Leif Byström 1 2000-09-13 IPCM WG Report; RfP Response Summary Leif Byström TINA IPCM WG Chairman A Framework for Connectivity Service Delivery Process.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1Copyright © 2011, Printer Working Group. All rights reserved. PWG Plenary TCG Activity Summary May 2011 Webster, NY – PWG Meeting Ira McDonald (High North.
Advertisements

1 Introducing the Specifications of the Metro Ethernet Forum.
Practical Digital Signature Issues. Paving the way and new opportunities. Juan Carlos Cruellas – DSS-X co-chair Stefan Drees - DSS-X.
Restricted Sten Hubendick, Leif Byström Dynamic Connection Management System for Optical Networks: Applicability in a TINA environment Sten.
Omniran GPP Trusted WLAN Access to EPC Use Case Analysis Date: Authors: NameAffiliationPhone Max RiegelNSN
Practical Implementations of TINA_C concepts and specifications September 14th, 2000 Martine Lapierre TINA_C.
Fostering worldwide interoperabilityGeneva, July 2009 Global Standards Collaboration (GSC) 14 DOCUMENT #:GSC14-GTSC7-005R1 FOR:Presentation SOURCE:TIA.
PARLAY and the 3GPP Open Service Architecture TINA ideas and principles Dr. Lucas Klostermann chairman 3GPP-CN5 system manager PU SCSA
Multicasting Applications Across Inter-Domain Peering Points Percy S. Tarapore, AT&T Robert Sayko, AT&T Greg Shepherd, Cisco Toerless Eckert, Cisco Ram.
Cooperating Layered Architecture for SDN (CLAS) Luis M. Contreras Telefónica Carlos J. Bernardos Universidad Carlos III de Madrid (UC3M) Diego R. López.
Coppo September 2000TINA Paris Conference Paolo COPPO TINA Technical Forum Chairman Yuji Inoue Former TINA CTC Chairman The Four dimensions of.
XMPP (eXtensible Messaging and Presence Protocol ) Reporter : Allen.
Page 1 Building Reliable Component-based Systems Chapter 18 - A Framework for Integrating Business Applications Chapter 18 A Framework for Integrating.
NGN Architecture Overview Speaker: Chen-Nien Tsai Adviser: Kai-Wei Ke.
Enterprise Total Computing TECHNOLOGY SERVICES Sprint Proprietary Information 18/10/99 Slide 1 Sprint’s Early Interest in TINA-C.
TIPHON IP Telephony Implementation Association TIPIA Overview Ayse Dilber, Michael Blaschitz TIPIA Vice-Chair, TIPIA Chair
Omniran IEEE 802 Scope of OmniRAN Date: Authors: NameAffiliationPhone Max RiegelNSN
©Ian Sommerville 2004Software Engineering, 7th edition. Chapter 11 Slide 1 Architectural Design.
ATIS Liaison Pre-letter Ballot Review Security Management System (TMOC Issue 56) Chris Lonvick Joe Salowey Personal Liaisons to the TMOC Chair.
1 MultimEDia transport for mobIlE Video AppLications 9 th Concertation Meeting Brussels, 13 th February 2012 MEDIEVAL Consortium.
The need for further standards and technical developments Brian Moore ITU-T Study Group 13 Chairman Lucent Technologies.
From Single Universe to Parallel Universes - TINA in the age of telecom service Big-Bang - Takeo HamadaMitsuhiro.
(C)1999 NTT 1 Transfer of TINA Results to Standards Bodies TINA2000 Paris, France, September 2000 TINA Technical Architecture Board Vice Chair KITAMI,
Unrestricted Connection manager MIF WG IETF 78, Maastricht Gaëtan Feige, Cisco (presenter) Pierrick Seïté, France Telecom -
World Class Standards WG8 presentation of current Subscription Management Activities TISPAN WG8 – 3GPP SA#5 Joint meeting Sophia Antipolis, May14th - 15.
IEEE MEDIA INDEPENDENT HANDOVER DCN: Title: MIIS and Its Higher Layer Transport Requirements: Ad hoc Update and Discussion on.
FI-CORE Data Context Media Management Chapter Release 4.1 & Sprint Review.
Draft-li-mpls-global-label-framework-02IETF 90 MPLS WG1 A Framework of MPLS Global Label draft-li-mpls-global-label-framework-02 Zhenbin Li, Quintin Zhao,
ISO/IEC CD and WD : Core Model and Model Mapping ISO/IEC JTC1/SC32/WG September 2005, Toronto SC32/WG2 Japan (Kanrikogaku Ltd) Masaharu.
OMA Mobile liaison Considers the OMA Mobile Requirements as input from the mobile community in terms of requirements for mobile features.
