republic of Poland to the European Union.
Inge Van Oost EC - DG Agriculture and Rural Development Unit AGRI - D1 - “Soutien direct” The Farm Advisory System FAS (Art of Reg (EC) No 1782/2003)
Ingo Heinz University of Dortmund, Germany Nature and Economy: An Application to the Rural Countryside Wageningen, 31 May – 2 June 2007 Workshop The EU.
Potentials for Organic Farming Enviromental friendly agriculture and Efficient Sustainable Small-Scale Wastewater Systems Maria Staniszewska and Gunnar.
E-submission of new measures within the single application Sándor Matuska Agricultural and Rural Development Agency, Hungary.
Protecting Working Lands: Through USDA Conservation Programs Denise Coleman National Farm and Ranch Lands Protection Program Manager USDA, Natural Resources.
CEEWEB Academy III Strengthening civil participation in the implementation of EU nature conservation directives through the experiences gained by the 10.
EU Rural Development Policy and Tourism Jean-Michel Courades DG Agriculture and Rural Development European Commission.
Experience with the implementation of the LEADER approach in Hungary Anna Parizán Counsellor - Rural Development Officer Ministry of Rural Development.
Rural Development policy
EU Rural Development Policy
1 Agriculture and environment EU agriculture policy perspective Royal Agricultural University – EEA Copenhagen, 8 th February 2007.
„Less Favoured Areas in Poland after one year of the implementation” Conference „One Year of EU 25 – Nature Conservation Policy Experience Regarding the.
1 Food, Conservation, and Energy Act of 2008 (Farm Bill) Disclaimer: Provisions provided in this presentation are subject to change or interpretive differences.
Technical meeting for LFA in Bulgaria MINISTRY OF AGRICULTURE AND FORESTRY National Program for Rural Development in Bulgaria Bonn, Germany.
RD measures working for nature? – a good example Gábor Figeczky WWF Hungary Nature Conservation and the EU policy for sustainable land management in the.
European Commission Directorate General for Agriculture and Rural Development EU rural development policy.
Ignacio Seoane Unit AGRI F6: Bioenergy, biomass, forestry and climate change EU Forestry Strategy Screening of Chapter 27, Brussels 5 April 2006.
EUROPEAN COURT OF AUDITORS 6 – 8 November 2006 EUROSAI - Prague Léon KIRSCH European Court of Auditors Audit of the Single Payment Scheme ( SPS) (Systems.
European Commission, DG Agriculture and Rural Development
Sotiris Koutsomitros 1 Common agricultural policy 2014 – 2020 Impacts on horticulture Sotiris Koutsomitros Agricultural-Engineer MSc Environmental Engineer.
Rural Development Plan for England (RDPE) – improving the environment through agri-environment Rosie Simpson, Natural England.
Main agricultural pollution sources in Bulgaria storage of manure storage of fertilizers and plant protection materials use of fertilizers and plant protection.
European Commission - Directorate General for Agriculture 1 EU rural development policy Nikiforos SIVENAS European Commission Directorate General.
1 Improving the competitiveness of the agricultural and forestry sector Imre Wayda Senior counsellor Ministry of Rural Development 27th June 2011.
Enver AKSOY, MSc Head of Strategy Development Board of MoFAL Policy approaches of Ministry of Food, Agriculture and Livestock to pasture management in.
Wageningen International Introduction agri environment measures Pleven Agri environment in the Netherlands Background Natura 2000 and agricultere Common.
“One year of EU 25 – Nature Conservation policy experience regarding the 2nd pillar of the CAP and reform prospects” The main points of the new EAFRD Regulation.
Organic Farming in Romanian in Rural Development Program Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Rural Development.
„Forestry support and early retirement in Poland after one year of the implementation” Conference „One Year of EU 25 – Nature Conservation Policy Experience.
8/30/05The Ministry of Environment of the Republic of Lithuania1 Agri-Environmental measures Agri-Environmental measures Jolita Ruzgienė Nature Protection.
Ministry of the Environment, Conservation, Agriculture and Consumer Protection of the State of North Rhine-Westphalia Agri-environmental Measures in North.
Dorota Metera IUCN Programme Office for Central Europe Rural Development Policy in the EU10 One Year of EU 25 – Nature Conservation Policy Experience Regarding.
Rural Development The Second Pillar of the Common Agricultural Policy Dr. Rolf Moehler.
Landscape Related Measures of the Austrian Agricultural Policy for the Period th Landscape and Landscape Ecology Symposium Nitra 2015 Klaus.
Federal Association of Farm and Forest Owners in Austria Implementation of Common Agricultural Policy in Austria Vienna Twinning Conference 7 th October.
Update of the progress under the CAP- delegated acts, implementing rules, RDPs Claudia OLAZABAL Head of Unit Unit Agriculture, Forest and Soil DG ENV –
TAIEX Workshop on Agricultural Advisory Services in the EU Kiev, Ukraine February 2016 Peculiarities of legal regulation of the advisory service.
The CAP towards 2020 Direct payments DG Agriculture and Rural Development European Commission.
Article 38 of rural development Regulation Definition of the implementing rules for payments linked to the WFD Strategic co-ordination group for the WFD.
PRODUCER GROUPS AND ORGANIZATIONS IN THE AGRICULTURE OF HUNGARY Marton Bittsanszky Deputy Head of Department.
Proposed goal 15. Protect and restore terrestrial ecosystems and halt all biodiversity loss 15.1 by 2020 halt the loss of all biodiversity, including forests,
PRODUCER GROUPS AND ORGANIZATIONS IN THE AGRICULTURE OF IN HUNGARY.
Adaptation to climate change in the Common Agricultural Policy
Environmental policies in Europe
Overview on RDP measures for maintenance and restoration of grasslands/wetlands in Lithuania By Žymantas Morkvėnas, Baltic Environmental Forum Lithuania.
Directorate General for Agriculture and Rural Development
EU Biodiversity Strategy to 2020 Towards implementation & monitoring
Title: EastAgri Workshop
Sergiu Didicescu, Unit H1 DG Agriculture and Rural Development
Article 38 and implementing rules for payments linked to the WFD
Directorate General for Agriculture and Rural Development
A quick word on water and rural development policy after 2013
Future EU rural development policy and the Water Framework Directive
Most prominent environmental issues/concerns arising from farming:
Meeting of the Water Directors - Athens, 17/18 June 2003
The Commission proposal for the CAP post 2013
Opportunities for financing Natura 2000 in the next MFF
Rural development support for implementing the Water Framework Directive Expert Group on WFD and Agriculture Seville, 6-7 April 2010.
Support for young farmers in Hungary
Leverage effect of PAFs : experience from CAP integration
Presentation transcript:

1 Measures to improve the environment and the countryside by supporting land management Ministry of Rural Development Department of Agricultural Development Szalai András June 27.

2 The general objective of Axis II of the NHRDP to improve the environment and the countryside by supporting land management

3 Measures targeting the sustainable management of agricultural areas 1. Areas with handicaps 2. Natura 2000 payments 3. Agri-environmental payments 4. Preservation of native and endangered farm animals’ genetic resources through breeding 5. Preservation of plant genetic resources 6. Assistance provided non-productive investments +1 Animal welfare payments

4 Measures targeting the sustainable management of forest areas 7. First afforestation of agricultural land 8. First establishment of agro-forestry systems on agricultural land 9. The first afforestation of non-agricultural land 10. Forest-environment payments 11. Restoring forestry potential and introduction of preventive actions 12. Non-productive investments on forest areas

5 Legal background of Axis II measures EU regulations: Council Regulation No 1698/2005; Commission Regulations 1974/2006 and 1975/2006 Document adopted by the Commission: New Hungary Rural Development Programme (for the whole country area) National regulation: Ministerial level regulations of the measures

6 Payments to farmers in areas with handicaps, other than mountain areas (Less Favoured Areas) Scope and action: To provide compensation payments for farming on less favoured grassland and fodder areas. No payment can be made, if the following crops are grown: autumn or spring wheat, rice, sunflower, corn, sugar beet, potato, industrial purpose crops and vegetables. From 2009 onwards, farmers have to comply the rules of the cross-compliance, as provided by Annex III. of 1782/2003 EC Regulation, and they have to continue of farming activities on LFA areas for 5 years after the first transfer of the compensatory payments. Geographic areas: In areas specified in Articles 19 or 20 of Regulation No. 1257/1999/EC, and marked in the Hungarian Land Parcel Identification System (LPIS-Hu) (Article 19.: areas with poor productivity, difficult land use; lower-than-average production; low density of the population with high share of agricultural workers; Article 20.: areas were selected on the basis of 2 out of a total of 4 specific handicaps (agronomic limiting factors). Beneficiaries: each registered agricultural producer

