Development of a Registration Fees scheme across provider markets 26 March 2010.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Workshop A -Commissioning Finance Danny Storr – Head of Finance NHS Hull Clinical Commissioning Group.
Advertisements

A Health and Wellbeing Board for Leicestershire Cheryl Davenport Programme Director.
Provider Forum A Joint Commissioning Strategy – planning for better lives and better health for Adults with Learning Disabilities.
Carer Respite Needs Engagement Exercise in Nottingham City Kathryn Brown Commissioning Manager NHS Nottingham City 13 th October 2010.
The New Landscape - Transforming Commissioning. Agenda The likely impact of the White Paper on the commissioning landscape The NHS London Commissioning.
Understanding the NHS reforms Jo Webber, Deputy Policy Director 20 th March 2012.
MEDICAL HOME 1/2009 Mary Goldman, D.O., President of MAOFP.
Devon team CQC inspectors. 2 We make sure people get better care Who are we improving care for ? People who use services, carers and families People in.
Better Regulation Provider Advisory Group 2 October 2009 Alan Rosenbach, Head of Strategy and Innovation, CQC Molly Corner, Strategy Development and Innovation.
Edinburgh Shadow Strategic Planning Group Wednesday 18 March 2015.
Healthwatch: Dementia Patient / Customer Experience Briefing to Health and Well-Being Board Janice Horsman Chair Healthwatch Westminster.
Introduction and overview Care Act What is this module about?  Part 1 of the Care Act and its statutory guidance  Who’s it for?  Adult social.
Healthy People, Healthy Lives Our strategy for public health in England.
Healthy People, Healthy Lives Our strategy for public health in England Transparency in Outcomes Funding and Commissioning routes for public health.
Virginia McClane Commissioning Manager October 2014 Commissioners intentions for supporting people to live in their own homes Kent Housing Group 22 October.
Towards Active Engagement
Patient-Focused Funding & Payment by Results The UK Experience CEO Forum, Kananaskis, Alberta February 16, 2009 Robert J. Bell – Chief Executive Royal.
South West Peninsula SHA Local consultation on Commissioning a Patient-led NHS 14 Dec 2005–22 Mar 2006.
The NHS White Paper A system not structure Outcomes focused Robust Quality & Economic regulation Empowered professionals in autonomous providers.
Standards for Better Health implementation Suzie Loader Director of Nursing.
Corporate Objectives 2010/11. Aspirations for March 2011 Financial close achieved for Surbiton Polyclinic. PCT functions integrated with RBK and the SWL.
Integration, cooperation and partnerships
Module 1: Health, Social Care and Children’s Services
Mental health and social care commissioning Andrea Wright, Head of Social Care Maureen Begley, Commissioning Manager.
Regulating the dental sector Tracy Norton Compliance Manager (Central Region) 4 October 2012.
Care Options for NHS Continuing Health Care (CHC) Wirral PCT Board – 12 February 2008 Tina Long - Director of Strategic Partnerships Sheila Hillhouse -
Patient Advice and Liaison Service NHS Devon, Plymouth and Torbay The work of PALS Patient transport Health and Wellbeing Boards.
Safeguarding Adults Board 6 th Annual Conference Adult Safeguarding and the NHS Alison Knowles Commissioning Director NHS England, West Yorkshire.
North Staffordshire Combined Healthcare NHS Trust Application for Registration under the Health & Social Care Act 2008 Presentation to the Trust Board.
“Shaping our Future in North Somerset” Public Engagement Meetings.
1 Final Version© Ipsos MORI Final Version Evaluation of Adult Cancer Aftercare Services Quantitative and Qualitative Service Evaluation for NHS Improvement.
1 Mental Health Act and Mental Capacity Act. 2 Agenda 1. Mental Capacity Act – Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards 2. Modernising Mental Health Act function.
HEE – Beyond transition and into the Future Abdol Tavabie Interim Dean Director for HEKSS February 2015.
Social investment and SHARED LIVES
Equality and Excellence: Liberating the NHS Ian R Cumming 12th July 2010.
Dental Public Health DWSI document: How can this help a dentist to set up a contract with the PCT? Eric Rooney Consultant in Dental Public Health.
Assessment for improvement [Name] [Title] [Date / Event] V4.5.
Making Healthcare Mutual A Mutual Provider for OOH Primary Care Cliff Mills 4 th March 2004
Department of Health The Role of the DPH and Joint Strategic Needs Assessment George Leahy Head of Public Health Development Department of Health PUBLIC.
Makingadifference NHS SWINDON PRESENTATION FOR LINK MEETING 18 MAY.
Screen | 1 EPA - Drivers for Regionalisation Max Harvey Director Operations Environment Protection Authority Presentation, reference, author, date.
Implementing the National Safety and Quality Health Service Standards Margaret Banks Program Director June 2, 2015 What is, and what is to come.
The emerging regulatory model SSRG Annual Workshop, 21 April 2009 Alan Rosenbach, Head of Strategy and Innovation.
Having your say within the new NHS health structures.
Children’s palliative care From independent enquiry to effective sustainable services Alan Craft Liverpool Jan 2009.
Helping to make care better Cynthia Bower, CEO National Care Association Conference 11 November 2009.
Rachael Dodgson Interim Head of Regulatory Design Regulating for better outcomes.
NHS Library Services to support Commissioning in the South West: a Workshop Lyngford House 21 st March 2013.
Southend-on-Sea PCT Patient & Public Involvement Forum Annual report 1 April March 2006.
Health and Wellbeing Scrutiny Select Committee Sue Lightup; Community, Health and Social Care Mel Sirotkin; Public Health.
1 Organisational structure of supervisory organisations – The CQC approach Husna Mortuza & Claire Robbie Strategy & Policy 29 September
Registering the care sector – next steps Dr Linda Hutchinson Director, Care Quality Commission National Care Association Conference, 21 October 2010.
Berkshire Healthcare NHS Foundation Trust The Community Health Services of Berkshire East and Berkshire West are part of Berkshire Healthcare NHS Foundation.
Person centred care planning workshop -23 rd June 2010 York.
Choice of Hospital Patient Choice Jonathan Marron 5th May 2004.
Pam Hobbs Chief Finance Officer. 2014/15 Finances Financial Overview Revenue allocation of £222.7m + £2.4m income from other organisations e.g. hosting.
London Health Libraries Induction 15 th September 2008 The NHS in London Mandy Guest Knowledge Service Manager Islington Primary Care Trust London Health.
Regulation Inside Government: Approach and lessons learned Punita Goodfellow, Better Regulation Executive, Cabinet Office, UK.
NHS Connecting for Health is delivering the National Programme for Information Technology Development of the NHS Code of Practice for Records Management.
Care Quality Commission (CQC) Registration. Background The Care Quality Commission (CQC) is the health and social care regulator for England. From 1 April.
One Nottingham Lunchtime Learning Public Spending Cuts.
Aim To provide an overview of the Act Participants will: Know about the history of the Act Be aware of the Parts and features of the Act Appreciate differences.
Today’s Lesson Understand the structure of the NHS.
Health & Social Care Information Centre SEPHIG: 12 th September, 2012.
Equity and Excellence: Liberating the NHS What’s it all mean??!
Scrutiny Commission 3 Scrutiny of Health 30 September 2002 Jane Lewington Chief Executive North East Lincolnshire PCT.
An introduction to ACSA
Derbyshire’s Challenge
Registration Policy and Practice First Aid Forward
Health reform in England: update and commissioning framework
Presentation transcript:

