Lessons from the field: What have we learned about civil society budget work?* Helena Hofbauer Innovation and Partnership Development International Budget.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
WCDR Thematic Panel Governance: Institutional and Policy Frameworks for Risk Reduction Annotated Outline UNDP – UNV – ProVention Consortium – UN-Habitat.
Advertisements

Disaster Risk Reduction and Governance. Ron Cadribo.
11 Scaling Up World Bank Group Engagement with Civil Society: A Strategic Priorities Paper Civil Society Team EXTIA.
Good governance for water, sanitation and hygiene services
Policies and Procedures for Civil Society Participation in GEF Programme and Projects presented by GEF NGO Network ECW.
The Challenge for Accountability and Legitimacy Civil Society Perspective (OSI)
TACKLING POVERTY TOGETHER Youth Contributing to Poverty Reduction.
Developmental Local Government and Participatory Governance Commonwealth Foundation 16 May 2013.
Vision: A strong and capable civil society, cooperating and responsive to Cambodia’s development challenges Host of the 2nd Global Assembly for CSO Development.
FUTURE ROLE OF INGO IN CAMBODIA
Role of RAS in the Agricultural Innovation System Rasheed Sulaiman V
CSO’s on the Road to Busan: Key Messages and Proposals.
Global Poverty Action Fund Community Partnership Window Funding Seminar January 2014 Global Poverty Action Fund Community Partnership Window Funding Seminar.
Knowledge Networking: How Networks Influence Policy By Aly Z. Ramji.
INSTRUCTIONAL LEADERSHIP FOR DIVERSE LEARNERS Susan Brody Hasazi Katharine S. Furney National Institute of Leadership, Disability, and Students Placed.
PRESENTATION TO THE MOLE CONFERENCE, CHANCES HOTEL, 15 JULY 2009 YIGA BAKER M ANEW REGIONAL COORDINATOR EASTERN AFRICA.
© IDEAS IDEAS-RELAC Joint Conference Bogotá, Colombia May 2007 Development evaluation: meeting the challenges of learning, ownership, accountability and.
OPTIONS AND REQUIREMENTS FOR ENGAGEMENT OF CIVIL SOCIETY IN GEF PROJECTS AND PROGRAMMES presented by Faizal Parish Regional/Central Focal Point GEF NGO.
February 8, 2012 Session 4: Educational Leadership Policy Standards 1 Council of Chief School Officers April 2008.
Common recommendations and next steps for improving local delivery of climate finance Bangkok, October 31, 2012.
UNICEF Turkey Country Programme
Establishing Research and Evaluation Network on Child Issues in Indonesia Nuning Akhmadi Indonesia Research and Evaluation Network Manila, 7 – 8 November.
South-South Cooperation for Democratic Development: CSO Key Messages and Policy Recommendations.
Critical Role of ICT in Parliament Fulfill legislative, oversight, and representative responsibilities Achieve the goals of transparency, openness, accessibility,
Title Consultation on the 7 th replenishment of IFAD’s resources IFAD’s operating model : overall structure and components Consultation on the 7th replenishment.
Planning for Sustainability National Child Traumatic Stress Network All Network Meeting February 6, 2007.
Overview of Building Blocks of Participation at the Macro Level Parmesh Shah Participation Coordinator The World Bank
Inclusive Business in Agrifood Markets: Evidence and Action FANRPAN Model – A Regional Multi-stakeholder Platform for Research, Knowledge Sharing and Policy.
CONNECTICUT HEALTH FOUNDATION: Update on Evaluation Planning for the Strategic Plan.
Commissioning Self Analysis and Planning Exercise activity sheets.
1 S trengthening accountability for gender equality To learn more visit
Development and Cooperation The Roots of Democracy and Sustainable Development: Europe's Engagement with Civil Society in External Relations.
DRAFT: Budget Transparency and Country Systems December 4, 2013, Seoul Forum on Using Country Systems to Manage Climate Finance.
Governance of AIDS Response UNDP HIV/AIDS Group, BDP Moscow, June 6, 2007.
8 TH -11 TH NOVEMBER, 2010 UN Complex, Nairobi, Kenya MEETING OUTCOMES David Smith, Manager PEI Africa.
