Foundational Work using Evidence-Centered Design.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Writing constructed response items
Advertisements

Assessment The role of context Asturias Feb, 2009 Keith Kelly
Test Development.
Understanding the ELA/Literacy Evidence Tables. The tables contain the Reading, Writing and Vocabulary Major claims and the evidences to be measured on.
Performance Tasks for English Language Arts
Advances in the PARCC Mathematics Assessment August
Ricki Sabia, JD Technical Assistance and Parent Training Specialist National Center and State Collaborative Senior Associate, edCount, LLC
The Network of Dynamic Learning Communities C 107 F N Increasing Rigor February 5, 2011.
1 The Professional Teaching and Learning Cycle in Action.
Assessment Literacy Series
Module 2 Text Comprehension
“The meat and potatoes of differentiated instruction” Tomlinson (1999)
Assessment “We assess students not merely to evaluate them, but to improve the entire process of teaching and learning.” - Douglas B. Reeves, Making Standards.
Science Breakout New Teacher Meeting 6, Year 2 March 31, 2011.
Robert J. Mislevy & Min Liu University of Maryland Geneva Haertel SRI International Robert J. Mislevy & Min Liu University of Maryland Geneva Haertel SRI.
Providing High-Quality Professional Development Session Questions How does the PTLC connect the improvement work to the classroom level? How does the.
Analyzing Performance Tasks: Turning Results Into Action Getting Smarter & Long Term EL Symposium January 13, 2015 Access PPT at:
Presentation slide 1.1 Aims of the literacy module – the main features and teaching strategies used during English lessons – the role of the TA in supporting.
John Smithson, WCER Carolyn K. Eastman, CCSSO Building Knowledge of Instructional Alignment using SEC.
NCSC Project Description
Building Effective Assessments. Agenda  Brief overview of Assess2Know content development  Assessment building pre-planning  Cognitive factors  Building.
Welcome to the Data Warehouse HOME HELP COGNITIVE LEVELS Assessments COGNITIVE LEVELS.
The Depth of Knowledge (DOK) Matrix
ELA SCHOOL TEAM SESSION Welcome to EEA, 2012! 10/2/2015MSDE1.
ATTRIBUTEDESCRIPTION Focal Knowledge, Skills, Abilities The primary knowledge / skills / abilities (KSAs) targeted by this design pattern. RationaleHow/why.
English Language Arts Item Review Considerations Training Module.
PISA International Conference. Reading Performance of Hong Kong’s 15-Year-Old Students in PISA.
THINK / PUZZLE / EXPLORE Think about what you may have read as part of the pre-reading activity for this workshop as well as what you already know about.
English Language Arts/Literacy Louisiana Textbook Adoption Publisher’s Orientation March 1, 2012.
Illustration of a Validity Argument for Two Alternate Assessment Approaches Presentation at the OSEP Project Directors’ Conference Steve Ferrara American.
Exploring SBAC August 2, 2013MCLA. A Balanced Assessment System Common Core State Standards specify K-12 expectations for college and career readiness.
Monkemeier  For Classroom Use – Materials must align with learning outcomes.  Resources for Students – text books, web links,  To extend.
Common Core State Standards, Next Generation Science Standards and English Language Learners.
Exploring SBAC August 2, 2013MCLA. A Balanced Assessment System Common Core State Standards specify K-12 expectations for college and career readiness.
Leewood K-8 Center FSA Parent Night Department of English Language Arts Lori Granja Melissa Rebecchini February 11, 2015.
The Complexities of Reading Comprehension. What is Reading? Reading is an active and complex process that involves:  Understanding written text,  Developing.
Smarter Balanced Interim Assessment System. Session Overview What are the interim assessments? How to access? How to score? Using the THSS and the scoring.
Bridge Year (Interim Adoption) Instructional Materials Criteria Facilitator:
Student Learning and Growth Goals Foundations 1. Outcomes Understand purpose and requirements of Student Learning and Growth (SLG) goals Review achievement.
Computing the CCSS Way e/ /Summer%20Institute%
Maryland College and Career Readiness Conference Summer 2015.
Common Core What Juniors Should Know about the “Test”
Reviewing Using the Instructional Materials Evaluation Tool: Mathematics Module 103: Standards for Mathematical Practice and Access for All Students (AC.
GRAPH Definition: A PICTORIAL REPRESENTATION OF INFORMATION RECORDED IN A DATA TABLE. USED TO SHOW A RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN TWO OR MORE FACTORS.
Using Data and Grouping to Teach All Students All the Time—Differently!
ACTion for Mathematics-ASPIRE. Background The math assessment was developed to reflect students’ knowledge and skill accumulation over time; capturing.
Using Evidence-Centered Design to develop Scenario Based Interactive Computer Tasks Daisy Rutstein.
+ PSD, 11/5/15. + CELEBRATING WeBro SUCCESS! + WHAT DOES OUR DATA SHOW? Category % Score Curricular Areas to Build Capacity Key Ideas and Details74%Liberal.
Welcome Opening Prayer. Content Objectives: 1.I will review the definition of texts and the teacher’s responsibility in choosing classroom materials.
LEAP TH GRADE. DATES: APRIL 25-29, 2016 Test Administration Schedule:  Day 1 April 25- ELA Session 1: Research Simulation Task (90mins) Mathematics.
SBAC Performance Assessment Sara Shore 1. What is Performance Assessment? Integration of knowledge across the domains Measure depth of understanding,
Building Effective Content Literacy Tasks. The Cycle of Assessment Teach: Does the instruction and the tasks align to the identified learning target(s)?
3 rd, 4 th and 5 th Grade. Agenda Preparation looks like… General Information for Exams Overview of ELA Exam Overview of Math Exam Ways to Help At Home.
An Overview of Georgia Milestones 4 th Grade Parent Involvement.
Constructive Conversation Smart Start Lessons
Literacy Skills Development
How to navigate the ACCESS Project Website
AP Language and Composition
Boston Tutoring Services: The Redesigned SAT
3rd-5th Grade FSA Parent Night
Deep dive on learning progressions + Critiquing lesson methods
3rd-5th Grade FSA Parent Night
Introducing the Numeracy continuum K-10
LEAP TH GRADE.
C516: Learner Response Systems: A UDL Approach Addressing All Students
Georgia Milestones Online Testing Program
Goals for Tonight Present the new Georgia Milestones Assessment System
Goals for Tonight Present the new Georgia Milestones Assessment System
3rd-5th Grade FSA Parent Night
Test Content Specifications
Presentation transcript:

