Valuing Short Term Beach Closure in a RUM Model of Recreation Demand Using Stated Preference Data Stela Stefanova and George R. Parsons Camp Resources.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Overview Examples of TranSight Applications What Does TranSight Analyze? Model Structure.
Advertisements

Valuation 9: Travel cost model
American Oystercatcher Best Management Practices.
Angler Heterogeneity and Species- Specific Demand for Recreational Fishing in the Southeast United States Tim Haab (Ohio State University) Rob Hicks (College.
Rural Economy Research Centre Modelling taste heterogeneity among walkers in Ireland Edel Doherty Rural Economy Research Centre (RERC) Teagasc Department.
Ask a Hypothetical Question, Get a Valuable Answer? Joseph Herriges Catherine Kling Christopher Azevedo.
What’s the value of nature tourism in the Lower Rio Grande Valley of Texas? Woosnam, An, Aleshinloye, Dudensing, and Hanselka March 2012.
Discrete Choice Modeling William Greene Stern School of Business New York University.
Recreational Values of Gulf Grouper John Whitehead, Appalachian State University Gulf of Mexico Fishery Management Council Socioeconomic Panel Miami, Florida.
Error Component models Ric Scarpa Prepared for the Choice Modelling Workshop 1st and 2nd of May Brisbane Powerhouse, New Farm Brisbane.
Empirical Study of Urban Commercial Vehicle Tour Patterns in Texas Wei Zhou, Jane Lin University of Illinois at Chicago Department of Civil and Materials.
The Effect of Fairness on individual’s Acceptability of Road Pricing Policy Kuang-Yih Yeh Hao-Ching Hsia National Cheng Kung University.
Choice Modeling Externalities: A Conjoint Analysis of Transportation Fuel Preferences Matthew Winden and T.C. Haab, Ph.D. Agricultural, Environmental,
1/54: Topic 5.1 – Modeling Stated Preference Data Microeconometric Modeling William Greene Stern School of Business New York University New York NY USA.
Discrete Choice Models for Modal Split Overview. Outline n General procedure for model application n Basic assumptions in Random Utility Model n Uncertainty.
Domestic Tourism Destination Choices- A Choice Modelling Analysis Assignment 3 Group 3 Hari Hara Sharan Nagalur Subraveti Kasun Dilhara Wimalasena Kento.
1 Ardavan Asef-Vaziri Sep-09Operations Management: Waiting Lines3  Terminology: The characteristics of a queuing system is captured by five parameters:
Employment Decisions of European Women After Childbirth Chiara Pronzato (ISER) EPUNet Conference, May 9th 2006.
15. Stated Preference Experiments. Panel Data Repeated Choice Situations Typically RP/SP constructions (experimental) Accommodating “panel data” Multinomial.
COLLABORATE. INNOVATE. EDUCATE. What Smartphone Bicycle GPS Data Can Tell Us About Current Modeling Efforts Katie Kam, The University of Texas at Austin.
Wrecks of the World II Presentation, the Economic Impact Presented by: Avalon Mayor Martin L. Pagliughi Avalon Public Information Officer Scott Wahl Wrecks.
The Economic Impacts of Climate Change on Beach Recreation in North Carolina Nicholas Livy, Appalachian State University Faculty Advisor: John Whitehead,
Econ 231: Natural Resources and Environmental Economics SCHOOL OF APPLIED ECONOMICS.
DOES WATER = JOBS? Dr. Jeff Michael Director, Business Forecasting Center Eberhardt School of Business.
Valuation of improvements in coastal environments.
11 May, 2011 Discrete Choice Models and Behavioral Response to Congestion Pricing Strategies Prepared for: The TRB National Transportation Planning Applications.
Discrete Choice Models William Greene Stern School of Business New York University.
Transit Estimation and Mode Split CE 451/551 Source: NHI course on Travel Demand Forecasting (152054A) Session 7.
The impact of airline service failures on travelers’ carrier choice Yoshinori Suzuki.
Human Capital Policies in Education: Further Research on Teachers and Principals 5 rd Annual CALDER Conference January 27 th, 2012.
Empirical Methods for Microeconomic Applications University of Lugano, Switzerland May 27-31, 2013 William Greene Department of Economics Stern School.
Value of Time: How do taxi fares compare with research Ransford S. McCourt, PE, PTOE DKS Associates.
Everyday travel mode choice and its determinants: trip attributes and lifestyle Markéta Braun Kohlová Faculty of Social.
Prof Max Munday The E4G Toolkit. What is an E4G project expected to do/collect in terms of visitor numbers and related information? When you need to deliver.
May 20, 2015 Estimation of Destination Choice Models using Small Sample Sizes and Cellular Phone Data Roberto O. Miquel Chaitanya Paleti Tae-Gyu Kim, Ph.D.
The Profile of First-time & Repeat Trips to Maine Maine Overnight Visitor Studies - Special Analytics Prepared for the: Maine Office of Tourism November.
The State of Seawater Desalination in Texas Jorge A. Arroyo P.E. Innovative Water Technologies.
1/54: Topic 5.1 – Modeling Stated Preference Data Microeconometric Modeling William Greene Stern School of Business New York University New York NY USA.
Ranking and Rating Data in Joint RP/SP Estimation by JD Hunt, University of Calgary M Zhong, University of Calgary PROCESSUS Second International Colloquium.
The Annual Meeting of the RSAI – The Israeli Branch, Tel-Aviv University, January 10, 2010 Development and estimation of a semi- compensatory residential.
Estimating non-market values across scale and scope John Rolfe.
A Model for Joint Choice of Airport and Ground Access Mode 11th National Transportation Planning Applications Conference May 6-10, 2007, Daytona Beach,
Integration of Statistics and Harmonic Analysis to Predict Water Levels in Estuaries and Shallow Waters of the Gulf of Mexico Texas A&M University - Corpus.
TYBEE ISLAND TOURISM STUDY, OUTLINE 1.Introduction 2.Survey of Tybee Island Visitors 3.Visitor Expenditure Patterns 4.Estimated Annual Visitation.
Estimating Potential Demand for Electric Vehicles (EVs) Michael K. Hidrue and George R. Parsons Camp Resources XVII Wrightsville Beach, NC June 24-25,
Economic Value of Public Access to Great Lakes Beaches Frank Lupi, 1 Feng Song & Michael Kaplowitz 1Department of Ag, Food, & Resource Economics; Department.
BARRIER ISLANDS TEXAS GULF COAST.
Developing Species-Specific Recreational Values for Allocation: Snapper-Grouper in the Gulf of Mexico Tim Haab (Ohio State University) Rob Hicks (College.
Angler Heterogeneity and Species-Specific Demand for Recreational Fishing in the Southeast United States* Tim Haab (Ohio State University) Rob Hicks (College.
Evaluating Recreational Benefits of Water Resources on Small Geographical Areas An Application to Rivers in Puerto Rico Prepared by: Juan Marcos González.
Presentation For Incorporation of Pricing in the Time-of-Day Model “Express Travel Choices Study” for the Southern California Association of Governments.
Discrete Choice Modeling William Greene Stern School of Business New York University.
Valuing Water Quality Through Recreational Uses in Iowa Joseph Herriges and Catherine Kling Department of Economics Center for Agricultural and Rural Development.
Location Choice and Expected Catch: Determining Causal Structures in Fisherman Travel Behavior Michael Robinson Department of Geography University of California,
Economic Valuation of Coastal Resources in Latin America and the Caribbean Lee G. Anderson George R. Parsons University of Delaware.
Systems Analysis Group TPAC, 2015 Application Experience of Multiple Discrete Continuous Extreme Value (MDCEV) Model for Activity Duration and Trip Departure.
1 Update on Economic Analysis for Cape Hatteras National Seashore P.O. Box · 3040 Cornwallis Road · Research Triangle Park, NC Phone:
Improving the Residential Location Model for the New York Metropolitan Region Haiyun Lin City College of New York Project Advisors: Prof. Cynthia Chen,
Independence of Irrelevant Alternatives The conditional logit model has imbedded in it a property which, if violated in reality, makes the use of the model.
How may bike-sharing choice be affected by air pollution
Arbeidspakke 4. Undersøkelse av tiltakseffekter og transporttilbud
User preferences for coworking space characteristics
Is The Best of Both Worlds the Best We Can Hope For?
Discrete Choice Models
Discrete Choice Modeling
William Greene Stern School of Business New York University
User preferences for coworking space characteristics
Microeconometric Modeling
Climate change impact on recreation in heathland areas: the case of the National Park Hoge Kempen Anne Nobela, Sebastien Lizina, Nele Wittersa, Francois.
Microeconometric Modeling
Presentation transcript:

