Presented by Terje R. Pedersen Oslo Disclosure: Research grants and/or speaker- / consulting fees from Merck, MSP, Astra-Zeneca, Pfizer.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
The results of the Study of Heart and Renal Protection (SHARP)
Advertisements

P Sever (Co-chair), B Dahlöf (Co-chair), N Poulter (Secretary), H Wedel (Statistician), G Beevers, M Caulfield, R Collins, SE Kjeldsen, A Kristinsson,
1 CAMELOT: Study Design A Morbidity and Mortality Study Patients with documented CAD on standard-of-care therapies* (n=1997) Clinical events (morbidity.
The results of the Study of Heart and Renal Protection (SHARP) Colin Baigent, Martin Landray on behalf of the SHARP Investigators Disclosure: SHARP was.
THE ACTION TO CONTROL CARDIOVASCULAR RISK IN DIABETES STUDY (ACCORD)
1. 2 The primary Objective of IDEAL LDL-C Simvastatin mg/d Atorvastatin 80 mg/d risk CHD In stable CHD patients IDEAL: The Incremental Decrease.
HPS2-THRIVE: Randomized placebo-controlled trial of ER niacin and laropiprant in 25,673 patients with pre-existing cardiovascular disease. Jane Armitage.
HPS2-THRIVE: Randomized placebo-controlled trial of ER niacin and laropiprant in 25,673 patients with pre-existing cardiovascular disease. Jane Armitage.
TNT: Study Design Treating to New Targets 2 5 years 10,001 Patients Clinically evident CHD LDL-C 130  250 mg/dL following up to 8-week washout and 8-week.
The Long-Term Intervention with Pravastatin in Ischemic Disease (LIPID) The LIPID Study Group N Engl J Med 1998;339:
Cholesterol quintile (mg/dL)
VBWG IDEAL: The Incremental Decrease in End Points Through Aggressive Lipid Lowering Study.
Diabetes Trials Unit University of Oxford WebSite: Lipids in Diabetes Study.
HYPERLIPIDAEMIA. 4S 4444 patients –Hx angina or MI –Cholesterol Simvastatin 20mg (10-40) vs. placebo FU 5 years  total cholesterol 25%;  LDL.
COURAGE: Clinical Outcomes Utilizing Revascularization and Aggressive Drug Evaluation Purpose To compare the efficacy of optimal medical therapy (OMT)
CHARM-Preserved: Candesartan in Heart failure: Assessment of Reduction in Mortality and morbidity - Preserved Purpose To determine whether the angiotensin.
BEAUTI f UL: morBidity-mortality EvAlUaTion of the I f inhibitor ivabradine in patients with coronary disease and left ventricULar dysfunction Purpose.
Presented by Terje R. Pedersen, M.D. Oslo, Norway.
0902CZR01NL537SS0901 RENAAL Altering the Course of Renal Disease in Hypertensive Patients with Type 2 Diabetes and Nephropathy with the A II Antagonist.
Modern Management of Cholesterol in the High-Risk Patient.
Fenofibrate Intervention and Event Lowering in Diabetes FIELDFIELD Presented at The American Heart Association Scientific Sessions, November 2005 Presented.
Management of Elevated Cholesterol in the Primary Prevention Group of Adult Japanese (MEGA) Trial MEGA Trial Presented at The American Heart Association.
Slide Source: Lipids Online Slide Library Collaborative Atorvastatin Diabetes Study (CARDS) Type 2 diabetes mellitus Men and women.
HPS: Heart Protection Study Purpose To determine whether simvastatin reduces mortality and vascular events in patients with and without coronary disease,
Avoiding Cardiovascular Events through COMbination Therapy in Patients LIving with Systolic Hypertension The First Outcomes Trial of Initial Therapy With.
Laura Mucci, Pharm.D. Candidate Mercer University 2012 Preceptor: Dr. Rahimi February 2012.
Incremental Decrease in Clinical Endpoints Through Aggressive Lipid Lowering (IDEAL) Trial IDEAL Trial Presented at The American Heart Association Scientific.
The Prospective Pravastatin Pooling Project L I P I D CARECARE PPP Project Investigators Am J Cardiol 1995; 76:899–905.
Aim To determine the effects of a Coversyl- based blood pressure lowering regimen on the risk of recurrent stroke among patients with a history of stroke.
