OCTOBER 15, 2013 SHS DATA DAY. Critical Components of RtI 1.Leadership and Shared Responsibility 2.Problem-Solving/Data Based Decision Making 3.Assessment.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Vs. Attending a Different Training as a Site Team.
Advertisements

Consensus Building Infrastructure Developing Implementation Doing & Refining Guiding Principles of RtI Provide working knowledge & understanding of: -
West Virginia Department of Education. July 1, 2011 timeline for middle school implementation West Virginia Department of Education.
PAYS FOR: Literacy Coach, Power Hour Aides, LTM's, Literacy Trainings, Kindergarten Teacher Training, Materials.
Students with Learning Disabilities Reading. Dyslexia Severe difficulty learning to read Behavioral manifestations of central nervous system deficits.
Academic Data for Instructional Decisions: Elementary Level Dr. Amy Lingo, Dr. Nicole Fenty, and Regina Hirn Project ABRI University of Louisville Project.
Digging Deeper with DIBELS Data
The JCPS / Bellarmine University Literacy Project
Language and Literacy Domain California Preschool Learning Foundations Volume 1 Published by the California Department of Education (2008) LanguageandLiteracy.
Elementary Literacy Audit Kindergarten – 5th Grade
LEARNINGS IN ASU 28 Sept-23 Dec 2013 Bhagwati Singh Senior Professional Sarva Shiksha Abhiyan, Uttar Pradesh.
North Penn School District Phase III Update Introduction to Response to Instruction and Intervention (RTII): A Schoolwide Framework for Student Success.
Response to Intervention Finding RTI-Ready Measures to Assess and Track Student Academic Skills Jim Wright
Comprehensive Curriculum Framework for Tiered Instruction: A Response to Intervention Model Sarah Jackson, M.Ed. Sandra Hess Robbins, M.Ed. Sanna Harjusola-Webb,
Response to Intervention (RTI) Presented by Ashley Adamo and Brian Mitchell January 6, 2012.
Literacy Across the Lifespan: What Works Timothy Shanahan University of Illinois at Chicago.
Reading First Assessment Faculty Presentation. Fundamental Discoveries About How Children Learn to Read 1.Children who enter first grade weak in phonemic.
Keystone State Reading Conference October 29, 2012 Dr. Deb Carr, King’s College.
Problem Solving Model Problem Solving Model NC DPI Summer Preparation Preparation & Implementation Implementation North Carolina.
Assessment for teaching Presented at the Black Sea Conference, Batumi, September 12, Patrick Griffin Assessment Research Centre Melbourne Graduate.
CINDY EDWARDS, RTI- DYSLEXIA/504 ADMINISTRATIVE SUPERVISOR AUSTIN ISD 2012 RtI A Focus on Early Reading Within A Multi-Tiered Preventative Framework.
The Idaho State Department of Education Presents: “ELLA” Early Learning Literacy Activities This program is designed to support the most important early.
Research Foundations and EGRA Protocols or Why these measures? Sylvia Linan-Thompson.
Vision: Every child in every district receives the instruction that they need and deserve…every day. Oregon Response to Intervention Vision: Every child.
Ten Foundations of Literacy Success Timothy Shanahan University of Illinois at Chicago.
Reading Interventions that Work! Barb Denbow Brenda Schulz January 24, 2008.
Welcome to Title I Reading Night! September 24, 2012.
RtI Basics for Secondary School District of Manatee County PS-RtI Team.
Work Sample Seminar1 Work Sample Seminar Screening Assessments, File Review, & Context Part 1 Portland State University.
What is Reading First This “program” focuses on putting proven methods of early reading instruction in classrooms. Through Reading First, states and districts.
Blending Academics and Behavior Dawn Miller Shawnee Mission School District Steve Goodman Michigan’s Integrated Behavior and Learning.
Title 1 Open House/Parent Meeting September 23, 2015.
Response to Intervention (RTI) at Mary Lin Elementary Principal’s Coffee August 30, 2013.
Parents Overview of Success For All This information booklet will provide you with information on Literacy at Thomas Arnold: FROM SEPTEMBER 2012.
TECHNOLOGY AND TEXTBOOKS: Cutting- Edge Early Literacy Technology By Kari Miller.
Response to Intervention Franklin Community Schools January 24, 2011.
Student Achievement Manager Intervention Plans. Creating a Student Intervention Plan Intervention Plans: Encompass all components of an intervention –
1 The Oregon Reading First Model: A Blueprint for Success Scott K. Baker Eugene Research Institute/ University of Oregon Orientation Session Portland,
SETRC network guide for assessment of programs.  Assessing quality of district program and practice in areas of literacy  Determining priority need.
Best Start Kindergarten Assessment
Comprehensive Literacy Program Pre-K through 12 Mary E. Robbins, Ed.D. Debra P. Price, Ph.D. Sam Houston State University © 2004 by Mary E. Robbins and.
Common Core State Standards for Literacy in Technical Subjects.
Tier III Implementation. Define the Problem  In general - Identify initial concern General description of problem Prioritize and select target behavior.
Tuesday, October 23, Why Treasures?  Built on a solid foundation of research  Best practices, tools, and strategies  Explicit instruction and.
Projects #9, 17, 29, and 32 Mentor: Helga Bernard, Ph. D. Clark County School District School Improvement and Research.
Maine Department of Education Maine Reading First Course Session #1 Introduction to Reading First.
Reading WonderWorks Intervention K-1 st Grade Tier 2 Intervention.
DIBELS: Doing it Right –. Big Ideas of Today’s Presentation Reading success is built upon a foundation of skills DIBELS (Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early.
1 One Common Voice – One Plan School Improvement Module 3 Study: Analyze Data Set Goals and Measurable Objectives Research Best Practice.
WCSD-Ganley 2009 Speech-Language PLC Our Journey as a PLC Defining our next steps October 30, 2009.
Understanding the Common Core State Standards and Literacy Standards.
Right on Target… sCC4&safe=active sCC4&safe=active.
Components of a literacy program November 21, 2008.
GOING DEEPER WITH INDEPENDENT READING AND FURTHER THAN INDEPENDENT READING.
Lead Teach Learn PLC Fundamental IV: Multi-Tiered System of Supports.
Wilkinsburg School District Literacy Development Framework May 2011.
Building A Community Of Learners Who Lead Building A Community Of Learners Who Lead.
ILEADR Consultants: Brie Beane & Amanda Goulds. Prior to RtI  Academic Ranking- 55 th  Graduation Rate- 61% (53rd)  SAT- 57 th  Dropout Rate- 6.5%
Knowledge-Building and Instructional Practice in Georgia Reading First.
Copyright 2012 Pearson Education. Vukelich, Helping Young Children Learn Language and Literacy: Birth Through Kindergarten 3/e Chapter 1 Foundations of.
Long Range Technology Plan, Student Device Standards Secondary Device Recommendation.
Tier III Preparing for First Meeting. Making the Decision  When making the decision to move to Tier III, all those involve with the implementation of.
Supporting Literacy for Students with Developmental Disabilities Being a Literacy Partner.
Middle School Training: Ensuring a Strong Foundation of Supports
How are HLPs used? Components of HLP identified.
AVID and The Common Core
Curriculum and Instructional Design in Teaching Literacy for Individuals with Exceptionalities EDU 9744T.
WHAT IS READING? What makes a ABLE reader? What do ABLE readers do?
K-2 Reading Foundation Instructional Materials & Training
Intensive Intervention – Tier 3
Presentation transcript:

OCTOBER 15, 2013 SHS DATA DAY

Critical Components of RtI 1.Leadership and Shared Responsibility 2.Problem-Solving/Data Based Decision Making 3.Assessment 4.Curriculum and Instruction 5.Sustainability and Integration 6.Family and Community Partnerships

72% 15% 13% 66% 19% 15% 59% 26% 15% Fall: Winter : Fall:

Foundational Skills Flowchart Phonemic Awareness Decoding Sight Word Knowledge Fluency Vocabulary Comprehension

Team Time Identify the problem based on Student Data Analysis – RtI Data Log (Kummerow) – Reference Class rosters (Powerschool) Tips: Typically begins broad Skills Based? Behavioral? Thinking Problem? Concrete, Observable and Measurable?

Develop Hypothesis We must ask questions to form a hypothesis regarding “What is the problem? Why is it occurring?” We ask questions across four domains InstructionCurriculumEnvironment

Develop Hypothesis Review Curricular materials Curriculum Maps Etc… Interview Previous Teachers Current Teachers Etc.. Observe Teacher’s instructional strategies During Instructional Time Etc.... Test Group Diagnostic Test Individual Testing data Skill specific test on sample of students Etc....

Team Time Develop Hypotheses for… – Instructional – Curricular – Environmental Discuss what data you will need to confirm/refute your Hypotheses

Discuss & Select Solutions Teacher utilizes direct instruction oral reading fluency strategies during anchor activity. Utilize i3 Website for Literacy and Assessment resources. Kummerow goes in the classrooms to teach fluency skills S - Specific M - Measurable A - Attainable R - Relevant T - Time-Bound ✖ Discuss possible Solutions based on our Problem Statement

Tier 1 Literacy Strategies Choral reading Chunking text Vocabulary, word study-See it, hear it, say it Spelling-See it, hear it, say it Engagement: Say, Write, Do-every 2-10 for secondary Think, Ink, Link See strategies on lists given and i3 website

Tier 1 Literacy Strategies Choral reading Chunking text Vocabulary, word study-See it, hear it, say it Spelling-See it, hear it, say it Engagement: Say, Write, Do-every 2-10 for secondary Think, Ink, Link See strategies on lists given and i3 website

RtI - Tier 1 Calendar Kummerow’s WebpageWebpage “INSPECT WHAT YOU EXPECT”