Margaret Barihaihi National Programme Coordinator, World Vision - ACCRA Uganda.
The shift to programs in the LAC region. What is a program? A program is a coherent set of initiatives by CARE and our allies that involves a long-term.
T he Istanbul Principles and the International Framework Geneva, Switzerland June 2013.
 Question:  How many CSOs working in your country have an impact on children?  Answer:  All of them.  Whether or not they work in a traditionally.
The Next Stage for Results in Africa. Context 2005 Paris Declaration on Aid Effectiveness 2006 Mutual Learning Events Uganda & Burkina Faso 2007 Hanoi.
BEYOND MKUKUTA FRAMEWORK: Monitoring and Evaluation, Communication and Implementation Guide Presentation to the DPG Meeting 18 th January, 2011.
European Commission Joint Evaluation Unit common to EuropeAid, Relex and Development Methodology for Evaluation of Budget support operations at Country.
OPTIONS AND REQUIREMENTS FOR ENGAGEMENT OF CIVIL SOCIETY IN GEF PROJECTS presented by Ermath Harrington GEF Regional Focal Point.
ACCOUNTABILITY AND MONITORING IN HEALTH INITIATIVE PUBLIC HEALTH PROGRAM Capacity Building Consultation 5 – 7 June, 2012 Istanbul, Turkey.
Policies and Procedures for Civil Society Participation in GEF Programme and Projects presented by GEF NGO Network ECW.
Resource Mobilization and Awareness Working Group Mercedes Mas de Xaxás Population Action International.
DEVELOPMENT COOPERATION FRAMEWORK Presentation by Ministry of Finance 10 December 2013.
Consultant Advance Research Team. Outline UNDERSTANDING M&E DATA NEEDS PEOPLE, PARTNERSHIP AND PLANNING 1.Organizational structures with HIV M&E functions.
OVERVIEW OF MACROECONOMIC & HEALTH KEY POINTS FROM THE OCTOBER 2003 GLOBAL CONSULTATION Briefing for Permanent Mission Representatives.
Kathy Corbiere Service Delivery and Performance Commission
Strategies for making evaluations more influential in supporting program management and informing decision-making Australasian Evaluation Society 2011.
Governance and Civic Engagement Program. Program Goal: By 2020, citizen, specially youth and women, are engaged in a transparent, inclusive, and institutionalized.
Global Partnership for Enhanced Social Accountability (GPESA) December 19, 2011 World Bank.
SEL1 Implementing an assessment – the Process Session IV Lusaka, January M. Gonzales de Asis and F. Recanatini, WBI
Paris, Accra, Busan. Paris Declaration of 2005 Provides foundation for aid effectiveness agenda. Introduces aid effectiveness principles which remain.
Advocacy and Partnerships for the MDGs. Context and Rationale The MDGs were created in 2000 as a concrete means to help improve the lives of poor people.
New approach in EU Accession Negotiations: Rule of Law Brussels, May 2013 Sandra Pernar Government of the Republic of Croatia Office for Cooperation.
Inclusive Partnerships & Multi-stakeholder Approaches Busan Partnership Workshop Nov. 6-7, 2014 Break-out Session 4 Jacqueline Wood for the Task Team on.
CDP-GIZ research project – Paris Workshop Gesellschaft für internationale Zusammenarbeit GmbH André Lammerding, Head of Programme International Water Stewardship.
OWN, SCALE-UP & SUSTAIN The 16 th International Conference on AIDS & STIs in Africa 4 to 8 December 2011, Addis Ababa
International Standards of Supreme Audit Institutions (ISSAIs) Jennifer Thomson Director OPSPF & Chief Financial Management Officer World Bank.
Upcoming Work on the Enabling Environment for Civic Engagement Initiative Jeff Thindwa Participation and Civic Engagement Group Social Development Department,
820 First St. NE Suite 510 Washington, DC USA Tel: Fax:
Global and regional programmes in support of 2020 Round Population and Housing censuses United Nations Regional Workshop on the 2020 World Programme on.
UNFPA ESARO Technical Adviser, Population Data Policy
Country Level Programs
Local Government in Jamaica
820 First St. NE Suite 510 Washington, DC USA
The SWA Collaborative Behaviors
820 First St. NE Suite 510 Washington, DC USA
Presentation transcript:

Lessons from the field: What have we learned about civil society budget work?* Helena Hofbauer Innovation and Partnership Development International Budget Project Based on Paolo de Renzio and Warren Krafchik, “Lessons from the Field”, International Budget Project; and Mark Robinson, “Budget Analysis and Policy Advocacy: the Role of Non-governmental Public Action”, Working Paper 279, Institute of Development Studies, University of Sussex, September 2006.

International Budget Project Mission: Improve governance and reduce poverty by nurturing budget groups. Strategy: Build core regional and issue partnerships. Activities: Focus on 4 critical challenges: Open Budget Initiative improves information access. Training/TA builds analytical/advocacy skills Re-granting provides sustained funding Networking and information exchange promote peer engagement. Core donor partners: OSI, Hewlett Foundation, Ford Foundation.

What are budget groups? Independent CSOs dedicating resources to analyzing and influencing public budgeting in over 80 countries. Common strategies Applied fiscal research and advocacy Timely, accessible, useful information Focus on budget impact on the poor Diverse contexts and organizations Levels of income Political systems Full spectrum of CSOs

What is budget work? Wide range of methods enabling CSOs to monitor each stage of the budget process: Drafting (Resource revenue tracking, Procurement monitoring & Priority setting) Approval (Macro, expend & revenue analysis) Execution (Expenditure tracking) Evaluation/Audit (Social audits, impact monitoring, performance audits, audit tracking)

Case studies – research aims Document growth of applied budget work. Provide systematic analysis of the nature and impact of applied budget work. Disseminate lessons learned to budget groups and policy makers in governments and aid agencies. Research collaboration between Institute for Development Studies and the International Budget Project, funded by ESRC, the Ford Foundation, Hewlett Foundation, and the Open Society Institute.

Six case studies DISHA, India Fundar, Mexico IBASE, Brasil IDASA, South Africa Institute for Public Finance, Croatia Uganda Debt Network, Uganda

Team composition and field work Two member teams combining a mix of disciplines, experience and country knowledge. Maximize cross-evaluation and potential learning outcomes; at least one team member is directly engaged in applied budget work. Field visits of 10 to 12 working days. Data gathered from several sources, including interviews and focus group discussions with wide range of stakeholders, public budget and policy data, IBP and group materials, and media reports.

Key research questions Budget policies: Changes in budget policies and systems; budget allocations; implementation (efficiency and effectiveness) and outputs. Budget process: Budget awareness and understanding; budget transparency; participation in the budget process

FINDINGS

Long-term outcomes Democracy Active Citizenship Accountability Integrity Intermediate outcomes Budget process Budget policies Relationships and advocacy External factorsInternal factors Poverty reduction Equity Justice Inclusiveness

Long-term outcomes Democracy Active Citizenship Accountability Integrity Relationships and advocacy External factorsInternal factors Poverty reduction Equity Justice Inclusiveness Intermediate outcomes Budget process Budget policies

Long-term outcomes Democracy Active Citizenship Accountability Integrity Poverty reduction Equity Justice Inclusiveness Intermediate outcomes Budget process 1. Budget awareness and literacy 2. Budget transparency and availability of budget information 3. Engagement in the budget process Budget policies 1. Budget systems 2. Budget allocations 3. Budget results Relationships and advocacy External factorsInternal factors

Long-term outcomes Democracy Active Citizenship Accountability Integrity Poverty reduction Equity Justice Inclusiveness Intermediate outcomes Budget process 1. Budget awareness and literacy: building and expanding public understanding and interest in budget issues * How to link budget issues to citizens’ daily lives * How to use media creatively to get the message across Budget policies Relationships and advocacy External factorsInternal factors

Long-term outcomes Democracy Active Citizenship Accountability Integrity Poverty reduction Equity Justice Inclusiveness Intermediate outcomes Budget process 2. Budget transparency and availability of budget information: expanding public access to budget information, in terms of quantity and quality * Key sources of independent, authoritative and accessible information * Information on the impact of budget policies on the poor * Repackaging information in accessible ways Budget policies Relationships and advocacy External factorsInternal factors

Long-term outcomes Democracy Active Citizenship Accountability Integrity Poverty reduction Equity Justice Inclusiveness Intermediate outcomes Budget process 3. Engagement in the budget process: expanding the opportunities for effective engagement of citizens and oversight institutions in the budget process * Specialized knowledge and skills for participation in budget process * Facilitate and contribute to other CSO’s engagement * Increase legislators’ engagement * Enhance quality of media input Budget policies Relationships and advocacy External factorsInternal factors

Long-term outcomes Democracy Active Citizenship Accountability Integrity Poverty reduction Equity Justice Inclusiveness Intermediate outcomes Budget process 1. Budget awareness and literacy 2. Budget transparency and availability of budget information 3. Engagement in the budget process Budget policies 1. Budget systems: systemic changes in the legal/institutional framework * Difficult to achieve, more long-term systemic change (some changes in South Africa and Croatia) Relationships and advocacy External factorsInternal factors

Long-term outcomes Democracy Active Citizenship Accountability Integrity Poverty reduction Equity Justice Inclusiveness Intermediate outcomes Budget process 1. Budget awareness and literacy 2. Budget transparency and availability of budget information 3. Engagement in the budget process Budget policies 2. Budget allocations: * Increase in specific budget lines and programs aimed at the poor * Program design modifications and budget increases * IDASA-CBU, Child Support Grant (South Africa) * Fundar, maternal mortality (Mexico) Relationships and advocacy External factorsInternal factors