Foundational Work using Evidence-Centered Design

Evidence-centered Design and Universal Design for Learning How do we judge what students know and what they can do? –Make explicit what knowledge or skills are the target –Identify non-target but required knowledge and skills –Generate the kinds of observations that provide evidence of a student having the target knowledge –Determine the kinds of stimuli and work products needed to gather the evidence Argument based on Evidence Based on SRI International Work with NCSC

Designing Items Graduated Complexity –Systematic Use of Variable Features –Scaffolding

Math Example Item 4 assesses content that is closest to grade level and includes minimal use of non-construct relevant scaffolds. Item 3, relative to Item 4, assesses content that is less complex but is still close to grade level (e.g., reduce number of data points, reduce magnitude of numbers used), includes non-construct relevant scaffolds, and most typically uses a start- to-finish demonstration using data not included in the item. Item 2, relative to Items 3 and 4, assesses content that is less complex than Item 3 (e.g., further reduction in number of data points, magnitude of numbers used), includes non-construct relevant scaffolds, and most typically uses a step-by-step demonstration using data not included in the item Item 1 contains the least complex content (e.g., greater reduction in number of data points or magnitude of numbers used) in addition to non-construct relevant scaffolds, such as the use of concrete materials and limited use of symbols. Item 1 targets the lowest ability students within the population.