Monocyte damaged endothelium macrophage foam cell lipid thrombocytes plaque oxidative stress smooth muscle cells 4 5 Gaviraghi et al., 1998 Lacidipine:
OVERALL SURVIVAL Adapted from Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study Group Lancet 1994;344: % of patients alive Simvastatin (n=2221)
SPARCL Stroke Prevention by Aggressive Reduction in Cholesterol Levels trial.
Collaborative Atorvastatin Diabetes Study CARDS Dr Sachin Kadoo.
P Sever (Co-chair), B Dahlöf (Co-chair), N Poulter (Secretary), H Wedel (Statistician), G Beevers, M Caulfield, R Collins, SE Kjeldsen, A Kristinsson,
Baseline characteristics. Patient flow Completed Completed Perindopril Placebo Randomised Not randomised Registered.
On-Treatment Analysis A Multicenter, Double-Blind, Randomized Study to Establish the Clinical Benefit and Safety of Vytorin (Ezetimibe/Simvastatin Tablet)
4S: Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study
Clinical Outcomes with Newer Antihyperglycemic Agents FDA-Mandated CV Safety Trials 1.
Tailoring Intervention – Effectively Targeting the High-risk Population Cardiovascular Event Reduction in the Higher-Risk Primary Prevention Population.
Long-term Cardiovascular Effects of 4.9 Years of Intensive Blood Pressure Control in Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: The Action to Control Cardiovascular Risk.
Clinical Trial Results. org RAAVE Luis M. Moura, MD; Sandra F. Ramos, MSc; José L. Zamorano, MD, PhD; Isabel M. Barros, MD; Luis F. Azevedo, MD; Francisco.
Rosuvastatin 10 mg n=2514 Placebo n= to 4 weeks Randomization 6weeks3 monthly Closing date 20 May 2007 Eligibility Optimal HF treatment instituted.
Ten Year Outcome of Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery Versus Medical Therapy in Patients with Ischemic Cardiomyopathy Results of the Surgical Treatment.
Clinical Outcomes with Newer Antihyperglycemic Agents
Clinical Outcomes with Newer Antihyperglycemic Agents
Title slide.
Terje R. Pedersen, M.D. Presented by Oslo, Norway
Trial profile SAS denotes the Simvastatin in Aortic Stenosis Study
Baseline characteristics and effectiveness results
European Society of Cardiology 2017 Clinical Trial Update I
Clinical Implications of Electrocardiographic Left Ventricular Strain and Hypertrophy in Asymptomatic Aortic Stenosis: The SEAS study Anders M. Greve,
Cholesterol Treatment Trialists’ (CTT) Collaboration Slide deck
REVEAL: Randomized placebo-controlled trial of anacetrapib in 30,449 patients with atherosclerotic vascular disease Louise Bowman on behalf of the HPS.
Triglycerides Cholesterol HDL-C or N NIDDM N or or N IDDM.
AIM HIGH Niacin plus Statin to prevent vascular events
CANTOS: The Canakinumab Anti-Inflammatory Thrombosis Outcomes Study
First time a CETP inhibitor shows reduction of serious CV events
SPIRE Program: Studies of PCSK9 Inhibition and the Reduction of Vascular Events Unanticipated attenuation of LDL-c lowering response to humanized PCSK9.
Scandinavian Simvastatin Survival Study (4S)
Western Norway B-vitamin Intervention Trial
Jane Armitage on behalf of the HPS2-THRIVE Collaborative Group
The Hypertension in the Very Elderly Trial (HYVET)
The results of the SHARP trial
Insights from the Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial (ASCOT)
Terje R. Pedersen, M.D. Presented by Oslo, Norway
Lipid-Lowering Arm (ASCOT-LLA): Results in the Subgroup of Patients with Diabetes Peter S. Sever, Bjorn Dahlöf, Neil Poulter, Hans Wedel, for the.
LRC-CPPT and MRFIT Content Points:
The results of the SHARP trial
PROSPER: trial design                                                                                                                                                                 
SPIRE Program: Studies of PCSK9 Inhibition and the Reduction of Vascular Events Unanticipated attenuation of LDL-c lowering response to humanized PCSK9.
Presentation transcript:

Presented by Terje R. Pedersen Oslo Disclosure: Research grants and/or speaker- / consulting fees from Merck, MSP, Astra-Zeneca, Pfizer

Patients Randomized by Country Denmark n=330 Sweden n=401 Norway n=425 UK n=187 Germany n=292 Ireland n=17 Finland n=221 Rossebø et al. NEJM. 2008;359

SEAS Steering Committee Terje R. Pedersen (Chairman), Anne B. Rossebø (Coordinator), Kurt Boman John Chambers Kenneth Egstrup Eva Gerdts Christa Gohlke-Bärwolf Ingar Holme (Statistician) Antero Y. Kesäniemi Christoph Nienaber Simon Ray Terje Skjærpe Kristian Wachtell Ronnie Willenheimer Nonvoting members: Philippe Brudi (MSP), William Malbecq (MSD statistician) Rossebø et al. NEJM. 2008;359

Study Design Randomized Double blind Placebo controlled Multicenter 4 Weeks placebo/diet run-in Simvastatin 40 mg + ezetimibe 10 mg or placebo Median duration: 4.5 year (minimum follow-up 4 years)

Rossebø et al. NEJM. 2008;359 Primary Endpoint Major Cardiovascular Events: Cardiovascular death Aortic valve replacement surgery (AVR) CHF as a result of progression of AS Non-fatal myocardial infarction CABG PCI Hospitalized unstable angina Non-hemorrhagic stroke PCI = percutaneous coronary intervention CHF= congestive heart failure CABG = coronary-artery bypass grafting

Rossebø et al. NEJM. 2008;359 Secondary Endpoints Aortic Valve Events Aortic Valve Replacement CHF as a result of progression of AS Cardiovascular death Ischemic Cardiovascular Events Cardiovascular death Nonfatal MI CABG PCI Hospitalized unstable angina Nonhemorrhagic stroke

Rossebø et al. NEJM. 2008;359 Other Objectives Echocardiography Safety

Rossebø et al. NEJM. 2008;359 Patient Definition Men and Women Age years Asymptomatic Valvular AS: ▬ Aortic valve thickening on echocardiographic evaluation ▬ Doppler jet velocity ≥2.5 - ≤4.0 m/sec Normal LV systolic function

Rossebø et al. NEJM. 2008;359 Exclusion Criteria Statin therapy or indication for statins Coronary heart disease Other important valvular disease ▬ Significant mitral valve stenosis or regurgitation ▬ Severe or predominant aortic regurgitation ▬ Rheumatic valvular disease or AV prosthesis or subvalvular (hypertrophic, obstructive cardiomyopathy) or supravalvular AS Diabetes Mellitus Other conditions precluding participation

Rossebø et al. NEJM. 2008;359 Baseline Characteristics Placebo Simva + Ezetimibe n= 929n= 944 Age (years) Women (%) SBP (mm Hg) DBP (mm Hg)82 Smoker (%)1820 Ex-smoker (%)3735 Never smoker (%)45 BMI (kg/m 2)

Rossebø et al. NEJM. 2008;359 Baseline Medications Placebo Simva + Ezetimibe n= 929n= 944 ACE inhibitors A-II blockers Ca antagonists Beta-blockers Aspirin Diuretics

Rossebø et al. NEJM. 2008;359 Baseline Lipids and Lipoproteins Fasting Serum Lipid and Lipoprotein Levels at Baseline (n=1,873) Concentration (mmol/L) Concentration (mg/dl) Total Cholesterol LDL Cholesterol HDL Cholesterol Triglycerides Apolipoprotein B (g/L) Values given as mean ± SD; LDL = low-density lipoprotein; HDL = high-density lipoprotein

Rossebø et al. NEJM. 2008;359 Baseline Echocardiography Mean Values Placebo Simva + Ezetimibe n= 929n= 944 Transaortic Peak velocity (m/sec) Peak gradient (mmHg) Mean gradient (mmHg) Aortic valve area (cm 2 ) Bicuspid valve (%)6.35.0

Rossebø et al. NEJM. 2008;359 LDL-Cholesterol Intention to Treat Population Year Mean (mg/dL) ±SE EZ/Simva 10/40 mg Placebo