Proposed Co-convened WG1/2 Objectives, Schedule, and Activities Group Name: TP#1 Source: Omar Elloumi (Alcatel-Lucent), Laurent Laporte (Sprint) Meeting.
P847 EURESCOM Participants in P847 (FT, IT, NT, TI) 1 Paolo Coppo Carlo A. Licciardi CSELT What is TINA and is it useful for the TelCos ?
JEM for 3GPP2 Vision, San Diego, July 12-13, Long-term All IP Conference and IP 2 Ad-Hoc group ARIB/TTC IP 2 Ad-hoc Group Joint Experts Meeting for.
Page 1 TSAS: Linda Strick, GMD Fokus Marcel Mampaey, Alcatel TINA Reference Points become an OMG Standard.
1 SIPREC draft-ietf-siprec-architecture-00 An Architecture for Media Recording using SIP IETF SIPREC INTERIM – Sept 28 th 2010 Andrew Hutton.
Resource control and signaling requirements and protocols in ITU-T Q5/SG11 DOCUMENT #:GSC13-GTSC6-15 FOR:Presentation SOURCE:Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd.
1 HGI MESSAGE TO ONEM2M TECHNICAL PLENARY HANS WERNER BITZER, DEUTSCHE TELEKOM VICE CHAIR, HGI ONEM2M TP#19, SOPHIA ANTIPOLS, FRANCE.
1 Software Design Lecture What’s Design It’s a representation of something that is to be built. i.e. design  implementation.
Omniran IEEE 802 Scope of OmniRAN Date: Authors: NameAffiliationPhone Max RiegelNSN
IMS developments in 3GPP
“IPCablecom” Global standardisation of IP communication for cable networks Richard Catchpole Study Group 9 Associate Rapporteur
1 The Features of the IoT and Some Extension Considerations China Communications Standards Association Subin Shen 21th meeting CJK.
Slide no. 1  =====!"§!“!Nova§ ITU-T work on technical languages and general software issues Amardeo Sarma Chairman, ITU-T Study Group 10.
Group Name: oneM2M WG1 Requirements Source: Phil Hawkes, Rapporteur “Benefits of oneM2M technology” TR,
DHCP options for PAA Status report of draft-ietf-dhc-paa-option-01.txt Lionel Morand IETF-65, Dallas.
Proposed Co-convened WG1/2 Objectives, Schedule, and Activities Group Name: TP#1 Source: Omar Elloumi (Alcatel-Lucent), Laurent Laporte (Sprint) Meeting.
1 Introduction to Web Application Review. 2 Five Layers Architecture HTML, CSS, Java Script ASP.net User ’ s.dll, Nunit, Web Services ADO.net SQL Server,
ITU-T Study Group 13 and L1 VPNs Marco Carugi ITU-T SG13 Liaison Officer to IETF CCAMP/VPN WGs Q.2/13 Rapporteur
Group Name: oneM2M WG1 Requirements Source: Phil Hawkes, Rapporteur “Benefits of oneM2M technology” TR,
IEEE MEDIA INDEPENDENT HANDOVER DCN: Title: IETF Pre-authentication Activity Date Submitted: February 26, 2006.
1 Prototype for the interoperability between FEDERICA slices and other IP domains by means of the IPsphere Framework Josep Pons Camps i2Cat.
Omniran IEEE 802 Scope of OmniRAN Date: Authors: NameAffiliationPhone Max RiegelNSN
Systems Engineering Concept Model (SECM) Status 03/17/2016 John Watson.
XCON WG IETF-64 Meeting Centralized Conferencing (XCON) using the Message Session Relay Protocol (MSRP) draft-boulton-xcon-msrp-conferencing-02 Editors:
ITU Liaison on T-MPLS Stewart Bryant
Introduction to RBM 5.0.
Jim McEachern Senior Technology Consultant ATIS July 8, 2015.
Existing Service Specifications
IEEE MEDIA INDEPENDENT HANDOVER DCN:
Review of new Question descriptions under ITU-T SG11
IEEE 802 OmniRAN Study Group: SDN Use Case
Cryptography and Network Security Chapter 16
OmniRAN Introduction and Way Forward
Chapter 2 Introduction Application Requirements VS. Transport Services
IS 4506 Server Configuration (HTTP Server)
Overview of ETS in IPCablecom Networks
IEEE 802 Scope of OmniRAN Abstract
Network Resource Information Model and Connectivity Management Architecture, A Hands On Experience Report Tina 2000 Lyle Bertz Sprint PCS 2/25/2019.
OmniRAN Introduction and Way Forward
3GPP and SIP-AAA requirements
Presentation transcript:

Leif Byström IPCM WG Report; RfP Response Summary Leif Byström TINA IPCM WG Chairman A Framework for Connectivity Service Delivery Process

