R esidents A gainst P olluting S tacks A voluntary,non-political, community organisation.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Asthma & the Environment Oklahoma Asthma Initiative American Lung Association of the Central States.
Advertisements

Air Pollution Control Program: Proposed Changes Presented to the Air Pollution Control Board April 2009.
Carolyn Dunn Environmental Assessment Division Healthy Environments Consumer Safety Branch Health Canada High Lake Mine Pre-Hearing Conference December.
Workshop August Process of approval –State Significance Infrastructure Application –Director General provides environmental assessment requirements.
Why Green Cleaning?. Why We Clean Appearance Health –Remove and extract contaminants created by Dust Pesticides VOCs Allergens Metals, Lead, Cadmium Particulates.
Ambient Air Monitoring for the Revised Lead NAAQS Daniel Garver US EPA Region 4.
Group Against Smog and Pollution Grassroots advocacy and education in action February 25, 2010.
Why is an air quality improvement plan needed? Because of constant complaints about conditions inside the tunnel and evidence of actual harm to motorists.
I Breathe What? Each day in the United States, hundreds of thousands of tons of polluting emissions that result from human activity enter the air!
DRAYTON MINE IMPROVEMENTS TO DUST AND EMISSIONS MANAGEMENT – AIR QUALITY INFORMATION SESSIONS October 2014.
Ohio’s Clean Diesel School Bus Retrofit Grant Program Winner of a 2008 Leadership Award from the.
Clean Energy and Transportation City of Seattle Presented by Margaret Pageler Seattle Councilmember and Former Chair of Puget Sound Clean Air Agency An.
Particulate Air Pollution By Susan Tang Bio Sci 2B 5/24/06.
Human Ecology Department Arehna Workshop Health and Mobility Kos, 3-5 May, 2003 Health and Mobility in Flanders (Belgium) Pascal Lammar and Luc Hens Human.
Let’s Clean Our Air, Together. What is the Breathe Project? We are: A coalition of businesses, government, nonprofits, residents and many others in southwestern.
Diesel Pollution Reduction Initiative The West Oakland Environmental Indicators Project and Pacific Institute.
International Health and Safety at Work
Conduct an education campaign that teaches citizens about link between air quality and health. Purpose Teach people how to reduce their loved ones’ exposure.
Other Environmental Issues U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Noise Endangered and Threatened Species Explosive/Flammable Hazards and Underground.
Indiana Environmental Health Summit Indiana Department of Environmental Management (IDEM) June 6, 2011 Thomas W. Easterly, P.E., BCEE, QEP Commissioner,
Ohio’s Clean Diesel School Bus Retrofit Grant Program Winner of a 2008 Leadership Award from the.
Houston Air Quality John D. Wilson Galveston-Houston Association for Smog Prevention
Participate in Environmentally Sustainable Work Practices
Air Quality Program Fort Wainwright, Alaska Environmental Officer Course 2011 Name//office/phone/ address UNCLASSIFIED 9/12/
Transportation-related Air Pollutants Health Effects and Risk Linda Tombras Smith, PhD Chief, Health and Exposure Assessment Branch Research Division October.
A Smart Tool for a Sustainable Future. Chicago skyline PM 2.5 < 10 μg/m 3.
NUMMI New United Motor Manufacturing, Inc. Automobile manufacturing venture of General Motors Corporation and Toyota Motor Corporation.
1 EPA’s Proposal for Nonroad Diesel Engines & Fuel May 2003 U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Office of Transportation and Air Quality Informal document.
GENERAL CONDITIONS: ARTICLE 39 DIESEL VEHICLE EMISSIONS CONTROL GENERAL CONDITIONS: ARTICLE 39 DIESEL VEHICLE EMISSIONS CONTROL Connecticut's Diesel Reduction.
Air Quality for All What exactly is air pollution?