7 Natura 2000 payments on agricultural areas Scope of action Compensation for farming at Natura 2000 grasslands for the compliance with the Council Directive 79/409/EEC of April 2, 1979, on the conservation of wild birds and and the Directive 92/43/EEC of May 21, 1992, on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora Farmers shall compliance with the provisions for land use determined in the Regulation 269/2007 of the Hungarian Government Geographic area: Natura 2000 grasslands indicated in LPIS determined according to the Regulation 275/2004 of the Hungarian Government Scope of the beneficiaries: agricultural producers, land users

8 The first afforestation of agricultural land Content of the measure Afforestation on less suitable for agricultural cultivation areas Support: - establishment (first year, basic and supplementary support) - maintenance (first five years) - support for loss of income (farmers – higher amount support for loss of income) - period of support for loss of income depending on the standing types (max. 15 years) Geographic Area: Total area of Hungary Scope of the beneficiaries: agricultural producer, and each user of the agricultural areas Period of covenant: years depending on the standing types

9 Forest-environment payments Content of the measure: Compensation payments for forest managers taking on voluntary forest-environmental commitments exceeding the minimum requirements in 9 schemes Schemes: 1. Repression of aggressively expanding non-indigenous tree and shrub species 2. Selection forest management; 3. Conversion of forest stands and maintenance based on manual work; 4. Reduction of clear-cutting with artificial regeneration; 5. Ensuring special forest habitats, and the conditions for natural forest regeneration (Creation and maintenance of micro-habitats, Leaving groups of trees after final felling, Bush regulation to ensure the success of forest regeneration); 6. Postponement of final felling in order to protect soil and habitat; 7. Maintenance of forests for public welfare purposes; 8. Creation and maintenance of forest clearings; 9. Application of environmentally friendly materials handling methods Geographic Area: Total area of Hungary

10 Agri-environmental measure horizontal and zonal schemes based on area Main objective: promotion and support of environmentally friendly farming practices Precedent: agri-environmental measure of the National Rural Development Plan (NRDP) – Great number of supported farmers (cc ), significant area affected (1,5 million ha) Scope of beneficiaries: agricultural producers, land users Form of support: 5 year term; normative, area-based payment, non-refundable Intensity of support: – Total public expenditure: million € – EAFRD contribution: 874 million €

11 Support value: depends on type of scheme ( €/ha in case of arable land, €/ha for grassland, €/ha for plantation and €/ha for wetland) Eligible activities: – Fulfilment of the schemes’ prescriptions – Commitments must exceed the minimum requirements specified in CR 1782/2003/EC – Area-based payments (horizontal and zonal) Selection criteria of beneficiaries: – Environmental sensitivity of the area (Natura 2000, nitrate sensitive etc. areas) – Harmony between animal husbandry and plant production – Experience of the applicant in environmentally friendly production

12 Support period: Between 1 st of September 2009 and 31 st of August 2014./2019. Submission period of support claim : Between 1 st of June and 25 th of July, Submission period of area identification claim: Until 15 th of May (max. 9 th of June), 2010, before the submission of the payment claim Submission period of payment claim : With the single electronical claim, between 1 st of April and 15 th of May in every year

(NAEP) 2003 (NAEP) 2004 (NRDP) 2009 (NHRDP) Number of applicants Claimed area (ha) Number of supported farmers Suported area (ha)

14 Zonal Anti-erosion scheme (wind) Anti-erosion scheme (water) Nature cons. purpose farming (ncpf) – Red-footed falcon Nature cons. purpose grassland establishment ncpf – bird/small gameEnv. land use change scheme ncpf – wild goose/cranencpf – habitat management Management of wetlands ncpf – great bustard Conversion of arable land into wetland Hori- zontal Man. of trad. homesteads (tanya) Management of trad. orchards Organic farmingOrg. grassland management Organic fruit production Integrated farmingExtensive grass-land management Integrated fruit production Reed management Arable schemesGrassland schemes Plantation schemes Wetland schemes

15 Agri-environmental indicators Beside CMEF indicators, the following specific (so called „own”) indicators are proposed: supported person related data (agricultural producer or other land user) supported area related data (ha) / Natura2000, LFA, nitrate sensitive area / land utilization related data (ha) /grassland-meadow, pasture, arable land-vegetable, plantation/ Effect indicator monitoring system: on the basis of collected data of this monitoring system, a special evaluation can be performed focused on the results, impacts and relevance of the intervention. The system has 3+1 main parts: 1.) nature conservation/biodiversity (bird/target species – insects – botany/coenology) 2.) environment protection (soil – water – land use) 3.) economy (profitability/expenses – social/employment aspects) +1) informatics (storage – query of data) Effect indicator monitoring will be held on the 10% of the whole supported area.

16

17

18 Thank you for your attention!