ASIAN PANEL GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS FROM SHIPS ASIAN PANEL March 2, 2010 GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS FROM SHIPS JOSEPH ANGELO DEPUTY MANAGING DIRECTOR.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Energy efficiency – Including measures to limit GHG emissions Arsenio A. Dominguez Vice-Chairman, Marine Environment Protection Committee, IMO Panamas.
Advertisements

MARINTEK 1 Assessment of CO 2 emission performance of individual ships: The IMO CO 2 index Øyvind Buhaug MARINTEK.
REDUCING GHG FROM SHIPS INTERTANKO Latin American Panel Cancun October 28/29, 2008.
March 2009 Emissions Trading in South Africa National Climate Change Summit Emily Tyler.
Virtual Arrival means reduced emission Greening Logistics European Parliament Brussels 28 April 2010 Manager Research and Projects.
Virtual Arrival. Virtual Arrival An OCIMF / INTERTANKO project reducing emission Virtual Arrival is all about managing time and managing speed. It’s not.
Virtual Arrival an Initiative by Shipping to reduce GHG emission Singapore 8 may 2012 Senior Manager Research & Projects INTERTANKO.
Assessing the MBM EG’s report Dr Per Kågeson MEPC September 2010.
The EU Emissions Trading System (ETS) Rationale and Lessons learnt Artur Runge-Metzger Head of International Climate Negotiations, European Commission.
EU views on greenhouse gases and global warming potentials and options for addressing GHG emissions from international aviation and maritime transport.
Anti-Trust/Competition Law Compliance Statement INTERTANKO’s policy is to be firmly committed to maintaining a fair and competitive environment in the.
RECENT DEVELOPMENTS AND CURRENT ENVIRONMENTAL CHALLENGES FOR IMO
| 1 | 1 REDUCING THE IMPACT OF SHIPPING ON THE ENVIRONMENT DECARBONISATION.
In-session workshop on means to reach emission reduction targets (Kyoto AWG) Bangkok 1-3 April 2008 Topic 4: Greenhouse gases, sectors and source categories.
Latin American Panel September, 2010 Lima, Perú GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS FROM SHIPPING Peter M. Swift.
1 Brendan Devlin Adviser, Markets and Infrastructure Directorate B, DG ENER European Commission.
Latin American Panel October 2009 Vina Del Mar, Chile Peter M. Swift.
Reporting on Policies and Measures Introductory presentation by the UNFCCC secretariat Workshop on the preparation of fourth national communications from.
From Pipe Dreams to Pipelines: Getting the first CDM project in Israel going Presented by: Adi Dishon Managing Director.
IMO activities on control of GHG emissions from ships IMO activities on control of GHG emissions from ships Eivind S. Vagslid Head, Chemical and Air Pollution.
IMO GHG REGULATIONS Latin American Panel Cartagena, Columbia November 1, 2011.
The Economics of Climate Change Policy EC 133 May 1, 2007.
Attracting Green Ships May About RightShip The Current Environment The Existing Vessel Design Index Accuracy of data Factoring in relative CO 2.
Anti-Trust/Competition Law Compliance Statement INTERTANKO’s policy is to be firmly committed to maintaining a fair and competitive environment in the.
Anti-Trust/Competition Law Compliance Statement INTERTANKO’s policy is to be firmly committed to maintaining a fair and competitive environment in the.
Leading the way; making a difference INTERTANKO Council November 15, 2012 UPDATE ON GHG MARKET BASED MEASURES JOSEPH ANGELO DEPUTY MANAGING DIRECTOR.
BAHAMAS INTERNATIONAL MARITIME CONFERENCE FEBRUARY 11, 2010 INTERTANKO’S APPROACH TO THE ENVIRONMENTAL CHALLENGES JOSEPH ANGELO DEPUTY MANAGING DIRECTOR.
1 DEDICATED TO MAKING A DIFFERENCE Vincent Mages Climate Change Initiatives VP Lafarge Greenhouse gas mitigation in the cement.
An International Fund for Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Ships INTERTANKO ISTEC & Executive Committees Dubai, January 2009 Christian BREINHOLT Director.
Leading the way; making a difference Sustainability of the Oil Transportation Industry China Oil Transportation Safety Conference Nanjing September 2012.
Action Plan « Towards a sustainable industrial policy » An industrial policy for a competitive low carbon economy High Level Group on the competitiveness.