It’s a Good Idea to Shut It Down: Reducing Unnecessary Idling School Bus Driver “Reduce Idling” Training North Carolina DMV June 2005 Save Fuel and Breathe.
Office of Sustainability Anti-idling Guideline Presentation 2010.
What is it?. Presentation Outline What is the AQI? How does AQI work? Where can I find the AQI? How can I use the AQI?
London Congestion Charging. Central London Congestion Charging Zone.
WHO European Centre for Environment and Health Overview of health impacts of particulate matter in Europe Michal Krzyzanowski WHO ECEH Bonn Office Joint.
Global Ozone Project Curriculum
PROPOSED AMENDMENTS TO THE S21 LISTED ACTIVITIES OF THE AIR QUALITY ACT (ACT 39 OF 2004) Submission to the Portfolio Committee on Water and Environmental.
Clean Air Act and New Source Review Permits EPA Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards Research Triangle Park NC March
Updated 10/26/11 Carolyn Watkins, Office of Environmental Education Carolina Prado, Division of Air.
Air Quality & Traffic August 25, 2015.
Hydraulic Fracturing in Central North Carolina Potential Impacts on Triangle Air Quality Therese Vick March 2012 Blue Ridge Environmental Defense League.
The Clean Air Act First Clean Air Act passed in 1967: 1970 Amendments established current relationship between states and federal government and required.
Particles, your health & your lungs. Why care about air pollution? Sonoma County air is clean compared to other areas, but SF air blows here Sonoma County.
For 2014 Golden Empire AWMA Conference September 16, 2014 Leland Villalvazo, Supervising AQS San Joaquin Valley APCD.
Indoor Air Quality Update June 27, Indoor air quality reflects outdoor and indoor air pollution sources Improving outdoor air quality reduces indoor.
Health Effects of Air Pollution
CALIFORNIA’S AIR TOXICS PROGRAM: IMPROVEMENTS TO ASSESS HEALTH RISK Update to the Air Resources Board July 24, 2014 California Environmental Protection.
Air Pollution Inwood Intermediate School 52
AIR POLLUTION REVIEW 1.WHAT ARE THE TWO MAJOR AIR POLLUTANTS IN THE TRIAD?
The Proposed London Low Emission Zone
Intelligent Traffic Environmental System (ITES-AIR)
Particle Pollution: It’s a Serious Concern. So small, you can’t see just one of them … Particle pollution is a complex mixture of extremely small particles.
Air pollution in Stuttgart ? NO 2 O3O3 PM 10. Stuttgart.
1 Diesel Risk Assessment & 1 st Level Screening Worksheets Joel Leon Bureau of Technical Services October 16, 2012.
Air Pollution Control Program Regulation Update Presented to City Council Public Safety and Health Subcommittee Mamie Colburn, M.S, R.S. Missoula.
Air pollution. What is air pollution? Air pollution is the presence of substances in the air that are harmful to health or the environment. It can be.
CHOOSE CLEAN AIR FOR CALIFORNIA RALPH JOHN DI LIBERO, MD 135 TH LACMA PRESIDENT.
Go Low Forum Air pollution and Health Richard Taylor Nottingham City Council: Environmental Health and Safer Places.
Improving London’s air quality Joanne McCartney Deputy Mayor of London 1 st June 2016.
Expertise SR 710 North Study An Evaluation of the DEIR/EIS Presentation to the City of San Gabriel City Council February 2, 2016 Leland C Dolley, Special.
You have undertaken a task specific risk assessment and determined the control measures. You have considered whether additional ventilation or ‘add on’
Air Pollution Some Terms..  ppm-parts per million  ppmv-parts per million by volume  ppb-parts per billion  UTC-universal time coordinated(used to.
Poor housing and asthma
Clean Air Act Glossary.
Fire Resource Guide for Health Officials
Poor housing and asthma
Bart Ostro, Chief Air Pollution Epidemiology Unit
IMPORTANT NOTE TO CONSTRUCTION MANAGERS
IMPORTANT NOTE TO CONSTRUCTION MANAGERS
Air Quality and Health Dr Liz Robin Director of Public Health
Presentation transcript:

R esidents A gainst P olluting S tacks A voluntary,non-political, community organisation

RAPS aims are:  Installation of air cleaning in the M5 tunnel to reduce the impact on the local area.  To seek fair infrastructure planning and pollution regulations.  To support ecological sustainability in all projects affecting the local area.  To share information on issues related to urban air pollution and planning

The RTA has applied to the Department of Planning to modify the operating conditions for the M5 tunnel The main change requested is to allow unfiltered portal emissions from both Bexley North and Arncliffe for 14 hours per day to help improve in- tunnel conditions.

The RTA $50 million plan has 4 main parts: Video cameras to track and fine smoky trucks to reduce emissions. Extra jet fans for better air flow control.  Portal emissions to allow for extra fresh air into the tunnel. ? A ‘trial’ of filtration equipment at the west end of the west-bound tunnel to reduce ‘haze’.

The RTA Plan for Bexley North The RTA plan is unique. It has never been done anywhere! It is exceptionally complex and costly. The air tunnel will cost at least $20 million. If it works at all, it will solve 1/3 of 1/4 of the problem.

The RTA proposal is aimed solely at improving in-tunnel conditions for motorists. The stated aim is to remove the ‘perception’ of a problem with ‘haze’ and to reduce tunnel closures due to bad air quality. The budget is $50 million.

BUT….! ‘Haze’ is not harmless. It is made up almost entirely of Diesel particle emissions which cause asthma and lung irritation and are now known to trigger heart attacks and cause cancer. According to the California Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment its cancer risk factor is 3 in 10,000 for every 1µg/m3 increase in exposure.

Will it improve the air in the tunnel? Probably yes. The pollution level inside the tunnel will be roughly halved. The stack emissions should be reduced by 40% Filter

The RTA plan may ‘work’ for those inside the tunnel, but not for those outside the tunnel: Portal emissions start immediately and will significantly increase the impact of harmful diesel fumes on people living round the tunnel portals. Around $45 million is spent on fixing 1/3 of 1/4 of the “haze” problem in the tunnel. The remainder of the problem is ‘fixed’ by dumping the diesel emissions out of the portals at ground level. There is no guarantee that the filters will be kept working after the one year ‘trial’.

The revised NSW Health ‘Residents’ Health Study’ contains a CSIRO map showing the impact of the portal emissions which occurred in September -October 2003

Portal emissions have been known to be dangerous since the first major road tunnels were built The 2005 CSIRO study found: “ portal emissions have an impact on ground-level concentrations that is up to 50 times greater than if the same emissions occurred from the stack.”

The RTA EIS document predicts that the portal emissions will represent an increase in PM10 at the worst location of 0.6µg/m 3 per year. This is claimed to represent an increased mortality risk of 1 in 20 million. The RTA compares this with the risk of being killed by lightning, which is 1 in 1.6 million

This claim is insulting, misleading and, above all, incorrect! It is contrary to the advice given by NSW Health and the EPA about the potential dangers of portal emissions. The risk of 1:20 million claimed by the RTA is a ‘daily’ risk not a ‘lifetime’ risk as is required by the EPA.

An increase of 0.6 µg/m 3 in diesel particle emissions increases life-time cancer risk by 180 in a million, according to the new California OEHHA guidelines. This is 3,600 times greater than the risk claimed in the RTA. It is 180 times the risk threshold specified by the NSW EPA!

There are about 1000 houses, and at least 4 blocks of units within 500m of the Bexley North portal! All will receive some increase in pollution from the portal emissions. The impact at Marsh St is similar.

RAPS believes that for $50 million, the public should get cleaner air inside and outside the tunnel by: installing, at both Bexley North and Marsh St, filtration and cleaning equipment, similar to that in Madrid, to remove diesel particulate and nitrogen dioxide from the tunnel exhaust and using ceiling mounted particle filtration inside the tunnel.

To ensure the safety of this proposal: The cleaned air must be ejected upwards to improve dispersal. The efficiency and operation of the filter systems must be independently supervised. There must be a comprehensive, independent technical and health assessment of the project before and after construction.

In addition we should require: Effective action to reduce traffic congestion on the whole M5 motorway, to reduce local pollution and improve our health and that of our children. The provision of a property value guarantee (buy-back scheme).

RAPS suggests that this meeting: Supports the installation of appropriate air cleaning systems at the portals and inside the M5 tunnel Demands that this be done in a safe and cost effective manner. Rejects the RTA plan as it stands.

RAPS suggests that you: Write to the Department of Planning outlining your objections to the proposal. Inform your local member of your decision and request their support.