ACRIN 6678 Site Training ACRIN 6678 FDG-PET/CT as a Predictive Marker of Tumor Response and Patient Outcome: Prospective Validation in Non-small Cell Lung.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Treatment.
Advertisements

Gaurav Agarwal / Jul 2008 SGPGIMS, Lucknow, India Why is SGPGIMS Lucknow an ideal Hospital for state-of-the-art treatment of Breast Cancer.
SARC023 Phase I/II trial of ganetespib, an heat shock protein 90 inhibitor in combination with the mTOR inhibitor sirolimus for patients with unresectable.
Modified Megestrol The Clinical Trials by : Carolina R. Akib
Research Protocol ACRIN 6678 Learning About PET/CT Scans: Can PET/CT scans provide helpful information for the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer?
Consent for Research Study A study for patients newly diagnosed with advanced glioblastoma (brain cancer): Learning whether a PET scan with F-fluoromisonidazole.
Consent for Research Study A Study for Women with Advanced Cervical Cancer: Learning whether an MRI scan with an investigative contrast agent (called.
Matthew Kilmurry, M.D. St. Mary’s General Hospital Grand River Hospital.
Total Lesion Glycolysis by 18 F-FDG PET/CT a Reliable Predictor of Prognosis in Soft Tissue Sarcoma Ilkyu Han Musculoskeletal Tumor Center, Seoul National.
Clinical Trials The Way We Make Progress Against Disease.
Improving Decision-Making for Medications in Rheumatoid Arthritis Edward Yelin, Ph.D. Jennifer Barton, M.D. Laura Trupin, M.P.H. Gina Evans-Young University.
SURGEONS ROLE AND INVOLVEMENT IN SBRT PROGRAM Stephen R. Hazelrigg, M.D. Professor and Chair, Cardiothoracic Surgery Southern Illinois University, School.
ACRIN 6657/CALGB Consent for Research Study Contrast-Enhanced Breast MRI and MRS: A Correlative Science Studies to Characterize Tumor Response in.
ACRIN Abdominal Committee ACRIN Gynecologic Committee Fall Meeting 2010.
ACRIN Research Associates Educational Session Radiation Therapy Oncology Group Research Associates Committee Joyce Neading, RHIT, CTR Program Director,
Arthur Stillman, M.D., Ph.D., PI Pamela Woodard, M.D., Study Co-chair Randomized Evaluation of Patients with Stable Angina Comparing Utilization of Diagnostic.
Primary Aim To compare outcomes of participants with symptoms of stable angina or angina equivalent evaluated with an anatomic imaging strategy using CCTA.
EN.8 - A PHASE III STUDY OF STANDARD THERAPY VERSUS RIDAFOROLIMUS IN WOMEN WITH RECURRENT OR METASTATIC ENDOMETRIAL CANCER WHO HAVE PREVIOUS HAD CHEMOTHERAPY.
AGO-OVAR DESKTOP III (Protocol AGO - OVAR OP.4)
ACRIN 6671/GOG 0233 Consent for Research Study A study for Women with Advanced Cervical Cancer: Learning whether a PET/CT scan using an imaging agent called.
 Determining the Nature of a Breast Abnormality  It is a procedure that may be used to determine whether a lump is a cyst (sac containing fluid) or a.
ACRIN 6673 Percutaneous Radiofrequency Ablation of Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Cirrhotic Patients: A Multi-Center Study.
A Phase II Study to Evaluate the Safety and Toxicity of Sparing Radiation to the Pathologic N0 Side of the Neck in Squamous Cell.
Session Fertility and Pregnancy FL-BBM Specific questions Risk of premature ovarian failure Ability to become pregnant Safety of pregnancy.
radio-iodinated metaiodobenzylguanidine (123I-MIBG)
RTOG1106: Randomized Phase IIR Trial of Personalized Adaptive Radiotherapy Based on Mid-treatment FDG-PET in Locally Advanced NSCLC P.I.: Feng-Ming (Spring)
ACRIN 6678 Site Training ACRIN 6678 FDG-PET/CT as a Predictive Marker of Tumor Response and Patient Outcome: Prospective Validation in Non-small Cell Lung.
ACRIN 6682 Phase II Trial of 64 Cu-ATSM PET/CT in Cervical Cancer Principal Investigator: Farrokh Dehdashti, MD 10/2/09.
ACRIN 6685 Overview ACRIN 6685 A Multi-center Trial of FDG-PET/CT Staging of Head and Neck Cancer and its Impact on the N0 Neck Surgical Treatment in Head.
Inclusion Criteria Patient has definitive histologically or cytologically confirmed metastatic adenocarcinoma of the pancreas. The definitive diagnosis.
The Colorectal Cancer Center Jena Gharbi A, Settmacher U. Department of General, Visceral and Vascular Surgery, Friedrich-Schiller-University Jena
Prospective Phase I/II Trial of Carbon Ion Radiotherapy for Locally Advanced Non-small-cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) Abstract title: CIRT for Locally Advanced.
RECIST Overview.
1 SNDA Gemzar plus Carboplatin Treatment of Late Relapsing Ovarian Cancer.