EXECUTIVE ROUNDTABLE SERIES Aviation in the EU Emission Trading Scheme Sophie Hagège, M&A Partner June 3, 2010 KEY LEGAL CONSIDERATIONS GOVERNING THE NEXT.
Presentation “Green Investment Schemes – greenhouse gas emissions quotas trading mechanisms in Ukraine according to the Kyoto Protocol to the Convention.
Climate and Energy Package Open Days 2008 Workshop “ Climate change and the role of regions“ 7 October 2008 Martin Weiss European Commission DG ENV, unit.
Greenhouse Gas Emissions and INTERTANKO Policy Position Members’ Meeting Singapore 2 November 2009 Peter M. Swift.
Market-Based Measures Presented by WG 5 Co-Rapporteurs: Stephen Seidel Michael Rossell to ICAO Environmental Colloquium April 9-11, 2001.
Anti-Trust/Competition Law Compliance Statement INTERTANKO’s policy is to be firmly committed to maintaining a fair and competitive environment in the.
International Shipping and Climate Change Michael Sutton A/g Executive Director Infrastructure and Surface Transport Policy.
North American Panel 4 November 2010 Houston Reducing GHG Emissions from Shipping Peter M. Swift.
Regional perspectives under the Clean Development Mechanism Jose Domingos Gonzalez Miguez, Ministry of Science and Technology, Brazil.
IFLOS SUMMER ACADEMY 2008 Panel Discussion “SHIP AIR EMISSIONS” Peter M. Swift, MD, INTERTANKO.
Leading the way; making a difference GHG EMISSIONS FROM SHIPS OPERATIONAL EFFICIENCY STANDARDS FOR INTERNATIONAL SHIPPING LATIN AMERICAN PANEL Buenos Aires.
Leading the way; making a difference MONITORING REPORTING & VERIFICATION (MRV) OF DATA TO ASSESS THE ENERGY EFFICIENCY OF SHIPS IN OPERATIONS (FUEL CONSUMPTION.
North American Panel 23 March 2009 Stamford, CT. Peter M. Swift.
Leading the way; making a difference EXPONAVAL – TRANSPORT 2014 December 3, 2014 Environmental Regulatory Challenges Facing the Maritime Industry JOSEPH.
Anti-Trust/Competition Law Compliance Statement INTERTANKO’s policy is to be firmly committed to maintaining a fair and competitive environment in the.
Asian Panel 3 December 2010 Hong Kong Reducing GHG Emissions from Shipping Peter M. Swift.
Climate Change October Main concepts Climate change – lasting change of some or all characteristics, describing the average weather condition Greenhouse.
Climate Challenge and the Tanker Industry Tim Wilkins Regional Manager Asia-Pacific Environmental Manager Image Courtesy of NORDEN AS Maritime Cyprus 2009.
GHG EMISSIONS REDUCTIONS - UPDATE - INTERTANKO Council 10 May 2011 Athens.
HELLENIC MEDITERRANEAN PANEL HELLENIC MEDITERRANEAN PANEL March 10, 2011 INTERTANKO OVERVIEW REPORT JOSEPH ANGELO MANAGING DIRECTOR.
GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS FROM SHIPS UPDATE ON IMO DEVELOPMENTS NORTH AMERICAN PANEL OCTOBER 7, 2009 GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS FROM SHIPS UPDATE ON IMO DEVELOPMENTS.
Sustainable Seaborne Transport — Our Common Challenge Shipping Emissions — What are the next steps? Peter M. Swift Managing Director, INTERTANKO.
EU action on reducing shipping emissions Lies Craeynest 18 April 2012.
Standards Development for Climate Change  Consensus reached between UNFCCC & ISO that internationally accepted standards will be promoted globally  Include.
EEB Clean Air Seminar 20 Nov Lisbon Air Pollution from ships Portuguese perspective.
NORTH AMERICAN PANEL OCTOBER 14, 2008
Shipping Industry Combating Climate Change
Market-Based Measures
International Transport and the Paris Agreement
INTERTANKO OVERVIEW REPORT DEPUTY MANAGING DIRECTOR
2.1 – GHG Emission Reductions
The “rush” for energy efficiency and it’s impact on ships
INTERTANKO Seminar 27 April 2010 Singapore
Climate action in the international shipping sector
SCP in the 7th Environmental Action Programme
EU plan: Supporting directives • The EU Renewable Energy Directive was adopted at the end of 2008 • EU Renewable Energy Directive.
Market-Based Measures
IMO work to address GHG emissions from ships
IMO GLOBAL SULPHUR LIMIT 2020, IMPACTS TO MAJOR FLAGS AND MEASURES TO HELP SHIPOWNERS AND OPERATORS 2019.
Presentation transcript:

ASIAN PANEL GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS FROM SHIPS ASIAN PANEL March 2, 2010 GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS FROM SHIPS JOSEPH ANGELO DEPUTY MANAGING DIRECTOR

IMO ACTIONS Nine fundamental principles Technical measures Operational measures Market based instruments (MBI)

IMO PRINCIPLES 1.Effective in contributing to the reduction of total global GHG emissions 2.Binding & equally applicable to all flag States 3.Cost-effective 4.Able to limit or effectively minimize competitive distortion 5.Based on sustainable environmental development without penalizing global trade and growth 6.Based on a goal-based approach and not prescribe specific methods 7.Supportive of promoting and facilitating technical innovation and R&D in the entire shipping sector 8.Accommodating to leading technologies in the field of energy efficiency 9.Practical, transparent, fraud free and easy to administer

TECHNICAL MEASURES Energy Efficiency Desing Index (EEDI) - require a minimum energy efficiency of new ships - stimulate technical development - separate technical and design based measures from operational and commercial measures - compare the energy efficiency of an individual ship to similar ships which could have taken its cargo - Cost: Emission of CO 2 - Benefit: Cargo capacity transported a certain distance (Relates to a seagoing maximum condition)

OPERATIONAL MEASURES Ship Energy Efficiency Managment Plan (SEEMP) –improve energy efficiency of ships in operations –best measurable practices on operational procedures setting goals –plan implementation strategy –monitoring – Energy Efficiency Operational Indicator (EEOI) –procedures for self-evaluation/improvement towards set goals Energy Efficiency Operations Index (EEOI) - assist shipowners/operators in the evaluation of the performance of their fleet with regard to CO2 emissions - how to measure a ship’s energy performance - how the EEOI can be used to promote low emissions from ships INTERTANKO Guide on Tanker EEMP - assist members in implementing IMO SEEMP

IMO STATUS MEPC agreed on: Interim Guidelines on the method of calculation of the Energy Efficiency Design Index (EEDI) for new ships Interim Guidelines on voluntary verification of the EEDI Guidelines for voluntary use of the ship Energy Efficiency Operations Index (EEOI) Guidelines for Ship Energy Efficiency Management Plan (SEEMP) Workplan for further consideration of Market Based Instruments (MBIs)

IMO WORKPLAN MEPC 60 (March 2010) – Further details of MBI proposals are submitted MEPC 60 – Further consideration of methodology and criteria for feasibility studies and impact assessments of MBIs MEPC 61 (October 2010) – Preferably clearly indicate which MBI it wishes to further evaluate and identify elements to be included MEPC 62 (Summer 2011) – Could be in a position to report progress to Assembly and identify possible future steps

MARKET BASED INSTRUMENTS Should MBIs be included? Reasons for MBIs –Long life of ships –Growth of international shipping –CO 2 reductions due to EEDI (new ships) = long term measure –Measures on existing ships = not sufficient to meet reductions of 20% or more in the short terms (up to 2020) Which MBI? - GHG Compensation Fund (Denmark/Japan) - Emission Trading Scheme (ETS) (Norway, Germany & France) - US alternative – based upon EEDI - World Shipping Council (WSC) – modified US alternative

GHG COMPENSATION FUND Ships make a set contribution to the Fund based upon fuel consumption Collection by registered Bunker Suppliers Bunker Delivery Note as evidence Mandatory registration of Bunker Suppliers Revenues used for - Mitigation, Adaption and Technology Projects - Non-vessel Specific R&D Projects - Technological Cooperation within IMO - Rewarding most efficient ships (Japanese alternative)

EMISSION TRADING SCHEME CAP on net CO 2 emssions for shipping CAP to be agreed by UNFCCC or IMO with periodical declining trajectory Carbon allowance = 1t equivalent CO 2 emission Allowances (distributed) or sold = CAP End of each period – ship owners surrender allowances to correspond to the actual fuel consumption: –emissions < CAP – rest allowances can be sold –emissions > CAP – buy additional allowances

USA ALTERNATIVE Compliance with Efficiency Index standard (EI R ) EI R uses the EEDI formula as a model Ship delivery: EI R = mandatory EEDI value EI R value gradually and periodically lowered Ship compliance: –attained Efficiency Index (EI A ) or –direct and continuous fuel consumption monitoring IMO establish Efficiency Credit (EC) trading for ships Measuring compliance: EC = (EI R – EI A ) x Activity EC > 0 – ship sells credits; EC < 0 – ship buys credits Activity (over a compliance monitoring period) could be: –actual cargo tonne-miles; –tonne-miles only or –tonne-mile default value for each type and size of ship