Rossebø et al. NEJM. 2008;359 Primary Endpoint MCE Intention to Treat Population Years in Study Percentage of Patients With First Event EZ/Simva 10/40 mg Placebo EZ/Simva 10/40 mg No. at Risk Hazard ratio: 0.96, p=

Rossebø et al. NEJM. 2008;359 2nd EP: Aortic Valve Events Years in Study Placebo EZ/Simva 10/40 mg No. at Risk Intention to Treat Population EZ/Simva 10/40 mg Placebo Hazard ratio: 0.97, p=0.732 Percentage of Patients With First Event

Rossebø et al. NEJM. 2008;359 Aortic Valve Replacement Placebo Intention to Treat Population Years in Study EZ/Simva 10/40 mg No. at risk Hazard ratio: 1.00, p= Percentage of Patients With First Event EZ/Simva 10/40 mg Placebo

Rossebø et al. NEJM. 2008;359 Peak Aortic - Jet Velocity Intention to Treat Population EZ/Simva 10/40 mg Placebo Year 1Year 2Last Follow-up Time Change from Baseline (m/sec) Mean (±SE)

Rossebø et al. NEJM. 2008;359 2nd EP: Ischemic CV Events Placebo EZ/Simva 10/40 mg No. at risk Percentage of Patients With First Event Intention to Treat Population Years in Study Hazard ratio: 0.78, p=0.024 EZ/Simva 10/40 mg Placebo

Rossebø et al. NEJM. 2008;359 Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting (CABG) 30 Years in Study Placebo EZ/Simva 10/40 mg No. at risk Percentage of Patients With First Event Intention to Treat Population Hazard ratio: 0.68, p=0.015 EZ/Simva 10/40 mg Placebo

Rossebø et al. NEJM. 2008;359 Clinical Adverse Events (AE) PlaceboEZ/ Simva N=929N=943* nnp= Any serious AE (SAE) Drug discon. due to SAE7977 All Patients as Treated Population

Rossebø et al. NEJM. 2008;359 Clinical Adverse Events (AE) PlaceboEZ/ Simva N=929N=943* nnp= Any serious AE (SAE) Drug discon. due to SAE7977 Musculoskeletal AE Myopathy / Rhabdo00 All Patients as Treated Population

Rossebø et al. NEJM. 2008;359 Clinical Adverse Events (AE) PlaceboEZ/ Simva N=929N=943* nnp= Any serious AE (SAE) Drug discon. due to SAE7977 Musculoskeletal AE Myopathy / Rhabdo00 New cancer Recurrent, same site53 Cancer, total All Patients as Treated Population

Rossebø et al. NEJM. 2008;359 Fatal Cancer Placebo EZ/Simva 10/40 mg No. at risk P=0.05 Unadjusted P=0.06 With Log-rank continuity correction Years in Study Hazard ratio: 1.67 Cumulative Percentage EZ/Simva 10/40 mg Placebo Intention to Treat Population n=23 (2.5%) n=39 (4.1%)

Rossebø et al. NEJM. 2008;359 Incident Cancer Site Placebo (N=929) EZ/simva (N=943) nn Lip, oral pharynx, Oesophagus 1 1 Stomach15 Large bowel / intestine89 Pancreas14 Liver gallbladder, bile ducts32 Lung107 Other respiratory01 Skin (any)818 Breast58 Prostate1321 Kidney2 2 Bladder7 7 Genital4 4 Hemathological5 7 Other/unspecified7 12 All differences are non-significant All Patients as Treated Population

Rossebø et al. NEJM. 2008;359 All Cause Mortality Intention to Treat Population Placebo EZ/Simva 10/40 mg No. risk Years in Study Hazard ratio: 1.04, p= EZ/Simva 10/40 mg Placebo Cumulative Percentage

Rossebø et al. NEJM. 2008;359 Major CV Events - Components ITT Population Major CV Events CV Death AVR CHF Nonfatal MI CABG PCI Hospitalized UAP Non hem. Stroke Endpoints Favors PlaceboFavors EZ/Simva 10/40 mg Hazard Ratio (95% CI) # of Events Placebo EZ/Simva * *p=0.02 vs Placebo