Searching for sand reservoirs using 3C-3D seismic data, horizontal well logs, and VSP AGL Update Meeting Houston, Texas May 2 nd, 2012 Robert R. Stewart.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Estimates of Arctic Wetland Extent Using Ground Penetrating Radar Stefan Schultheiss 1 ; Christoph E. Geiss 2 ; Phil Camill 5 ; Mark B. Edlund 4 ; Charles.
Advertisements

Time-Lapse Monitoring of CO2 Injection with Vertical Seismic Profiles (VSP) at the Frio Project T.M. Daley, L.R. Myer*, G.M. Hoversten and E.L. Majer.
Seismic Stratigraphy EPS 444
Geologic Structure and Seismic Analysis
Imaging Furniture, Graves, and Stone Rings at Depth: Recent Magnetic and Radar Results from the Northern Rockies Steve Sheriff Professor of Geophysics,
Body and Surface Wave Seismic Tomography for Regional Geothermal Assessment of the Western Great Basin Glenn Biasi 1, Leiph Preston 2, and Ileana Tibuleac.
Multicomponent seismic interpretation of the Marcellus shale
Using 3D Seismic Imaging for Mine and Mineral Exploration G. Schuster University of Utah.
Near-Surface Geophysical Investigation of the 2010 Haiti Earthquake Epicentral Area Eray Kocel, Robert R. Stewart, Paul Mann, and Li Chang Eray Kocel,
Brian Russell #, Larry Lines #, Dan Hampson. , and Todor Todorov
Near-surface Imaging at Meteor Crater, Arizona Soumya Roy, Ph. D. Student Advisor: Dr. Robert R. Stewart AGL Annual Meeting University of Houston, 2 nd.
Environmental and Exploration Geophysics II tom.h.wilson Department of Geology and Geography West Virginia University Morgantown, WV.
GG450 April 22, 2008 Seismic Processing.
Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) GPR technology can be used to determine depth to bedrock and or water table, locate buried ordinance at gunnery ranges,
Seismic Reservoir Characterization of the Morrow A Sandstone Thomas L. Davis & Robert D. Benson CSM Scott Wehner, Chaparral Energy, and Michael D. Raines.
Applied Geophysics An Introduction
Petrotech 2007 AOA Geophysics Inc Integrity Oil Services Specialists in Applied Geophysics.
Seismic Reflection Data: what it is, how it can be used, & an application at Elk Hills, CA - Hudec and Martin, 2004.
Inversion of Z-Axis Tipper Electromagnetic (Z-TEM)‏ Data The UBC Geophysical Inversion Facility Elliot Holtham and Douglas Oldenburg.
Reflection Field Methods
Youli Quan & Jerry M. Harris
Anatomy of Anomalies Total Field Magnetics and Ground Penetrating Radar at a Potential Archaeological Site.
Small is beautiful: AGL physical modeling and salt measurements N. Dyaur, R. Stewart, and L. Huang Houston May 16,
HEAVY-OIL SEISMIC MONITORING at PIKES PEAK, SK I.A. Watson*, L.R. Lines and K.F. Brittle November 20, 2001.
Tom Wilson, Department of Geology and Geography Environmental and Exploration Geophysics II tom.h.wilson Department of Geology.
Copyright © Optim Inc. and University of Nevada John N. Louie University of Nevada, Reno Satish Pullammanappallil Bill Honjas Optim Inc.
November 19, 2001 Seismic modelling of coal bed methane strata, Willow Creek, Alberta Sarah E. Richardson, Rudi Meyer, Don C. Lawton, Willem Langenberg*
Geology 5660/6660 Applied Geophysics 26 Feb 2014 © A.R. Lowry 2014 For Fri 28 Feb: Burger (§8.4–8.5) Last Time: Industry Seismic Interpretation.
RESOLVING FOCAL DEPTH WITH A NEAR FIELD SINGLE STATION IN SPARSE SEISMIC NETWORK Sidao Ni, State Key Laboratory of Geodesy and Earth’s Dynamics, Institute.
Ground Penetrating Radar for Utilities mapping and Detection ์
New Trends in AVO Brian Russell and Dan Hampson
Searching for blind faults: the Haiti subsurface imaging project ERAY KOCEL ERAY KOCEL with with Robert R. Stewart, Paul Mann, Robert R. Stewart, Paul.
Arnim B. Haase and Robert R. Stewart
Geology 5660/6660 Applied Geophysics 28 Feb 2014 © A.R. Lowry 2014 Last Time: Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) Radar = electromagnetic radiation (light)
Interpreting a 3C-3D seismic survey, Ross Lake, Saskatchewan
SEISMIC INTERPRETATION
GravStat™ A OEX Technology Registered in the U. S. Patent and Trademark Office and offered through Lockhart Geophysical GravStat™ A method of determining.
Needs to be more interactive Radar Methods - An Overview
Environmental and Exploration Geophysics II tom.h.wilson Department of Geology and Geography West Virginia University Morgantown, WV.
Environmental and Exploration Geophysics II tom.h.wilson Department of Geology and Geography West Virginia University Morgantown,
PP and PS imaging and reflectivity of the Ardley coal zone, Red Deer, Alberta Sarah E. Richardson Don C. Lawton.
Sandy Chen*, L.R.Lines, J. Embleton, P.F. Daley, and L.F.Mayo
Designing a Ground Penetrating Radar Experiment You need to determine: 1.Amount of time to record the signal 2.Antenna frequency 3.Line spacing While thinking.
Sedimentary Geology Geos 240 – Chapter 2 Collecting the Data Part 2 – Regional Geophysical Data Dr. Tark Hamilton Camosun College.
Investigation of Subsurface Magma Feeders Taryn Serwatowski Dr. Sven Morgan Department of Geology CMU.
Wave-Equation Waveform Inversion for Crosswell Data M. Zhou and Yue Wang Geology and Geophysics Department University of Utah.
Geology 5660/6660 Applied Geophysics 29 Feb 2016 © A.R. Lowry 2016 Last Time: Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) Radar = electromagnetic radiation (light)
1 Introduction to Applied Geophysics & Geophysical Exploration Prof Jeannot Trampert (coordinator) Dr Fred Beekman
Geology 5660/6660 Applied Geophysics 26 Feb 2016 © A.R. Lowry 2016 For Mon 29 Feb: Burger (§8.4) Last Time: Industry Seismic Interpretation Seismic.
Ground-roll Inversion for Near-surface Shear-Wave Velocity
INSTRUCTOR © 2017, John R. Fanchi
GPR Simulations for pipeline oil drainage
Ground-Penetrating Radar
Technologies to model Ground water
Applied Geophysics Fall 2016 Umass Lowell
GPR Keren Engoltz and Semion Polinov Prof. Ammatzia Peled
Modeling of free-surface multiples - 2
Creating a Conference Poster
Arnim B. Haase and Robert R. Stewart
Radar Methods – General Overview
Acoustic Reflection 2 (distance) = (velocity) (time) *
Interpreting a 3C-3D seismic survey, Ross Lake, Saskatchewan
The radar band is loosely taken to extend from approximately 0
The Wave Equation Modeled
A case study in the local estimation of shear-wave logs
Upscaling Petrophysical Properties to the Seismic Scale
Impedance estimation from PP and PS seismic data: Ross Lake
Ground-Penetrating Radar
Velocity and anisotropy parameter scan
Presentation transcript:

Searching for sand reservoirs using 3C-3D seismic data, horizontal well logs, and VSP AGL Update Meeting Houston, Texas May 2 nd, 2012 Robert R. Stewart University of Houston Chuandong (Richard) Xu Oxy Petroleum, California Arnim Haase University of Calgary

 Introduction ◦ Ross Lake, northern Williston Basin ◦ Motivation – delineate reservoirs & find new ones  Geology - Stratigraphy & incised valley targets  Data - 3C-3D surface seismic and VSP  Analysis - Interpretation of PP & PS data ◦ Time structure, time thickness, Vp/Vs  Results - Horizontal well logs ◦ new targets

Geological Setting Cretaceous Jurassic Mannville Gp Vanguard Gp Pense Fm Cantuar Fm Success Fm Roseray Fm Rush Lake Fm Shaunavon Fm Target: Sandbars in Dimmock Creek Member of the Cantuar Formation of Mannville Group, L. Cretaceous (from Christopher, 1974)

(Data from National Energy Board, 2001) 30 million barrel pool to be found Motivation for continued & improved exploration in the area Numerous 10 million barrel pools

Crossplot of Vs and Vp from 4 regional wells Regression: Vp=1.416*Vs+1070 Vp/Vs=1.5 Vp/Vs=2.0 Vp/Vs=3.0 Mudrock: Vp=1.16*Vs+1360