WORLD SHIPPING COUNCIL VESSEL EFFICIENCY SYSTEM (VES) Combination of US MBI & GHG Fund Emission targets: –EEDI value and its reduction - new buildings –Less stringent base line and targeted reduction for ships in operations Ships meeting the target = no additional charges Less efficient ships = charges/ton of fuel consumed over the target IMO establish a Fund to collect charges

PRINCIPLES FOR INCENTIVES/PENALTIES GHG Fund –all ships pay a levy –contribution by fuel consumption (fixed price) –efficient ships receive a reward (Japan) ETS –all ships buy allowances –difference in number of allowances purchased (market price) US & WSC MBIs –no extra costs for ships complying with required efficiency standard –US - same standard for all ships (?) –WSC - different standards for new and for existing ships –Both provide incentive for efficient ships

INTERTANKO POSITION MBIs – a political decision Meaningful GHG reductions or a “cash cow”? If MBIs are included as part of IMO regulatory package for the reduction of GHG emissions from ships, the selected measures should meet the IMO nine principles INTERTANKO will make its own evaluation according to a set of principles similar to the IMO nine principles

INTERTANKO CRITERIA 1 Governed by the IMO and be specific for the shipping industry 2 Effective in contributing to the reduction of total GHG emissions: –any funds collected should be used as “offsets” –should stimulate leading energy efficiency technologies –should provide incentives for further innovation and R&D –should stimulate stakeholders, such as charterers and ports, to employ ships in the most effective manner to reduce GHG emissions 3 Environmentally sustainable without negative impact on global trade and growth –should be cost effective –should not lead to competitive distortion –should not disadvantage operators or ships which have already taken actions resulting in GHG reductions 4 Efficient and credible enforcement and monitoring –should be binding and equally applicable to all ships –should be practical, transparent, fraud-free and easy to administer by the governing authority –should enable compliance to be demonstrated through proper monitoring –should ensure certainty and predictability

COP 15 COP 15 provides little answers for shipping Copenhagen Accord refers to “new and additional funding shall be provided for developing countries” Will this come from shipping?? If so, could result in a double tax for shipping if MBIs are introduced IMO MEPC meeting in March should shed some light on this

COP 15 Kyoto Protocol remains in place Article 2.2 of the Kyoto Protocol – Parties included in Annex 1 shall pursue reduction of GHG emissions from marine bunker fuels working through IMO - “common but differentiated responsibilities” (CBDR) CBDR Concept is embedded in the Copenhagen accord Impact on IMO negotiations in March remains to be seen

COMPLICATING FACTOR Applying GHG emission standards only to the flags on Annex 1 countries will not have significant effect Would apply to less that 30% of the world’s fleet BUT, some are thinking – Technical and operational standards for all ships MBIs, if included, incorporate CBDR concept

INTERTANKO POSITION Shipping should strive to significantly reduce GHG emissions Advocates measures that would result in CO 2 and other GHG emissions reductions from tankers Believes that energy efficiency will be gained through better coordination with other stakeholders involved in the logistical chain Supports the IMO process to develop regulations that do not hinder commerce Supports “ship neutral” regulations, equally applicable to all flags

INTERTANKO POSITION Supports the adoption of EEDI Supports the adoption of SEEMP and has developed a SEEMP model specific for tankers Stakeholders and regulators have to agree on targeting levels for GHG emission reductions The target levels should be ambitious Targets should also be realistic and thus provide incentives for sustainable efforts to achieve them Initial agreed target levels could be adjusted as experience is gained - it is important to initiate the process of CO 2 emission reduction from shipping as soon as possible

VIRTUAL ARRIVAL Cooperation between Charterer (Terminal Operator) and Tanker Operator Speed is “optimised” when ship’s estimated arrival is before the terminal is ready Operator and Charterers agree a speed adjustment Uses independent 3 rd party to calculate/audit adjustment Operators retain demurrage, while fuel savings and any carbon credits are split between parties OCIMF-INTERTANKO have established Virtual Arrival project: - Monitoring trial voyages - Guidance for development of Charter Parties clauses - Criteria for certifying 3 rd parties

VIRTUAL ARRIVAL

THANKYOU!!