Optimization of dynamic aperture by TESLA

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES NSLS-II ASAC-2007, April. 23, 2007 Injection System with a Booster in Separate Tunnel T. Shaftan for the NSLS-II team.
Advertisements

1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Considerations for Nonlinear Beam Dynamics in NSLS-II lattice design Weiming Guo 05/26/08 Acknowledgement: J. Bengtsson.
Dr. Zafer Nergiz Nigde University THE STATUS OF TURKISH LIGHT SOURCE.
BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES Abstract Magnetic Specifications and Tolerances Weiming Guo, NSLS-II Project In this presentation I briefly introduced the.
Searching for Quantum LOVE at the Australian Synchrotron Light Source Eugene Tan On behalf of Rohan Dowd 120/10/2010Eugene Tan – IWLC 2010, Genega ASLS.
Topic Three: Perturbations & Nonlinear Dynamics UW Spring 2008 Accelerator Physics J. J. Bisognano 1 Accelerator Physics Topic III Perturbations and Nonlinear.
Alignment and Beam Stability
Yichao Jing 11/11/2010. Outline Introduction Linear lattice design and basic parameters Combined function magnets study and feasibility Nonlinear dynamics.
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, N.Kazarinov.
1 Laurent S. Nadolski FFAG Workshop, Grenoble, 2007 Application of Frequency Map Analysis for Studying Beam Transverse Dynamics Laurent S. Nadolski Accelerator.
Y. Ohnishi / KEK KEKB-LER for ILC Damping Ring Study Simulation of low emittance lattice includes machine errors and optics corrections. Y. Ohnishi / KEK.
Optimization of the ESRF upgrade lattice lifetime and dynamic aperture using genetic algorithms Nicola Carmignani 11/03/2015.
Studies on Lattice Calibration With Frequency Analysis of Betatron Motion R. Bartolini DIAMOND Light Source Ltd FMA workshop, Orsay, LURE, 1 st and 2 nd.
Details of space charge calculations for J-PARC rings.
October 4-5, Electron Lens Beam Physics Overview Yun Luo for RHIC e-lens team October 4-5, 2010 Electron Lens.
Simulation of direct space charge in Booster by using MAD program Y.Alexahin, A.Drozhdin, N.Kazarinov.
CASA Collider Design Review Retreat HERA The Only Lepton-Hadron Collider Ever Been Built Worldwide Yuhong Zhang February 24, 2010.
1 FFAG Role as Muon Accelerators Shinji Machida ASTeC/STFC/RAL 15 November, /machida/doc/othertalks/machida_ pdf/machida/doc/othertalks/machida_ pdf.
Beam Loss Simulation in the Main Injector at Slip-Stacking Injection A.I. Drozhdin, B.C. Brown, D.E. Johnson, I. Kourbanis, K. Seiya June 30, 2006 A.Drozhdin.
A U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science Laboratory Operated by The University of Chicago Office of Science U.S. Department of Energy Containing a.
Flat-beam IR optics José L. Abelleira, PhD candidate EPFL, CERN BE-ABP Supervised by F. Zimmermann, CERN Beams dep. Thanks to: O.Domínguez. S Russenchuck,
SuperB Lattice Studies M. Biagini LNF-INFN ILCDR07 Workshop, LNF-Frascati Mar. 5-7, 2007.
Vertical Emittance Tuning at the Australian Synchrotron Light Source Rohan Dowd Presented by Eugene Tan.
1 NICA Collider: status and further steps O.S. Kozlov LHEP, JINR, Dubna for the NICA team Machine Advisory Committee, JINR, Dubna, October 19-20, 2015.
28-May-2008Non-linear Beam Dynamics WS1 On Injection Beam Loss at the SPring-8 Storage Ring Masaru TAKAO & J. Schimizu, K. Soutome, and H. Tanaka JASRI.
ILC Damping Ring Alternative Lattice Design ( Modified FODO ) ** Yi-Peng Sun *,1,2, Jie Gao 1, Zhi-Yu Guo 2 Wei-Shi Wan 3 1 Institute of High Energy Physics,