25 Inline Xline After processing, NS Inline 1-132, EW Xline 1-91, about 7.5 km 2 3C-3D seismic survey to locate horizontal well Shot by CGGVeritas Dynamite source, 3C VectorSeis® receivers Record length: ms sample rate

Q type Spect. ratio DriftEmpirConv/ WE Inst. Amp. Average Qp Qs2337? From Best et al., 1994 and Calderon-Macias et al., 2004 * Q values from Ross Lake VSP

PS VSP (700m offset) PP time, applied 5/10-50/60 bandpass filter PP dataPS data, Vp/Vs=2.35 AND bulk shift UP 125ms PP VSP (700m offset)

PS synthetic (PS time) PP synthetic & section (PP time)

PP time thickness RushLake-IHACMPS time thickness RushLake-IHACM Map of average Vp/Vs between RushLake and IHACM

Zoom of Vp/Vs map (IHACM to Rush-Lake) MD:1240 m MD:1570 m

S-impedance from sparse-spike inversion

Vp/Vs from time-thickness (isochron) ratiosVp/Vs from impedance ratios Comparison of traveltime and impedance Vp/Vs

Horizontal well design on Vp/Vs Proposed horizontal well

 PP time thickness indicates channels & sand bar shape  VSP and synthetic seismograms assist in PP-PS correlation.  Vp/Vs from time thickness & inversions indicate reservoir sands  Combining and PS data provides another reservoir delineator & additional targets  Husky Energy Inc. – especially, Larry Mewhort, Kenneth Hedlin and Angela Ricci  Schlumberger – in particular, Mike Jones  CGGVeritas Hampson-Russell Software Services Ltd.  Allied Geophysical Lab, & the CREWES Project

Ground Penetrating Radar (GPR) and Total Station Survey in Robertson Stadium, University of Houston Suleyman Coskun Geophysical Data Acquisition Term Project Presentation 26 April 2012

 Introduction  Methods  Data Acquisition  Data Processing  Results  Conclusion

 The Robertson Stadium is a football stadium located in University of Houston Main Campus.  Most of the stadiums have a pipeline distribution below the field in order to prevent flooding or freezing.  Our 1st objective: To map the pipeline if the Robertson Stadium has one and define its spacing and top depth.  Our 2 nd objective: To map the topography of the field using Total Station

Ground Penetrating Radar GPR is an electromagnetic system that emits time- varying wave pulses from the surface and receives the reflections which are created by any discontinuities encountered underground. The fundamental basis for using GPR to determine the subsurface is the relationship between the wave velocity and material’s electrical property (permittivity). The unit of Electromagnetic travel time is nanosecond (10 -9 sec) Penetration and Resolution depend on center frequency of system antenna. Total Station Total station is a modern surveying technique that uses electronic/optical distance measuring device and reflector. Total station system can determine the coordinate and elevation information of a point by using simple trigonometry and triangulation equations. It has has very high accuracy (~1.5mm).

GPR System : Noggin 250 MHz Grid Line Spacing: 3 ft. Number of stack: 32 Y line: 54 – X Line: 51 Total Line length: 16,290 ft. Trimble Total Station System Point Spacing: 5 yards in X direction 10 yards in Y direction 190 data point in total Dimension of the field: 300x160 ft. Data acquired from half of the field

feet depth slice 1.7 – 1.75 feet depth slice

feet depth slice Inclination towards E-W Self- drainage system?

 Some geotechnical and topographic features of the Robertson Stadium at University of Houston are determined by ground penetrating radar and total station systems  The drainage pipeline separation is 15 ft and the pipeline distribution has a very clear image in processed GPR data.  Also GPR data indicates a shallow lineament in the East side on the study area but the source of this anomaly remains unknown.  Topographic data indicates that the stadium is inclined towards East and West directions. This inclination is interpreted as a self- drainage system that provides water to be drained from the center to the corners for preventing a flooding.

 Dr. Robert Stewart (Director of Allied Geophysical Laboratories)  Jeremy McDonald (Director of facilities and operations - Department of Athletics)  Susan Green, Ady Geda, Emrah Pacal and Anoop Williams (AGL)  Ozbil Yapar, Omer Akbas, Kenan Yazan and Tuna Altay Sansal (Acquisition Crew)