ACRIN 6682 Phase II Trial of 64 Cu-ATSM PET/CT in Cervical Cancer Principal Investigator: Farrokh Dehdashti, MD 9/30/10.
SARC: Participation and Protocol / Concept Review Robert Maki, MD PhD Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center.
Cancer Centers In Clinical Trials Sandrine Marreaud Head of Medical Department.
The treatment of metastatic squamous cell carcinoma (SCCA) of the anal canal: A single institution experience P. Pathak, B. King, A. Ohinata, P. Das, C.H.
BASED ON PROTOCOL VERSION 1 SEPTEMBER 2012 A new study evaluating an investigational drug to treat patients with HER2-positive metastatic gastroesophageal.
Consent for Research Study A study for patients newly diagnosed with advanced glioblastoma (brain cancer): Learning whether a PET scan with F-fluoromisonidazole.
THE OUTBACK TRIAL A Phase III trial of adjuvant chemotherapy following chemoradiation as primary treatment for locally advanced cervical cancer compared.
American College of Radiology Imaging Network ACRIN 6664 ACRIN 6664 – Protocol Review The National CT Colonography Trial Name(s) of presenters.
MABEL – a large multinational study of cetuximab plus irinotecan in metastatic colorectal cancer progressing on irinotecan H Wilke, R Glynne-Jones, J Thaler,
Enrollment and Monitoring Procedures for NCI Supported Clinical Trials Barry Anderson, MD, PhD Cancer Therapy Evaluation Program National Cancer Institute.
Symptom control in patients with recurrent ovarian cancer Measuring the benefit of palliative chemotherapy in women with platinum refractory/ resistant.
. Background Paclitaxel and Irinotecan in Platinum Refractory or Resistant Small Cell Lung Cancer: a Galician Lung Cancer.
ACRIN 6682 Phase II Trial OF 64 Cu-ATSM PET/CT in Cervical Cancer Principal Investigator: Farrokh Dehdashti, MD 10/4/08.
CB-1 Background of Pancreatic Cancer & NCIC CTG PA.3 Study Design Malcolm Moore, MD Professor of Medicine and Pharmacology Princess Margaret Hospital Chair,
Patterns of Care in Medical Oncology Treatment of Metastatic Colon Cancer.
A Randomized, Double-Blinded, Placebo-Controlled, Multi-Institutional, Phase II.5 Study of AZD0530, a Selective Src Kinase Inhibitor, in Patients with.
Personalized medicine in lung cancer R4 김승민. Personalized Medicine in Lung Cancer patients with specific types and stages of cancer should be treated.
HE-4 TRIAL Prospective phase II trial on the prognostic and predictive value of HE-4 regression during neoadjuvant chemotherapy for advanced ovarian, Fallopian.
Single-agent nab-Paclitaxel Given Weekly (3/4) as First-line Therapy for Metastatic Breast Cancer (An International Oncology Network Study, #I )
HE-4 TRIAL Prospective phase II trial on the prognostic and predictive value of HE-4 regression during neoadjuvant chemotherapy for advanced ovarian, Fallopian.
Adjuvant autologous renal tumour cell vaccine and risk of tumour progression in patients with renal- cell carcinoma after radical nephrectomy: phase III,
RANDOMIZED PHASE II STUDY OF NABPACLITAXEL, IN RECURRENT ADVANCED OR METASTATIC CERVICAL CANCER MITO CER-NAB Enrica Mazzoni, MD Medical Oncology & Breast.
ACOSOG Sarcoma Committee Chair: Peter W.T. Pisters, MD Vice Chairs: Edward Cheng, MD (Orthopedic Oncology) Robert Maki, MD, PhD (Medical Oncology) Brian.
Randomized phase III trial of gemcitabine and cisplatin vs. gemcitabine alone inpatients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer and a performance status.
ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA- Summarised
Differences in Primary Care Clinicians' Approach to Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Patients Compared with Breast Cancer  Timothy R. Wassenaar, MD, Jens C.
S1207: Phase III randomized, placebo-controlled trial adding 1 year of everolimus to adjuvant endocrine therapy for patients with high-risk, HR+, HER2-
Feasibility Study) PB-PG
Learning About PET/CT Scans:
Comments on design and sequence of biomarker studies
Differences in Primary Care Clinicians' Approach to Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Patients Compared with Breast Cancer  Timothy R. Wassenaar, MD, Jens C.
MITO CERV …3…(?) Phase II study on Carboplatin-Paclitaxel-Pembrolizumab in neoadjuvant treatment of locally advanced cervical cancer.
- Phase 1 Signalling Study
CoPrincipal Investigators
MITO 26 PHASE II TRIAL ON TRABECTEDIN IN THE TREATMENT OF ADVANCED UTERINE AND OVARIAN CARCINOSARCOMA (CS)
General strategies of Cancer Treatment and evaluation of Response
Presentation transcript:

ACRIN 6678 Site Training ACRIN 6678 FDG-PET/CT as a Predictive Marker of Tumor Response and Patient Outcome: Prospective Validation in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Study Overview

ACRIN 6678 Site Training Protocol Investigator Wolfgang Weber, MD Department of Nuclear Medicine University of Freiberg Germany Protocol Co-Investigators Denise Aberle, MD Department of Radiology UCLA Medical Center Barry Siegel, M.D. Division of Nuclear Medicine Mallinckrodt Institute of Radiology Protocol Investigators Protocol Co-Investigators Anthony Shields, MD, PhD Karmanos Cancer Institute Karen Reckamp, MD Department of Medicine City of Hope Medical Center Steven Dubinett, MD Department of Medicine UCLA Medical Center Joel Karp, PhD University of Pennsylvania Department of Radio Nuclear Medicine Protocol Statistician Constantine Gatsonis, PhD Center For Statistical Sciences Brown University

ACRIN 6678 Site Training Protocol Overview  Background  Design  Objectives  Inclusion and Exclusion Criteria  Participant Accrual

ACRIN 6678 Site Training Background  Single-institution studies suggest FDG-PET is useful for early monitoring of tumor response to therapy.  Validation is required in a multi-institutional trial prior to FDG-PET’s use as a new marker for tumor response for patient management.  Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) was selected because: it is a common disease with a poor prognosis; it allows for correlation of FDG-PET/CT tumor response and patient survival; almost universally demonstrates intense FDG uptake – facilitating the quantitative analysis.

ACRIN 6678 Site Training Eligibility Patients with advanced NSCLC scheduled to undergo palliative chemotherapy with a two drug chemotherapy regimen GROUP A Option  Two (2) FDG-PET/CT scans prior to chemotherapy – at least 24 hours between the 2 scans;  One (1) FDG-PET/CT scan post-cycle 1 of chemotherapy;  Follow-up CT scans every 6 weeks from initiation of chemotherapy for 18 weeks per standard of care;  Observational clinical follow-up for one year. GROUP B Option:  One (1) FDG-PET/CT scan prior to chemotherapy;  One (1) FDG-PET/CT scan post-cycle 1 of chemotherapy;  One (1) FDG-PET/CT scan post-cycle 2 of chemotherapy;  Follow-up CT scans every 6 weeks from initation of chemotherapy for 18 weeks per standard of care;  Observational clinical follow-up for one year. Study Design

ACRIN 6678 Site Training Eligibility Patients with advanced NSCLC scheduled to undergo palliative chemotherapy with a two drug chemotherapy regimen GROUP C Option: Two (2) FDG-PET/CT scans prior to chemotherapy—at least 24 hours, but no more than 7 days, between the 2 scans. Study Design (cont.)

ACRIN 6678 Site Training Study Hypotheses 1.Changes in tumor metabolism during chemotherapy provide early prediction of patient survival. This is the primary endpoint of the study and evaluated in Groups A and B 2.Treatment induced changes in tumor glucose utilization can be measured by FDG-PET with high reproducibility (Group A) This secondary endpoint of the study is evaluated in Groups A and C

ACRIN 6678 Site Training 1.To test whether a metabolic response (indicated by ≥ 25% decrease in peak tumor SUV post-cycle 1 provides early prediction of tpatient survival and best tumor response (Groups A and B). 2.To determine the test-retest reproducibility of quantitative assessment of tumor FDG uptake by SUVs (Group A and C). 3.To compare the predictive value of FDG-PET for one year survival after 1 and 2 cycles of chemotherapy uptake (Group B). 4.To evaluate in an exploratory analysis changes in tumor volume during chemotherapy by multi-slice CT (Groups A and B). Study Objectives – Overview

ACRIN 6678 Site Training Inclusion Criteria 1.Histologically or cytologically proven NSCLC 2.Participant meets one of the following criteria:  Newly diagnosed Stage IIIB (with malignant pleural effusion) or stage IV  Recurrent or metastatic NSCLC – surgery or radiation therapy performed ≥ three (3) months prior to enrollment  measurable lesion in the chest  Recurrent or metastatic NSCLC – received chemotherapy in the adjuvant setting or as part of combined modality therapy for locoregional disease ≥ three (3) months prior to diagnosis  measurable lesion in the chest  If previously irradiated, lesion(s) must be outside the prior radiation port or, if within a prior radiation port, must demonstrate radiologic progression by RECIST criteria.

ACRIN 6678 Site Training Inclusion Criteria cont. 3.Participant has following minimum workup to confirm tumor stage:  Chest CT or MR – if necessary to confirm stage  History/physical examination within 6 weeks prior to registration;  CT or MR scan of the brain within 4 weeks prior to registration if indicated. 4.At least one measurable primary or other intrathoracic / supraclavicular lesion ≥ 2 cm, according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) 5.Performance status of 0 to 2 on the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) scale

ACRIN 6678 Site Training Inclusion Criteria cont. Age 18 years or older Using medically appropriate contraception if sexually active; women of childbearing potential must not be pregnant or breastfeeding Able to give study-specific informed consent Able to tolerate PET/CT imaging required by protocol, to be performed at an ACRIN-qualified facility

ACRIN 6678 Site Training Exclusion Criteria 1.Small cell carcinoma histology 2.Pure bronchioloalveolar cell carcinoma histology 3.Thoracic radiotherapy, lung surgery or chemotherapy within three (3) months prior to inclusion in the study 4.Poorly controlled diabetes (defined as fasting glucose level > 150 mg/dl) 5.Prior malignancy (exception: participants with basal cell or squamous cell carcinoma of the skin, or carcinoma in situ, or other cancer from which the participant has been disease free for more than 3 years.

ACRIN 6678 Site Training Exclusion Criteria cont. 6.Patients of reproductive potential, who are sexually active but unwilling and/or unable to use medically appropriate contraception, or women who are pregnant or breastfeeding 7.Patients with intent to undergo chemoradiotherapy (Groups A and B) 8.Clinical or radiographic signs of post-obstructive pneumonia 9.Symptomatic brain metastases (Groups A and B) 10.Patients in whom concurrent treatment is planned with any targeted or biologic therapy other than bevacizumab and/or cetuximab (Groups A and B) 11. Patients in whom treatment is planned with chemotherapy other than a platinum-based doublet, with or without bevacizumab or cetuximab, administered at 3-week cycles (Groups A and B)

ACRIN 6678 Site Training Participant Accrual  Targets  Process  Support

ACRIN 6678 Site Training Participant Accrual Enrollment Targets  Groups A and B: 228 participants with at least 171 in Group B  Groups A and C: 57 total combined participants Site enrollment expectations: > 60 percent of what site reported on application. Trial enrollment expectations: 7 to 10 patients per month

ACRIN 6678 Site Training Participant Accrual Process Participants interested in the trial will be consented to one of the three study arms depending upon their:  eligibility evaluation,  personal preference, and  ability to adhere to the timing sequences for each arm. The decision will be made by the referring physician, the study PI, and the research staff consenting the patient.

ACRIN 6678 Site Training Participant Accrual Process (cont.)  Primary medical oncologist coordinates enrollment within his or her practice and among clinicians specializing in lung cancer.  pulmonologists, surgical oncologists primary care physicians  Nuclear medicine physician and radiologist maintain communication with oncologist and oversee imaging.  Research associates coordinate participant communication and ensure timely imaging and follow up.

ACRIN 6678 Site Training Accrual Monitoring and Support Recruitment Materials  Support letter – introduces trial to potential referring clinicians. Send with eligibility checklist and brochures.  Protocol informational slide set – for use at tumor boards and other educational opportunities.  Site customized brochure – for distribution throughout hospital network. Spanish brochure can be made available.  Available at:

ACRIN 6678 Site Training Accrual Monitoring and Support (cont.)  A Protocol Enrollment Support Committee (PESC) will review accrual barriers and rates.:  Goal: work with individual sites to overcome recruitment barriers  Members: trial PI, designated RA, project manager, recruitment coordinator  Process: conduct site-specific recruitment calls and work with site to develop plans

ACRIN 6678 Site Training Study Sponsorship ACRIN 6678: FDG-PET as a Predictive Marker of Tumor Response and Patient Outcome: Prospective Validation in Non- small Cell Lung Cancer is the first multi-center clinical trial supported by the Biomarker Consortium which is a public- private partnership whose membership includes the National Institutes of Health, the US Food and Drug Administration, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services as well as industry and patient advocacy groups.

ACRIN 6678 Site Training Questions