An ultra-low emittance lattices for Iranian Light Source Facility storage ring Esmaeil Ahmadi On behalf of beam dynamics group Iranian Light Source Facility.
FMA workshop April 1st and 2nd, 2004 L. Nadolski1 Guiding Lines for Computing and Reading a Frequency Map New FMA Calculations for SOLEIL including Insertion.
Frequency map analysis workshop - Orsay 1 - 2/04/04Mahdia Belgroune 1 Role of the frequency map analysis in the choice of the working point of SOLEIL M.
PEP-X Ultra Low Emittance Storage Ring Design at SLAC Lattice Design and Optimization Min-Huey Wang SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory With contributions.
The Introduction to CSNS Accelerators Oct. 5, 2010 Sheng Wang AP group, Accelerator Centre,IHEP, CAS.
Lattice design for FCC-ee Bastian Haerer (CERN BE-ABP-LAT, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT)) 1 8 th Gentner Day, 28 October 2015.
Workshop on Accelerator R&D for Ultimate Storage Rings – Oct Nov.1 – Huairou, Beijing, China A compact low emittance lattice with superbends for.
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES 1 NSLS-II Lattice Design 1.TBA-24 Lattice Design - Advantages and shortcomings Low emittance -> high chromaticity -> small.
Parameter scan for the CLIC damping rings July 23rd, 2008 Y. Papaphilippou Thanks to H. Braun, M. Korostelev and D. Schulte.
Single particle dynamics in the ThomX ring Jianfeng zhang 12/02/2015 LAL.
Optics with Large Momentum Acceptance for Higgs Factory Yunhai Cai SLAC National Accelerator Laboratory Future Circular Collider Kick-off Meeting, February.
Plans for Diamond-II ESLSXX Workshop, Bessy II, 19 November 2012 R. Bartolini Diamond Light Source and John Adams Institute for Accelerator Science University.
Application of Differential Evolution Algorithm in Future Circular Colliders Yuan IHEP, Beijing Demin Zhou, KEK, Ibaraki, Japan.
Ultra-low Emittance Coupling, method and results from the Australian Synchrotron Light Source Rohan Dowd Accelerator Physicist Australian Synchrotron.
CLIC Frequency Multiplication System aka Combiner Rings Piotr Skowronski Caterina Biscari Javier Barranco 21 Oct IWLC 2010.
Diamond-II upgrade toward ultra-low emittance T. Pulampong University of Oxford Octoberfest October 2014 Royal Holloway, London.
Long Term Plans at MAX IV
Off-axis injection lattice design studies of HEPS storage ring
Orbit Response Matrix Analysis
Bocheng Jiang SSRF AP group
Design study of CEPC Alternating Magnetic Field Booster
NSLS-II Lattice Design Strategies Weiming Guo 07/10/08
Electron Cooling Simulation For JLEIC
Optimization of Triplet Field Quality in Collision
Large Booster and Collider Ring
Coupling Correction at the Australian Synchrotron
First Look at Nonlinear Dynamics in the Electron Collider Ring
Jeffrey Eldred, Sasha Valishev
Multiturn extraction for PS2
Status of CEPC lattice design
The new 7BA design of BAPS
R. Bartolini Diamond Light Source Ltd
DA Study for the CEPC Partial Double Ring Scheme
LHC (SSC) Byung Yunn CASA.
SPEAR3 Lower Emittance & Nonlinear Dynamics
Negative Momentum Compaction lattice options for PS2
Design study of CEPC Alternating Magnetic Field Booster
PEPX-type BAPS Lattice Design and Beam Dynamics Optimization
M. E. Biagini, LNF-INFN SuperB IRC Meeting Frascati, Nov , 2007
Optics considerations for PS2
Negative Momentum Compaction lattice options for PS2
Yuri Nosochkov Yunhai Cai, Fanglei Lin, Vasiliy Morozov
Fanglei Lin JLEIC R&D Meeting, August 4, 2016
DYNAMIC APERTURE OF JLEIC ELECTRON COLLIDER
Presentation transcript:

Optimization of dynamic aperture by TESLA for double mini-by lattice in TPS Mau-Sen Chiu 2012/03/14 Beam Dynamics Group, NSRRC

Outline Introduction Multi-objective genetic algorithm - Double mini-by lattice in TPS. Multi-objective genetic algorithm Optimization of dynamic aperture (DA) by TESLA - Check 268 sets of solutions after completion: DA, tune shift with momentum and tune shift with amplitude. - Pick up the best one to calculate frequency map and Touschek lifetime. Conclusion

Introduction TPS Storage ring TPS Storage Ring Parameters Locations of the double mini-by lattice Circumference 518.4 (m) Nominal energy 3.0 GeV Betatron tune 26.18/13.28 Natural chromaticity -75/-26 RF frequency 499.654 Harmonic number 864 Natural emittance 1.6 nm-rad Energy spread 8.86E-04 Energy loss per turn 853 keV TPS Storage ring 7m X 18 12m X 6 Purpose: Install two small gap IDs in tandem to obtain 4 times brightness. 3

Double mini-by lattice Use 240 quadrupoles to match a lattice (nx/ny =26.18/12.82). 13.26-0.44 Add three sets of quadrupole triplet at the center of three long straights, respectively. Apply p trick to match the double mini-by lattice (nx/ny = 26.18/14.26). Q2 Q5 Q2 4.9 m 4.9 m Q3 Q1 Q4 Q4 Q1 Q3 ny = 12.82 ny = 14.26 (m) L (m) K1 Q1 0.3 -1.217349 Q2 0.6 1.384064 Q3 -1.526270 Q4 0.5 -1.431159 Q5 1.681944 Purpose: Install two small gap IDs in tandem to obtain 4 times brightness. 4

Multiobjective Optimization A general multiobjective optimization problem consists of a number of objectives and is associated with a number of inequality and equality constraints. Mathematically, the problem can be written as follows Minimize/Maximize fk(x) k = 1, 2, …, K Subject to gj(x) j = 1, 2, …, J hm(x) m= 1, 2, …, K with i = 1, 2, …, N The variable vector x represents a set of variables xi, i = 1, 2, …, N Ex: Optimization of dynamic aperture (DA) for double mini-by lattice in TPS Objectives: f1(S1, S2, …, S6, SA, SB): DA area in (x-d) plane. f2(S1, S2, …, S6, SA, SB): Tune shift with amplitude terms. Constraints: Chromaticity are corrected at fixed values with SF and SD through out DA optimization. Sextupole integral strength: for each family.

Genetic Algorithm A genetic algorithm (GA) is routinely used to generate useful solutions to optimization and search problems using techniques inspired by natural evolution, such as inheritance, crossover, mutation, and selection. Crossover during meiosis Mutation of gene What’s a gene? Type of mutation: point mutation, substitution, insertion, deletion, A gene is a segment of DNA needed to contribute to a function. This diagram labels a region of only 50 or so bases as a gene. In reality, most genes are hundreds of times larger.

Multi-Objective Genetic Algorithm (MOGA) 1: Initialize population (first generation, random) 2: for ( int i = 2; i <= gen; i++) { - crossover: Within crossover probability, apply crossover to two parents to generate two children. These two parents are randomly chosen from the survivals of the last generation. Otherwise, copy parents to children. - mutation : Within mutation probability, apply mutation to parents to generate children. Otherwise, do nothing. - evaluate (children): calculate objective functions - merge ( parents, children): - non-dominated sort (rank): - select half of (parents, children) for next generation. }

TESLA Author: Dr. LingYun Yang, NSLS-II, Brookhaven National Laboratory Algorithm: NSGA-II (Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm II) Parameters: -Number of individual: 2000. -Number of generation: 50 -Number of sextupole family: 8 -Lower and Upper bound of each sextupole family: 3 33 # L H SA -33 -3 # L H SB 0 30 # L H S1 -30 0 # L H S2 18 48 # L H S3 -48 -18 # L H S4 18 48 # L H S5 -48 -18 # L H S6 -Crossover probability: 0.8 -Mutation probability: 0.9 -Distribution index for crossover: 3 -Distribution index for mutation: 0.3 Reference: Tracking code development for beam dynamics optimization, L. Yang, BNL, PAC11 A Fast and Elitist Multiobjective Genetic Algorithm: NSGA-II, K. Deb et al. IEEE, 2002

Flow of MOGA in TESLA GA loop evaluate_pop (child) GA loop 1. Master prepare the input for each individual in the child population then sent it to slaves 2. Each slave : Execute DA tracking (128 turns) in (x-d) plane, calculate the DA area and tune shift with amplitude terms. Chromaticity are corrected to a fixed value before DA tracking. After completion, send the results back to the master. 3. Once master receive the results sent by some slave. This slave will receive another individual. 4. This process will continue till the whole population are distributed to slaves completely.

PC Cluster in NSRRC Hardware for running TESLA node28 ~ node37: CPU: Intel Xeon X5550, quad core 2.66 GHz * 2 RAM: 16G ECC DDR2 RAM node38 ~ node40: RAM: 18G ECC DDR3 RAM Total: 104 cores / 26 CPUs 2000 individuals and 50 generations takes about 10 days. Hardware for running TRACY 2.6 node19 ~ node23: CPU: Intel Xeon X5550, quad core 2.66 GHz * 2 RAM: 18G ECC DDR3 Total: 40 cores / 10 CPUs

Objective functions in TESLA f1: The inverse of the sum of the on- and off-momentum DA area S in (x-d) plane. (To transfer the maximum problem to minimum problem.) f2: Square sum of tune shift with amplitude. The Sextupole Scheme for the Swiss Light Source (SLS), 1997, Johan Bengtsson

Objective functions after generation 2 nature log Total number of points: 2000 Each point represents a set of solution of sextupole strength.

