The Common Core Standards: A Civil Rights Perspective Bradley Scott, Ph.D. Director IDRA South Central Collaborative for Equity

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
WV High Quality Standards for Schools
Advertisements

Inclusion Quality Mark for Wales
1 Getting to the Core of the Common Core State Standards What they are! & How they came to be! Implications for Policy and Practice Advanced Literacy Panel.
April 6, 2011 DRAFT Educator Evaluation Project. Teacher Education and Licensure DRAFT The ultimate goal of all educator evaluation should be… TO IMPROVE.
Carnegie Schools for a New Society: Reflections on a National, Districtwide High School Reform Initiative ROCHELLE NICHOLS-SOLOMON & MICHELLE FEIST Academy.
Common Core State Standards OVERVIEW CESA #9 - September 2010 Presented by: CESA #9 School Improvement Services Jayne Werner and Yvonne Vandenberg.
Knows and performs Illinois Professional Teaching Standards including working with diverse learners Demonstrates basic competency in planning, instruction,
Renewed Outcomes-based Curriculum 6-9. Purpose for Renewal Teacher feedback –Provide concise & coherent curriculum –Time allocations have not changed.
Shelda Hale, Title III, ELL and Immigrant Education Kentucky Department of Education.
Excellence for All Children 1 Higher Academic Standards A Defining Moment for Tennessee Schools.
Estándares claves para líderes educativos publicados por
Transforming The School Counseling Profession
Academic Development and Planning for College and Career Readiness K-12 CHAPTER 11.
INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP FOR DIVERSE LEARNERS Susan Brody Hasazi Katharine S. Furney National Institute of Leadership, Disability, and Students Placed.
Practicing the Art of Leadership: A Problem Based Approach to Implementing the ISLLC Standards, 4e © 2013, 2009, 2005, 2001 Pearson Education, Inc. All.
1. KCS Strategic Goals: Focus on the student to ensure they excel academically and are prepared for life beyond the classroom. Recruit, select, induct,
COLLEGE-READY LEARNER CRITICAL THINKER ADAPTABLE & PRODUCTIVE LEADERRESPONSIBLE DECISION MAKER SKILLED COMMUNICATOR HISD.
ICT in Education UNESCO Bangkok
Principal Evaluation in Massachusetts: Where we are now National Summit on Educator Effectiveness Principal Evaluation Breakout Session #2 Claudia Bach,
Meeting SB 290 District Evaluation Requirements
STATEWIDE ROLL-OUT: CESA STATEWIDE SIS GROUP DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC INSTRUCTION AUGUST, 2010 Foundations Kit: Common Core State Standards 1.
Strategic Planning Board Update February 27, 2012 Draft - For Discussion Purposes Only.
Massie Ritsch U.S. Department of Education ESEA REAUTHORIZATION.
1. 2 Why is the Core important? To set high expectations –for all students –for educators To attend to the learning needs of students To break through.
Technology Leadership
Leadership: Connecting Vision With Action Presented by: Jan Stanley Spring 2010 Title I Directors’ Meeting.
Eric W. Waldo U.S. Department of Education Deputy Chief of Staff July 2012 U.S. Department of Education Policy Overview.
Communication System Coherent Instructional Program Academic Behavior Support System Strategic FocusBuilding Capacity.
Mission The faculty and staff of Pittman Elementary School are committed to providing every student with adequate time, effective teaching, and a positive.
2012 National Partnerships Schools’ Forum Margery Evans CEO, AITSL ~ Leadership for Learning ~
Culture, Practice, and Leadership: Where Do I Stand? Tiffany Young, M. Ed. Equity & Diversity Coordinator Josh Deason, M.A. Equity & Diversity Specialist.
The Challenge We must realize that the system is the cause of weak execution due to lack of clarity, commitment, collaboration and accountability resulting.
U.S. Department of Education Reform Agenda Overview April 2010.
By Karen Diaz TechKNOW Associates.
A significant and historic opportunity for states to collectively develop and adopt a core set of academic standards in Mathematics and English/Language.
A state-wide effort to improve teaching and learning to ensure that all Iowa students engage in a rigorous & relevant curriculum. The Core Curriculum.
Common Core State Standards (CCSS) & North Carolina Essential Standards (NCES) June 12, 2012.
What is a 21st Century Learner?
Forum on Educational Accountability Gene Wilhoit Council of Chief State School Officers January 7, 2010.
Dr. Nancy S. Grasmick July 26,2012.  Maryland is proud to be the top-ranked state in U.S. growth as reported in this study, and judged by Education Week.
1 Latest EU developments in the field of Adult education 19 Mars 2010 Marta Ferreira.
1. Administrators will gain a deeper understanding of the connection between arts, engagement, student success, and college and career readiness. 2. Administrators.
CALIFORNIA STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION State Policies: Orchestrating the Common Core Mathematics Classroom Ilene W. Straus, Vice President California State.
New Jersey Assessment Of Skills and Knowledge Science 2015 Carmela Triglia.
Graduate School of Education Leading, Learning, Life Changing Emerging Trends in K-12 Education in Oregon Patrick Burk, PH.D. Educational Leadership and.
ANNOOR ISLAMIC SCHOOL AdvancEd Survey PURPOSE AND DIRECTION.
Simpson County Schools Summer Leadership Retreat 2011 Enhancing Leadership Capacity and Effectiveness to Impact Student Learning and Staff Performance.
21 st Century Skills for Education Leaders: How do we prepare our students for the new global economy? Partnership for 21 st Century Skills Teaching &
Staff All Surveys Questions 1-27 n=45 surveys Strongly Disagree Disagree Neutral Agree Strongly Agree The relative sizes of the colored bars in the chart.
WASC Western Association for Schools and Colleges.
About District Accreditation Mrs. Sanchez & Mrs. Bethell Rickards Middle School
Measuring Child and Family Outcomes Conference Crystal City, VA July 30, 2010 Jacqueline Jones, PhD Senior Advisor to the Secretary for Early Learning.
Office of Service Quality
ACS WASC/CDE Visiting Committee Final Presentation South East High School March 11, 2015.
Vision Statement We Value - An organization culture based upon both individual strengths and relationships in which learners flourish in an environment.
2010 NATIONAL EDUCATION TECHNOLOGY PLAN Eva Perez EDIT 654 OL.
Raising the Bar for Oregon. Why Now?  New Mathematics Content Standards were adopted for grades K-8 in 2007 and high school in Oregon Statewide.
Minnesota’s Promise World-Class Schools, World-Class State.
ACS WASC/CDE Visiting Committee Final Presentation Panorama High School March
Transformational Leadership Group of Metropolitan Nashville Public Schools Performance of Disadvantaged Youth November 23, 2010 Brenda Steele, Co-Chair.
External Review Report Westminster Public Schools April 24-27, 2016.
Nevada Plan to Ensure Equitable Access to Excellent Educators A Systemic Approach to Educator Equity: Carson City School District’s Aligned “Learner-Centered”
Making an impact with PE & school sport Kevin Barton Executive Head of Achievement Youth Sport Trust.
Clerks’ Annual Conference 2010 Clerking towards an “Outstanding” Governing Body Steve Telfer Leadership & Governance.
STAFF/CURRICULUM DEVELOPMENT NETWORK (S/CDN) September 14, 2006 Albany Marriott Hotel Presented by: Jean C. Stevens Interim Deputy Commissioner New York.
Educator Equity Resource Tool: Using Comprehensive Equity Indicators
Reflecting National Education Goals in Teacher’s Competency Standards
THE NEW YORK CITY DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Dolores Esposito, Executive Superintendent of Leadership Developing Social and Emotional Skills in our Schools.
Foundations Kit: Common Core State Standards
English Learner Parent Academy
Presentation transcript:

The Common Core Standards: A Civil Rights Perspective Bradley Scott, Ph.D. Director IDRA South Central Collaborative for Equity San Antonio, Texas

Sixth Generation of Civil Rights and Educational Equity 2012-Future Systemic Equity Transformed ways systems and individuals habitually operate to ensure that every student has the greatest opportunity to learn supported by the appropriate resources.

Quality Schools Action Framework “A Quality Schools Action Framework – Framing Systems Change for Student Success,” IDRA Newsletter, Nov-Dec ©2005, Intercultural Development Research Association Parent Involvement/ Community Engagemen t Teaching Quality Student Engagemen t Curriculum Quality and Access Actionable Knowledge Community Capacity Building Coalition Building School Capacity Building Governance Efficacy Strategic Administrative Leadership Fair Funding School Holding Power Graduation and College going Student Success College Graduation Life success Global competence Levers of Change Change Strategies School System Fundamentals School System Indicators Outcome Indicators What do we need? How do we make change happen? Which fundamentals must be secured? Where do we focus systems change? What outcomes will result? Engaged Citizens Accountable Leadership Enlightened Public Policy Equity Lens and Goals of Educational Equity

Equity Lens and Goals of Educational Equity

The Equity Context and Lens The Lens The optic through which all of the business of the organization is filtered.