Cognitive Background AKSAs and Variable Features Used to Support Them 5 AKSAs Variable Features Item 4Item 3Item 2Item 1 Knowledge of what ordered pairs represent No demonstration of plotting the ordered pair Shown ordered pair and teacher demonstrates plotting Teacher demonstrates determining the ordered pair by using a ruler aligned from the point to the x- axis and to the y-axis NA--Aligned to Essential Understanding Knowledge of graphing conventions Teacher points to origin, x-axis, y- axis and points to a previously plotted point Teacher points to origin, x-axis, and y-axis X- and y-axes are identified NA--Aligned to Essential Understanding Based on SRI International Work with NCSC

AKSAs Associated with Cognitive and Executive Functioning UDL Categories and Variable Features UDL AKSAs Variable Features Item 4Item 3Item 2Item 1 Cognitive: Response formats Constructed response Constructed response Selected response: 3 response options Selected response: 2 response options Cognitive: Multiple Representations Text-based representation; Graphic representation; No explanation by teacher Text-based representation; Graphic representation; Teacher explains plotting points from provided ordered pair Text-based representation; Graphic representation; Teacher explains determining the ordered pair from plotted point Graphic representation only to minimize visual stimuli in support of the dichotomous choice Executive Functioning: Number of Item Parts Two parts One part

Sample Item -- 4 Test Administrator "You are going to plot points on this graph.” Test Administrator "This is the x-axis.“ Test Administrator "This is the y-axis." Test Administrator "This is the origin where the x and y-axes meet. Its ordered pair is zero, zero." Test Administrator "One point is already plotted on the graph. It is located at two, four. The ordered pair is two, four. Now it's your turn to plot a point." Question 1 - "Plot a point at one, three on this graph." Question 2 - "Now, plot a point at seven, five on this graph." 7

Sample Item -- 2 Test Administrator (TA) -- "You are going find what ordered pair was used to plot this point. First follow the line down to the x- axis. This number two is the first number of the ordered pair." TA presents student with a note card with the order pair template and writes '2' in the blank ordered pair template and says, "This is how we write an ordered pair. The two is the first number in this ordered pair. It comes from the x-axis." TA returns to Stimulus Material 1 and says, "Then we go back to the point on the graph. Follow the line across to the y-axis axis. This number four on the y-axis is the second number of the ordered pair. The second number of the ordered pair is placed here." TA removes Stimulus Materials 1 and 2, and presents student with another graph (Stimulus Material 3) and says, Question -- "What was the ordered pair that was used to plot this point ?" A. "one, three" B. "two, four or" C. "three, one?"

AKSAs Associated with Cognitive and Executive Functioning UDL Categories and Variable Features UDL AKSAs Variable Features Item 4Item 3Item 2Item 1 Cognitive: Response formats Constructed response Constructed response Selected response: 3 response options Selected response: 2 response options Cognitive: Multiple Representations Text-based representation; Graphic representation; No explanation by teacher Text-based representation; Graphic representation; Teacher explains plotting points from provided ordered pair Text-based representation; Graphic representation; Teacher explains determining the ordered pair from plotted point Graphic representation only to minimize visual stimuli in support of the dichotomous choice Executive Functioning: Number of Item Parts Two parts One part

Reading Items Passages with Items –Varied by word count and Lexiles –Level of Scaffolding –Visual Supports –Level of Inferences –Varied Text Structure –Language Features (e.g., simple sentences)

ELA: Average P-values by Tiers GradeTier 1Tier 2Tier 3Tier (.11).55 (.14).54 (.14).47 (.17) 4.77 (.08).53 (.14).52 (.14).46 (.14) 5.78 (.07).53 (.14).51 (.13).47 (.12) 6.80 (.07).60 (.12).52 (.13).48 (.11) 7.76 (.09).52 (.15).51 (.13).48 (.13) 8.77 (.09).55 (.13).51 (.12).48 (.13) (.09).58 (.15).54 (.14).49 (.14)

Math: Average P-values by Tiers GradeTier 1Tier 2Tier 3Tier (.10).50 (.12).42 (.11) 4.66 (.14).40 (.14).37 (.12).30 (.11) 5.67 (.11).40 (.11).34 (.11).33 (.10) 6.70 (.10).54 (.13).48 (.10).42 (.13) 7.69 (.10).47 (.11).43 (.08).38 (.12) 8.65 (.13).45 (.12).44 (.11).42 (.10) (.15).47 (.10).41 (.11).38 (.12)