Objective functions after generation 50 nature log 1. 286 points inside 3 regions are checked: DA (d =0, 3%, -3%), tune shift with momentum, tune shift with amplitude (horizontal and vertical direction). Total number of figures: 286 * 6 = 1716. 2. Pick up the best solution by inspection for further analysis by frequency map and Touschek lifetime.

DA, Tune shift with momentum and amplitude calculated at x = 0, y = 0 calculated at the long straight center Vertical Horizontal calculated at x = 0, d = 0 1% Emittance coupling Multipole errors Chamber limit ID kick map ━ calculated at y = 0, d = 0

Frequency map analysis (x – d) 1% Emittance coupling Multipole errors Chamber limit ID kick map ┿ ━ 1% Emittance coupling Multipole errors Chamber limit ID kick map ┿ ━

DA & FMA (dp/p = 0) 3nx + ny = 93 3nx + ny = 93 3ny = 43 1% Emittance coupling Multipole errors Chamber limit ID kick map ┿ ━ 1% Emittance coupling Multipole errors Chamber limit ID kick map ┿ 16

DA & FMA (dp/p = 3%) 4nx = 105 1% Emittance coupling Multipole errors Chamber limit ID kick map ┿ ━ 1% Emittance coupling Multipole errors Chamber limit ID kick map ┿ 17

DA & FMA (dp/p = -3%) 3nx – 2ny = 50 3ny = 43 1% Emittance coupling Multipole errors Chamber limit ID kick map ┿ ━ 1% Emittance coupling Multipole errors Chamber limit ID kick map ┿ 18

Momentum Acceptance & Touschek lifetime Ex: 1.58E-9 Ey: 1.59E-11 Bruck’s formula: T: 18.72/ Tp: 12.86/ Tn: 34.39 (hrs) Bunch current: 400 mA / 800 bunches Bunch length: 2.86 mm 1% Emittance coupling Multipole errors Chamber limit ID kick map ┿ ━

Momentum Acceptance & Touschek lifetime Ex: 1.58E-9 Ey: 1.60E-11 Bruck’s formula: T: 18.64/ Tp: 12.84/ Tn: 34.03 (hrs) Bunch current: 400 mA / 800 bunches Bunch length: 2.86 mm 1% Emittance coupling Multipole errors Chamber limit ID kick map ┿

Conclusions 1. After DA optimization by TESLA, you still use tracking code to do DA tracking, then pick up the best one. Finally, plot frequency map to decide whether the solution could be accepted or not. 2. We can see that the frequency map show resonance line when ID kick maps are included. It should slightly move working point to avoid resonance line. 3. Maybe it should add the tune optimization in the near future to search ,

Appendix

Crossover: Simulated Binary Cross-Over (SBX) SBX is used to create child solutions xc1 , xc2 from parents xp1 , xp2. if u <= 1/a1 , if u <= 1/a2 , otherwise, otherwise, u : a random number between [0, 1]. , assume Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Energ. 186 (2000) 311-338, K. Deb h (distribution index for crossover): It control the shape of probability distribution function of crossover. Within the crossover probability, apply crossover, Otherwise, copy the parents to children. Application multiobjective genetic algorithm in accelerator physics, ICAP09, L. Yang, et al.

Polynomial Mutation Polynomial mutation is used to create a child solution xc in the vicinity of a parent solution xp. u = a random number between [0, 1] if u <= 0.5, otherwise, Comput. Methods Appl. Mech. Energ. 186 (2000) 311-338, K. Deb hm (distribution index for mutation): It control the shape of probability distribution function of mutation. The smaller the hm, the far away from the parents the child. Within the mutation probability, apply mutation, Otherwise, do nothing. Application multiobjective genetic algorithm in accelerator physics, ICAP09, L. Yang, et al.

SR multipole tolerances Multipole errors SR multipole tolerances DM QM SM Bn/BM @ 25mm (*E-4) B1/B0 ±5 A2/B1 ±3 B0/B2 B2/B0 -5±2 B0/B1 B1/B2 ±10 B3/B0 ±2 B2/B1 B3/B2 B4/B0 5±2 B3/B1 B4/B2 B5/B0 ±1 B4/B1 B5/B2 ±0.5 B6/B0 -2±0.2 B5/B1 0±1 B6/B2 B8/B0 -0.6±0.6 B9/B1 B7/B2 ±0.1 Each rest term B13/B1 B8/B2 B17/B1 B14/B2 B21/B1 B20/B2 B26/B2 Note: n=0 is dipole term, n=1 is quadrupole term and so on. Bn is normal term, An is skew term. 25

Min(Chamber size, ID gap) (Aperture) IU22 IU22 IU22 IU22 EPU48 EPU46 Y(mm) S (m) Injection point (80 cm, down stream of the long straight center) Vertical: Horizontal: IU22 EPU48 EPU46 Beam Pipe 26