Focusing the Equity Lens How does this (activity) impact all learners? What might create a negative or adverse impact on any identifiable population? How do we address any adverse impact?

How might that adverse impact be avoided? What precautions should we take as we move forward? and, How do we monitor our work and comparable outcomes for all students?

This lens: Protects the civil rights of every learner; Guarantees equitable educational opportunity for all; Provides appropriate supports for school success.

The Equity Context and Lens The Equity Context The systems and structures that are put in place ensure that no learner is denied the fair and equitable benefit afforded to all other students regardless of race, gender, national origin, economic level, and disability.

The Sixth Generation of Civil Rights and Educational Equity Equity Concerns: Strategic and focused implementation of the Goals Goal 1:Comparably High Achievement and Other Student Outcomes Goal 2:Equitable Access and Inclusion Goal 3:Equitable Treatment Goal 4:Equitable Opportunity to Learn Goal 5:Equitable Resource Distribution Goal 6:Equitable Shared Accountability

Pre-k through 20 education and school completion Resolution of persistent “gap” issues Institutionalizing innovations Eradicating barriers that block high achievement

Transformed curriculum that is relevant, meaningful, powerful, and dynamic Mastery of English language literacy Mastery of core content at a global competence level

Technology equity for management, instruction, creation and development Heightened stakeholder collaboration Parental involvement and engagement Safe, secure, non-hostile learning environments

Reformed, expanded, and targeted professional development, staff renewal and staff support systems Confronting new discrimination Confronting “isms” in school Embracing the civil rights concerns Creating cultures of positive change Building 21st century efficacy

Creating good community and school health Creating a cradle to college and career pipeline Eradicating the cradle to prison pipeline...

The Common Core Standards The Common Core Standards lay a foundation for system-wide education reform The standards reflect knowledge most critical for college and career success The standards bring consistency across states The standards are more rigorous than most state standards. The standards increase the coherence and rigor of what is expected of American students.

BUT... There Are Some Concerns By their own admission, the standards: 1. Do not address interventions for students well below grade level; 2. Do not delineate the full range of support for English language learners; 3. Do not describe how teachers should teach (CCSSO and NGA)

There are Other Civil Rights Concerns The equity lens needs cleaning How does this (activity) impact all learners? What might create a negative or adverse impact on any identifiable population? How do we address any adverse impact? How might that adverse impact be avoided? What precautions should we take as we move forward? and, How do we monitor our work and comparable outcomes for all students?

The equity context is perforated The systems and structures that are put in place ensure that no learner is denied the fair and equitable benefit afforded to all other students regardless of race, gender, national origin, economic level, and handicap. Race to the Top Other competitive grants

The performance field is uneven Where do ELLs start? Where do the Low performers start? What do these standards look like in rural and remote areas? What do these standards really look like in inner city (distressed urban) versus suburban areas? What do they look like in tribal settings on and off reservations? What do these standards look like in alternative school settings?

The goals of equity are fractured Goal 1:Comparably High Achievement and Other Student Outcomes Goal 2:Equitable Access and Inclusion Goal 3:Equitable Treatment Goal 4:Equitable Opportunity to Learn Goal 5:Equitable Resource Distribution Goal 6:Equitable Shared Accountability

Teaching quality may fail some students Knowledge and skills in first and second language acquisition Skills for teaching the challenged learner Pedagogy that supports success in low performing learners The use of culturally competent pedagogy PD for the “challenged pedagogue” Mis-alignment of practice, and Skewed expectations

Quality leadership may fail to manifest itself Teacher evaluation systems The principal as Learning Leader Assurance of protection of civil rightsunder the law for non-discrimination Guarantees of equal protection under the law and equal treatment The right to learn The appropriate distribution of resources to support excellence for all (not just some) Accountability – Who’s responsible, who’s to blame?

In Truth... Transforming systems requires: Moving from a different place to a different place with the right intentionality Dislodging our habits Seeing with a different lens Acting in a different way Being a professional who asserts “the right”

Creating schools that work for all children Intercultural Development Research Association 5815 Callaghan Road, Suite 101 San Antonio, Texas