Development of a Registration Fees scheme across provider markets 26 March 2010

Background CQC has the power to set fees across all the provider markets which will be registered in 2011 and beyond (c.45,000 providers) The proposal for NHS providers for 2010/11 is complete The consultation on the interim fee structure for adult social care and independent healthcare providers for 2010/11 is commencing This presentation is to discuss the strategic fee scheme options to allocate and recover costs post Ernst & Young have been appointed to develop: - overarching fees scheme for 2011 and beyond - including market analysis of impact of the scheme - cost model

Where we are today Strategic assessment ► Exploration of other regulators approaches to fees ► Joint Ernst & Young/CQC workshops on fee scheme options Cost assessment ► Assessment of costs associated with registration, compliance and enforcement ► Map costs and activities Market analysis ► Segment the market and carry out trend analysis to understand potential changes in the provider base Options analysis and scenario simulation Stakeholder engagement Model amendments and preferred option selection ► Populate data and make amendments to the model functionality once tested with real data ► Explore the sensitivities of the different options and certainty of cost recovery ► Meet a cross section of ‘voices for’ and ‘voices in’ the market to discuss broadly discuss fee scheme options ► Make amendments from stakeholder feedback ► Rate and score options → agreement of preferred option Build model and final report ► Clean options and extend functionality for the selected option where required ► Write final report Jan April Today

Analogous research Seven organisations were reviewed: The Audit Commission Ofsted The NHS Litigation Authority The Environment Agency Financial Services Authority The Civil Aviation Authority ABPI Detailed profiles of their fee scheme structures are in Appendix A