Long-term outcomes Democracy Active Citizenship Accountability Integrity Poverty reduction Equity Justice Inclusiveness Intermediate outcomes Budget process 1. Budget awareness and literacy 2. Budget transparency and availability of budget information 3. Engagement in the budget process Budget policies 3. Budget results: improving the impact of the budget on the poor * Monitoring budget implementation and service delivery * DISHA: Linking allocations to local projects (Gujarat, India) * UDN: community monitors check quality of service delivery (Uganda) Relationships and advocacy External factorsInternal factors

Long-term outcomes Democracy Active Citizenship Accountability Integrity Intermediate outcomes Budget process Budget policies Relationships and advocacy External factors Internal factors Poverty reduction Equity Justice Inclusiveness

Long-term outcomes Democracy Active Citizenship Accountability Integrity Intermediate outcomes Budget process Budget policies Relationships and advocacy Internal factors Poverty reduction Equity Justice Inclusiveness External factors 1.Political environment 2.Legal and institutional framework 3.Role of international donors 4.Literacy levels and public interest in budget issues

Long-term outcomes Democracy Active Citizenship Accountability Integrity Intermediate outcomes Budget process Budget policies Relationships and advocacy Internal factors Poverty reduction Equity Justice Inclusiveness External factors 1.Political environment * Easier in democratic environments, but also possible in less transparent countries. * Important to constantly monitor the political landscape and adapt strategies * Always produce high-quality research and work strategically

Long-term outcomes Democracy Active Citizenship Accountability Integrity Intermediate outcomes Budget process Budget policies Relationships and advocacy Internal factors Poverty reduction Equity Justice Inclusiveness External factors 2.Legal and institutional framework * Need to understand key aspects of legal and institutional framework * Engage different players within institutional arrangement

Long-term outcomes Democracy Active Citizenship Accountability Integrity Intermediate outcomes Budget process Budget policies Relationships and advocacy Internal factors Poverty reduction Equity Justice Inclusiveness External factors 3.Role of international donors * Influence budget systems and policies in recipient countries (macroeconomic framework) * Sometimes determine specific policies (pro-poor) * Involved in public finance management reforms

Long-term outcomes Democracy Active Citizenship Accountability Integrity Intermediate outcomes Budget process Budget policies Relationships and advocacy Internal factors Poverty reduction Equity Justice Inclusiveness External factors 4.Literacy levels and public interest in budget issues * An educated, informed citizenry makes budget work easier * Challenge: no natural audiences * Strategies: social movements, simplified involvement of community leaders, e-communication and learning

Long-term outcomes Democracy Active Citizenship Accountability Integrity Intermediate outcomes Budget process Budget policies Relationships and advocacy External factors Internal factors Poverty reduction Equity Justice Inclusiveness

Long-term outcomes Democracy Active Citizenship Accountability Integrity Intermediate outcomes Budget process Budget policies Relationships and advocacy Poverty reduction Equity Justice Inclusiveness Internal factors 1.Mission 2.Leadership 3.Capacity 4.Products/dissemination External factors

Long-term outcomes Democracy Active Citizenship Accountability Integrity Intermediate outcomes Budget process Budget policies Relationships and advocacy Poverty reduction Equity Justice Inclusiveness Internal factors 1.Mission * Budget work can be carried out effectively by a wide variety of groups * Variety of missions: poverty reduction, democracy, access to information * Budget work and provision of timely, objective, accessible and accurate information as part of the mission * Research-based evidence to inform policy debate and advocacy * Non-partisanship: analysis based on facts, not ideology — credibility External factors

Long-term outcomes Democracy Active Citizenship Accountability Integrity Intermediate outcomes Budget process Budget policies Relationships and advocacy Poverty reduction Equity Justice Inclusiveness Internal factors 2.Leadership * Common problem: “founder syndrome” * Priority: Multiple layers of potential leaders * Transitions must be carefully managed External factors

Long-term outcomes Democracy Active Citizenship Accountability Integrity Intermediate outcomes Budget process Budget policies Relationships and advocacy Poverty reduction Equity Justice Inclusiveness Internal factors 3.Capacity * Technical skills for budget work are not easily found — no formal training available * However, technical skills for budget work are easily learned — no economics degree required * Mix of strategies to develop skills * Challenge: retaining skilled capacity External factors