Valuing Short Term Beach Closure in a RUM Model of Recreation Demand Using Stated Preference Data Stela Stefanova and George R. Parsons Camp Resources XV August 6 – 7, Wilmington, NC

Acknowledgements Funded by the National Park Service Funded by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s Coastal Response Research Center at the University of New Hampshire Presently under consideration for a chapter in: “Preference Data for Environmental Valuation”, eds. John Whitehead, Ju-Chin Huang and Tim Haab

Outline Motivation Data Padre Island National Seashore Park Linked Model and Welfare Our Approach to Incorporating Delayed Trips Coefficient and Welfare estimates Conclusion

Motivation Random Utility Models (RUM) are well suited for valuing seasonal closures of sites However, RUM are not well suited for valuing short term closures when there is substitution across time periods within the same season Short term closures may have little impact on total visitation to the closed site People may be delaying trips, in effect substituting across time periods

Data 884 Texas residents living within 200 miles of the Texas Gulf Coast 2692 day trips taken to 65 Texas Gulf Coast beaches between May and September, 2001 Limited choice set to beaches within 300 miles of residence

Padre Island National Seashore Padre Island is located near Corpus Christi, Texas. 66 miles along the Texas Gulf Coast Accessible by car, approximately 30 minutes from Corpus Christi and approximately 2.5 hours from San Antonio. North Beach, Malaquite Beach, South Beach, Little Shell and Big Shell Beaches, Mansfield cut 14% of people visited Padre beaches trips

