1 Radiation Safety Aspects of the Linear Collider B. Racky, A. Leuschner, N. Tesch Radiation Protection Group TeV Superconducting Linear Accelerator.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
General Infrastructures Services Department LIU-SPS external beam dump - Internal Review Civil Engineering Aspect for Option B (LSS4) 30/7/2014 Martin.
Advertisements

Stefan Roesler SC-RP/CERN on behalf of the CERN-SLAC RP Collaboration
EDMS November th LHC Radiation Day RAMSES Induced Activity Monitors 5 th LHC Radiation Day CERN - 29 November 2005 RAMSES Induced Activity.
TLEP3 How radiation issues could be studied through FLUKA simulations. Possible approaches/mitigation schemes Alberto Fassò.
Question from the GDE : Could local “doughnut” type muon spoilers like those in SLC be substituted for the 5 meter magnetized wall? 5m magnetized wall.
1 Activation problems S.Agosteo (1), M.Magistris (1,2), Th.Otto (2), M.Silari (2) (1) Politecnico di Milano; (2) CERN.
Radiation at accelerator laboratories Prompt radiation from the particle beam Beam induced radiation –Neutrons –Gammas –Synchrotron radiation Radiation.
Shielding Studies using MARS Monte Carlo code Noriaki Nakao (SLAC) Jan. 6, 2005, WORKSHOP Machine-Detector Interface at ILC, SLAC.
PROBLEM: Radiation Dose Rate in IR2 When IR1 is Operating (and Vice Versa) Muon Dose Rate > 1 mRem/hr for 0.1% Collimated Halo.
Induced Activity Calculations in Support of D&D Activities at SLAC Joachim Vollaire, Radiation Protection Department.
NLC - The Next Linear Collider Project Backgrounds Update Tom Markiewicz SLAC LCWS Cornell 15 July 2003.
Beam Dynamics Tutorial, L. Rivkin, EPFL & PSI, Prague, September 2014 Synchrotron radiation in LHC: spectrum and dynamics The Large Hadron Collider (LHC)
1 Induced radioactivity in the target station and in the decay tunnel from a 4 MW proton beam S.Agosteo (1), M.Magistris (1,2), Th.Otto (2), M.Silari (2)
NLC - The Next Linear Collider Project NLC Backgrounds What’s New? Tom Markiewicz LC’99, Frascati, Italy October 1999.
Higher Physics – Unit 3 3.5Dosimetry and Safety. Activity of Radiation The activity of a radioactive source is the average number of nuclei decaying per.
Radiological Aspects of ILC Hee-Seock Lee Pohang Accelerator Laboratory 2 nd Workshop of Korean ILC at PAL.
ELI-NP: the way ahead, March Anna Ferrari An overview of the shielding problems around high energy laser-accelerated beams Anna Ferrari Institute.
Proposal for Experiment S291: " Residual radioactivity induced by U ions - experimental investigation and longtime predictions" GSI, Darmstadt: G.Fehrenbacher,
Radiation Protection considerations concerning a future SPS dump design Helmut Vincke DGS-RP.
MSL - SLAC11 Radiation Protection studies for SiD Mario Santana, SLAC / RP 2010 Linear Collider Workshop & International Linear Collider Meeting Tsinghua.
Radiation safety evaluation for “KAMABOKO” Main Linac Tunnel KEK-APL : T.Sanami, S.Ban KEK-ACC : A.Enomoto, M.Miyahara ILC Mechanical & Electrical Review.
1 Target Station Design Dan Wilcox High Power Targets Group, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory EuroNu Annual Meeting 2012.
NUMI NuMI Internal Review July 27, 2001 Target Hall Shielding Review Page 1 Target Hall Shielding Review Radiation Safety Coordinator Nancy Grossman FNAL.
Integrated Radiation Measurement and Radiation Protection of BES Ⅲ Zhang Qingjiang, Wu protection group, accelerator center, IHEP,
N_TOF Technical Report INTC, CERN 21 May 2007 P. Cennini AB-ATB n_TOF Technical Coordinator Status of the old Target Removal Status of the old Target Removal.
Isotope Technologies Garching GmbHCERN 2010 Radiation Protection Aspects Related to Lutetium-177 Use in Hospitals R. Henkelmann, A. Hey, O. Buck, K. Zhernosekov,
Beam line Experiment area SC magnet Pion production target
1 Target Station Design for Neutrino Superbeams Dan Wilcox High Power Targets Group, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory NBI 2012, CERN.
Beam loads & dump concepts T. Kramer, B. Goddard, M. Benedikt, Hel. Vincke.
Radiation Protection aspects for SHIP Doris Forkel-Wirth, Stefan Roesler, Helmut Vincke, Heinz Vincke CERN Radiation Protection Group 1 st SHIP workshop,
Nuclear Facilities Decommissioning & Design An introduction to SENAC activities JM. Dumas CEA Saclay, DSM/DAPNIA/SENAC, F Gif-sur-Yvette,
Estimates of Radiation Levels in the Main Linac Tunnel and Beam Dump Caverns for the CLIC Design Study Sophie Mallows, Thomas Otto SATIF 10, S.
Stefania Trovati EPFL - CERN S. Trovati - SATIF 101.
Recent Studies on ILC BDS and MERIT S. Striganov APD meeting, January 24.
Risk Analysis P. Cennini AB-ATB on behalf of the n_TOF Team  Procedure  Documents in preparation  Conclusions Second n_TOF External Panel Review, CERN,
11/15/20051 Radiation Protection Issues for ILC (not exhaustive) A. Fassò, N. Noriaki, H. Vincke Radiation Physics.
Considerations for an SPL-Beamdump Thomas Otto CERN in collaboration with Elias Lebbos, Vasilis Vlachoudis (CERN) and Ekaterina Kozlova (GSI) Partly supported.
Radiation Protection in J-PARC neutrino beam line Sep Yuichi Oyama (KEK) for T2K neutrino beam line construction group Happy birthday.
GRAN SASSO’S HADRON STOP Temperature’s behaviour under specified beam conditions Barbara Calcagno.
NToF - Radiation Protection M. Brugger, P. Cennini, A. Ferrari, E. Lebbos, V. Vlachoudis CERN AB/ATB/EET.
R. ArnoldCLIC08, CERN, 16 Oct Heat and Radiation in the Water and Shielding in the18 MW Water Dump for ILC Preliminary Results from FLUKA and FLUENT.
WP2 progress on safety E. Baussan EUROnu CB Meeting Monday 10th & Tuesday 11th June 2011 CERN, Geneva, Switzerland.
Radiation protection and radiation safety issues for HIE-ISOLDE. FLUKA calculations Y. Romanets ISOLDE Workshop and Users meeting 2010 CERN, 8 December.
BooNE / NuMI Rad. Protection NBI 2002 S. Childress (FNAL) Radiation Protection for Mini-BooNE & NuMI 18 March, 2002 Mini-BooNE inputs from Peter Kasper.
Radiation Protection Considerations for the CDR Helmut Vincke DGS-RP.
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES NSLS-II Shielding Workshop R. Casey Activation Issues for NSLS-II March 28, 2007.
Simulation of heat load at JHF decay pipe and beam dump KEK Yoshinari Hayato.
Ma zhongjian Ding yadong Wang qingbin Wu qingbiao Radiation Protection Group/IHEP.
Radiation Protection At Accelerator Facilities Matthew Quinn, PhD Radiation Physicist, Fermilab ESH&Q Section American Nuclear Society Student Section.
EURISOL DS Task meeting Orsay, 07 Janvier Preliminary shielding assessment of EURISOL Post Accelerator D. Ene, D. Ridikas. B. Rapp.
Status of the FAIR pbar target: Target handling study (M. Helmecke)
Fermilab Limited Scope Accelerator Readiness Review (ARR) October 1 -3, 2013 Technical Breakout Session 2A Radiological Safety for 700 kW Operations.
Positron Source for Linear Collider Wanming Liu 04/11/2013.
EURISOL, TASK#5, Bucuresti, November 1 Preliminary shielding assessment of EURISOL Post Accelerator D. Ene, D. Ridikas. B. Rapp.
1 How Many Protons can we afford to loose in the PS ? Thomas Otto SC-RP.
KEK Radiation Related Topics neutrino beam construction subgroup Yuichi Oyama (KEK) and target monitor subgroup for.
1 Positron Source Configuration Masao KURIKI ILC AG meeting at KEK, 2006 Jan. Positron Source Configuration KURIKI Masao and John Sheppard  BCD Description.
1 SAFERIB EURISOL DS WP5 Progress Report CERN-RP: Mariano Menna, Jerôme Desarzens, Thomas Otto.
Beam Dump Hall Volume Beam Dump Meeting at SLAC May S.Ban
J. Bauer, V. Bharadwaj, H. Brogonia, A. Fasso, M. Kerimbaev, J. Liu, S
Heating and radiological
Shielding Design for LCLS Injector Operation – Phase one
Beam Loss and Radiation Working Group: Conclusions
Radiation protection of Linac4 M. Silari Radiation Protection Group
Another Crazy Idea of a LC Dump
Radiation Shielding Val Kostroun REU Presentation, June 1, 2009
Fassò, N. Nakao, H. Vincke Aug. 2, 2005
CFS consideration on the Main Dump and around
Operations Section Leader
CEPC Radiation and Shielding
Presentation transcript:

1 Radiation Safety Aspects of the Linear Collider B. Racky, A. Leuschner, N. Tesch Radiation Protection Group TeV Superconducting Linear Accelerator

2 Radiation Safety Aspects of TESLA Overview TESLA Locations of beam loss Protection of the public exposure limits exposure paths Protection of the staff

3 Top view, route on map

4 Some data of TESLA :

5 Side view with earth cover

6 Main locations of beam loss

7 Calculations of doses and activities MC code FLUKA99 fluence/ dose conversion: ICRP Neutron and Gamma fields Muon fields Activity concentrations MC code FLUKA99 (option resnuclei) analytical model (1- dimenional transport)

8 Protection of the Public (local population and environment) Stray radiation fields Radioactivity of released tunnel air Radioactivity of drinking water Activation of soil

9 Protection of the Public Sum of all exposures Release of radioactive air Activation of groundwater Activation of soil 1 mSv/a 0,1 mSv/a 0,3 mSv/a 0,3 mSv/a ? ? 0,03 mSv/a < natural activity

10 Stray radiation fields due to neutrons

11 Stray radiation fields due to myons

12 Release of radioactive air Produced Nuclei Main air activation zone in the tunnel, near IP: 100 kW beam loss (collimators)

13 Release of radioactive air Radioactive air can be released without any permission, if the mean annual activity concentration is below given nuclide specific limits. (leading to a dose < 0,3 mSv/a for the worst case of exposure) §§§§§ For a mixture of nuclei : ratio < 0.1

14 Release of radioactive air Overview ventilation system S. II-251 TDR Should it be operated as a closed or open system?

15 Release of radioactive air Open system : Tunnel ventilation rate : 0,8 m/s, 6*10 4 m 3 /h length of collimator section : 100 m volume of activation zone :2000 m 3 distance to exhaust station :5 km delay time :1.4 h Closed system : data : Ventilation switched off during 1 month operation, air blown out on each monthly maintenance day Ventilation switched on during operation, air blown out permanently

16 Release of radioactive air Closed system Sum of all ratios = << 1.0 and << 0.1

17 Release of radioactive air Open system Sum of all ratios =

18 Release of radioactive air Conclusions A closed ventilation system leads to much smaller release of radioactivity Also an open system would fulfill the legal requirements Compromise ? open system with bypassed release stations closed to loss points

19 Activation of soil and ground water wet soil (27% water) concrete shielding (3 m) in the vicinity of a main dump dump TESLA lumi run: Operation time: 5000 h (1 year) Energy: 250 GeV power: 12 MW

20 Activity concentration of wet soil Most relevant nuclei Sum of all activity concentrations: Bq/g rings of 50 cm thickness

21 Activation of Soil and Groundwater region of 50 cm around a main dump after 5000 h of operation sandwater 7 Be 3 H 22 Na Silicon 32 % Oxygen 53 % Aluminium 4 % Oxygen 89 % 100 % 15 % natural activity: Bq/g Dose, consuming 800 l/a 2.5 mSv (?% 22 Na) 3 H : 2.60 Bq/g 22 Na : 0.45 Bq/g 7 Be : ? Bq/g 22 Na : ? Bq/g

22 Transport of ground water Ground water flow: (expert‘s report) area north dump south dump descent 1m / 750m 1m/ 900m permeability 5* m/s 5* m/s filter velocity 6.7* m/s 5.6* m/s distance velocity 2.2* m/s 1.9* m/s distance velocity 6.9 m/ year 6.0 m/ year error about 80% ?

23 Transport of activated ground water activation zone: north dump 12 m south dump 18 m At what distance is the activity concentration so low, that drinking 800 l /a results in a dose of 30 µSv/a ? Distance calculations for the dominant nuclide Na-22 After activation:

24 Zones of activated ground water Distance A c for 30 µSv/a after velocity distance time (m/s) (m) (a) 5.0 * * * * * * * *

25 Protection of the Staff accelerator operation: stray radiation fields (shielding, interlocks) maintenance time: residual radioactivity (choice of material, shielding) radioactive air (ventilation concept)

26 Protection of the Staff personal doses < 6 mSv / a (2000 h working time) local doses < 15 mSv / a (5000 h operation time) = local doses < 1,5 mSv / a

27 Protection of the Staff personal doses < 20 mSv / a local dose rates < 3 mSv / h Only temporary access ALARA

28 Residual Radioactivity Hot spots

29 Radioactivity of the tunnel air

30 Conclusions