Long-term outcomes Democracy Active Citizenship Accountability Integrity Intermediate outcomes Budget process Budget policies Relationships and advocacy Poverty reduction Equity Justice Inclusiveness Internal factors 4.Products/dissemination * Disseminate in diverse, targeted, clear and timely ways * Address each audience specifically External factors

Long-term outcomes Democracy Active Citizenship Accountability Integrity Intermediate outcomes Budget process Budget policies Relationships and advocacy External factorsInternal factors Poverty reduction Equity Justice Inclusiveness

Long-term outcomes Democracy Active Citizenship Accountability Integrity Intermediate outcomes Budget process Budget policies External factorsInternal factors Poverty reduction Equity Justice Inclusiveness Relationships and advocacy 1.With the rest of civil society 2.With the media 3.With the executive 4.With the legislature 5.With donors

Long-term outcomes Democracy Active Citizenship Accountability Integrity Intermediate outcomes Budget process Budget policies External factorsInternal factors Poverty reduction Equity Justice Inclusiveness Relationships and advocacy 1.With the rest of civil society * Success in isolation is hard * Partnerships ensure that groups address issues of broad interest, and draw on others’ strengths and capacities * Long-term, strategic, project-based or tactical alliances

Long-term outcomes Democracy Active Citizenship Accountability Integrity Intermediate outcomes Budget process Budget policies External factorsInternal factors Poverty reduction Equity Justice Inclusiveness Relationships and advocacy 2.With the media * Governments take media into account — it elevates the stakes * Different strategies: articles published regularly, training for journalists, special coverage

Long-term outcomes Democracy Active Citizenship Accountability Integrity Intermediate outcomes Budget process Budget policies External factorsInternal factors Poverty reduction Equity Justice Inclusiveness Relationships and advocacy 3.With the executive * Policy makers are the final audience budget groups need to reach * Quiet diplomacy, constructive criticism * Identification of like-minded technicians in key positions * Explore formal and informal channels

Long-term outcomes Democracy Active Citizenship Accountability Integrity Intermediate outcomes Budget process Budget policies External factorsInternal factors Poverty reduction Equity Justice Inclusiveness Relationships and advocacy 4.With the legislature * Natural partnership: budget groups need information, legislature needs analysis * Strengthen the legislature’s role of accountability

Long-term outcomes Democracy Active Citizenship Accountability Integrity Intermediate outcomes Budget process Budget policies External factorsInternal factors Poverty reduction Equity Justice Inclusiveness Relationships and advocacy 5.With donors * They have more information than civil society * They have access to decision makers * They can play a role in influencing governments

Long-term outcomes Democracy Active Citizenship Accountability Integrity Poverty reduction Equity Justice Inclusiveness Intermediate outcomes Budget process 1. Budget awareness and literacy 2. Budget transparency and availability of budget information 3. Engagement in the budget process Budget policies 1. Budget systems 2. Budget allocations 3. Budget results External factors 1.Political environment 2.Legal and institutional framework 3.Role of international donors 4.Literacy levels and public interest in budget issues Internal factors 1.Mission 2.Leadership 3.Capacity 4.Products/dissemination Relationships and advocacy 1.With the rest of civil society 2.With the media 3.With the executive 4.With the legislature 5.With donors

IBP’S STRATEGY TO STRENGTHEN BUDGET WORK AND DEEPEN IMPACT

The Civil Society Budget Initiative Small grants initiative, now in third year of operation Coordinated by IBP Funded by DfiD and SIDA and Norad Led by a multi-stakeholder steering committee of donors and civil society organizations Mission: To promote civil society budget work in low-income countries where applied budget work is emerging Goal: To improve government accountability & achieve poverty reduction

Principles Work with groups of local origin to build sustained internal capacity; Budget work to become part of core activities of partners; Horizontal collaboration among CSO, strategic alliances at global level; Follow local demand for budget work in any field of interest.

Criteria of eligibility Clear vision of budget work as core activity Ability to combine solid analytic work with substantial relationships in civil society Favorable national, regional or local climate for budget work to advance the interests of poor people; Independent of political parties Only open to targeted countries

Future Directions Scale up impact to more organizations Provide a combination of tailored support, including funding, training, technical assistance and a peer network for horizontal exchange and learning, to established budget groups and organizations that are new to the field Grant decisions made by Steering Committee Mission: To strengthen civil society budget work in middle and low-income countries, with a focus on pro-poor agendas Strategy: To build a vibrant network of dedicated budget groups, that share a set of core goals and maximize South-South relationships and horizontal learning.

820 First St. NE Suite 510 Washington, DC USA Tel: Fax: