Professional Development by Johns Hopkins School of Education, Center for Technology in Education Supporting Individual Children Administering the Kindergarten.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
IDEA® English Language Proficiency Tests (IPT)
Advertisements

A Vehicle to Promote Student Learning
Teaching Strategies Gold
Effective Schooling for English Language Learners Beginner Level The School District of Philadelphia Office of Multilingual Curriculum and Programs.
VB-MAPP Verbal Behavior Milestones Assessment and Placement Program
I.E.P. on IEPs: Information Especially for Parents on Individualized Education Programs.
Understanding the IEP Process
English as a Second Language, Special Education, or both? Melanie Manares The Kansas State Department of Education KSDE Annual Conference October 2010.
IDEA AND ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS WITH DISABILITIES Office of General Counsel Division of Educational Equity August 15, 2012.
Defensible IEPs Douglas County School District 1 Module V: Documentation and Timelines.
The Marzano School Leadership Evaluation Model Webinar for Washington State Teacher/Principal Evaluation Project.
Language Assessment System (LAS) Links TM Census Test.
LPAC overview - Fall 2004 The Language Assessment Process in Texas  LPAC, Language Assessment Proficiency Committee  ARD is the Admissions, Review and.
Daniel Boone Area School District English as a Second Language (ESL) Program.
New Era MMSR- Maryland Model for School Readiness ends. Maryland’s Early Learning Framework begins… begins transition:
PARCC Accommodation: Text-to-Speech, Screen Reader Version, ASL Video, Human Reader/Human Signer For the ELA/Literacy Assessment December 2014.
English-Language Development Unit 5 - Getting Ready for the Unit
IDENTIFICATION 1 PROPOSED REGULATORY CHANGECOMMENTS Implement a four step ELL identification process to ensure holistic and individualized decisions can.
Minnesota Manual of Accommodations for Students with Disabilities Training Guide
Action Research: For Both Teacher and Student
Introduction to GREAT for ELs Office of Student Assessment Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction (608)
Michael Toole Southwest Plains Regional Service Center.
This session will begin with a discussion of strategies to ensure appropriate identification and interventions for ELLs as well as teacher resources. Strategies.
Creating Assessments with English Language Learners in Mind In this module we will examine: Who are English Language Learners (ELL) and how are they identified?
Program Overview: Focus- Assessment Bilingual Module 3 Presented by Marcee Camarillo Silvia Saldaña.
I nitial E valuation and R eevaluation in IDEA Produced by NICHCY, 2007.
1 Reclassification of English Learners Making Sense of the Process.
Interstate New Teacher Assessment and Support Consortium (INTASC)
Unit 5: Science: A Setting for English Language Development Learning Objectives Learn strategies that incorporate CA CCSS for ELA/Literacy and the California.
Digging Deeper The Power of Observations and the Kindergarten Readiness Assessment 1 Digging Deeper.
ACCESS for ELLs® Interpreting the Results Developed by the WIDA Consortium.
Assessing Program Quality with the Autism Program Environment Rating Scale.
Administering ELDA K & ELDA 1-2 English Language Development Assessment Assessing ELL Students in the Primary Grades Developed by the Limited English Proficient.
English-Language Development Domain California Preschool Learning Foundations Volume 1 Published by the California Department of Education (2008) English-Language.
1 ELPA Initial Screening Policies and Procedures ELPA Initial Screening Policies and Procedures Fall 2009 Michigan Department of Education.
Bilingual Students and the Law n Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 n Title VII of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act - The Bilingual Education.
Student Learning Objectives: Approval Criteria and Data Tracking September 17, 2013 This presentation contains copyrighted material used under the educational.
WIDA ELP Standards Providing Educational Equity to ELLs through Language Development.
Professional Development by Johns Hopkins School of Education, Center for Technology in Education Supporting Individual Children Supporting Students with.
Professional Development by Johns Hopkins School of Education, Center for Technology in Education Ready for Kindergarten.
Accommodations Required Content for STC and TA Training.
English Learners and State Assessment Accommodations Susan Fossett State Assessment Coordinator Maine Department of Education September 20,
Summative Jeopardy Summing Up Summative Decision- Making.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Jack O’Connell, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Bilingual Coordinators Network September 17, 2010 Margaret.
Comprehensible Input “Say WHAT?!” Translating “teacherese” into “studentese” with ease! ~Dr. Cindy Oliver.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Jack O’Connell, State Superintendent of Public Instruction California English Language Development Test and Title III.
Hart County School System ESOL Program
ESOL ASSESSMENT Susan Millington ESOL Adviser, School Support Services.
STAAR Decision Making Process for LPAC for Teachers.
The Arizona English Language Learner Assessment (AZELLA)
Technical Assistance Meeting II. Agenda Introductions Sharing our System Information (T-Chart) Activity – Evaluating the EL Program Balloon Activity Next.
English Learners at MPS January Who are our students? O MPS currently has 398 EL students enrolled K-12 O Current EL students speak 10 different.
PROFESSIONAL LEARNING ESOL ELIGIBILITY REQUIREMENTS. ESOL Teacher: Anastasiya Ard.
“All kids get to go to school and get a fair chance to learn. That’s the idea behind IDEA. Getting a fair chance to learn, for kids with disabilities,
K - 12 students are identified as English Language Learners (ELLs) if, at the time of their enrollment, they meet the following criteria: 1. There is a.
Private School Test Coordinators FLKRS Training, Part 2 Fall 2016 Colleen Risner.
The Arizona English Language Learner Assessment (AZELLA)
Understanding the Alternate ACCESS for ELLs Individual Student Report
Pre-Referral to Special Education: Considerations
Identifying and Supporting English Learners with
Please check, just in case…
Assessing all children
Ready 4 Kindergarten: Maryland’s Early Childhood Comprehensive Assessment System Kindergarten Readiness Assessment App.
Dr. Jacqueline C. Ellis, NBCT November 7, 2017
The Arizona English Language Learner Assessment (AZELLA)
TELPAS Alternate Student Eligibility
Evaluation in IDEA 2004.
August 5, 2015 – Proposal Level
Chapter 4 Standardized Tests.
Accommodations Required Content for STC and TA Training
Presentation transcript:

Professional Development by Johns Hopkins School of Education, Center for Technology in Education Supporting Individual Children Administering the Kindergarten Readiness Assessment to English Learners Supporting English Learners

Professional Development by Johns Hopkins School of Education, Center for Technology in Education Supporting Individual Children

Professional Development by Johns Hopkins School of Education, Center for Technology in Education Accessibility and Supports Assessing Young Students with Disabilities

Professional Development by Johns Hopkins School of Education, Center for Technology in Education Important Message: Sight T ranslation/Interpretation During the Kindergarten Readiness Assessment Fall 2015 administration: English learners in Maryland will not be allowed to use the tools of sight translation and/or interpretation to enable the students to use their native languages Important Message: Sight T ranslation/Interpretation

Professional Development by Johns Hopkins School of Education, Center for Technology in Education Level the Field Supports Reduce the language load necessary to access the assessment content Address the unique linguistic and sociocultural needs of the child by reducing the effects of English language skills on his or her overall performance on the assessment Level the Field Supports

Professional Development by Johns Hopkins School of Education, Center for Technology in Education Consider multiple modes for demonstrating skills and behaviors if the item implies verbal or spoken language, such as observational rubric items that use the words express, suggest, communicate, ask, or tell. Accept multiple means of expression by allowing the student to point to, gesture toward, or touch a response instead of, or in addition to providing a verbalized response Allowable “Level the Field” Supports

Maryland Determinations for Eligible ELs Beginning English Language Proficiency: a raw score of 0-10* Intermediate English Language Proficiency: a raw score of 11-18* Advanced English Language Proficiency (not eligible): a raw score of 19-28* * Kindergarten W-APT Listening and Speaking Conversion Table that is used for screening to determine a student’s eligibility for English for speakers of other languages (ESOL) services. The teacher should consult with the ESOL teacher and follow the protocol that Maryland has established for eligibility as an EL and proficiency level.