Leif Byström Phase 1 - Initial RfP Contributors IPCM RfP-1 Submitters Telia (Overview, ConS, FCon, ConC) Telia (Overview, ConS, FCon, ConC) Sprint (TINA RIM, FCon) Sprint (TINA RIM, FCon) Fujitsu (ConS-IPCM) Fujitsu (ConS-IPCM) Comments and Reviews CSELT CSELT AT&T AT&T

Leif Byström RfP Objectives Framework for connectivity service delivery Framework for connectivity service delivery Service delivery model of TINA network resources Service delivery model of TINA network resources Refine the definitions of domains and reference points Refine the definitions of domains and reference points Applicability of the CAT Facet concept Applicability of the CAT Facet concept Extensions to OMG TSAS Extensions to OMG TSAS Specifications of ConS-RP, FCon-RP and ConC-RP Specifications of ConS-RP, FCon-RP and ConC-RP TINA Resource Information Model TINA Resource Information Model TINA RIM Version 4.0 TINA RIM Version 4.0

Leif Byström OMG TSAS Domains Retailer (Any Kind of) Service Provider Consumer Initial Access Authentication Initial Access Authentication Access Service Access Subscription

Leif Byström TINA Generic Core RP Facet Client/Server Side (Interfaces from OMG TSAS) Any Client (Inter/Intra) Domain Any Server (Inter/Intra) Domain Initial Access Initial Access Authentication

Leif Byström TINA Inter Domain RP Facet Client/Server Side (Interfaces from OMG TSAS) Client Inter Domain Server Inter Domain Initial Access Initial Access Authentication Access Service Access Service Access

Leif Byström Example; ConS-RP Facets Connectivity Provider ConS-RP Retailer/SP TSAS Interfaces Client Side Server Side ConS-RP Usage Interfaces ConS-RP Facet ConS-RP

Leif Byström Problem area to solve? Retailer (Any Service) Provider Standardization of business case specific interactions??? What about e.g. standards regarding SLA templates: IP VPN:s IP network access IP telephony access Video Conferencing Gaming services etc.

Leif Byström IPCM WG Approach TINA Business Role Reference Points Connectivity Provider Server Client Connectivity Provider Server Retailer Client Service Provider Client Server NOT within the scope of IPCM WG ConS-RP FCon-RP Network Transport Services Network Transport Services Network Federation Services

Leif Byström Example: Server Facet Dependencies Generic Server Core Facet FConRP Server Core Facet ConSRP Server Core Facet ConCRP Server Core Facet Inter Domain CP Server Core Facet Intra Domain CP Server Core Facet Inter Domain Server Core Facet Intra Domain Server Core Facet

Leif Byström Example - Facet Relationship specific package generic package security generic security interface (from generic package) specific security interface (from specific package) generic security interface (from generic package) specific security interface (from specific package)

Leif Byström Reference Architecture Federated CS Manager CS Manager CP Domain ConS-RP CP Domain FCon-RP Retailer/SP Domain INTER-domain RP INTRA-domain RP ConC-RP Layer Network Domain Manager Generic Network Manager

Leif Byström ToDo´s & NOT ToDo´s WE WILL: Focus on the Connectivity Provider Business Role (Reference Points and Information Models) Focus on the Connectivity Provider Business Role (Reference Points and Information Models) Specify framework for TINA Reference Point specifications Specify framework for TINA Reference Point specifications Enhance the concept of roles, domains and facets (segments) Enhance the concept of roles, domains and facets (segments) Enhance TINA (Network) Resource Information Model Enhance TINA (Network) Resource Information Model WE WILL NOT: Specify new versions of already existing “standard” interfaces such as: Specify new versions of already existing “standard” interfaces such as: TSAS Access or 3GPP/OSA Generic Call Control etc. TSAS Access or 3GPP/OSA Generic Call Control etc. Provide “complete” reference point specifications Provide “complete” reference point specifications

Leif Byström Phase 2 - RfP Joint Submission End of 2000 Delivery Main Stream   IPCM RfP-1 Overview Description (in progress...)   TINA RIM Version 4.0 (Sprint contribution)   ConS-RP Specification Version 2.0 (in progress...)   FCon-RP Specification Version 1.0 (in progress...)   ConC-RP Specification Version 1.0 (in progress...) Reference Document   TINA-C kTN & CMA, IETF PBN and OMG ETF: A Unified Approach (Sprint contribution)

Leif Byström The Targets? TINA Community TINA Community OMG OMG IETF IETF ITU-T ITU-T Industrial groupings Industrial groupings Expected to be approached when specifications are ready for review!

Leif Byström That’s all folks! Chairman: IPCM WG: IPCM Homepage