Market segments Hospitals (Ind/NHS) Community provider (Ind/Vol/ NHS PCT) NHS GP practices Dental Provider (Ind/NHS/ Mixed) Hospitals (Ind/NHS) Independent private practice by NHS consultants Walk in centres Secure provision (Ind/NHS) Care Home w/o nursing (Ind/NHS(LA)/ Vol) Non residential care (in community) Urgent Patient Transport (Ind/NHS/Vol) Planned Patient Transport (Vol/Ind/NHS) Care Home (Ind/NHS(LA)/ Vol) Hospitals (Ind/NHS) Secure provision (Ind.NHS) Mental Health Ambulance Services Primary Medical Services Dental Other Acute Community Health Adult Social Care Learning Disabilities NHS Blood and Transplant Health Protection Agency NHS Direct Doctors currently in private practice Out of hours services Prison services Immigration and detention services This diagram is still under construction and will be finalised once all data has been collected. The adult social care elements for mental health and learning disabilities have been accounted for in adult social care. Therefore only the healthcare elements are shown under mental health and learning disabilities in this diagram. Segmentation of the overall CQC market by service provision was undertaken to understand the current and future state of this market.

Decision criteria Qualitative Criteria Perceived LegitimacyLevel of acceptance of fee scheme and understanding of its structure in the market SimplicityCQC ability to implement and maintain the Fee Scheme Degree of incentivisationExtent to which scheme promotes desirable behaviour Quantitative Criteria Degree of change% change in fee levels of providers from current interim scheme Recovery of CQC costsCertainty of cost recovery depending on a number of scheme characteristics related to external factors. Accuracy of cost allocation Estimate of how close recovered costs match costs across and within market sectors StabilityThe extent to which the fee scheme leads to a change in the provider base

Building blocks

The first two options are based on achieving straight line recovery Option 1 - The simple approach (% of turnover) Option 1a - The simple approach taking into consideration market segment sensitivities and locations Fee Structure One annual fee per provider, ie, not broken down by registration, compliance, enforcement One structure for all markets Cost DriversTurnover Incentive scheme None Other fee schemes This is similar to the approach adopted by the Association of British Pharmaceutical Industry (ABPI) except the ABPI have a fee for registration and charge an annual fee based on two tiers of % of turnover. Fee Structure One annual fee per provider, i.e. not broken down by registration, compliance, enforcement Fees are split by segments (e.g. Dental, GPs, Acute) Cost DriverCost drivers for all sectors are the same: turnover and location. Incentive scheme None Other fee schemes This is similar to the OFSTED approach in terms of charging per location and the Financial Services Authority Approach in terms of banding providers by type and setting fees based on % of turnover.

The second two options are based on maximising the accuracy of cost allocations Option 2 - Fees broken down per CQC activity, using a risk based approach. Option 2a - Fees broken down per CQC activity using a risk based approach. In addition to option 1 enforcement charged as ‘pay as you use’ Fee Structure Fees are broken down by:  a flat fee for registration by segment  a combined fee for compliance and enforcement by segment based on risk and turnover. Cost Drivers Cost drivers for all segments are the same: turnover and risk rating Incentive scheme No incentive. Comparabil ity to other fee schemes This is similar to the NHS Litigation Authority Approach of setting fees based on the risk profiles of providers. Fee Structure Fees are broken down by:  a flat fee for registration by segment  an average fee for compliance by segment  a ‘pay as you use’ enforcement fee Cost Drivers Cost drivers for all segments are the same: turnover and risk rating Incentive scheme No incentive. Compara bility to other fee schemes Similar to the NHS Litigation Authority Approach but also including the Environment Agency and Civil Aviation Authority Approach of setting fees based on activities.

The last option is a based on incentivising good performance Option 3 – Fees broken down per CQC activity using a risk based approach Enforcement charged as ‘pay as you use’ Direct financial reward for top performers Fee StructureFees are broken down by:  A flat fee for registration by segment  An average fee for compliance by segment  A ‘pay as you use’ enforcement fee Cost DriversCost drivers for all segments are the same: turnover and risk rating Incentive scheme  Fee reduction on compliance only for top performers, calculated as a % of the fee a particular providers is supposed to pay (e.g. 1% for good performers, 2% for excellent). Comparability to other fee schemes Similar to the NHS Litigation Authority Approach using risk profiles and in setting discounts based on achieving CNST standards but also including the Environment Agency and Civil Aviation Authority Approach of setting fees based on activities.

Implementation Issues Turnover data Availability Extracting non-registerable activity Year on year movements Risk data Availability System for new providers – measuring risk associated with dentists, GPs and private ambulance providers Risk of over recovery – new registrations in year paying fees CQC recovering through incumbents – risk over recover.

Stakeholder approach Provider Advisory Group and specific provider association meetings (voice of the market) Telephone interviews and meetings with individual organisations in each segment (voice in the market) To test options in broad terms, explore views about strengths/weaknesses, compare differences between sub-segments and voices in and for the market.