A Linked Model of Site Choice and Trip Frequency Step 1: Discrete choice site selection – Logit – Mixed Logit Step 2: Trip frequency – Negative binomial Bockstael, Hanemann, and Kling Herriges, Kling, and Phaneuf Parsons, Jakus, and Tomasi

Beach Characteristics Number of Beaches Mean or % of Beaches Beach length (miles)5.35 Gulf accessBeach is located on the Gulf4874% State parkBeach is part of a state park46% RemoteBeach has a remote location2234% Vehicle freeVehicles not allowed on beach2640% Manual cleaningBeach is routinely manually cleaned3351% Machine cleaningBeach is routinely machined cleaned3655% Rest roomRestrooms located at beach3757% LifeguardsLifeguards at beach17 26% ConcessionConcession located at beach1523% Red tide historyBeach has a recent history of red tide1218% Advisory/Closure history Beach has a recent history of closures and/or advisories 1117%

Individual Characteristics Variable Mean or % of Sample (Adjusted for Stratification) Age 41 years Work Fulltime 62% Student 5% Unemployed 5% Children Under 17 49% High School 32% College 24% Graduate School 10% Retire 9% Spanish 9% Female 60% Own Boat 24% Own Pool 24% Own Coastal Property 7%

Three Measures of Welfare Loss Per trip Per season Loss to trip ratio

Strategy for Incorporating Delayed Trips Using SP These welfare measures rely on RP data Do not capture substitution across time periods in the case of a short term closure Survey questions offered the following options in case of site closure – visit another site now – stay home now but visit the closed site later to “make up” for the lost trip – stay home without making up the trip later

SP Data Option% of SP responses Another Beach Now 19% Padre Later 76% Stay Home 5%

Strategy for Incorporating Delayed Trips Using SP Two Models Padre Open Model RP data on all trips Padre Closed Model RP data on trips to Padre is replaced with SP data * Trips to other sites assumedthe same * The scaling parameter on the SP choices relative to the RP choices vanishes in estimation. Brownstone, Bunch, and Train

Strategy for Incorporating Delayed Trips in Welfare Measures Using SP Padre Open (RP data) Choice set: Conventional ApproachOur Approach Padre Closed (RP)Padre Closed (RP/SP) Choice set: non Padre sites delayed trips to Padre Padre sites

Strategy for Incorporating Delayed Trips in Welfare Measures Using SP Padre Open (RP data) Padre Utility: Conventional Approach Our Approach Padre Closed (RP)Padre Closed (RP/SP) Padre Utility: 0

Strategy for Incorporating Delayed Trips in Welfare Measures Using SP Padre Open (RP data) Expected Utility: Padre Closed (RP) Padre Closed (RP/SP)

Strategy for Incorporating Delayed Trips in Welfare Measures Using SP Padre Closed - Conventional Approach Padre Closed - Accounting For Delayed Trips

Results Logit PADRE OPEN MODEL VariableMeanT stat. Travel cost Gulf Restroom Lifeguard State park Length Machine clean Vehicle free Remote Manual clean VariableMeanT stat. Concession Red tide Closure Padre ASC Region Region Region Region Region PADRE CLOSED MODEL Padre ASC

Results Mixed Logit PADRE OPEN MODEL Fixed parametersMeanT stat. Travel cost Restroom Lifeguard State park Length Machine clean Manual clean Concession Red tide Closure Padre ASC Random ParametersMeanT stat.Std. Dev.T stat. Padre Closed Std. Dev. Gulf Vehicle free Remote Region Fixed Region Region Region Region Region PADRE CLOSED MODEL Padre ASC Unconstrained in Padre Closed

Welfare Loss for Closure of All Padre Beaches (2001$) LogitMixed Logit Conventional approach: Per season Per trip Loss to trip ratio Accounting for delayed trips: Per season Per trip Loss to trip ratio

Conclusion Included the alternative of delaying a trip in a conventional RUM Estimated losses are 72% to 77% lower when delayed trips are incorporated in the model

References Bockstael, N., W. M. Hanemann, and C. L. Kling Estimating the Value of Water Quality Improvements in a Recreational Demand Framework. Water Resources Research 23, no. 5: Parsons, G. R., P. Jakus, and T. Tomasi A comparison of welfare estimates from four models for linking seasonal recreational trips to multinomial models of site choice,” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 38(2): Brownstone, D., D. S. Bunch, and K. Train Joint mixed logit models of stated and revealed preferences for alternative fuel vehicles. Transportation Research Record B, 34.

Step 1: Discrete choice site selection Logit

Step 1: Discrete choice site selection Mixed logit

Step 2: Trip frequency Negative binomial model

Negative Binomial Results VariableCoefficientT-Stat. Intercept Iv/beta_tc0.01 lnage female fulltime childdm property ownboat own pool ownsfcst spanish gradsch college high sc retired att Dispersion

Linked model

Welfare in linked model