Professional Development by Johns Hopkins School of Education, Center for Technology in Education Meet with EL Team (may include teachers, school/district bilingual teachers/coordinators, school/district administrator, and parents). Discuss which supports might assist the student during daily instruction in the classroom. Determine which supports to try out with the student during instruction in each content area. Document and evaluate the effectiveness of the supports used over time. Make adjustments to the use of supports for the future. Determine which of the supports used effectively in the classroom should be used on the KRA, provided they are allowed. Identifying Needed Supports

Professional Development by Johns Hopkins School of Education, Center for Technology in Education Decision Making Process Option 1: General Administration Student is able to participate Administer items in the recommended order following general administration procedures and utilizing KRA universally designed allowances. 1.Record the student’s score in Ready for Kindergarten Online. 2.Continue to next item. Note: Repeated use of a particular universally designed allowance across multiple items could indicate an instructionally-relevant pattern of support needs. Record this information on the Student Details page in Ready for Kindergarten Online by clicking the Comment button within the Individualized Supports box to note any allowances that were repeatedly used. Decision Making Process: Option 1

Professional Development by Johns Hopkins School of Education, Center for Technology in Education Decision Making Process Option 2: Level the Field Administer the item following General Administration procedures, but provide one or more of the following allowable supports beyond Universally Designed Allowances: Consider multiple modes for demonstrating skills and behaviors if the item implies verbal or spoken language, such as observational rubric items that use the words express, suggest, communicate, ask, or tell. Accept multiple means of expression by allowing the student to point to, gesture toward, or touch a response instead of, or in addition to, providing a verbalized response. Decision Making Process: Option 2

Decision Making Process Option 2: Level the Field Recording scores Student is able to participate 1. On the Individual Student Details page in Ready for Kindergarten Online, click the View Supports button within the Level the Field Supports box and select the support(s) used under English Learner. Note: The same Level the Field support may be used for multiple items, but it only needs to be recorded once within the Level the Field Supports box. 2. Record the student’s score for the item. 3. Continue to the next item. Option 2: Level the Field: Recording scores

Professional Development by Johns Hopkins School of Education, Center for Technology in Education Decision Making Process 1.Record “Not Scorable” for the item in Ready for Kindergarten Online. 2.Use the item’s comment box to explain why the item was “Not Scorable”. Also, look for the skill in naturally-occurring routines and activities and record information/observations useful for instructional decision-making. 3.Continue to the next item. Option 3: Not Scorable Recording scores Option 3: Not Scorable:Recording scores

Professional Development by Johns Hopkins School of Education, Center for Technology in Education Pausing Administration of a Domain Pause the administration of a domain when a student is unable to access three items (not necessarily consecutive) in the domain given allowable supports. Meet with the student’s EL team to review the remaining items in the domain. Pausing Administration of a Domain

Professional Development by Johns Hopkins School of Education, Center for Technology in Education Pausing Administration of a Domain “ Not Scorable” means the teacher was not able to score the item because the child could not access it given allowable supports. A score of “0” means the child was able to access the item, but did not demonstrate the skill according to the scoring criteria. Teachers are not advised to pause administration of a domain after three scores of “0” unless there are other reasons to do so. Pausing Administration of a Domain

Professional Development by Johns Hopkins School of Education, Center for Technology in Education Key T akeaways Follow the Guidelines on Allowable Supports for Administration of the Kindergarten Readiness Assessment document Meet with the child’s EL team as outlined in the guidelines Follow the decision-making process Record scores and supports as appropriate Key Takeaways